Skip to contentSkip to conversation

BUG: IPv4 conntrack reassembles forwarded packets

PATCH Applied Christian Perle 4 participants 8 messages Jan 5, 2021 – Jan 7, 2021

Subsystems (5)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello,

During testing several tunnel scenarios, I noticed a problematic behaviour of IPV4 conntrack.

BUG: IPv4 conntrack reassembles forwarded packets
=================================================

Conntrack needs to reassemble fragments in order to have complete packets for rule matching. However the IPv4 stack should not change forwarded packets if not explicitely told to do so. Unwanted reassembly can even lead to packet loss.

Consider the following setup:

            +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
            |Router A|-------|Wanrouter|-------|Router B|
            |        |.IPIP..|         |..IPIP.|        |
            +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
           /                  mtu 1400                   \
          /                                               \
+--------+                                                 +--------+
|Client A|                                                 |Client B|
|        |                                                 |        |
+--------+                                                 +--------+

Router A and Router B use IPIP tunnel interfaces to tunnel traffic between Client A and Client B over WAN. Wanrouter has MTU 1400 set on its interfaces.

Detailed setup for Router A
---------------------------
Interfaces:
eth0: 10.2.2.1/24
eth1: 192.168.10.1/24
ipip0: No IP address, local 10.2.2.1 remote 10.4.4.1 Routes:
192.168.20.0/24 dev ipip0 (192.168.20.0/24 is subnet of Client B)
10.4.4.1 via 10.2.2.254 (Router B via Wanrouter)
No iptables rules at all.

Detailed setup for Router B
---------------------------
Interfaces:
eth0: 10.4.4.1/24
eth1: 192.168.20.1/24
ipip0: No IP address, local 10.4.4.1 remote 10.2.2.1 Routes:
192.168.10.0/24 dev ipip0 (192.168.10.0/24 is subnet of Client A)
10.2.2.1 via 10.4.4.254 (Router A via Wanrouter)
No iptables rules at all.

Path MTU discovery
------------------
Running tracepath from Client A to Client B shows PMTU discovery is working as expected:

clienta:~# tracepath 192.168.20.2
 1?: [LOCALHOST]                      pmtu 1500
 1:  192.168.10.1                                          0.867ms
 1:  192.168.10.1                                          0.302ms
 2:  192.168.10.1                                          0.312ms pmtu 1480
 2:  no reply
 3:  192.168.10.1                                          0.510ms pmtu 1380
 3:  192.168.20.2                                          2.320ms reached
     Resume: pmtu 1380 hops 3 back 3

Router A has learned PMTU (1400) to Router B from Wanrouter. Client A has learned PMTU (1400 - IPIP overhead = 1380) to Client B from Router A.

Send large UDP packet
---------------------
Now we send a 1400 bytes UDP packet from Client A to Client B:

clienta:~# head -c1400 /dev/zero | tr "\000" "a" | nc -u 192.168.20.2 5000

The IPv4 stack on Client A already knows the PMTU to Client B, so the UDP packet is sent as two fragments (1380 + 20). Router A forwards the fragments between eth1 and ipip0. The fragments fit into the tunnel and reach their destination.

Adding conntrack iptables rule ==> packet loss
----------------------------------------------
Now on Router A the following iptables rule is added:

routera:~# iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m state \
  --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

When sending the large UDP packet again, Router A now reassembles the fragments before routing the packet over ipip0. The resulting IPIP packet is too big (1400) for the tunnel PMTU (1380) to Router B, it is dropped on Router A before sending.

Client A cannot do anything to fix this, because it already respects the PMTU (1380) to Client B and sends fragments fitting into it.

The problem also happens when using IPSec tunnels with XFRM interfaces (this is the actual use case, the setup above just uses IPIP for simplicity).

IPv6 does it right
------------------
When testing a similar setup with IPv6 and ip6tnl interfaces, the conntrack ip6tables rule does not affect the forwarded UDP fragments. Though reassembly takes place for conntrack, the reassembled packet is not forwarded.

So the solution would be making IPv4 behaving like IPv6, using reassembly for conntrack reasons *only* and not forwarding the reassembly result but the original fragments.

Regards,
Christian Perle

Signature · 16 lines
Christian Perle
Senior Berater / Senior Consultant
Netzwerk- und Client-Sicherheit / Network & Client Security
Öffentliche Auftraggeber / Public Authorities
secunet Security Networks AG

Tel.: +49 201 54 54-3533, Fax: +49 201 54 54-1323
E-Mail: [email protected]
Ammonstraße 74, 01067 Dresden, Deutschland
www.secunet.com

secunet Security Networks AG
Sitz: Kurfürstenstraße 58, 45138 Essen, Deutschland
Amtsgericht Essen HRB 13615
Vorstand: Axel Deininger (Vors.), Torsten Henn, Dr. Kai Martius, Thomas Pleines
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Ralf Wintergerst
maintainer
#1 lore raw

cover net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole

Christian Perle reported a PMTU blackhole due to unexpected interaction between the ip defragmentation that comes with connection tracking and ip tunnels.

Unfortunately setting 'nopmtudisc' on the tunnel breaks the test scenario even without netfilter.

Christinas setup looks like this:

     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
     |Router A|-------|Wanrouter|-------|Router B|
     |        |.IPIP..|         |..IPIP.|        |
     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
          /             mtu 1400           \
         /                                  \
 +--------+                                  +--------+
 |Client A|                                  |Client B|
 +--------+                                  +--------+

MTU is 1500 everywhere, except on Router A to Wanrouter and Wanrouter to Router B.

Router A and Router B use IPIP tunnel interfaces to tunnel traffic between Client A and Client B over WAN.

Client A sends a 1400 byte UDP datagram to Client B. This packet gets encapsulated in the IPIP tunnel.

This works, packet is received on client B.

When conntrack (or anything else that forces ip defragmentation) is enabled on Router A, the packet gets dropped on Router A after encapsulation because they exceed the link MTU.

Setting the 'nopmtudisc' flag on the IPIP tunnel makes things worse, no packets pass even in the no-netfilter scenario.

Patch one is a reproducer script for selftest infra.

Patch two is a fix for 'nopmtudisc' behaviour so ip_tunnel will send an icmp error to Client A. This allows 'nopmtudisc' tunnel to forward the UDP datagrams.

Patch three enables ip refragmentation for all reassembled packets, just like ipv6.

maintainer
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/3 selftests: netfilter: add selftest for ipip pmtu discovery with enabled connection tracking

Convert Christians bug description into a reproducer.

---
 tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/Makefile    |   3 +-
 .../selftests/netfilter/ipip-conntrack-mtu.sh | 206 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipip-conntrack-mtu.sh
tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/Makefile +2 -1
index a374e10ef506..3006a8e5b41a 100644
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@
 TEST_PROGS := nft_trans_stress.sh nft_nat.sh bridge_brouter.sh \
 	conntrack_icmp_related.sh nft_flowtable.sh ipvs.sh \
 	nft_concat_range.sh nft_conntrack_helper.sh \
-	nft_queue.sh nft_meta.sh
+	nft_queue.sh nft_meta.sh \
+	ipip-conntrack-mtu.sh
 
 LDLIBS = -lmnl
 TEST_GEN_FILES =  nf-queue
tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipip-conntrack-mtu.sh new file +206 -0

206 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
maintainer
#3 lore raw

PATCH 2/3 net: fix pmtu check in nopmtudisc mode

In reply to Florian Westphal

For some reason ip_tunnel insist on setting the DF bit anyway when the inner header has the DF bit set, EVEN if the tunnel was configured with 'nopmtudisc'.

This means that the script added in the previous commit cannot be made to work by adding the 'nopmtudisc' flag to the ip tunnel configuration. Doing so breaks connectivity even for the without-conntrack/netfilter scenario.

When nopmtudisc is set, the tunnel will skip the mtu check, so no icmp error is sent to client. Then, because inner header has DF set, the outer header gets added with DF bit set as well.

IP stack then sends an error to itself because the packet exceeds the device MTU.

