dt-bindings: Correct GV11B GPU register sizes
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 dt-bindings: Correct GV11B GPU register sizes
Commit 90a09178f309 ("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU") added the GV11B GPU device-tree bindings information but incorrectly added an additional 0 to the size of the addresses in the example.
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt +2 -2
@@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ Example for GV11B: gpu@17000000 { compatible = "nvidia,gv11b"; - reg = <0x17000000 0x10000000>, - <0x18000000 0x10000000>; + reg = <0x17000000 0x1000000>, + <0x18000000 0x1000000>; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, <GIC_SPI 71 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; interrupt-names = "stall", "nonstall";
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Quoted 9 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
90a09178f309("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU") added the GV11B GPU device-tree bindings information but incorrectly added an additional 0 to the size of the addresses in the example.Fixes 90a09178f309 ("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Quoted 10 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
90a09178f309("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU") added the GV11B GPU device-tree bindings information but incorrectly added an additional 0 to the size of the addresses in the example.Fixes 90a09178f309 ("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks!
But really, it's just an example and rather than fix trivial things in txt bindings, convert them to schema please.
Quoted 12 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 10 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
90a09178f309("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU") added the GV11B GPU device-tree bindings information but incorrectly added an additional 0 to the size of the addresses in the example.Fixes 90a09178f309 ("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
Applied, thanks!
But really, it's just an example and rather than fix trivial things in txt bindings, convert them to schema please.
The conversion to schema of this binding was part of a series I sent out earlier this year converting a bunch of Tegra-related bindings. At the time you had requested that rather than converting one binding after another it might be easier to review if whole directories were converted at a time.
I've been struggling to find time to do so, so I wonder if you'd prefer me to send out that series again, or perhaps in smaller chunks? That sounds better than not doing any conversions at all because I lack the time to do whole directories at once.
Thierry
Rob Herring
maintainerQuoted 16 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 14 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 10 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
90a09178f309("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU") added the GV11B GPU device-tree bindings information but incorrectly added an additional 0 to the size of the addresses in the example.Fixes 90a09178f309 ("dt-bindings: Add documentation for GV11B GPU")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/nvidia,gk20a.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Applied, thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
But really, it's just an example and rather than fix trivial things in txt bindings, convert them to schema please.
The conversion to schema of this binding was part of a series I sent out earlier this year converting a bunch of Tegra-related bindings. At the time you had requested that rather than converting one binding after another it might be easier to review if whole directories were converted at a time.
That's largely just because the issues tend to be the same (both doing the conversion and reviewing it).
Quoted 4 lines
I've been struggling to find time to do so, so I wonder if you'd prefer me to send out that series again, or perhaps in smaller chunks? That sounds better than not doing any conversions at all because I lack the time to do whole directories at once.
The whole series is fine.
Rob