"Bad page state" while freeing gigantic pages
Subsystems (2)
cover "Bad page state" while freeing gigantic pages
The following "Bad page state" occurs on s390 when freeing gigantic pages:
[ 276.681603] BUG: Bad page state in process bash pfn:380001 [ 276.681614] page:00000000c35f0856 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000126b68aa index:0x0 pfn:0x380001 [ 276.681620] aops:0x0 [ 276.681622] flags: 0x3ffff00000000000() [ 276.681626] raw: 3ffff00000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000122 0000000100000000 [ 276.681628] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000000 0000000000000000 [ 276.681630] page dumped because: non-NULL mapping [ 276.681632] Modules linked in: [ 276.681637] CPU: 6 PID: 616 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-next-20201208 #1 [ 276.681639] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M03 703 (LPAR) [ 276.681641] Call Trace: [ 276.681648] [<0000000458c252b6>] show_stack+0x6e/0xe8 [ 276.681652] [<000000045971cf60>] dump_stack+0x90/0xc8 [ 276.681656] [<0000000458e8b186>] bad_page+0xd6/0x130 [ 276.681658] [<0000000458e8cdea>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x26a/0x800 [ 276.681661] [<0000000458e8e67e>] free_unref_page+0x6e/0x90 [ 276.681663] [<0000000458e8ea6c>] free_contig_range+0x94/0xe8 [ 276.681666] [<0000000458ea5e54>] update_and_free_page+0x1c4/0x2c8 [ 276.681669] [<0000000458ea784e>] free_pool_huge_page+0x11e/0x138 [ 276.681671] [<0000000458ea8530>] set_max_huge_pages+0x228/0x300 [ 276.681673] [<0000000458ea86c0>] nr_hugepages_store_common+0xb8/0x130 [ 276.681678] [<0000000458fd5b6a>] kernfs_fop_write+0xd2/0x218 [ 276.681681] [<0000000458ef9da0>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x2b8 [ 276.681684] [<0000000458efa15c>] ksys_write+0xac/0xe0 [ 276.681687] [<000000045972c5ca>] system_call+0xe6/0x288 [ 276.681730] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
I bisected it to commit 1378a5ee451a ("mm: store compound_nr as well as compound_order"), and it seems that the new compound_nr overlaying page->mapping is not properly cleared, which then triggers the non-NULL mapping warning.
This is because only the compound_order is cleared in destroy_compound_gigantic_page(), and compound_nr is set to 1U << order == 1 for order 0 in set_compound_order(page, 0).
For some reason, I can not reproduce this on x86, but I do not see where this could be an arch-sepcific issue. Still, I might be missing something, and my proposed patch also looks a bit ugly (at least to me), hence this RFC. Any comments?
BTW, for "normal sized" hugepages, this is not an issue, as page->mapping seems to be cleared explicitly in this case, in free_tail_pages_check(), but the freeing path for normal hugepages is quite different from that for gigantic pages using free_contig_range(). So a "page[1].mapping = NULL" might also be an option, instead of the "page[1].compound_nr = 0" in my patch, but that looks even more ugly, since it would clear more than needed.
Gerald Schaefer (1):
mm/hugetlb: clear compound_nr before freeing gigantic pages
mm/hugetlb.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
RFC PATCH 1/1 mm/hugetlb: clear compound_nr before freeing gigantic pages
Commit 1378a5ee451a ("mm: store compound_nr as well as compound_order") added compound_nr counter to first tail struct page, overlaying with page->mapping. The overlay itself is fine, but while freeing gigantic hugepages via free_contig_range(), a "bad page" check will trigger for non-NULL page->mapping on the first tail page:
[ 276.681603] BUG: Bad page state in process bash pfn:380001 [ 276.681614] page:00000000c35f0856 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000126b68aa index:0x0 pfn:0x380001 [ 276.681620] aops:0x0 [ 276.681622] flags: 0x3ffff00000000000() [ 276.681626] raw: 3ffff00000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000122 0000000100000000 [ 276.681628] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000000 0000000000000000 [ 276.681630] page dumped because: non-NULL mapping [ 276.681632] Modules linked in: [ 276.681637] CPU: 6 PID: 616 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-next-20201208 #1 [ 276.681639] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M03 703 (LPAR) [ 276.681641] Call Trace: [ 276.681648] [<0000000458c252b6>] show_stack+0x6e/0xe8 [ 276.681652] [<000000045971cf60>] dump_stack+0x90/0xc8 [ 276.681656] [<0000000458e8b186>] bad_page+0xd6/0x130 [ 276.681658] [<0000000458e8cdea>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x26a/0x800 [ 276.681661] [<0000000458e8e67e>] free_unref_page+0x6e/0x90 [ 276.681663] [<0000000458e8ea6c>] free_contig_range+0x94/0xe8 [ 276.681666] [<0000000458ea5e54>] update_and_free_page+0x1c4/0x2c8 [ 276.681669] [<0000000458ea784e>] free_pool_huge_page+0x11e/0x138 [ 276.681671] [<0000000458ea8530>] set_max_huge_pages+0x228/0x300 [ 276.681673] [<0000000458ea86c0>] nr_hugepages_store_common+0xb8/0x130 [ 276.681678] [<0000000458fd5b6a>] kernfs_fop_write+0xd2/0x218 [ 276.681681] [<0000000458ef9da0>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x2b8 [ 276.681684] [<0000000458efa15c>] ksys_write+0xac/0xe0 [ 276.681687] [<000000045972c5ca>] system_call+0xe6/0x288 [ 276.681730] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
This is because only the compound_order is cleared in destroy_compound_gigantic_page(), and compound_nr is set to 1U << order == 1 for order 0 in set_compound_order(page, 0).