Fixes 23a3647bc4f93 ("ip_tunnels: Use skb-len to PMTU check.")
Cc Stefano Brivio <[email protected]>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c +5 -6
index ee65c9225178..64594aa755f0 100644
@@ -759,8 +759,11 @@ void ip_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 		goto tx_error;
 	}
 
-	if (tnl_update_pmtu(dev, skb, rt, tnl_params->frag_off, inner_iph,
-			    0, 0, false)) {
+	df = tnl_params->frag_off;
+	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && !tunnel->ignore_df)
+		df |= (inner_iph->frag_off & htons(IP_DF));
+
+	if (tnl_update_pmtu(dev, skb, rt, df, inner_iph, 0, 0, false)) {
 		ip_rt_put(rt);
 		goto tx_error;
 	}
@@ -788,10 +791,6 @@ void ip_tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
 			ttl = ip4_dst_hoplimit(&rt->dst);
 	}
 
-	df = tnl_params->frag_off;
-	if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && !tunnel->ignore_df)
-		df |= (inner_iph->frag_off&htons(IP_DF));
-
 	max_headroom = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev) + sizeof(struct iphdr)
 			+ rt->dst.header_len + ip_encap_hlen(&tunnel->encap);
 	if (max_headroom > dev->needed_headroom)
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
maintainer
#4 lore raw

PATCH 3/3 net: ip: always refragment ip defragmented packets

In reply to Florian Westphal

Conntrack reassembly records the largest fragment size seen in IPCB. However, when this gets forwarded/transmitted, fragmentation will only be forced if one of the fragmented packets had the DF bit set.

In that case, a flag in IPCB will force fragmentation even if the MTU is large enough.

This should work fine, but this breaks with ip tunnels. Consider client that sends a UDP datagram of size X to another host.

The client fragments the datagram, so two packets, of size y and z, are sent. DF bit is not set on any of these packets.

Middlebox netfilter reassembles those packets back to single size-X packet, before routing decision.

packet-size-vs-mtu checks in ip_forward are irrelevant, because DF bit isn't set. At output time, ip refragmentation is skipped as well because x is still smaller than the mtu of the output device.

If ttransmit device is an ip tunnel, the packet size increases to x+overhead.

Also, tunnel might be configured to force DF bit on outer header.

In this case, packet will be dropped (exceeds MTU) and an ICMP error is generated back to sender.

But sender already respects the announced MTU, all the packets that it sent did fit the announced mtu.

Force refragmentation as per original sizes unconditionally so ip tunnel will encapsulate the fragments instead.

The only other solution I see is to place ip refragmentation in the ip_tunnel code to handle this case.

Fixes d6b915e29f4ad ("ip_fragment: don't forward defragmented DF packet")
---
 net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
net/ipv4/ip_output.c +1 -1
index 89fff5f59eea..2ed0b01f72f0 100644
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int __ip_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
 	if (skb_is_gso(skb))
 		return ip_finish_output_gso(net, sk, skb, mtu);
 
-	if (skb->len > mtu || (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FRAG_PMTU))
+	if (skb->len > mtu || IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size)
 		return ip_fragment(net, sk, skb, mtu, ip_finish_output2);
 
 	return ip_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: ip: always refragment ip defragmented packets

Hello Florian,

Quoted 2 lines · Florian Westphal

Force refragmentation as per original sizes unconditionally so ip tunnel will encapsulate the fragments instead.

[...]

Quoted 15 lines
net/ipv4/ip_output.c +1 -1
index 89fff5f59eea..2ed0b01f72f0 100644
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int __ip_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
 	if (skb_is_gso(skb))
 		return ip_finish_output_gso(net, sk, skb, mtu);
 
-	if (skb->len > mtu || (IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FRAG_PMTU))
+	if (skb->len > mtu || IPCB(skb)->frag_max_size)
 		return ip_fragment(net, sk, skb, mtu, ip_finish_output2);
 
 	return ip_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
Signature · 1 line
2.26.2

Did some tests yesterday and I can confirm that this patch fixes the problem for both IPIP tunnel and XFRM tunnel interfaces.

