spi: rockchip: avoid objtool warning
Subsystems (2)
PATCH v2 1/1 spi: rockchip: avoid objtool warning
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Building this file with clang leads to a an unreachable code path causing a warning from objtool:
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.o: warning: objtool: rockchip_spi_transfer_one()+0x2e0: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
Change the unreachable() into an error return that can be handled if it ever happens, rather than silently crashing the kernel.
---
v2: use 'return' instead of 'BUG()'
--- drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c +10 -3
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_prepare_dma(struct rockchip_spi *rs,return 1 ; } -static void rockchip_spi_config (struct rockchip_spi *rs, +static int rockchip_spi_config (struct rockchip_spi *rs,struct spi_device *spi,struct spi_transfer *xfer,bool use_dma,bool slave_mode) {
@@ -521,7 +521,9 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,* ctlr->bits_per_word_mask, so this shouldn't * happen */ -unreachable (); +dev_err (rs->dev,"unknown bits per word: %d\n" , + xfer->bits_per_word); +return -EINVAL ; }if (use_dma) {
@@ -554,6 +556,8 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,*/ writel_relaxed (2 *DIV_ROUND_UP (rs->freq,2 * xfer->speed_hz), rs->regs +ROCKCHIP_SPI_BAUDR ); + +return 0 ; }static size_t rockchip_spi_max_transfer_size (struct spi_device *spi)
@@ -577,6 +581,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one( struct spi_transfer *xfer) {struct rockchip_spi *rs =spi_controller_get_devdata (ctlr); +int ret;bool use_dma; WARN_ON(readl_relaxed(rs->regs + ROCKCHIP_SPI_SSIENR) &&
@@ -596,7 +601,9 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one( use_dma = ctlr->can_dma ? ctlr->can_dma (ctlr, spi, xfer) : false; -rockchip_spi_config (rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave); + ret =rockchip_spi_config (rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave); +if (ret) +return ret;if (use_dma)return rockchip_spi_prepare_dma (rs, ctlr, xfer);
Signature · 7 lines
2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Quoted 5 lines · Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Building this file with clang leads to a an unreachable code path causing a warning from objtool:
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.o: warning: objtool: rockchip_spi_transfer_one()+0x2e0: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frameChange the
unreachable()into an error return that can be handled if it ever happens, rather than silently crashing the kernel.Fixes 65498c6ae241 ("spi: rockchip: support 4bit words")Signed-off-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Signature · 8 lines
Regards, Pratyush Yadav Texas Instruments Inc. _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Quoted 6 lines · Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Building this file with clang leads to a an unreachable code path causing a warning from objtool:
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.o: warning: objtool: rockchip_spi_transfer_one()+0x2e0: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frameChange the
unreachable()into an error return that can be handled if it ever happens, rather than silently crashing the kernel.Fixes 65498c6ae241 ("spi: rockchip: support 4bit words")Signed-off-by Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Thanks for the v2!
Quoted 61 lines
---
v2: use 'return' instead of 'BUG()'--- drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c +10
-4@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_prepare_dma(struct rockchip_spi *rs,return 1 ; } -static void rockchip_spi_config (struct rockchip_spi *rs, +static int rockchip_spi_config (struct rockchip_spi *rs,struct spi_device *spi,struct spi_transfer *xfer,bool use_dma,bool slave_mode) {@@ -521,7 +521,9 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,* ctlr->bits_per_word_mask, so this shouldn't * happen */ -unreachable (); +dev_err (rs->dev,"unknown bits per word: %d\n" , + xfer->bits_per_word); +return -EINVAL ; }if (use_dma) {@@ -554,6 +556,8 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,*/ writel_relaxed (2 *DIV_ROUND_UP (rs->freq,2 * xfer->speed_hz), rs->regs +ROCKCHIP_SPI_BAUDR ); + +return 0 ; }static size_t rockchip_spi_max_transfer_size (struct spi_device *spi)@@ -577,6 +581,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one( struct spi_transfer *xfer) {struct rockchip_spi *rs =spi_controller_get_devdata (ctlr); +int ret;bool use_dma; WARN_ON(readl_relaxed(rs->regs + ROCKCHIP_SPI_SSIENR) &&@@ -596,7 +601,9 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one( use_dma = ctlr->can_dma ? ctlr->can_dma (ctlr, spi, xfer) : false; -rockchip_spi_config (rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave); + ret =rockchip_spi_config (rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave); +if (ret) +return ret;if (use_dma)return rockchip_spi_prepare_dma (rs, ctlr, xfer); --2.29.2
Signature · 7 lines
Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list [email protected] http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Building this file with clang leads to a an unreachable code path causing a warning from objtool:
drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.o: warning: objtool: rockchip_spi_transfer_one()+0x2e0: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frameChange the
unreachable()into an error return that can be handled if it ever happens, rather than silently crashing the kernel.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: rockchip: avoid objtool warning
commit: d86e880f7a7c5b64a650146a1353f98750863f21
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip