crypto: aegis128 enhancements
Subsystems (2)
v3 cover crypto: aegis128 enhancements
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpers
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
crypto/aegis128-core.c | 245 ++++++++++++++------ crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c | 122 ++++++++-- crypto/aegis128-neon.c | 21 +- 3 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v3 1/4 crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
The AEGIS spec mentions explicitly that the security guarantees hold only if the resulting plaintext and tag of a failed decryption are withheld. So ensure that we abide by this.
While at it, drop the unused struct aead_request *req parameter from crypto_aegis128_process_crypt().
--- crypto/aegis128-core.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
crypto/aegis128-core.c +26 -6
@@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_ad(struct aegis_state *state, } } +static void crypto_aegis128_wipe_chunk (struct aegis_state *state,u8 *dst, +const u8 *src,unsigned int size) +{ +memzero_explicit (dst, size); +} +static void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk (struct aegis_state *state,u8 *dst,const u8 *src,unsigned int size) {
@@ -324,7 +330,6 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_process_ad(struct aegis_state *state, static __always_inline int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state, - struct aead_request *req, struct skcipher_walk *walk, void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst, const u8 *src,
@@ -403,14 +408,14 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt(struct aead_request *req)if (aegis128_do_simd ()) {crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, req, &walk, +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd);crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); }else {crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, req, &walk, +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk);crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); }
@@ -438,19 +443,34 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt(struct aead_request *req)if (aegis128_do_simd ()) {crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, req, &walk, +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd);crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); }else {crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, req, &walk, +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk);crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); } -return crypto_memneq (tag.bytes, zeros, authsize) ? -EBADMSG :0 ; +if (unlikely (crypto_memneq (tag.bytes, zeros, authsize))) { +/* +* From Chapter 4. 'Security Analysis' of the AEGIS spec [0] +* +* "3. If verification fails, the decrypted plaintext and the +* wrong authentication tag should not be given as output." +* +* [0] https://competitions.cr.yp.to/round3/aegisv11.pdf +*/ +skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (NULL , &walk, + crypto_aegis128_wipe_chunk); +memzero_explicit (&tag,sizeof (tag)); +return -EBADMSG ; + } +return 0 ; }static struct aead_alg crypto_aegis128_alg = {
Signature · 7 lines
2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v3 2/4 crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
In reply to Ard BiesheuvelAvoid copying the tail block via a stack buffer if the total size exceeds a single AEGIS block. In this case, we can use overlapping loads and stores and NEON permutation instructions instead, which leads to a modest performance improvement on some cores (< 5%), and is slightly cleaner. Note that we still need to use a stack buffer if the entire input is smaller than 16 bytes, given that we cannot use 16 byte NEON loads and stores safely in this case.
--- crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c +75 -14
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@extern int aegis128_have_aes_insn;void *memcpy (void *dest,const void *src,size_t n); -void *memset (void *s,int c,size_t n);struct aegis128_state {uint8x16_t v[5 ];
