can-isotp fix and functional addressing
Subsystems (4)
Oliver Hartkopp
maintainercover can-isotp fix and functional addressing
This patch set contains a fix that showed up while implementing the functional addressing switch suggested by Thomas Wagner.
Unfortunately the functional addressing switch came in very late but it is really very simple and already tested.
I would like to leave it to the maintainers whether the second patch can still go into the 5.10-rc tree, which is intended for long-term.
Oliver Hartkopp (2):
can-isotp: block setsockopt on bound sockets
can-isotp: add SF_BROADCAST support for functional addressing
include/uapi/linux/can/isotp.h | 2 +- net/can/isotp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
Oliver Hartkopp
maintainerPATCH 1/2 can-isotp: block setsockopt on bound sockets
The isotp socket can be widely configured in its behaviour regarding addressing types, fill-ups, receive pattern tests and link layer length. Usually all these settings need to be fixed before bind() and can not be changed afterwards.
This patch adds a check to enforce the common usage pattern.
--- net/can/isotp.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
net/can/isotp.c +3 -0
@@ -1155,10 +1155,13 @@ static int isotp_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,int ret =0 ;if (level !=SOL_CAN_ISOTP )return -EINVAL ; +if (so->bound) +return -EISCONN ; +switch (optname) {case CAN_ISOTP_OPTS :if (optlen !=sizeof (struct can_isotp_options ))return -EINVAL ;
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
Oliver Hartkopp
maintainerPATCH 2/2 can-isotp: add SF_BROADCAST support for functional addressing
In reply to Oliver HartkoppWhen CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST is set in the CAN_ISOTP_OPTS flags the CAN_ISOTP socket is switched into functional addressing mode, where only single frame (SF) protocol data units can be send on the specified CAN interface and the given tp.tx_id after bind().
In opposite to normal and extended addressing this socket does not register a CAN-ID for reception which would be needed for a 1-to-1 ISOTP connection with a segmented bi-directional data transfer.
Sending SFs on this socket is therefore a TX-only 'broadcast' operation.
--- include/uapi/linux/can/isotp.h | 2 +- net/can/isotp.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
include/uapi/linux/can/isotp.h +1 -1
@@ -133,11 +133,11 @@ struct can_isotp_ll_options {#define CAN_ISOTP_HALF_DUPLEX 0x040/* half duplex error state handling */ #define CAN_ISOTP_FORCE_TXSTMIN 0x080/* ignore stmin from received FC */ #define CAN_ISOTP_FORCE_RXSTMIN 0x100/* ignore CFs depending on rx stmin */ #define CAN_ISOTP_RX_EXT_ADDR 0x200/* different rx extended addressing */ #define CAN_ISOTP_WAIT_TX_DONE 0x400/* wait for tx completion */ - +#define CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST 0x800/* 1-to-N functional addressing */ /* default values */ #define CAN_ISOTP_DEFAULT_FLAGS 0#define CAN_ISOTP_DEFAULT_EXT_ADDRESS 0x00
net/can/isotp.c +20 -9
@@ -863,10 +863,18 @@ static int isotp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) }if (!size || size >MAX_MSG_LENGTH )return -EINVAL ; +/* take care of a potential SF_DL ESC offset for TX_DL > 8 */ + off = (so->tx.ll_dl >CAN_MAX_DLEN ) ?1 :0 ; + +/* does the given data fit into a single frame for SF_BROADCAST? */ +if ((so->opt.flags &CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST ) && + (size > so->tx.ll_dl -SF_PCI_SZ4 - ae - off)) +return -EINVAL ; + err =memcpy_from_msg (so->tx.buf, msg, size);if (err <0 )return err; dev =dev_get_by_index (sock_net (sk), so->ifindex);
@@ -889,13 +897,10 @@ static int isotp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size) so->tx.idx =0 ; cf = (struct canfd_frame *)skb->data;skb_put (skb, so->ll.mtu); -/* take care of a potential SF_DL ESC offset for TX_DL > 8 */ - off = (so->tx.ll_dl >CAN_MAX_DLEN ) ?1 :0 ; -/* check for single frame transmission depending on TX_DL */ if (size <= so->tx.ll_dl -SF_PCI_SZ4 - ae - off) {/* The message size generally fits into a SingleFrame - good. * * SF_DL ESC offset optimization:
@@ -1014,11 +1019,11 @@ static int isotp_release(struct socket *sock)hrtimer_cancel (&so->txtimer);hrtimer_cancel (&so->rxtimer);/* remove current filters & unregister */ -if (so->bound) { +if (so->bound && (!(so->opt.flags &CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST ))) {if (so->ifindex) {struct net_device *dev; dev =dev_get_by_index (net, so->ifindex);if (dev) {
@@ -1050,10 +1055,11 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)struct net *net =sock_net (sk);int ifindex;struct net_device *dev;int err =0 ;int notify_enetdown =0 ; +int do_rx_reg =1 ; if (len < CAN_REQUIRED_SIZE(struct sockaddr_can, can_addr.tp))return -EINVAL ;if (addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id == addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id)
@@ -1064,10 +1070,14 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)return -EADDRNOTAVAIL ;if (!addr->can_ifindex)return -ENODEV ; +/* do not register frame reception for functional addressing */ +if (so->opt.flags &CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST ) + do_rx_reg =0 ; +lock_sock (sk);if (so->bound && addr->can_ifindex == so->ifindex && addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id == so->rxid && addr->can_addr.tp.tx_id == so->txid)
@@ -1091,17 +1101,18 @@ static int isotp_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int len)if (!(dev->flags &IFF_UP )) notify_enetdown =1 ; ifindex = dev->ifindex; -can_rx_register (net, dev, addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id, -SINGLE_MASK (addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id), isotp_rcv, sk, -"isotp" , sk); +if (do_rx_reg) +can_rx_register (net, dev, addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id, +SINGLE_MASK (addr->can_addr.tp.rx_id), + isotp_rcv, sk,"isotp" , sk);dev_put (dev); -if (so->bound) { +if (so->bound && do_rx_reg) {/* unregister old filter */ if (so->ifindex) { dev =dev_get_by_index (net, so->ifindex);if (dev) { can_rx_unregister(net, dev, so->rxid,
@@ -1300,11 +1311,11 @@ static int isotp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long msg,switch (msg) {case NETDEV_UNREGISTER :lock_sock (sk);/* remove current filters & unregister */ -if (so->bound) +if (so->bound && (!(so->opt.flags &CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST )))can_rx_unregister (dev_net (dev), dev, so->rxid,SINGLE_MASK (so->rxid), isotp_rcv, sk); so->ifindex =0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
Marc Kleine-Budde
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Oliver Hartkopp
This patch set contains a fix that showed up while implementing the functional addressing switch suggested by Thomas Wagner.
Unfortunately the functional addressing switch came in very late but it is really very simple and already tested.
I would like to leave it to the maintainers whether the second patch can still go into the 5.10-rc tree, which is intended for long-term.
Added to linux-can/testing.
Tnx,
Marc
Signature · 4 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |