cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
Subsystems (6)
Viresh Kumar
maintainerv2 cover cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
Hello,
CPPC cpufreq driver is used for ARM servers and this patch series tries to provide frequency invariance support for them.
This is tested with some hacks, as I didn't have access to the right hardware, on the ARM64 hikey board to check the overall functionality and that works fine.
Ionela/Peter Puhov, it would be nice if you guys can give this a shot.
This is based of pm/linux-next and patches [1] and [2] which I sent recently to cleanup arm64 topology stuff.
Changes since V1:
- The interface for setting the callbacks is improved, so different parts looking to provide their callbacks don't need to think about each other.
- Moved to per-cpu storage for storing the callback related data, AMU counters have higher priority with this.
--
viresh
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5ffc7b9ed03c6301ac2f710f609282959491b526.1608010334.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
Viresh Kumar (2):
topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick()
callback
cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 8 +- arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 89 +++++++++---------- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 56 +++++++++++- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 14 ++- kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + 6 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Signature · 7 lines
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRFC v2 1/2 topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
This patch attempts to make it generic enough so other parts of the kernel can also provide their own implementation of scale_freq_tick() callback, which is called by the scheduler periodically to update the per-cpu freq_scale variable.
The implementations now need to provide struct scale_freq_tick_data for the CPUs for which they have hardware counters available, and a callback gets registered for each possible CPU in a per-cpu variable.
The AMU counters are updated to adapt to this and they take the highest priority if they are available, i.e. they will be used instead of CPPC based counters for example.
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 8 +-- arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 13 ++++- 4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +1 -7
@@ -17,15 +17,9 @@ int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus);#include <linux/arch_topology.h> void update_freq_counters_refs (void ); -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN -/* -* Replace task scheduler's default counter-based -* frequency-invariance scale factor setting. -*/ +/* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariance scale factor setting */ #define arch_scale_freq_tick topology_scale_freq_tick -#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN */ /* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariant accounting */ #define arch_set_freq_scale topology_set_freq_scale
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c +39 -50
107 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +52 -4
76 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/arch_topology.h +12 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,18 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long max_freq);bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void ); -bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus); +enum scale_freq_tick_source { +SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_AMU , +}; + +struct scale_freq_tick_data { +enum scale_freq_tick_source source; +void (*scale_freq)(void ); +}; + +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); +void topology_set_scale_freq_tick (struct scale_freq_tick_data *data,const struct cpumask *cpus); +void topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (enum scale_freq_tick_source source,const struct cpumask *cpus); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, thermal_pressure);
Signature · 7 lines
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Re: [RFC V2 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
Hi,
I focused for now on the design of the solution and mostly on the generic code in arch_topology.c, as that will then impact the arm64 code.
On Tuesday 15 Dec 2020 at 16:46:35 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
[..]
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +3
-0@@ -21,17 +21,65 @@#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/smp.h> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct scale_freq_tick_data *, sft_data); +static struct cpumask scale_freq_tick_mask; +
drivers/base/arch_topology.c line 35
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +6
-1+static bool supports_scale_freq_tick (const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ +return cpumask_subset (cpus, &scale_freq_tick_mask); +} +bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void ) {return cpufreq_supports_freq_invariance () || -arch_freq_counters_available (cpu_online_mask); +supports_scale_freq_tick (cpu_online_mask);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think the names that involve "scale_freq_tick" are unfortunate and unclear here. arch_scale_freq_tick() is a good wrapper as it refers to some work being done for FIE on the tick, but for other functions and structures here, any similar naming makes things unclear.
Basically all FIE related activity on the tick involves counters that need regular sampling. So I'd suggest to keep to names that give a hint about the source of information for frequency invariance, as it makes it more clear what are the options you're choosing between for FIE.
s/supports_scale_freq_tick/supports_scale_freq_counters s/scale_freq_tick_data/scale_freq_data s/topology_set_scale_freq_tick/topology_set_scale_freq_source s/topology_clear_scale_freq_tick/topology_clear_scale_freq_source s/scale_freq_tick_mask/scale_freq_counters_mask
.. or similar.
drivers/base/arch_topology.c line 48
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +13
-0+} + +void topology_set_scale_freq_tick (struct scale_freq_tick_data *data, +const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ +struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd; +int cpu; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, cpus) { + sftd =per_cpu (sft_data, cpu); + +/* Use AMU counters whenever possible */ +if (!sftd || sftd->source !=SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_AMU ) {
I don't think the arch_topology driver should know anything about AMUs, as they are an arm64 feature. SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH might be better. This way any architecture that uses the arch topology driver can register some architected method which should take priority over all other methods (at least until someone shows up wanting otherwise).
