thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Fix stuck sensor with continuous mode for 4430
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/3 thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Fix stuck sensor with continuous mode for 4430
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)
Also, trying to read the temperature shows a stuck value with:
$ while true; do cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp; done
Where the temperature is not rising at all with the busy loop.
Additionally, the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit is not rising on 4430 in single conversion mode while it works fine in continuous conversion mode. It is also possible that the hung temperature sensor can affect the thermal shutdown alert too.
Let's fix the issue by adding TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY flag and use it for 4430.
Note that we also need to add udelay to for the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit polling as otherwise we have it time out too early on 4430. We'll be changing the loop to use iopoll in the following clean-up patch.
--- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c | 3 ++- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 9 +++++++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2 -1
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = {const struct ti_bandgap_data omap4430_data = { .features =TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_MODE_CONFIG |TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CLK_CTRL | -TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH , +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH | +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY , .fclock_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .div_ck_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .conv_table = omap4430_adc_to_temp,
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +7 -2
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/err.h>
@@ -605,8 +606,10 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; -/* Select single conversion mode */ -if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG )) +/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ +if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY )) +RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,1 ); +else if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG ))RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,0 );/* Start of Conversion = 1 */
@@ -619,6 +622,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask)break ; +udelay (1 ); }/* Start of Conversion = 0 */
@@ -630,6 +634,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (!(ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask))break ; +udelay (1 ); }return 0 ;
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h +2 -0
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {* has Errata 814 * TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE - used when the sensor readings are too * inaccurate. +* TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY - used when single mode hangs the sensor * TI_BANDGAP_HAS(b, f) - macro to check if a bandgap device is capable of a * specific feature (above) or not. Return non-zero, if yes. */
@@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_HISTORY_BUFFER BIT(9)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ERRATA_814 BIT(10)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE BIT(11) +#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY BIT(12)#define TI_BANDGAP_HAS (b, f) \ ((b)->conf->features & TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ ## f)
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
PATCH 2/3 thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Simplify polling with iopoll
We can use iopoll for checking the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit.
--- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 30 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +14 -16
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/clk.h> -#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/err.h>
@@ -27,6 +26,7 @@#include <linux/of_platform.h> #include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h> #include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
@@ -603,8 +603,9 @@ void *ti_bandgap_get_sensor_data(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)static int ti_bandgap_force_single_read (struct ti_bandgap *bgp,int id) { -u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; +int error; +u32 val;/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY ))
@@ -615,27 +616,24 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)/* Start of Conversion = 1 */ RMW_BITS (bgp, id, temp_sensor_ctrl, bgap_soc_mask,1 ); -/* Wait for EOCZ going up */ tsr = bgp->conf->sensors[id].registers; -while (--counter) { -if (ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & - tsr->bgap_eocz_mask) -break ; -udelay (1 ); - } +/* Wait for EOCZ going up */ + error =readl_poll_timeout_atomic (bgp->base + tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl, + val, val & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask, +1 ,1000 ); +if (error) +dev_warn (bgp->dev,"eocz timed out waiting high\n" );/* Start of Conversion = 0 */ RMW_BITS (bgp, id, temp_sensor_ctrl, bgap_soc_mask,0 );/* Wait for EOCZ going down */ - counter =1000 ; -while (--counter) { -if (!(ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & - tsr->bgap_eocz_mask)) -break ; -udelay (1 ); - } + error =readl_poll_timeout_atomic (bgp->base + tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl, + val, !(val & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask), +1 ,1000 ); +if (error) +dev_warn (bgp->dev,"eocz timed out waiting low\n" );return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
PATCH 3/3 thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Use non-inverted define for omap4
In reply to Tony LindgrenWhen we set bit 10 high we use continuous mode and not single mode. Let's correct this to avoid confusion. No functional changes here, the code does the right thing with bit 10.
--- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c | 4 ++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4xxx-bandgap.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2 -2
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ omap4430_mpu_temp_sensor_registers = { .bgap_dtemp_mask = OMAP4430_BGAP_TEMP_SENSOR_DTEMP_MASK, .bgap_mode_ctrl = OMAP4430_TEMP_SENSOR_CTRL_OFFSET, - .mode_ctrl_mask = OMAP4430_SINGLE_MODE_MASK, + .mode_ctrl_mask = OMAP4430_CONTINUOUS_MODE_MASK, .bgap_efuse = OMAP4430_FUSE_OPP_BGAP, };
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ omap4460_mpu_temp_sensor_registers = { .mask_cold_mask = OMAP4460_MASK_COLD_MASK, .bgap_mode_ctrl = OMAP4460_BGAP_CTRL_OFFSET, - .mode_ctrl_mask = OMAP4460_SINGLE_MODE_MASK, + .mode_ctrl_mask = OMAP4460_CONTINUOUS_MODE_MASK, .bgap_counter = OMAP4460_BGAP_COUNTER_OFFSET, .counter_mask = OMAP4460_COUNTER_MASK,
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4xxx-bandgap.h +2 -2
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@/* OMAP4430.TEMP_SENSOR bits */ #define OMAP4430_BGAP_TEMPSOFF_MASK BIT(12)#define OMAP4430_BGAP_TSHUT_MASK BIT(11) -#define OMAP4430_SINGLE_MODE_MASK BIT(10) +#define OMAP4430_CONTINUOUS_MODE_MASK BIT(10)#define OMAP4430_BGAP_TEMP_SENSOR_SOC_MASK BIT(9)#define OMAP4430_BGAP_TEMP_SENSOR_EOCZ_MASK BIT(8)#define OMAP4430_BGAP_TEMP_SENSOR_DTEMP_MASK (0xff << 0)
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@#define OMAP4460_BGAP_TEMP_SENSOR_DTEMP_MASK (0x3ff << 0)/* OMAP4460.BANDGAP_CTRL bits */ -#define OMAP4460_SINGLE_MODE_MASK BIT(31) +#define OMAP4460_CONTINUOUS_MODE_MASK BIT(31)#define OMAP4460_MASK_HOT_MASK BIT(1)#define OMAP4460_MASK_COLD_MASK BIT(0)
Signature · 1 line
2.29.2
Quoted 17 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)Also, trying to read the temperature shows a stuck value with:
$ while true; do cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp; doneWhere the temperature is not rising at all with the busy loop.
Additionally, the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit is not rising on 4430 in single conversion mode while it works fine in continuous conversion mode. It is also possible that the hung temperature sensor can affect the thermal shutdown alert too.
Quoted 8 lines
Let's fix the issue by adding
TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLYflag and use it for 4430.Note that we also need to add udelay to for the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit polling as otherwise we have it time out too early on 4430. We'll be changing the loop to use iopoll in the following clean-up patch.
Cc Adam Ford <[email protected]>
I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
adam
Quoted 87 lines
Cc Carl Philipp Klemm <[email protected]>Cc Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>Cc Merlijn Wajer <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>Cc Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>--- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c | 3 ++- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 9 +++++++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2
-1@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = {const struct ti_bandgap_data omap4430_data = { .features =TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_MODE_CONFIG |TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CLK_CTRL | -TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH , +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH | +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY , .fclock_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .div_ck_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .conv_table = omap4430_adc_to_temp,drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +7
-2@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/err.h> @@ -605,8 +606,10 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; -/* Select single conversion mode */ -if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG )) +/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ +if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY )) +RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,1 ); +else if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG ))RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,0 );/* Start of Conversion = 1 */ @@ -619,6 +622,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask)break ; +udelay (1 ); }/* Start of Conversion = 0 */ @@ -630,6 +634,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (!(ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask))break ; +udelay (1 ); }return 0 ;drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h +2
-1@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {* has Errata 814 * TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE - used when the sensor readings are too * inaccurate. +* TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY - used when single mode hangs the sensor * TI_BANDGAP_HAS(b, f) - macro to check if a bandgap device is capable of a * specific feature (above) or not. Return non-zero, if yes. */ @@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_HISTORY_BUFFER BIT(9)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ERRATA_814 BIT(10)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE BIT(11) +#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY BIT(12)#define TI_BANDGAP_HAS (b, f) \ ((b)->conf->features & TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ ## f) --2.29.2
Hi Adam and Tony,
Quoted 23 lines
Am 30.12.2020 um 13:55 schrieb Adam Ford <[email protected]>:
Quoted 20 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)Also, trying to read the temperature shows a stuck value with:
$ while true; do cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp; doneWhere the temperature is not rising at all with the busy loop.
Additionally, the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit is not rising on 4430 in single conversion mode while it works fine in continuous conversion mode. It is also possible that the hung temperature sensor can affect the thermal shutdown alert too.
Let's fix the issue by adding
TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLYflag and use it for 4430.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Note that we also need to add udelay to for the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit polling as otherwise we have it time out too early on 4430. We'll be changing the loop to use iopoll in the following clean-up patch.
Cc Adam Ford <[email protected]>I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
Indeed I remember a similar discussion from the DM3730 [1]. temp values were always those from the last measurement. E.g. the first one was done during (cold) boot and the first request after 10 minutes did show a quite cold system... The next one did show a hot system independent of what had been between (suspend or high activity).
It seems as if it was even reproducible with a very old kernel on a BeagleBoard. So it is quite fundamental.
We tried to fix it but did not come to a solution [2]. So we opened an issue in our tracker [3] and decided to stay with continuous conversion although this raises idle mode processor load.
BR,
Nikolaus
[1]: https://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/letux-kernel/2019-September/003958.html
[2]: https://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/letux-kernel/2019-September/003975.html
[3]: https://projects.goldelico.com/p/gta04-kernel/issues/928/
Quoted 89 lines
adam
Quoted 87 lines
Cc Carl Philipp Klemm <[email protected]>Cc Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>Cc Merlijn Wajer <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>Cc Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>---
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c | 3 ++- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 9 +++++++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2
-1@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = {const struct ti_bandgap_data omap4430_data = { .features =TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_MODE_CONFIG |TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CLK_CTRL | -TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH , +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH | +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY , .fclock_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .div_ck_name ="bandgap_fclk" , .conv_table = omap4430_adc_to_temp,drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +7
-2@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/err.h> @@ -605,8 +606,10 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; -/* Select single conversion mode */ -if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG )) +/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ +if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY )) +RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,1 ); +else if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG ))RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,0 );/* Start of Conversion = 1 */ @@ -619,6 +622,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask)break ; +udelay (1 ); }/* Start of Conversion = 0 */ @@ -630,6 +634,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (!(ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask))break ; +udelay (1 ); }return 0 ;drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h +2
-1@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {* has Errata 814 * TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE - used when the sensor readings are too * inaccurate. +* TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY - used when single mode hangs the sensor * TI_BANDGAP_HAS(b, f) - macro to check if a bandgap device is capable of a * specific feature (above) or not. Return non-zero, if yes. */ @@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_HISTORY_BUFFER BIT(9)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ERRATA_814 BIT(10)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE BIT(11) +#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY BIT(12)#define TI_BANDGAP_HAS (b, f) \ ((b)->conf->features & TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ ## f) --2.29.2
Quoted 7 lines · H. Nikolaus Schaller
Quoted 7 lines
Am 30.12.2020 um 13:55 schrieb Adam Ford <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)
...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
Indeed I remember a similar discussion from the DM3730 [1]. temp values were always those from the last measurement. E.g. the first one was done during (cold) boot and the first request after 10 minutes did show a quite cold system... The next one did show a hot system independent of what had been between (suspend or high activity).
Quoted 6 lines
It seems as if it was even reproducible with a very old kernel on a BeagleBoard. So it is quite fundamental.
We tried to fix it but did not come to a solution [2]. So we opened an issue in our tracker [3] and decided to stay with continuous conversion although this raises idle mode processor load.
Hmm so maybe eocz high always times out in single mode since it also triggers at least on dra7?
Yes it would be great if you guys can the $subject patch a try at least on your omap36xx and omap5 boards and see if you see eocz time out warnings in dmesg.
Regards,
Tony
Quoted 26 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 7 lines · H. Nikolaus Schaller
Quoted 7 lines
Am 30.12.2020 um 13:55 schrieb Adam Ford <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)...
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line
I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
Indeed I remember a similar discussion from the DM3730 [1]. temp values were always those from the last measurement. E.g. the first one was done during (cold) boot and the first request after 10 minutes did show a quite cold system... The next one did show a hot system independent of what had been between (suspend or high activity).
Quoted 6 lines
It seems as if it was even reproducible with a very old kernel on a BeagleBoard. So it is quite fundamental.
We tried to fix it but did not come to a solution [2]. So we opened an issue in our tracker [3] and decided to stay with continuous conversion although this raises idle mode processor load.
Quoted 6 lines
Hmm so maybe eocz high always times out in single mode since it also triggers at least on dra7?
Yes it would be great if you guys can the $subject patch a try at least on your omap36xx and omap5 boards and see if you see eocz time out warnings in dmesg.
I should be able to try it on the dm3730 logicpd-torpedo kit this weekend.
adam
Quoted 4 lines
Regards,
Tony
Quoted 28 lines · Adam Ford
Quoted 26 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 7 lines · H. Nikolaus Schaller
Quoted 7 lines
Am 30.12.2020 um 13:55 schrieb Adam Ford <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)...