@@ -173,10 +172,46 @@ void crypto_aegis128_update_neon(void *state, const void *msg)aegis128_save_state_neon (st, state); } +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM +/* +* AArch32 does not provide these intrinsics natively because it does not +* implement the underlying instructions. AArch32 only provides 64-bit +* wide vtbl.8/vtbx.8 instruction, so use those instead. +*/ +static uint8x16_t vqtbl1q_u8 (uint8x16_t a,uint8x16_t b) +{ +union { +uint8x16_t val; +uint8x8x2_t pair; + } __a = { a }; + +return vcombine_u8 (vtbl2_u8 (__a.pair,vget_low_u8 (b)), +vtbl2_u8 (__a.pair,vget_high_u8 (b))); +} + +static uint8x16_t vqtbx1q_u8 (uint8x16_t v,uint8x16_t a,uint8x16_t b) +{ +union { +uint8x16_t val; +uint8x8x2_t pair; + } __a = { a }; + +return vcombine_u8 (vtbx2_u8 (vget_low_u8 (v), __a.pair,vget_low_u8 (b)), +vtbx2_u8 (vget_high_u8 (v), __a.pair,vget_high_u8 (b))); +} +#endif + +static const uint8_t permute[]__aligned(64) = { +-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 , +0 ,1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ,15 , +-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 ,-1 , +}; +void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_neon (void *state,void *dst,const void *src,unsigned int size) {struct aegis128_state st =aegis128_load_state_neon (state); +const int short_input = size <AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ;uint8x16_t msg;preload_sbox ();
@@ -186,7 +221,8 @@ void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src, msg =vld1q_u8 (src); st =aegis128_update_neon (st, msg); -vst1q_u8 (dst, msg ^ s); + msg ^= s; +vst1q_u8 (dst, msg); size -=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ; src +=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ;
@@ -195,13 +231,26 @@ void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src,if (size >0 ) {uint8x16_t s = st.v[1 ] ^ (st.v[2 ] & st.v[3 ]) ^ st.v[4 ]; -uint8_t buf[AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ] = {}; +uint8_t buf[AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ]; +const void *in = src; +void *out = dst; +uint8x16_t m; -memcpy (buf, src, size); - msg =vld1q_u8 (buf); - st =aegis128_update_neon (st, msg); -vst1q_u8 (buf, msg ^ s); -memcpy (dst, buf, size); +if (__builtin_expect (short_input,0 )) + in = out =memcpy (buf +AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE - size, src, size); + + m =vqtbl1q_u8 (vld1q_u8 (in + size -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ), +vld1q_u8 (permute +32 - size)); + + st =aegis128_update_neon (st, m); + +vst1q_u8 (out + size -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , +vqtbl1q_u8 (m ^ s,vld1q_u8 (permute + size))); + +if (__builtin_expect (short_input,0 )) +memcpy (dst, out, size); +else +vst1q_u8 (out -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , msg); }aegis128_save_state_neon (st, state);
@@ -211,6 +260,7 @@ void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src, unsigned int size) {struct aegis128_state st =aegis128_load_state_neon (state); +const int short_input = size <AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ;uint8x16_t msg;preload_sbox ();
@@ -228,14 +278,25 @@ void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src,if (size >0 ) {uint8x16_t s = st.v[1 ] ^ (st.v[2 ] & st.v[3 ]) ^ st.v[4 ];uint8_t buf[AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ]; +const void *in = src; +void *out = dst; +uint8x16_t m; -vst1q_u8 (buf, s); -memcpy (buf, src, size); - msg =vld1q_u8 (buf) ^ s; -vst1q_u8 (buf, msg); -memcpy (dst, buf, size); +if (__builtin_expect (short_input,0 )) + in = out =memcpy (buf +AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE - size, src, size); - st =aegis128_update_neon (st, msg); + m = s ^vqtbx1q_u8 (s,vld1q_u8 (in + size -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ), +vld1q_u8 (permute +32 - size)); + + st =aegis128_update_neon (st, m); + +vst1q_u8 (out + size -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , +vqtbl1q_u8 (m,vld1q_u8 (permute + size))); + +if (__builtin_expect (short_input,0 )) +memcpy (dst, out, size); +else +vst1q_u8 (out -AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , msg); }aegis128_save_state_neon (st, state);
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
PATCH v3 3/4 crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
In reply to Ard BiesheuvelInstead of calculating the tag and returning it to the caller on decryption, use a SIMD compare and min across vector to perform the comparison. This is slightly more efficient, and removes the need on the caller's part to wipe the tag from memory if the decryption failed.
While at it, switch to unsigned int when passing cryptlen and assoclen - we don't support input sizes where it matters anyway.