Quoted 23 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +18
-2+per_cpu (sft_data, cpu) = data; +cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, &scale_freq_tick_mask); + } + } } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (topology_set_scale_freq_tick); -__weak bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus) +void topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (enum scale_freq_tick_source source, +const struct cpumask *cpus) { -return false; +struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd; +int cpu; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, cpus) { + sftd =per_cpu (sft_data, cpu); + +if (sftd && sftd->source == source) { +per_cpu (sft_data, cpu) =NULL ; +cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &scale_freq_tick_mask); + } + }
drivers/base/arch_topology.c line 79
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +9
-0} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (topology_clear_scale_freq_tick); + +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd = *this_cpu_ptr (&sft_data); + +if (sftd) + sftd->scale_freq (); +}
What do you think about having a single topology function that handles all sources of invariance (cpufreq, arch counters, platform counters)?
Snippet of possible code:
"""
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +1 -1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus);void update_freq_counters_refs (void );/* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariance scale factor setting */ -#define arch_scale_freq_tick topology_scale_freq_tick +#define arch_scale_freq_tick () topology_set_freq_scale(NULL, 0, 0)/* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariant accounting */ #define arch_set_freq_scale topology_set_freq_scale
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +12 -23
@@ -70,38 +70,27 @@ void topology_clear_scale_freq_tick(enum scale_freq_tick_source source, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (topology_clear_scale_freq_tick); -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ) -{ -struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd = *this_cpu_ptr (&sft_data); - -if (sftd) - sftd->scale_freq (); -} - DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (freq_scale);void topology_set_freq_scale (const struct cpumask *cpus,unsigned long cur_freq,unsigned long max_freq) { +struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd;unsigned long scale;int i; -if (WARN_ON_ONCE (!cur_freq || !max_freq)) -return ; - -/* -* If the use of counters for FIE is enabled, just return as we don't -* want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ. -* Instead the scale factor will be updated from arch_scale_freq_tick. -*/ -if (supports_scale_freq_tick (cpus)) -return ; - - scale = (cur_freq <<SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ) / max_freq; - -for_each_cpu (i, cpus) -per_cpu (freq_scale, i) = scale; +/* Retrieve provided method for scale factor setting for current CPU */ +if (!cpus) { + sftd = *this_cpu_ptr (&sft_data); +if (sftd) + sftd->scale_freq (); + }else if (cur_freq && max_freq) { +/* Use arguments to compute and set scale factor for CPUs */ + scale = (cur_freq <<SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ) / max_freq; +for_each_cpu (i, cpus) +per_cpu (freq_scale, i) = scale; + } } DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
include/linux/arch_topology.h +0 -1
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ struct scale_freq_tick_data {void (*scale_freq)(void ); }; -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void );void topology_set_scale_freq_tick (struct scale_freq_tick_data *data,const struct cpumask *cpus);void topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (enum scale_freq_tick_source source,const struct cpumask *cpus);
"""
This basically says that if there is a method registered for a certain CPU to set the scale factor, that method should be used. Otherwise, rely on this default math of obtaining the scale factor based on the current and maximum frequency arguments, if they are provided.
This could get us rid of supports_scale_freq_tick() and possibly even the scale_freq_tick_mask. topology_set_scale_freq_tick() and topology_clear_scale_freq_tick() could also be used to enable and disable system level invariance (through a static key) so we don't have to do cpumask checks in topology_scale_freq_invariant().
We might then add a static key to prevent those useless conditions being evaluated on the tick. But we'll see possible optimisations later.
Quoted 22 lines
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +3
-1+ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (freq_scale);void topology_set_freq_scale (const struct cpumask *cpus,unsigned long cur_freq,unsigned long max_freq)@@ -47,7 +95,7 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,* want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ. * Instead the scale factor will be updated from arch_scale_freq_tick. */ -if (arch_freq_counters_available (cpus)) +if (supports_scale_freq_tick (cpus))return ; scale = (cur_freq <<SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ) / max_freq;include/linux/arch_topology.h +0
-0@@ -34,7 +34,18 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long max_freq);bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void );
include/linux/arch_topology.h void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, · line 44
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/arch_topology.h +8
-1-bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus); +enum scale_freq_tick_source { +SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_AMU , +}; + +struct scale_freq_tick_data { +enum scale_freq_tick_source source; +void (*scale_freq)(void ); +};
s/scale_freq/set_freq_scale?
Hope it helps,
Ionela.
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/arch_topology.h +4
-0+ +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); +void topology_set_scale_freq_tick (struct scale_freq_tick_data *data,const struct cpumask *cpus); +void topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (enum scale_freq_tick_source source,const struct cpumask *cpus); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, thermal_pressure);Signature · 1 line
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [RFC V2 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
Quoted 11 lines · Ionela Voinescu
Review
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
(quoted diff) +7
-0+void topology_scale_freq_tick(void) +{ + struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd = *this_cpu_ptr(&sft_data); + + if (sftd) + sftd->scale_freq(); +}What do you think about having a single topology function that handles all sources of invariance (cpufreq, arch counters, platform counters)?
I think keeping them separate is better, both of these are called from scheduler's context (hotpath) and adding any more unnecessary conditionals there should be rather avoided. We could have given a though to merging them if they were going to share some code, but that is not the case here clearly. They are quite different.
This is how it looks now:
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +1 -7
@@ -17,15 +17,9 @@ int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus);#include <linux/arch_topology.h> void update_freq_counters_refs (void ); -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN -/* -* Replace task scheduler's default counter-based -* frequency-invariance scale factor setting. -*/ +/* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariance scale factor setting */ #define arch_scale_freq_tick topology_scale_freq_tick -#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN */ /* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariant accounting */ #define arch_set_freq_scale topology_set_freq_scale
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c +39 -50
107 lines not on this page · raw message
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +52 -4
76 lines not on this page · raw message
include/linux/arch_topology.h +12 -1
@@ -34,7 +34,18 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long max_freq);bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void ); -bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus); +enum scale_freq_source { +SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH , +}; + +struct scale_freq_data { +enum scale_freq_source source; +void (*set_freq_scale)(void ); +}; + +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); +void topology_set_scale_freq_source (struct scale_freq_data *data,const struct cpumask *cpus); +void topology_clear_scale_freq_source (enum scale_freq_source source,const struct cpumask *cpus); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, thermal_pressure);
Signature · 1 line
viresh
Re: [RFC V2 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
Hi,
Quoted 13 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 11 lines · Ionela Voinescu
drivers/base/arch_topology.c line 79
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
drivers/base/arch_topology.c +7
-0+void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +struct scale_freq_tick_data *sftd = *this_cpu_ptr (&sft_data); + +if (sftd) + sftd->scale_freq (); +}What do you think about having a single topology function that handles all sources of invariance (cpufreq, arch counters, platform counters)?
Quoted 3 lines
I think keeping them separate is better, both of these are called from scheduler's context (hotpath) and adding any more unnecessary conditionals there should be rather avoided. We could have given a
It would be a single added condition on the hotpath for !cpus and I think CPUs nowadays do a very good job optimising those. Also, you lose a branch and a cpumask operation on the arch_set_freq_scale path.
Quoted 3 lines
though to merging them if they were going to share some code, but that is not the case here clearly. They are quite different.
I think it would improve clarity a lot by having a single topology function, with clear comments on which path is taken when.
In regards to them sharing code, there's not much code they could be sharing, as one just does some simple math on provided values. I attempted to have a single function for frequency invariance at some point [1], as the logic for the computation is the same, but I could never convince myself the clarity gained was worth the changes. But I really like this version of your code for this purpose as well.
But I'll leave that to your judgement.
[1] https://gitlab.arm.com/linux-arm/linux-power/-/commit/b9277295475307051c34ca31aef28eac50115e1a
Quoted 9 lines
This is how it looks now:
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +0
-0@@ -17,15 +17,9 @@ int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus);#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h int pcibus_to_node(struct pci_bus *bus); · line 22
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +1
-6void update_freq_counters_refs (void ); -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN -/* -* Replace task scheduler's default counter-based -* frequency-invariance scale factor setting. -*/ +/* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariance scale factor setting */ #define arch_scale_freq_tick topology_scale_freq_tick
You could probably move this define under the comment below, as both arch functions do frequency-invariance accounting, but from different sources.
Quoted 205 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h +0
-1-#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN */ /* Replace task scheduler's default frequency-invariant accounting */ #define arch_set_freq_scale topology_set_freq_scalearch/arm64/kernel/topology.c +39
-50@@ -199,8 +199,44 @@ static int freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate, u64 ref_rate)return 0 ; } -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE (amu_fie_key); -#define amu_freq_invariant () static_branch_unlikely(&amu_fie_key) +static void amu_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +u64 prev_core_cnt, prev_const_cnt; +u64 core_cnt, const_cnt, scale; + + prev_const_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_const_cycles_prev); + prev_core_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_core_cycles_prev); + +update_freq_counters_refs (); + + const_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_const_cycles_prev); + core_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_core_cycles_prev); + +if (unlikely (core_cnt <= prev_core_cnt || + const_cnt <= prev_const_cnt)) +return ; + +/* +* /\core arch_max_freq_scale +* scale = ------- * -------------------- +* /\const SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE +* +* See validate_cpu_freq_invariance_counters() for details on +* arch_max_freq_scale and the use of SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT. +*/ + scale = core_cnt - prev_core_cnt; + scale *=this_cpu_read (arch_max_freq_scale); + scale =div64_u64 (scale >>SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT , + const_cnt - prev_const_cnt); + + scale = min_t(unsigned long, scale, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE); +this_cpu_write (freq_scale, (unsigned long )scale); +} + +static struct scale_freq_data amu_sfd = { + .source =SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH , + .set_freq_scale = amu_scale_freq_tick, +};static void amu_fie_setup (const struct cpumask *cpus) {@@ -227,7 +263,7 @@ static void amu_fie_setup(const struct cpumask *cpus)if (!invariant && !cpumask_equal (amu_fie_cpus, cpu_present_mask))return ; -static_branch_enable (&amu_fie_key); +topology_set_scale_freq_source (&amu_sfd, amu_fie_cpus);pr_debug ("CPUs[%*pbl]: counters will be used for FIE." ,cpumask_pr_args (cpus));@@ -283,53 +319,6 @@ static int __init init_amu_fie(void) }core_initcall (init_amu_fie); -bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus) -{ -return amu_freq_invariant () && -cpumask_subset (cpus, amu_fie_cpus); -} - -void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ) -{ -u64 prev_core_cnt, prev_const_cnt; -u64 core_cnt, const_cnt, scale; -int cpu =smp_processor_id (); - -if (!amu_freq_invariant ()) -return ; - -if (!cpumask_test_cpu (cpu, amu_fie_cpus)) -return ; - - prev_const_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_const_cycles_prev); - prev_core_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_core_cycles_prev); - -update_freq_counters_refs (); - - const_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_const_cycles_prev); - core_cnt =this_cpu_read (arch_core_cycles_prev); - -if (unlikely (core_cnt <= prev_core_cnt || - const_cnt <= prev_const_cnt)) -return ; - -/* -* /\core arch_max_freq_scale -* scale = ------- * -------------------- -* /\const SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE -* -* See validate_cpu_freq_invariance_counters() for details on -* arch_max_freq_scale and the use of SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT. -*/ - scale = core_cnt - prev_core_cnt; - scale *=this_cpu_read (arch_max_freq_scale); - scale =div64_u64 (scale >>SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT , - const_cnt - prev_const_cnt); - - scale = min_t(unsigned long, scale, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE); -this_cpu_write (freq_scale, (unsigned long )scale); -} -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB #include <acpi/cppc_acpi.h> drivers/base/arch_topology.c +52
-4@@ -21,17 +21,65 @@#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/smp.h> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct scale_freq_data *, sft_data); +static struct cpumask scale_freq_counters_mask; + +static bool supports_scale_freq_counters (const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ +return cpumask_subset (cpus, &scale_freq_counters_mask); +} +bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void ) {return cpufreq_supports_freq_invariance () || -arch_freq_counters_available (cpu_online_mask); +supports_scale_freq_counters (cpu_online_mask); +} + +void topology_set_scale_freq_source (struct scale_freq_data *data, +const struct cpumask *cpus) +{ +struct scale_freq_data *sfd; +int cpu; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, cpus) { + sfd =per_cpu (sft_data, cpu); + +/* Use ARCH provided counters whenever possible */ +if (!sfd || sfd->source !=SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH ) { +per_cpu (sft_data, cpu) = data; +cpumask_set_cpu (cpu, &scale_freq_counters_mask); + } + } } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (topology_set_scale_freq_source); -__weak bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus) +void topology_clear_scale_freq_source (enum scale_freq_source source, +const struct cpumask *cpus) { -return false; +struct scale_freq_data *sfd; +int cpu; + +for_each_cpu (cpu, cpus) { + sfd =per_cpu (sft_data, cpu); + +if (sfd && sfd->source == source) { +per_cpu (sft_data, cpu) =NULL ; +cpumask_clear_cpu (cpu, &scale_freq_counters_mask); + } + } } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (topology_clear_scale_freq_source); + +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +struct scale_freq_data *sfd = *this_cpu_ptr (&sft_data); + +if (sfd) + sfd->set_freq_scale (); +} + DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, freq_scale) = SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (freq_scale);void topology_set_freq_scale (const struct cpumask *cpus,unsigned long cur_freq,unsigned long max_freq)@@ -47,7 +95,7 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq,* want to update the scale factor with information from CPUFREQ. * Instead the scale factor will be updated from arch_scale_freq_tick. */ -if (arch_freq_counters_available (cpus)) +if (supports_scale_freq_counters (cpus))return ; scale = (cur_freq <<SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ) / max_freq;include/linux/arch_topology.h +0
-0
include/linux/arch_topology.h void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, · line 37
Quoted 5 lines
include/linux/arch_topology.h +1
-1@@ -34,7 +34,18 @@ void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, unsigned long max_freq);bool topology_scale_freq_invariant (void ); -bool arch_freq_counters_available (const struct cpumask *cpus); +enum scale_freq_source {
Maybe you can add SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPUFREQ as the first value (=0). That will give a hint of CPUFREQ being a source of information for FIE and the default when counters are not supported, even if nothing gets done with that value (for now at least).
Quoted 4 lines
include/linux/arch_topology.h +4
-0+ SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_ARCH, +}; + +struct scale_freq_data {
include/linux/arch_topology.h void topology_set_freq_scale(const struct cpumask *cpus, unsigned long cur_freq, · line 51
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/arch_topology.h +7
-0+enum scale_freq_source source; +void (*set_freq_scale)(void ); +}; + +void topology_scale_freq_tick (void ); +void topology_set_scale_freq_source (struct scale_freq_data *data,const struct cpumask *cpus); +void topology_clear_scale_freq_source (enum scale_freq_source source,const struct cpumask *cpus); DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, thermal_pressure);
+1 on the rewrite!
Many thanks,
Ionela.
Quoted 3 lines
Signature · 2 lines
-- viresh
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRe: [RFC V2 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback
Quoted 11 lines · Ionela Voinescu
I think it would improve clarity a lot by having a single topology function, with clear comments on which path is taken when.
In regards to them sharing code, there's not much code they could be sharing, as one just does some simple math on provided values. I attempted to have a single function for frequency invariance at some point [1], as the logic for the computation is the same, but I could never convince myself the clarity gained was worth the changes. But I really like this version of your code for this purpose as well.
But I'll leave that to your judgement.
Hmm, I don't really agree to merging those two paths into a single routine unless we share something there. So I would like to skip that for now :)
All other comments accepted.
Thanks.
Signature · 6 lines
viresh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Viresh Kumar
maintainerRFC v2 2/2 cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
In reply to Viresh KumarThe Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is providing a frequency scaling correction factor that helps achieve more accurate load-tracking.
Normally, this scaling factor can be obtained directly with the help of the cpufreq drivers as they know the exact frequency the hardware is running at. But that isn't the case for CPPC cpufreq driver.
Another way of obtaining that is using the AMU counter support, which is already present in kernel, but that hardware is optional for platforms.
This patch thus obtains this scaling factor using the existing logic present in the cppc driver. Note that the AMUs have higher priority than CPPC counters if available, though the CPPC driver doesn't need to have any special handling for that.
This also exports sched_setattr_nocheck() as the CPPC driver can be built as a module.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 + kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +138 -2
@@ -10,14 +10,18 @@#define pr_fmt (fmt) "CPPC Cpufreq:" fmt +#include <linux/arch_topology.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/cpufreq.h> #include <linux/dmi.h> +#include <linux/irq_work.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/time.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
@@ -39,6 +43,15 @@static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data;static bool boost_supported; +struct cppc_freq_invariance { +struct kthread_worker *worker; +struct irq_work irq_work; +struct kthread_work work; +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs prev_perf_fb_ctrs; +unsigned int max_freq; +}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cppc_freq_invariance, cppc_f_i); +struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE +1 ];char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE +1 ];
@@ -243,7 +256,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; -int ret =0 ; +int ret =0 , i; cpu_data->cpu = cpu; ret =cppc_get_perf_caps (cpu, caps);
@@ -300,6 +313,9 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu_data->cur_policy = policy; +for_each_cpu (i, policy->cpus) +per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i).max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; +/* * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost * is supported.
@@ -374,7 +390,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) {struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; -int ret; +int ret, i;if (!boost_supported) {pr_err ("BOOST not supported by CPU or firmware\n" );
@@ -389,6 +405,9 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) caps->nominal_perf); policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; +for_each_cpu (i, policy->related_cpus) +per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i).max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; + ret =freq_qos_update_request (policy->max_freq_req, policy->max);if (ret <0 )return ret;
@@ -449,6 +468,120 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)acpi_put_table (tbl); } +static void cppc_scale_freq_tick_workfn (struct kthread_work *work) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0 }; +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); +struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpu]; +u64 rate; + + cppc_fi = container_of(work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, work); + +if (cppc_get_perf_ctrs (cpu, &fb_ctrs)) { +pr_info ("%s: cppc_get_perf_ctrs() failed\n" , __func__); +return ; + } + + rate =cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs (cpudata, cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, fb_ctrs); + cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs = fb_ctrs; + + rate <<=SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ; +per_cpu (freq_scale, cpu) =div64_u64 (rate, cppc_fi->max_freq); +} + +static void cppc_irq_work (struct irq_work *irq_work) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; + + cppc_fi = container_of(irq_work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, irq_work); +kthread_queue_work (cppc_fi->worker, &cppc_fi->work); +} + +static void cppc_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i,raw_smp_processor_id ()); + +/* +* cppc_get_perf_ctrs() can potentially sleep, call that from the right +* context. +*/ +irq_work_queue (&cppc_fi->irq_work); +} + +static struct scale_freq_tick_data cppc_sftd = { + .source =SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , + .scale_freq = cppc_scale_freq_tick, +}; + +static void cppc_freq_invariance_exit (void ) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +int i; + +if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) +return ; + +topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , cpu_present_mask); + +for_each_possible_cpu (i) { + cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i); +if (cppc_fi->worker) { +irq_work_sync (&cppc_fi->irq_work); +kthread_destroy_worker (cppc_fi->worker); + cppc_fi->worker =NULL ; + } + } +} + +static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init (void ) +{ +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0 }; +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +struct sched_attr attr = { + .size =sizeof (struct sched_attr ), + .sched_policy =SCHED_DEADLINE , + .sched_nice =0 , + .sched_priority =0 , +/* +* Fake (unused) bandwidth; workaround to "fix" +* priority inheritance. +*/ + .sched_runtime =1000000 , + .sched_deadline =10000000 , + .sched_period =10000000 , + }; +struct kthread_worker *worker; +int i, ret; + +if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) +return ; + +for_each_possible_cpu (i) { + cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i); + +kthread_init_work (&cppc_fi->work, cppc_scale_freq_tick_workfn); +init_irq_work (&cppc_fi->irq_work, cppc_irq_work); + worker =kthread_create_worker_on_cpu (i,0 ,"cppc:%d" , i); +if (IS_ERR (worker)) +return cppc_freq_invariance_exit (); + + cppc_fi->worker = worker; + ret =sched_setattr_nocheck (worker->task, &attr); +if (ret) { +pr_warn ("%s: failed to set SCHED_DEADLINE\n" , __func__); +return cppc_freq_invariance_exit (); + } + + ret =cppc_get_perf_ctrs (i, &fb_ctrs); +if (!ret) +per_cpu (cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, i) = fb_ctrs; + } + +/* Register for freq-invariance */ +topology_set_scale_freq_tick (&cppc_sftd, cpu_present_mask); +} +static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init (void ) {struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;
@@ -484,6 +617,8 @@ static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)if (ret) goto out; +cppc_freq_invariance_init (); +return ret; out:
@@ -504,6 +639,7 @@ static void __exit cppc_cpufreq_exit(void)struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;int i; +cppc_freq_invariance_exit ();cpufreq_unregister_driver (&cppc_cpufreq_driver);for_each_possible_cpu (i) {
include/linux/arch_topology.h +1 -0
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ bool topology_scale_freq_invariant(void);enum scale_freq_tick_source {SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_AMU , +SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , };struct scale_freq_tick_data {
kernel/sched/core.c +1 -0
@@ -6075,6 +6075,7 @@ int sched_setattr_nocheck(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) {return __sched_setscheduler (p, attr, false, true); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (sched_setattr_nocheck);/** * sched_setscheduler_nocheck - change the scheduling policy and/or RT priority of a thread from kernelspace.
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
Hi,
Do you know of a current platform that would benefit from this, that we could run some tests on?
I've Cc-ed Jeremy as well, as he might be interested in this.
Also, please find some initial comments below:
Quoted 7 lines · Viresh Kumar
The Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is providing a frequency scaling correction factor that helps achieve more accurate load-tracking.
Normally, this scaling factor can be obtained directly with the help of the cpufreq drivers as they know the exact frequency the hardware is running at. But that isn't the case for CPPC cpufreq driver.
Quoted 8 lines
Another way of obtaining that is using the AMU counter support, which is already present in kernel, but that hardware is optional for platforms.
This patch thus obtains this scaling factor using the existing logic present in the cppc driver. Note that the AMUs have higher priority than CPPC counters if available, though the CPPC driver doesn't need to have any special handling for that.
Probably best to replace "AMU counters" with "architectural counters" as the use of cppc_cpufreq is not limited to arm64.
Quoted 59 lines
This also exports
sched_setattr_nocheck()as the CPPC driver can be built as a module.Signed-off-by Viresh Kumar <[email protected]>--- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 + kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +14
-1@@ -10,14 +10,18 @@#define pr_fmt (fmt) "CPPC Cpufreq:" fmt +#include <linux/arch_topology.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> #include <linux/cpufreq.h> #include <linux/dmi.h> +#include <linux/irq_work.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> #include <linux/time.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h> #include <asm/unaligned.h> @@ -39,6 +43,15 @@static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data;static bool boost_supported; +struct cppc_freq_invariance { +struct kthread_worker *worker; +struct irq_work irq_work; +struct kthread_work work; +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs prev_perf_fb_ctrs; +unsigned int max_freq; +}; +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cppc_freq_invariance, cppc_f_i); +struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE +1 ];char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE +1 ];@@ -243,7 +256,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps;unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; -int ret =0 ; +int ret =0 , i; cpu_data->cpu = cpu; ret =cppc_get_perf_caps (cpu, caps);
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) · line 318
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +3
-0@@ -300,6 +313,9 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu_data->cur_policy = policy; +for_each_cpu (i, policy->cpus) +per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i).max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; +
Is policy->cpuinfo populated at this point?
Quoted 36 lines
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +14
-1/* * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost * is supported. @@ -374,7 +390,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) {struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu];struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; -int ret; +int ret, i;if (!boost_supported) {pr_err ("BOOST not supported by CPU or firmware\n" );@@ -389,6 +405,9 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state) caps->nominal_perf); policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; +for_each_cpu (i, policy->related_cpus) +per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i).max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; + ret =freq_qos_update_request (policy->max_freq_req, policy->max);if (ret <0 )return ret;@@ -449,6 +468,120 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)acpi_put_table (tbl); } +static void cppc_scale_freq_tick_workfn (struct kthread_work *work) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0 }; +int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); +struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpu]; +u64 rate; + + cppc_fi = container_of(work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, work); +
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void) · line 490
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +10
-0+if (cppc_get_perf_ctrs (cpu, &fb_ctrs)) { +pr_info ("%s: cppc_get_perf_ctrs() failed\n" , __func__); +return ; + } + + rate =cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs (cpudata, cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, fb_ctrs); + cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs = fb_ctrs; + + rate <<=SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ; +per_cpu (freq_scale, cpu) =div64_u64 (rate, cppc_fi->max_freq);
It will save you some computation by skipping the intermediary frequency scale transition. For this computation you're obtaining current performance from counters, on the CPPC abstract performance scale, then you're converting it to a current frequency, which then gets translated again to a scale factor on the [0,1024] scale.
You probably want to keep the sanitation done in cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs() on the counter values, but you could skip the call to cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(), and use obtained performance together with caps->highest_perf, or caps->nominal_perf instead of cppc_fi->max_freq, in this function.
Also, to optimise it further, you can compute a reference scale (from reference performance and highest/nominal performance as done in freq_inv_set_max_ratio() - arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c, and use that instead in further freq scale computations.
I've resurrected my Juno setup and I'll do further review and testing tomorrow.
Hope it helps,
Ionela.
Quoted 141 lines
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +97
-0+} + +static void cppc_irq_work (struct irq_work *irq_work) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; + + cppc_fi = container_of(irq_work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, irq_work); +kthread_queue_work (cppc_fi->worker, &cppc_fi->work); +} + +static void cppc_scale_freq_tick (void ) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i,raw_smp_processor_id ()); + +/* +* cppc_get_perf_ctrs() can potentially sleep, call that from the right +* context. +*/ +irq_work_queue (&cppc_fi->irq_work); +} + +static struct scale_freq_tick_data cppc_sftd = { + .source =SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , + .scale_freq = cppc_scale_freq_tick, +}; + +static void cppc_freq_invariance_exit (void ) +{ +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +int i; + +if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) +return ; + +topology_clear_scale_freq_tick (SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , cpu_present_mask); + +for_each_possible_cpu (i) { + cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i); +if (cppc_fi->worker) { +irq_work_sync (&cppc_fi->irq_work); +kthread_destroy_worker (cppc_fi->worker); + cppc_fi->worker =NULL ; + } + } +} + +static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init (void ) +{ +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0 }; +struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; +struct sched_attr attr = { + .size =sizeof (struct sched_attr ), + .sched_policy =SCHED_DEADLINE , + .sched_nice =0 , + .sched_priority =0 , +/* +* Fake (unused) bandwidth; workaround to "fix" +* priority inheritance. +*/ + .sched_runtime =1000000 , + .sched_deadline =10000000 , + .sched_period =10000000 , + }; +struct kthread_worker *worker; +int i, ret; + +if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) +return ; + +for_each_possible_cpu (i) { + cppc_fi = &per_cpu (cppc_f_i, i); + +kthread_init_work (&cppc_fi->work, cppc_scale_freq_tick_workfn); +init_irq_work (&cppc_fi->irq_work, cppc_irq_work); + worker =kthread_create_worker_on_cpu (i,0 ,"cppc:%d" , i); +if (IS_ERR (worker)) +return cppc_freq_invariance_exit (); + + cppc_fi->worker = worker; + ret =sched_setattr_nocheck (worker->task, &attr); +if (ret) { +pr_warn ("%s: failed to set SCHED_DEADLINE\n" , __func__); +return cppc_freq_invariance_exit (); + } + + ret =cppc_get_perf_ctrs (i, &fb_ctrs); +if (!ret) +per_cpu (cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, i) = fb_ctrs; + } + +/* Register for freq-invariance */ +topology_set_scale_freq_tick (&cppc_sftd, cpu_present_mask); +} +static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init (void ) {struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;@@ -484,6 +617,8 @@ static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)if (ret) goto out; +cppc_freq_invariance_init (); +return ret; out:@@ -504,6 +639,7 @@ static void __exit cppc_cpufreq_exit(void)struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;int i; +cppc_freq_invariance_exit ();cpufreq_unregister_driver (&cppc_cpufreq_driver);for_each_possible_cpu (i) {include/linux/arch_topology.h +1
-0@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ bool topology_scale_freq_invariant(void);enum scale_freq_tick_source {SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_AMU , +SCALE_FREQ_SOURCE_CPPC , };struct scale_freq_tick_data {kernel/sched/core.c +1
-0@@ -6075,6 +6075,7 @@ int sched_setattr_nocheck(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) {return __sched_setscheduler (p, attr, false, true); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (sched_setattr_nocheck);/** * sched_setscheduler_nocheck - change the scheduling policy and/or RT priority of a thread from kernelspace. Signature · 1 line
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
Viresh Kumar
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · Ionela Voinescu
Hi,
Do you know of a current platform that would benefit from this, that we could run some tests on?
Thunderx2 is one.
Quoted 12 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 11 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -243,7 +256,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; struct cppc_perf_caps *caps = &cpu_data->perf_caps; unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu; - int ret = 0; + int ret = 0, i; cpu_data->cpu = cpu; ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, caps);@@ -300,6 +313,9 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
Quoted 7 lines
Review static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) · line 318
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +3
-0cpu_data->cur_policy = policy; + for_each_cpu(i, policy->cpus) + per_cpu(cppc_f_i, i).max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; +Is
policy->cpuinfopopulated at this point?
The base has changed since the time I posted the patch, but yes this routine itself updates min/max freq in cpuinfo at an earlier point.