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 1 line
I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
Indeed I remember a similar discussion from the DM3730 [1]. temp values were always those from the last measurement. E.g. the first one was done during (cold) boot and the first request after 10 minutes did show a quite cold system... The next one did show a hot system independent of what had been between (suspend or high activity).
It seems as if it was even reproducible with a very old kernel on a BeagleBoard. So it is quite fundamental.
We tried to fix it but did not come to a solution [2]. So we opened an issue in our tracker [3] and decided to stay with continuous conversion although this raises idle mode processor load.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Hmm so maybe eocz high always times out in single mode since it also triggers at least on dra7?
Yes it would be great if you guys can the $subject patch a try at least on your omap36xx and omap5 boards and see if you see eocz time out warnings in dmesg.
I should be able to try it on the dm3730 logicpd-torpedo kit this weekend.
I am going to be a bit delayed testing this. I cannot boot omap2plus using Linux version 5.11.0-rc2.
[ 2.666748] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xbc [ 2.673309] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABBDA3W [ 2.677368] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64 [ 2.685119] nand: using OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW [ 2.693237] Invalid ECC layout [ 2.696350] omap2-nand 30000000.nand: unable to use BCH library [ 2.702575] omap2-nand: probe of 30000000.nand failed with error -22 [ 2.716094] 8<--- cut here --- [ 2.719207] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018 [ 2.727600] pgd = (ptrval) ... [ 3.050933] ---[ end trace 59640c7399a80a07 ]--- [ 3.055603] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b [ 3.063323] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill
init! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
Once I get past this, I'll try to test the thermal stuff.
adam
Quoted 6 lines
adam
Quoted 4 lines
Regards,
Tony
Quoted 30 lines · Adam Ford
Quoted 28 lines · Adam Ford
Quoted 26 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 7 lines · H. Nikolaus Schaller
Quoted 7 lines
Am 30.12.2020 um 13:55 schrieb Adam Ford <[email protected]>:
Quoted 5 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)...
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 1 line
I don't have an OMAP4, but if you want, I can test a DM3730.
Indeed I remember a similar discussion from the DM3730 [1]. temp values were always those from the last measurement. E.g. the first one was done during (cold) boot and the first request after 10 minutes did show a quite cold system... The next one did show a hot system independent of what had been between (suspend or high activity).
It seems as if it was even reproducible with a very old kernel on a BeagleBoard. So it is quite fundamental.
We tried to fix it but did not come to a solution [2]. So we opened an issue in our tracker [3] and decided to stay with continuous conversion although this raises idle mode processor load.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Hmm so maybe eocz high always times out in single mode since it also triggers at least on dra7?
Yes it would be great if you guys can the $subject patch a try at least on your omap36xx and omap5 boards and see if you see eocz time out warnings in dmesg.
I do see chatter.
[ 15.531005] ti-soc-thermal 48002524.bandgap: eocz timed out waiting low [ 16.571075] ti-soc-thermal 48002524.bandgap: eocz timed out waiting low [ 17.610961] ti-soc-thermal 48002524.bandgap: eocz timed out waiting low
and it repeats quite often.
I would say this patch series would cause a regression on the DM3730.
adam
Quoted 35 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I should be able to try it on the dm3730 logicpd-torpedo kit this weekend.
I am going to be a bit delayed testing this. I cannot boot omap2plus using Linux version 5.11.0-rc2.
[ 2.666748] nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xbc [ 2.673309] nand: Micron MT29F4G16ABBDA3W [ 2.677368] nand: 512 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64 [ 2.685119] nand: using OMAP_ECC_BCH8_CODE_HW_DETECTION_SW [ 2.693237] Invalid ECC layout [ 2.696350] omap2-nand 30000000.nand: unable to use BCH library [ 2.702575] omap2-nand: probe of 30000000.nand failed with error -22 [ 2.716094] 8<--- cut here --- [ 2.719207] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000018 [ 2.727600] pgd = (ptrval) ... [ 3.050933] ---[ end trace 59640c7399a80a07 ]--- [ 3.055603] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b [ 3.063323] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to killinit! exitcode=0x0000000b ]---
Once I get past this, I'll try to test the thermal stuff.
adam
Quoted 6 lines
adam
Quoted 4 lines
Regards,
Tony
Hi Tony,
Quoted 16 lines · Tony Lindgren
At least for 4430, trying to use the single conversion mode eventually hangs the thermal sensor. This can be quite easily seen with errors:
thermal
thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone (-5)Also, trying to read the temperature shows a stuck value with:
$ while true; do cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/temp; doneWhere the temperature is not rising at all with the busy loop.
