linux-next: manual merge of the opp tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
between commit:
08b1cf474b7f ("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error")
from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
857219ae4043 ("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API")
from the opp tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Signature · 79 lines
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
index e349d01422c5,e61317220b9a..000000000000
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c
@@@ -750,12 -753,11 +750,11 @@@ static int venc_power_v4(struct device
return ret;
}
-static int vcodec_domains_get(struct device *dev)
+static int vcodec_domains_get(struct venus_core *core)
{
int ret;
- struct opp_table *opp_table;
struct device **opp_virt_dev;
- struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct device *dev = core->dev;
const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
struct device *pd;
unsigned int i;
@@@ -826,13 -825,11 +821,11 @@@ skip_pmdomains
if (core->opp_dl_venus)
device_link_del(core->opp_dl_venus);
-
- dev_pm_opp_detach_genpd(core->opp_table);
}
-static int core_get_v4(struct device *dev)
+static int core_get_v4(struct venus_core *core)
{
- struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct device *dev = core->dev;
const struct venus_resources *res = core->res;
int ret;
@@@ -871,35 -867,24 +863,24 @@@
}
}
- ret = vcodec_domains_get(dev);
+ ret = vcodec_domains_get(core);
- if (ret) {
- if (core->has_opp_table)
- dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
- dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(core->opp_table);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
return 0;
}
-static void core_put_v4(struct device *dev)
+static void core_put_v4(struct venus_core *core)
{
- struct device *dev = core->dev;
-
if (legacy_binding)
return;
- vcodec_domains_put(dev);
+ vcodec_domains_put(core);
-
- if (core->has_opp_table)
- dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
- dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(core->opp_table);
-
}
-static int core_power_v4(struct device *dev, int on)
+static int core_power_v4(struct venus_core *core, int on)
{
- struct venus_core *core = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct device *dev = core->dev;
struct device *pmctrl = core->pmdomains[0];
int ret = 0;Thanks Stephen!
Quoted 14 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.cbetween commit:
08b1cf474b7f("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error")from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
857219ae4043("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API")
Quoted 9 lines
from the opp tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
I don't know what is the best solution here.
Viresh, Can I take the OPP API changes through media-tree to avoid conflicts?
Signature · 2 lines
regards, Stan
Quoted 27 lines · Stanimir Varbanov
Thanks Stephen!
Quoted 14 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.cbetween commit:
08b1cf474b7f("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error")from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
857219ae4043("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API")Quoted 9 lines
from the opp tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Quoted 4 lines
I don't know what is the best solution here.
Viresh, Can I take the OPP API changes through media-tree to avoid conflicts?
I already suggested something similar earlier, and I was expecting Thierry to respond to that.. Not sure who should pick those patches.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210318103250.shjyd66pxw2g2nsd@vireshk-i7/
Can you please respond to this series then ?
Signature · 1 line
viresh
Hi Viresh,
Quoted 30 lines · Viresh Kumar
Quoted 29 lines · Stanimir Varbanov
Thanks Stephen!
Quoted 14 lines · Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the opp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.cbetween commit:
08b1cf474b7f("media: venus: core, venc, vdec: Fix probe dependency error")from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
857219ae4043("media: venus: Convert to use resource-managed OPP API")Quoted 9 lines
from the opp tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
I don't know what is the best solution here.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Viresh, Can I take the OPP API changes through media-tree to avoid conflicts?
I already suggested something similar earlier, and I was expecting Thierry to respond to that.. Not sure who should pick those patches.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210318103250.shjyd66pxw2g2nsd@vireshk-i7/
I guess you meant this thread.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Quoted 3 lines
Can you please respond to this series then ?
Done.
Signature · 2 lines
regards, Stan
Quoted 3 lines · Stanimir Varbanov
I guess you meant this thread.
I actually thought some other stuff is having the merge issues (as I was expecting something to happen there) :)
Anyway, you did the right thing. Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
viresh