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +10
-0+static void cppc_scale_freq_tick_workfn(struct kthread_work *work) +{ + struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; + struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0}; + int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); + struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpu]; + u64 rate; + + cppc_fi = container_of(work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, work); +Review static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
Quoted 10 lines
(quoted diff) +10
-0+ if (cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpu, &fb_ctrs)) { + pr_info("%s: cppc_get_perf_ctrs() failed\n", __func__); + return; + } + + rate = cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpudata, cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, fb_ctrs); + cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs = fb_ctrs; + + rate <<= SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; + per_cpu(freq_scale, cpu) = div64_u64(rate, cppc_fi->max_freq);It will save you some computation by skipping the intermediary frequency scale transition. For this computation you're obtaining current performance from counters, on the CPPC abstract performance scale, then you're converting it to a current frequency, which then gets translated again to a scale factor on the [0,1024] scale.
Quoted 5 lines
You probably want to keep the sanitation done in
cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs()on the counter values, but you could skip the call tocppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(), and use obtained performance together withcaps->highest_perf, orcaps->nominal_perfinstead ofcppc_fi->max_freq, in this function.
Something like this ?
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +24 -13
@@ -389,9 +389,9 @@ static inline u64 get_delta(u64 t1, u64 t0)return (u32 )t1 - (u32 )t0; } -static int cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs (struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data, -struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0, -struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t1) +static int cppc_perf_from_fbctrs (struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data, +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0, +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t1) {u64 delta_reference, delta_delivered;u64 reference_perf, delivered_perf;
@@ -404,11 +404,20 @@ static int cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data, fb_ctrs_t0.delivered);/* Check to avoid divide-by zero */ -if (delta_reference || delta_delivered) - delivered_perf = (reference_perf * delta_delivered) / - delta_reference; -else - delivered_perf = cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf; +if (!delta_reference && !delta_delivered) +return cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf; + +return (reference_perf * delta_delivered) / delta_reference; +} + +static int cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs (struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data, +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t0, +struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs_t1) +{ +u64 delivered_perf; + + delivered_perf =cppc_perf_from_fbctrs (cpu_data, fb_ctrs_t0, + fb_ctrs_t1);return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz (cpu_data, delivered_perf); }
@@ -539,21 +548,23 @@ static void cppc_scale_freq_workfn(struct kthread_work *work)struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi;struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0 };int cpu =raw_smp_processor_id (); -u64 rate; +struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data; +u64 perf; cppc_fi = container_of(work, struct cppc_freq_invariance, work); + cpu_data = cppc_fi->cpu_data;if (cppc_get_perf_ctrs (cpu, &fb_ctrs)) {pr_info ("%s: cppc_get_perf_ctrs() failed\n" , __func__);return ; } - rate =cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs (cppc_fi->cpu_data, - cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, fb_ctrs); cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs = fb_ctrs; + perf =cppc_perf_from_fbctrs (cpu_data, cppc_fi->prev_perf_fb_ctrs, + fb_ctrs); - rate <<=SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ; -per_cpu (freq_scale, cpu) =div64_u64 (rate, cppc_fi->max_freq); + perf <<=SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT ; +per_cpu (freq_scale, cpu) =div64_u64 (perf , cpu_data->perf_caps->highest_perf); }static void cppc_irq_work (struct irq_work *irq_work)
Quoted 4 lines
Also, to optimise it further, you can compute a reference scale (from reference performance and highest/nominal performance as done in
freq_inv_set_max_ratio()-arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c, and use that instead in further freq scale computations.
Signature · 1 line
viresh
Hi,
Quoted 5 lines · Viresh Kumar
Hello,
CPPC cpufreq driver is used for ARM servers and this patch series tries to provide frequency invariance support for them.
Nitpick: cppc_cpufreq already supports cpufreq-based frequency invariance, but not counter-based frequency invariance, when lacking AMUs :).
Quoted 6 lines
This is tested with some hacks, as I didn't have access to the right hardware, on the ARM64 hikey board to check the overall functionality and that works fine.
Ionela/Peter Puhov, it would be nice if you guys can give this a shot.
I'll be on holiday starting tomorrow until January. I fully intend to review and test this but I'll have to set myself a deadline for January to do it.
Sorry for the delay,
Ionela.
Quoted 33 lines
This is based of pm/linux-next and patches [1] and [2] which I sent recently to cleanup arm64 topology stuff.
Changes since V1:
- The interface for setting the callbacks is improved, so different parts looking to provide their callbacks don't need to think about each other.- Moved to per-cpu storage for storing the callback related data, AMU counters have higher priority with this.
--
viresh[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5ffc7b9ed03c6301ac2f710f609282959491b526.1608010334.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/Viresh Kumar (2):
topology: Allow multiple entities to providesched_freq_tick()
callback
cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariancearch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 8 +- arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 89 +++++++++---------- drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 56 +++++++++++- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/arch_topology.h | 14 ++- kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + 6 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)Signature · 1 line
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af