Additionally, the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit is not rising on 4430 in single conversion mode while it works fine in continuous conversion mode. It is also possible that the hung temperature sensor can affect the thermal shutdown alert too.
Quoted 6 lines
Let's fix the issue by adding
TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLYflag and use it for 4430.Note that we also need to add udelay to for the EOCZ (end of conversion) bit polling as otherwise we have it time out too early on 4430. We'll be changing the loop to use iopoll in the following clean-up patch.
I don't yet have my setup in working condition, so I can not test these.
Quoted 18 lines
Cc Adam Ford <[email protected]>Cc Carl Philipp Klemm <[email protected]>Cc Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>Cc Merlijn Wajer <[email protected]>Cc Pavel Machek <[email protected]>Cc Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>Cc Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>--- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c | 3 ++- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 9 +++++++-- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = { · line 62
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2
-1@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = {const struct ti_bandgap_data omap4430_data = { .features =TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_MODE_CONFIG |TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CLK_CTRL | -TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH , +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH | +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY ,
Can we add a comment with the observations?
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +0
-0.fclock_name = "bandgap_fclk", .div_ck_name = "bandgap_fclk", .conv_table = omap4430_adc_to_temp,drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +1
-0@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/err.h>
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) · line 613
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +4
-2@@ -605,8 +606,10 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; -/* Select single conversion mode */ -if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG )) +/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ +if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY )) +RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,1 ); +else if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG ))RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,0 );
Would not be better to:
if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, MODE_CONFIG)) {
if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CONT_MODE_ONLY))
RMW_BITS(bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask, 1);
else
RMW_BITS(bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask, 0);
}One can only switch to cont/single mode if the mode config is possible.
Quoted 38 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +2
-0/* Start of Conversion = 1 */ @@ -619,6 +622,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask)break ; +udelay (1 ); }/* Start of Conversion = 0 */ @@ -630,6 +634,7 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)if (!(ti_bandgap_readl (bgp, tsr->temp_sensor_ctrl) & tsr->bgap_eocz_mask))break ; +udelay (1 ); }return 0 ;drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h +2
-0@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {* has Errata 814 * TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE - used when the sensor readings are too * inaccurate. +* TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY - used when single mode hangs the sensor * TI_BANDGAP_HAS(b, f) - macro to check if a bandgap device is capable of a * specific feature (above) or not. Return non-zero, if yes. */ @@ -295,6 +296,7 @@ struct ti_temp_sensor {#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_HISTORY_BUFFER BIT(9)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ERRATA_814 BIT(10)#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_UNRELIABLE BIT(11) +#define TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY BIT(12)#define TI_BANDGAP_HAS (b, f) \ ((b)->conf->features & TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_ ## f)
Signature · 1 line
Péter
Quoted 10 lines · Péter Ujfalusi
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = { · line 62
Quoted 7 lines · Tony Lindgren
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/omap4-thermal-data.c +2
-1@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ omap4430_adc_to_temp[OMAP4430_ADC_END_VALUE - OMAP4430_ADC_START_VALUE + 1] = {const struct ti_bandgap_data omap4430_data = { .features =TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_MODE_CONFIG |TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CLK_CTRL | -TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH , +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_POWER_SWITCH | +TI_BANDGAP_FEATURE_CONT_MODE_ONLY ,Can we add a comment with the observations?
Sure, and I also noticed that the timeout triggers also on dra7 too. I need to recheck what all are affected.. At least we now see warnings on the SoCs affected.
Quoted 13 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id) · line 613
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c +4
-2@@ -605,8 +606,10 @@ ti_bandgap_force_single_read(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)u32 counter =1000 ;struct temp_sensor_registers *tsr; -/* Select single conversion mode */ -if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG )) +/* Select continuous or single conversion mode */ +if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,CONT_MODE_ONLY )) +RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,1 ); +else if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS (bgp,MODE_CONFIG ))RMW_BITS (bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask,0 );Would not be better to:
Quoted 8 lines
if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, MODE_CONFIG)) { if (TI_BANDGAP_HAS(bgp, CONT_MODE_ONLY)) RMW_BITS(bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask, 1); else RMW_BITS(bgp, id, bgap_mode_ctrl, mode_ctrl_mask, 0); }One can only switch to cont/single mode if the mode config is possible.
Yup makes sense thanks for spotting that.
Regards,
Tony