Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset

PATCH Applied Lijun Pan 2 participants 2 messages Jan 29, 2021 – Feb 2, 2021

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Lijun Pan

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset

Returning -EBUSY in ibmvnic_remove() does not actually hold the removal procedure since driver core doesn't care for the return value (see __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c calling dev->bus->remove()) though vio_bus_remove
(in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c) records the return value and passes it on. [1]

During the device removal precedure, checking for resetting bit is dropped so that we can continue executing all the cleanup calls in the rest of the remove function. Otherwise, it can cause latent memory leaks and kernel crashes.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/[email protected]/T/#m48f5befd96bc9842ece2a3ad14f4c27747206a53

Fixes 7d7195a026ba ("ibmvnic: Do not process device remove during device reset")

---
v2: drop v1's deletion of REMOVING check in __ibmvnic_reset.

 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c +0 -5
index 9778c83150f1..e19fa8bc763c 100644
@@ -5438,11 +5438,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_remove(struct vio_dev *dev)
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
-	if (test_bit(0, &adapter->resetting)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
 	adapter->state = VNIC_REMOVING;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->state_lock, flags);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.23.0
#1 lore raw
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

Quoted 8 lines · On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:34:01 -0600 you wrote:

Returning -EBUSY in ibmvnic_remove() does not actually hold the removal procedure since driver core doesn't care for the return value (see __device_release_driver() in drivers/base/dd.c calling dev->bus->remove()) though vio_bus_remove
(in arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c) records the return value and passes it on. [1]

[...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2] ibmvnic: device remove has higher precedence over reset

    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/5e9eff5dfa46

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html