Fix this by explicitly clearing compound_nr for first tail page after calling set_compound_order(page, 0).
--- mm/hugetlb.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
mm/hugetlb.c +1 -0
@@ -1216,6 +1216,7 @@ static void destroy_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, }set_compound_order (page,0 ); + page[1 ].compound_nr =0 ;__ClearPageHead (page); }
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] mm/hugetlb: clear compound_nr before freeing gigantic pages
Quoted 3 lines · Gerald Schaefer
This is because only the
compound_orderis cleared indestroy_compound_gigantic_page(), andcompound_nris set to 1U << order == 1 for order 0 inset_compound_order(page, 0).
I didn't realise there was a separate destroy path for gigantic pages. Thanks for catching and fixing this.
Quoted 51 lines · Gerald Schaefer
The following "Bad page state" occurs on s390 when freeing gigantic pages:
[ 276.681603] BUG: Bad page state in process bash pfn:380001 [ 276.681614] page:00000000c35f0856 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000126b68aa index:0x0 pfn:0x380001 [ 276.681620] aops:0x0 [ 276.681622] flags: 0x3ffff00000000000() [ 276.681626] raw: 3ffff00000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000122 0000000100000000 [ 276.681628] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000000 0000000000000000 [ 276.681630] page dumped because: non-NULL mapping [ 276.681632] Modules linked in: [ 276.681637] CPU: 6 PID: 616 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.10.0-rc7-next-20201208 #1 [ 276.681639] Hardware name: IBM 3906 M03 703 (LPAR) [ 276.681641] Call Trace: [ 276.681648] [<0000000458c252b6>] show_stack+0x6e/0xe8 [ 276.681652] [<000000045971cf60>] dump_stack+0x90/0xc8 [ 276.681656] [<0000000458e8b186>] bad_page+0xd6/0x130 [ 276.681658] [<0000000458e8cdea>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x26a/0x800 [ 276.681661] [<0000000458e8e67e>] free_unref_page+0x6e/0x90 [ 276.681663] [<0000000458e8ea6c>] free_contig_range+0x94/0xe8 [ 276.681666] [<0000000458ea5e54>] update_and_free_page+0x1c4/0x2c8 [ 276.681669] [<0000000458ea784e>] free_pool_huge_page+0x11e/0x138 [ 276.681671] [<0000000458ea8530>] set_max_huge_pages+0x228/0x300 [ 276.681673] [<0000000458ea86c0>] nr_hugepages_store_common+0xb8/0x130 [ 276.681678] [<0000000458fd5b6a>] kernfs_fop_write+0xd2/0x218 [ 276.681681] [<0000000458ef9da0>] vfs_write+0xb0/0x2b8 [ 276.681684] [<0000000458efa15c>] ksys_write+0xac/0xe0 [ 276.681687] [<000000045972c5ca>] system_call+0xe6/0x288 [ 276.681730] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taintI bisected it to commit
1378a5ee451a("mm: storecompound_nras well ascompound_order"), and it seems that the newcompound_nroverlayingpage->mappingis not properly cleared, which then triggers the non-NULL mapping warning.This is because only the
compound_orderis cleared indestroy_compound_gigantic_page(), andcompound_nris set to 1U << order == 1 for order 0 inset_compound_order(page, 0).For some reason, I can not reproduce this on x86, but I do not see where this could be an arch-sepcific issue. Still, I might be missing something, and my proposed patch also looks a bit ugly (at least to me), hence this RFC. Any comments?
BTW, for "normal sized" hugepages, this is not an issue, as
page->mappingseems to be cleared explicitly in this case, infree_tail_pages_check(), but the freeing path for normal hugepages is quite different from that for gigantic pages usingfree_contig_range(). So a "page[1].mapping = NULL" might also be an option, instead of the "page[1].compound_nr = 0" in my patch, but that looks even more ugly, since it would clear more than needed.
Quoted 5 lines
Gerald Schaefer (1):
mm/hugetlb: clearcompound_nrbefore freeing gigantic pagesmm/hugetlb.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
I cant see the patch?