--- crypto/aegis128-core.c | 21 +++++++++---- crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++---- crypto/aegis128-neon.c | 21 +++++++++---- 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
crypto/aegis128-core.c +15 -6
@@ -67,9 +67,11 @@ void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst, const u8 *src, unsigned int size);void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd (struct aegis_state *state,u8 *dst,const u8 *src,unsigned int size); -void crypto_aegis128_final_simd (struct aegis_state *state, -union aegis_block *tag_xor, -u64 assoclen,u64 cryptlen); +int crypto_aegis128_final_simd (struct aegis_state *state, +union aegis_block *tag_xor, +unsigned int assoclen, +unsigned int cryptlen, +unsigned int authsize);static void crypto_aegis128_update (struct aegis_state *state) {
@@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt(struct aead_request *req)crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd);crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, - cryptlen); + cryptlen,0 ); }else {crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen);
@@ -445,8 +447,15 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt(struct aead_request *req)crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen);crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd); -crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, - cryptlen); +if (unlikely (crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, + req->assoclen, + cryptlen, authsize))) { +skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (NULL , req, &walk, + crypto_aegis128_wipe_chunk); +return -EBADMSG ; + } +return 0 ; }else {crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv);crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen);
crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c +27 -6
@@ -199,6 +199,17 @@ static uint8x16_t vqtbx1q_u8(uint8x16_t v, uint8x16_t a, uint8x16_t b)return vcombine_u8 (vtbx2_u8 (vget_low_u8 (v), __a.pair,vget_low_u8 (b)),vtbx2_u8 (vget_high_u8 (v), __a.pair,vget_high_u8 (b))); } + +static int8_t vminvq_s8 (int8x16_t v) +{ +int8x8_t s =vpmin_s8 (vget_low_s8 (v),vget_high_s8 (v)); + + s =vpmin_s8 (s, s); + s =vpmin_s8 (s, s); + s =vpmin_s8 (s, s); + +return vget_lane_s8 (s,0 ); +}#endif static const uint8_t permute[]__aligned(64) = {
@@ -302,8 +313,10 @@ void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src,aegis128_save_state_neon (st, state); } -void crypto_aegis128_final_neon (void *state,void *tag_xor,uint64_t assoclen, -uint64_t cryptlen) +int crypto_aegis128_final_neon (void *state,void *tag_xor, +unsigned int assoclen, +unsigned int cryptlen, +unsigned int authsize) {struct aegis128_state st =aegis128_load_state_neon (state);uint8x16_t v;
@@ -311,13 +324,21 @@ void crypto_aegis128_final_neon(void *state, void *tag_xor, uint64_t assoclen,preload_sbox (); - v = st.v[3 ] ^ (uint8x16_t )vcombine_u64 (vmov_n_u64 (8 * assoclen), -vmov_n_u64 (8 * cryptlen)); + v = st.v[3 ] ^ (uint8x16_t )vcombine_u64 (vmov_n_u64 (8ULL * assoclen), +vmov_n_u64 (8ULL * cryptlen));for (i =0 ; i <7 ; i++) st =aegis128_update_neon (st, v); - v =vld1q_u8 (tag_xor); - v ^= st.v[0 ] ^ st.v[1 ] ^ st.v[2 ] ^ st.v[3 ] ^ st.v[4 ]; + v = st.v[0 ] ^ st.v[1 ] ^ st.v[2 ] ^ st.v[3 ] ^ st.v[4 ]; + +if (authsize >0 ) { + v =vqtbl1q_u8 (~vceqq_u8 (v,vld1q_u8 (tag_xor)), +vld1q_u8 (permute + authsize)); + +return vminvq_s8 ((int8x16_t )v); + } +vst1q_u8 (tag_xor, v); +return 0 ; }
crypto/aegis128-neon.c +15 -6
@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_neon(void *state, void *dst, const void *src, unsigned int size);void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_neon (void *state,void *dst,const void *src,unsigned int size); -void crypto_aegis128_final_neon (void *state,void *tag_xor,uint64_t assoclen, -uint64_t cryptlen); +int crypto_aegis128_final_neon (void *state,void *tag_xor, +unsigned int assoclen, +unsigned int cryptlen, +unsigned int authsize);int aegis128_have_aes_insn__ro_after_init ;
@@ -60,11 +62,18 @@ void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd(union aegis_block *state, u8 *dst,kernel_neon_end (); } -void crypto_aegis128_final_simd (union aegis_block *state, -union aegis_block *tag_xor, -u64 assoclen,u64 cryptlen) +int crypto_aegis128_final_simd (union aegis_block *state, +union aegis_block *tag_xor, +unsigned int assoclen, +unsigned int cryptlen, +unsigned int authsize) { +int ret; +kernel_neon_begin (); -crypto_aegis128_final_neon (state, tag_xor, assoclen, cryptlen); + ret =crypto_aegis128_final_neon (state, tag_xor, assoclen, cryptlen, + authsize);kernel_neon_end (); + +return ret; }
Signature · 7 lines
2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH v3 4/4 crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
In reply to Ard BiesheuvelWiring the SIMD code into the generic driver has the unfortunate side effect that the tcrypt testing code cannot distinguish them, and will therefore not use the latter to fuzz test the former, as it does for other algorithms.
So let's refactor the code a bit so we can register two implementations:
aegis128-generic and aegis128-simd.
--- crypto/aegis128-core.c | 220 +++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
crypto/aegis128-core.c +143 -77
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update(struct aegis_state *state) }static void crypto_aegis128_update_a (struct aegis_state *state, -const union aegis_block *msg) +const union aegis_block *msg, +bool do_simd) { -if (aegis128_do_simd ()) { +if (do_simd) {crypto_aegis128_update_simd (state, msg);return ; }
@@ -97,9 +98,10 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(struct aegis_state *state,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&state->blocks[0 ], msg); } -static void crypto_aegis128_update_u (struct aegis_state *state,const void *msg) +static void crypto_aegis128_update_u (struct aegis_state *state,const void *msg, +bool do_simd) { -if (aegis128_do_simd ()) { +if (do_simd) {crypto_aegis128_update_simd (state, msg);return ; }
@@ -128,27 +130,28 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_init(struct aegis_state *state,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&state->blocks[4 ], &crypto_aegis_const[1 ]);for (i =0 ; i <5 ; i++) { -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, key); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &key_iv); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, key, false); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &key_iv, false); } }static void crypto_aegis128_ad (struct aegis_state *state, -const u8 *src,unsigned int size) +const u8 *src,unsigned int size, +bool do_simd) {if (AEGIS_ALIGNED (src)) {const union aegis_block *src_blk = (const union aegis_block *)src;while (size >=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ) { -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, src_blk); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, src_blk, do_simd); size -=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ; src_blk++; } }else {while (size >=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ) { -crypto_aegis128_update_u (state, src); +crypto_aegis128_update_u (state, src, do_simd); size -=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ; src +=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ;
@@ -180,7 +183,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[1 ]);crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, src_blk); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, src_blk); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, src_blk, false); *dst_blk = tmp;
@@ -196,7 +199,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[1 ]);crypto_xor (tmp.bytes, src,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ); -crypto_aegis128_update_u (state, src); +crypto_aegis128_update_u (state, src, false);memcpy (dst, tmp.bytes,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE );
@@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[4 ]);crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[1 ]); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &msg); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &msg, false);crypto_aegis_block_xor (&msg, &tmp);
@@ -241,7 +244,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[1 ]);crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, src_blk); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp, false); *dst_blk = tmp;
@@ -257,7 +260,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[1 ]);crypto_xor (tmp.bytes, src,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE ); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp, false);memcpy (dst, tmp.bytes,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE );
@@ -279,7 +282,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,memset (msg.bytes + size,0 ,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE - size); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &msg); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &msg, false);memcpy (dst, msg.bytes, size); }
@@ -287,7 +290,8 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk(struct aegis_state *state, u8 *dst,static void crypto_aegis128_process_ad (struct aegis_state *state,struct scatterlist *sg_src, -unsigned int assoclen) +unsigned int assoclen, +bool do_simd) {struct scatter_walk walk;union aegis_block buf;
@@ -304,13 +308,13 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_process_ad(struct aegis_state *state,if (pos >0 ) {unsigned int fill =AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE - pos;memcpy (buf.bytes + pos, src, fill); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &buf); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &buf, do_simd); pos =0 ; left -= fill; src += fill; } -crypto_aegis128_ad (state, src, left); +crypto_aegis128_ad (state, src, left, do_simd); src += left & ~(AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE -1 ); left &=AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE -1 ; }
@@ -326,7 +330,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_process_ad(struct aegis_state *state,if (pos >0 ) {memset (buf.bytes + pos,0 ,AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE - pos); -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &buf); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &buf, do_simd); } }
@@ -368,7 +372,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_final(struct aegis_state *state,crypto_aegis_block_xor (&tmp, &state->blocks[3 ]);for (i =0 ; i <7 ; i++) -crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp); +crypto_aegis128_update_a (state, &tmp, false);for (i =0 ; i <AEGIS128_STATE_BLOCKS ; i++)crypto_aegis_block_xor (tag_xor, &state->blocks[i]);
@@ -396,7 +400,7 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *tfm,return 0 ; } -static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt (struct aead_request *req) +static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt_generic (struct aead_request *req) {struct crypto_aead *tfm =crypto_aead_reqtfm (req);union aegis_block tag = {};
@@ -407,27 +411,18 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt(struct aead_request *req)struct aegis_state state;skcipher_walk_aead_encrypt (&walk, req, false); -if (aegis128_do_simd ()) { -crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); -crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, - crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd); -crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, - cryptlen,0 ); - }else { -crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); -crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, - crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk); -crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); - } +crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); +crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen, false); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, + crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk); +crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen);scatterwalk_map_and_copy (tag.bytes, req->dst, req->assoclen + cryptlen, authsize,1 );return 0 ; } -static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt (struct aead_request *req) +static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt_generic (struct aead_request *req) {static const u8 zeros[AEGIS128_MAX_AUTH_SIZE ] = {};struct crypto_aead *tfm =crypto_aead_reqtfm (req);
@@ -442,27 +437,11 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt(struct aead_request *req) authsize, 0);skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); -if (aegis128_do_simd ()) { -crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); -crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, - crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd); -if (unlikely (crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, - req->assoclen, - cryptlen, authsize))) { -skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (NULL , req, &walk, - crypto_aegis128_wipe_chunk); -return -EBADMSG ; - } -return 0 ; - }else { -crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); -crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen); -crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, - crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk); -crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen); - } +crypto_aegis128_init (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); +crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen, false); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, + crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk); +crypto_aegis128_final (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen);if (unlikely (crypto_memneq (tag.bytes, zeros, authsize))) {/*
@@ -482,42 +461,128 @@ static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt(struct aead_request *req)return 0 ; } -static struct aead_alg crypto_aegis128_alg = { - .setkey = crypto_aegis128_setkey, - .setauthsize = crypto_aegis128_setauthsize, - .encrypt = crypto_aegis128_encrypt, - .decrypt = crypto_aegis128_decrypt, +static int crypto_aegis128_encrypt_simd (struct aead_request *req) +{ +struct crypto_aead *tfm =crypto_aead_reqtfm (req); +union aegis_block tag = {}; +unsigned int authsize =crypto_aead_authsize (tfm); +struct aegis_ctx *ctx =crypto_aead_ctx (tfm); +unsigned int cryptlen = req->cryptlen; +struct skcipher_walk walk; +struct aegis_state state; - .ivsize =AEGIS128_NONCE_SIZE , - .maxauthsize =AEGIS128_MAX_AUTH_SIZE , - .chunksize =AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , +if (!aegis128_do_simd ()) +return crypto_aegis128_encrypt_generic (req); - .base = { - .cra_blocksize =1 , - .cra_ctxsize =sizeof (struct aegis_ctx ), - .cra_alignmask =0 , +skcipher_walk_aead_encrypt (&walk, req, false); +crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); +crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen, true); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, + crypto_aegis128_encrypt_chunk_simd); +crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, cryptlen,0 ); - .cra_priority =100 , +scatterwalk_map_and_copy (tag.bytes, req->dst, req->assoclen + cryptlen, + authsize,1 ); +return 0 ; +} - .cra_name ="aegis128" , - .cra_driver_name ="aegis128-generic" , +static int crypto_aegis128_decrypt_simd (struct aead_request *req) +{ +struct crypto_aead *tfm =crypto_aead_reqtfm (req); +union aegis_block tag; +unsigned int authsize =crypto_aead_authsize (tfm); +unsigned int cryptlen = req->cryptlen - authsize; +struct aegis_ctx *ctx =crypto_aead_ctx (tfm); +struct skcipher_walk walk; +struct aegis_state state; - .cra_module =THIS_MODULE , +if (!aegis128_do_simd ()) +return crypto_aegis128_decrypt_generic (req); + +scatterwalk_map_and_copy (tag.bytes, req->src, req->assoclen + cryptlen, + authsize,0 ); + +skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); +crypto_aegis128_init_simd (&state, &ctx->key, req->iv); +crypto_aegis128_process_ad (&state, req->src, req->assoclen, true); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (&state, &walk, + crypto_aegis128_decrypt_chunk_simd); + +if (unlikely (crypto_aegis128_final_simd (&state, &tag, req->assoclen, + cryptlen, authsize))) { +skcipher_walk_aead_decrypt (&walk, req, false); +crypto_aegis128_process_crypt (NULL , &walk, + crypto_aegis128_wipe_chunk); +return -EBADMSG ; } +return 0 ; +} + +static struct aead_alg crypto_aegis128_alg_generic = { + .setkey = crypto_aegis128_setkey, + .setauthsize = crypto_aegis128_setauthsize, + .encrypt = crypto_aegis128_encrypt_generic, + .decrypt = crypto_aegis128_decrypt_generic, + + .ivsize =AEGIS128_NONCE_SIZE , + .maxauthsize =AEGIS128_MAX_AUTH_SIZE , + .chunksize =AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , + + .base.cra_blocksize =1 , + .base.cra_ctxsize =sizeof (struct aegis_ctx ), + .base.cra_alignmask =0 , + .base.cra_priority =100 , + .base.cra_name ="aegis128" , + .base.cra_driver_name ="aegis128-generic" , + .base.cra_module =THIS_MODULE , +}; + +static struct aead_alg crypto_aegis128_alg_simd = { + .setkey = crypto_aegis128_setkey, + .setauthsize = crypto_aegis128_setauthsize, + .encrypt = crypto_aegis128_encrypt_simd, + .decrypt = crypto_aegis128_decrypt_simd, + + .ivsize =AEGIS128_NONCE_SIZE , + .maxauthsize =AEGIS128_MAX_AUTH_SIZE , + .chunksize =AEGIS_BLOCK_SIZE , + + .base.cra_blocksize =1 , + .base.cra_ctxsize =sizeof (struct aegis_ctx ), + .base.cra_alignmask =0 , + .base.cra_priority =200 , + .base.cra_name ="aegis128" , + .base.cra_driver_name ="aegis128-simd" , + .base.cra_module =THIS_MODULE , };static int __init crypto_aegis128_module_init (void ) { +int ret; + + ret =crypto_register_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg_generic); +if (ret) +return ret; +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD ) && -crypto_aegis128_have_simd ()) +crypto_aegis128_have_simd ()) { + ret =crypto_register_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg_simd); +if (ret) { +crypto_unregister_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg_generic); +return ret; + }static_branch_enable (&have_simd); - -return crypto_register_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg); + } +return 0 ; } static void __exit crypto_aegis128_module_exit(void) { -crypto_unregister_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg); +if (IS_ENABLED (CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD ) && +crypto_aegis128_have_simd ()) +crypto_unregister_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg_simd); + +crypto_unregister_aead (&crypto_aegis128_alg_generic); }subsys_initcall (crypto_aegis128_module_init);
@@ -528,3 +593,4 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>");MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("AEGIS-128 AEAD algorithm" );MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO ("aegis128" );MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO ("aegis128-generic" ); +MODULE_ALIAS_CRYPTO ("aegis128-simd" );
Signature · 7 lines
2.17.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
ut 17. 11. 2020 o 14:32 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> napísal(a):
Quoted 9 lines
Wiring the SIMD code into the generic driver has the unfortunate side effect that the tcrypt testing code cannot distinguish them, and will therefore not use the latter to fuzz test the former, as it does for other algorithms.
So let's refactor the code a bit so we can register two implementations:
aegis128-generic and aegis128-simd.Signed-off-by Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Herbert Xu
maintainerQuoted 28 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpersCc Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>Cc Eric Biggers <[email protected]>[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
Quoted 4 lines
crypto/aegis128-core.c | 245 ++++++++++++++------ crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c | 122 ++++++++-- crypto/aegis128-neon.c | 21 +- 3 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
All applied. Thanks.