Thanks for the fix!
Christian Perle

Signature · 16 lines
Christian Perle
Senior Berater / Senior Consultant
Netzwerk- und Client-Sicherheit / Network & Client Security
Öffentliche Auftraggeber / Public Authorities
secunet Security Networks AG

Tel.: +49 201 54 54-3533, Fax: +49 201 54 54-1323
E-Mail: [email protected]
Ammonstraße 74, 01067 Dresden, Deutschland
www.secunet.com

secunet Security Networks AG
Sitz: Kurfürstenstraße 58, 45138 Essen, Deutschland
Amtsgericht Essen HRB 13615
Vorstand: Axel Deininger (Vors.), Torsten Henn, Dr. Kai Martius, Thomas Pleines
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Ralf Wintergerst
maintainer Acked-by on the v1 series
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole

In reply to Florian Westphal
Quoted 36 lines · Florian Westphal

Christian Perle reported a PMTU blackhole due to unexpected interaction between the ip defragmentation that comes with connection tracking and ip tunnels.

Unfortunately setting 'nopmtudisc' on the tunnel breaks the test scenario even without netfilter.

Christinas setup looks like this:

     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
     |Router A|-------|Wanrouter|-------|Router B|
     |        |.IPIP..|         |..IPIP.|        |
     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
          /             mtu 1400           \
         /                                  \
 +--------+                                  +--------+
 |Client A|                                  |Client B|
 +--------+                                  +--------+

MTU is 1500 everywhere, except on Router A to Wanrouter and Wanrouter to Router B.

Router A and Router B use IPIP tunnel interfaces to tunnel traffic between Client A and Client B over WAN.

Client A sends a 1400 byte UDP datagram to Client B. This packet gets encapsulated in the IPIP tunnel.

This works, packet is received on client B.

When conntrack (or anything else that forces ip defragmentation) is enabled on Router A, the packet gets dropped on Router A after encapsulation because they exceed the link MTU.

Setting the 'nopmtudisc' flag on the IPIP tunnel makes things worse, no packets pass even in the no-netfilter scenario.

Quoted 8 lines

Patch one is a reproducer script for selftest infra.

Patch two is a fix for 'nopmtudisc' behaviour so ip_tunnel will send an icmp error to Client A. This allows 'nopmtudisc' tunnel to forward the UDP datagrams.

Patch three enables ip refragmentation for all reassembled packets, just like ipv6.

Thanks.

maintainer Applied
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole

Quoted 39 lines · On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 23:14:03 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
Quoted 38 lines · Florian Westphal

Christian Perle reported a PMTU blackhole due to unexpected interaction between the ip defragmentation that comes with connection tracking and ip tunnels.

Unfortunately setting 'nopmtudisc' on the tunnel breaks the test scenario even without netfilter.

Christinas setup looks like this:

     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
     |Router A|-------|Wanrouter|-------|Router B|
     |        |.IPIP..|         |..IPIP.|        |
     +--------+       +---------+       +--------+
          /             mtu 1400           \
         /                                  \
 +--------+                                  +--------+
 |Client A|                                  |Client B|
 +--------+                                  +--------+

MTU is 1500 everywhere, except on Router A to Wanrouter and Wanrouter to Router B.

Router A and Router B use IPIP tunnel interfaces to tunnel traffic between Client A and Client B over WAN.

Client A sends a 1400 byte UDP datagram to Client B. This packet gets encapsulated in the IPIP tunnel.

This works, packet is received on client B.

When conntrack (or anything else that forces ip defragmentation) is enabled on Router A, the packet gets dropped on Router A after encapsulation because they exceed the link MTU.

Setting the 'nopmtudisc' flag on the IPIP tunnel makes things worse, no packets pass even in the no-netfilter scenario.

Patch one is a reproducer script for selftest infra.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines

Patch two is a fix for 'nopmtudisc' behaviour so ip_tunnel will send an icmp error to Client A. This allows 'nopmtudisc' tunnel to forward the UDP datagrams.

Patch three enables ip refragmentation for all reassembled packets, just like ipv6.

Applied, thanks!