5.4.106-rc1 review
Subsystems (3)
Quoted 12 lines · On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 19:35, <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release. There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:26 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.106-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.4.106-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.4.y
git commit: 26ba2df2641dff3b9583fc4d1fbdc668bd346f00
git describe: v5.4.105-169-g26ba2df2641d
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.4.y/build/v5.4.105-169-g26ba2df2641d
No regressions (compared to build v5.4.105)
No fixes (compared to build v5.4.105)
Ran 50881 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- nxp-ls2088-64k_page_size
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
- x86_64
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-zram
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* perf
* v4l2-compliance
* fwts
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kvm-unit-tests
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* network-basic-tests
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* ltp-cap_bounds-test[
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* rcutorture
* ssuite
Signature · 2 lines
Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:53:52PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release. There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:26 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 157 pass: 157 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 431 pass: 431 fail: 0
Guenter
Quoted 11 lines · On 2021/3/15 21:53, [email protected] wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release. There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:26 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.106-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.4.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Tested on arm64 for 5.4.106-rc1,
Kernel repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Branch: linux-5.4.y
Version: 5.4.106-rc1
Commit: 26ba2df2641dff3b9583fc4d1fbdc668bd346f00
Compiler: gcc version 7.3.0 (GCC)
arm64:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Testcase Result Summary:total_num: 4781succeed_num: 4781failed_num: 0timeout_num: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 7 lines · On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:53:52PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.106 release. There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Compiled and booted with no regressions on x86_64.
thanks,
Ross