Skip to contentSkip to conversation

OP-TEE driver for v5.11

GIT PULL Applied Jens Wiklander 3 participants 5 messages Nov 25, 2020 – Nov 27, 2020

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.

Thanks,
Jens

The following changes since commit 3cea11cd5e3b00d91caf0b4730194039b45c5891:

Linux 5.10-rc2 (2020-11-01 14:43:51 -0800)

are available in the Git repository at:

git://git.linaro.org/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/optee-valid-memory-type-for-v5.11

for you to fetch changes up to 853735e404244f5496cdb6188c5ed9a0f9627ee6:

optee: add writeback to valid memory type (2020-11-25 12:51:52 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Add writeback to valid OP-TEE shared memory types

Allows OP-TEE to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems by allowing writeback cache policy for shared memory.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Rui Miguel Silva (1):
optee: add writeback to valid memory type

 drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Jens Wiklander

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.

Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.

For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.

Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request in addition to linux-kernel.

Arnd

#2 lore raw

Hi Arnd,

Quoted 9 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 5 lines · Jens Wiklander

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.

Quoted 6 lines

Can you rebase that branch onto -rc1? I had started the arm/drivers branch early on top of that, so I'd prefer to avoid a backmerged.

For the commit itself, shouldn't that be marked as a bugfix and get merged into v5.10 instead? If it should, you don't have to rebase since the arm/fixes branch is already ahead.

Yes it is a bit of a bugfix, so if you don't mind taking it as that I'm sure that Rui would be happy to get it in this release.

Quoted 3 lines

Also, it would be nice to Cc linux-arm-kernel on the pull request in addition to linux-kernel.

I'll keep that in mind the next time. Thanks for the feedback.

Cheers,
Jens

#3 lore raw
In reply to Jens Wiklander
This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes):

Hello:

This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/arm/fixes):

Quoted 9 lines · On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:01:34 +0100 you wrote:

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.

Thanks,
Jens

[...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11

    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/ae597565d13f

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

#4 lore raw
In reply to Jens Wiklander
This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/for-next):

Hello:

This pull request was applied to soc/soc.git (refs/heads/for-next):

Quoted 9 lines · On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:01:34 +0100 you wrote:

Hello arm-soc maintainers,

Please pull this small patch which allows the OP-TEE driver to work with ARMv7 based single CPU systems.

Thanks,
Jens

[...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [GIT,PULL] OP-TEE driver for v5.11

    https://git.kernel.org/soc/soc/c/ae597565d13f

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html