Signature · 3 lines
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Hi Ard,
Quoted 20 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpersCc Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>Cc Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Quoted 6 lines
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto/aegis128-core.c: In function ‘crypto_aegis128_decrypt’:crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:40: error: passing argument 2 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
| ^~~
| |
| struct aead_request *
crypto/aegis128-core.c:335:29: note: expected ‘struct skcipher_walk *’
but argument is of type ‘struct aead_request *’
335 | struct skcipher_walk *walk,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:45: error: passing argument 3 of
‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
| ^~~~~
| |
| struct skcipher_walk *crypto/aegis128-core.c:336:14: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct aegis_state *, u8 *, const u8 *, unsigned int)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct aegis_state *, unsigned char *, const unsigned char *, unsigned int)’} but argument is of type ‘struct skcipher_walk *’
336 | void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state,
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
337 | u8 *dst, const u8 *src,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
338 | unsigned int size))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:4: error: too many arguments to function
‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’
454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/aegis128-core.c:334:5: note: declared here
334 | int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: crypto/aegis128-core.o] Error 1
Quoted 1 line
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
Fixes the above, but causes
ERROR: modpost: "crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined!
as reported by [email protected] for m68k/defconfig and m68k/sun3_defconfig.
(neon depends on arm).
Quoted 4 lines
crypto/aegis128-core.c | 245 ++++++++++++++------ crypto/aegis128-neon-inner.c | 122 ++++++++-- crypto/aegis128-neon.c | 21 +- 3 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
Signature · 5 lines
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Quoted 72 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Ard,
Quoted 20 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpersCc Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>Cc Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Quoted 6 lines
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto/aegis128-core.c: In function ‘crypto_aegis128_decrypt’:crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:40: error: passing argument 2 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~ | | | struct aead_request * crypto/aegis128-core.c:335:29: note: expected ‘struct skcipher_walk *’ but argument is of type ‘struct aead_request *’ 335 | struct skcipher_walk *walk, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:45: error: passing argument 3 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~ | | | struct skcipher_walk *
crypto/aegis128-core.c:336:14: note: expected ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, u8 *, const u8 *, unsigned int)’ {aka ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, unsigned char *, const unsigned char *, unsigned int)’} but argument is of type ‘structskcipher_walk*’336 | void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state, | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 337 | u8 *dst, const u8 *src, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 338 | unsigned int size)) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:4: error: too many arguments to function ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:334:5: note: declared here 334 | int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283:crypto/aegis128-core.o] Error 1Quoted 1 line
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
Quoted 8 lines
Fixes the above, but causes
ERROR: modpost: "
crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined!as reported by [email protected] for m68k/defconfig and m68k/sun3_defconfig.
(neon depends on arm).
Thanks for the report.
It seems like GCC is not optimizing away calls to routines that are unreachable. Which GCC version are you using?
Quoted 83 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 72 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Ard,
Quoted 20 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpersCc Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>Cc Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Quoted 6 lines
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto/aegis128-core.c: In function ‘crypto_aegis128_decrypt’:crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:40: error: passing argument 2 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~ | | | struct aead_request * crypto/aegis128-core.c:335:29: note: expected ‘struct skcipher_walk *’ but argument is of type ‘struct aead_request *’ 335 | struct skcipher_walk *walk, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:45: error: passing argument 3 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~ | | | struct skcipher_walk *
crypto/aegis128-core.c:336:14: note: expected ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, u8 *, const u8 *, unsigned int)’ {aka ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, unsigned char *, const unsigned char *, unsigned int)’} but argument is of type ‘structskcipher_walk*’336 | void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state, | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 337 | u8 *dst, const u8 *src, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 338 | unsigned int size)) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:4: error: too many arguments to function ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:334:5: note: declared here 334 | int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283:crypto/aegis128-core.o] Error 1Quoted 1 line
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
Quoted 8 lines
Fixes the above, but causes
ERROR: modpost: "
crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined!as reported by [email protected] for m68k/defconfig and m68k/sun3_defconfig.
(neon depends on arm).
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks for the report.
It seems like GCC is not optimizing away calls to routines that are unreachable. Which GCC version are you using?
Also, mind checking whether the below works around this?
crypto/aegis128-core.c +0 -0
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(struct
aegis_state *state,
const union aegis_block *msg, bool do_simd)
{
- if (do_simd) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {
crypto_aegis128_update_simd(state, msg);
return;
}@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(struct aegis_state *state,
static void crypto_aegis128_update_u(struct aegis_state *state, const
void *msg,
bool do_simd)
{
- if (do_simd) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {
crypto_aegis128_update_simd(state, msg);
return;
}Geert Uytterhoeven
Tested-byHi Ard,
Quoted 75 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 74 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 73 lines · Geert Uytterhoeven
Quoted 20 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
This series supersedes [0] '[PATCH] crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling', which is included as patch #3 here, but hasn't been modified substantially.
Patch #1 should probably go to -stable, even though aegis128 does not appear to be widely used.
Patches #2 and #3 improve the SIMD code paths.
Patch #4 enables fuzz testing for the SIMD code by registering the generic code as a separate driver if the SIMD code path is enabled.
Changes since v2:
- add Ondrej's ack to #1
- fix an issue spotted by Ondrej in #4 where the generic code path would still use some of the SIMD helpersCc Ondrej Mosnacek <[email protected]>Cc Eric Biggers <[email protected]>Quoted 6 lines
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/[email protected]/
Ard Biesheuvel (4):
crypto: aegis128 - wipe plaintext and tag if decryption fails
crypto: aegis128/neon - optimize tail block handling
crypto: aegis128/neon - move final tag check to SIMD domain
crypto/aegis128-core.c: In function ‘crypto_aegis128_decrypt’:crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:40: error: passing argument 2 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~ | | | struct aead_request * crypto/aegis128-core.c:335:29: note: expected ‘struct skcipher_walk *’ but argument is of type ‘struct aead_request *’ 335 | struct skcipher_walk *walk, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:45: error: passing argument 3 of ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~ | | | struct skcipher_walk *
crypto/aegis128-core.c:336:14: note: expected ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, u8 *, const u8 *, unsigned int)’ {aka ‘void (*)(structaegis_state*, unsigned char *, const unsigned char *, unsigned int)’} but argument is of type ‘structskcipher_walk*’336 | void (*crypt)(struct aegis_state *state, | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 337 | u8 *dst, const u8 *src, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 338 | unsigned int size)) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:454:4: error: too many arguments to function ‘crypto_aegis128_process_crypt’ 454 | crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(NULL, req, &walk, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ crypto/aegis128-core.c:334:5: note: declared here 334 | int crypto_aegis128_process_crypt(struct aegis_state *state, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283:crypto/aegis128-core.o] Error 1Quoted 1 line
crypto: aegis128 - expose SIMD code path as separate driver
Fixes the above, but causes
ERROR: modpost: "
crypto_aegis128_update_simd" [crypto/aegis128.ko] undefined!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
as reported by [email protected] for m68k/defconfig and m68k/sun3_defconfig.
(neon depends on arm).Thanks for the report.
It seems like GCC is not optimizing away calls to routines that are
The code is not unreachable. Both crypto_aegis128_encrypt_simd() and crypto_aegis128_decrypt_simd() call crypto_aegis128_process_ad(..., true);
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
unreachable. Which GCC version are you using?
I'm using 9.3.0, Kisskb is using 8.1.0.
Quoted 25 lines
Also, mind checking whether the below works around this?
crypto/aegis128-core.c +1
-1@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(structaegis_state *state, const union aegis_block *msg, bool do_simd) { - if (do_simd) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {crypto_aegis128_update_simd (state ,msg );return ;}crypto/aegis128-core.c +1
-1@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void crypto_aegis128_update_a(structaegis_state *state, static void crypto_aegis128_update_u(struct aegis_state *state, const void *msg, bool do_simd) { - if (do_simd) { + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_AEGIS128_SIMD) && do_simd) {crypto_aegis128_update_simd (state ,msg );
Quoted 2 lines
return;
}Thanks, that fixes the build for me.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
Signature · 5 lines
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds