Skip to contentSkip to conversation

CPU-Idle latency selftest framework

RFC Superseded Pratik Rajesh Sampat 3 participants 7 messages Apr 12, 2021 – Apr 25, 2021

Subsystems (3)

v4 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v4 cover CPU-Idle latency selftest framework

Changelog v3-->v4
Based on review comments by Doug Smythies,
1. Parsing the thread_siblings_list for CPU topology information to correctly identify the cores the test should run on in default(quick) mode.
2. The source CPU to source CPU interaction in the IPI test will always result in a lower latency and cause a bias in the average, hence avoid adding the latency to be averaged for same cpu IPIs. The latency will still be displayed in the detailed logs.

RFC v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/4/4/31
---
A kernel module + userspace driver to estimate the wakeup latency caused by going into stop states. The motivation behind this program is to find significant deviations behind advertised latency and residency values.

The patchset measures latencies for two kinds of events. IPIs and Timers As this is a software-only mechanism, there will additional latencies of the kernel-firmware-hardware interactions. To account for that, the program also measures a baseline latency on a 100 percent loaded CPU and the latencies achieved must be in view relative to that.

To achieve this, we introduce a kernel module and expose its control knobs through the debugfs interface that the selftests can engage with.

The kernel module provides the following interfaces within /sys/kernel/debug/latency_test/ for,

IPI test:
ipi_cpu_dest = Destination CPU for the IPI
ipi_cpu_src = Origin of the IPI
ipi_latency_ns = Measured latency time in ns
Timeout test:
timeout_cpu_src = CPU on which the timer to be queued timeout_expected_ns = Timer duration
timeout_diff_ns = Difference of actual duration vs expected timer

Sample output on a POWER9 system is as follows:
# --IPI Latency Test---
# Baseline Average IPI latency(ns): 3114
# Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State0: 3265 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State1: 3507 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State2: 3739 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State3: 3807 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State4: 17070 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State5: 1038174 # Observed Average IPI latency(ns) - State6: 1068784 #
# --Timeout Latency Test--
# Baseline Average timeout diff(ns): 1420
# Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State0: 1640 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State1: 1764 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State2: 1715 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State3: 1845 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State4: 16581 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State5: 939977 # Observed Average timeout diff(ns) - State6: 1073024

Things to keep in mind:

1. This kernel module + bash driver does not guarantee idleness on a core when the IPI and the Timer is armed. It only invokes sleep and hopes that the core is idle once the IPI/Timer is invoked onto it. Hence this program must be run on a completely idle system for best results

2. Even on a completely idle system, there maybe book-keeping tasks or jitter tasks that can run on the core we want idle. This can create outliers in the latency measurement. Thankfully, these outliers should be large enough to easily weed them out.

3. A userspace only selftest variant was also sent out as RFC based on suggestions over the previous patchset to simply the kernel complexeity. However, a userspace only approach had more noise in the latency measurement due to userspace-kernel interactions which led to run to run variance and a lesser accurate test. Another downside of the nature of a userspace program is that it takes orders of magnitude longer to complete a full system test compared to the kernel framework.
RFC patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/2/356

4. For Intel Systems, the Timer based latencies don't exactly give out the measure of idle latencies. This is because of a hardware optimization mechanism that pre-arms a CPU when a timer is set to wakeup. That doesn't make this metric useless for Intel systems, it just means that is measuring IPI/Timer responding latency rather than idle wakeup latencies.
(Source: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/2/610)
For solution to this problem, a hardware based latency analyzer is devised by Artem Bityutskiy from Intel.
https://youtu.be/Opk92aQyvt0?t=8266
https://intel.github.io/wult/

Pratik Rajesh Sampat (2):
cpuidle: Extract IPI based and timer based wakeup latency from idle
states
selftest/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency measurement

 drivers/cpuidle/Makefile                   |   1 +
 drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c     | 157 ++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug                          |  10 +
 tools/testing/selftests/Makefile           |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/Makefile   |   6 +
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/cpuidle.sh | 402 +++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/settings   |   2 +
 7 files changed, 579 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/Makefile
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/cpuidle.sh
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/settings
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
#1 lore raw

RFC v4 1/2 cpuidle: Extract IPI based and timer based wakeup latency from idle states

Introduce a mechanism to fire directed IPIs from a specified source CPU to a specified target CPU and measure the difference in time incurred on wakeup.

Also, introduce a mechanism to queue a HR timer on a specified CPU and subsequently measure the time taken to wakeup the CPU.

Finally define a simple debugfs interface to control the knobs to fire the IPI and Timer events on specified CPU and view their incurred idle wakeup latencies.

---
 drivers/cpuidle/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug                      |  10 ++
 3 files changed, 168 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c
drivers/cpuidle/Makefile +1 -0
index 26bbc5e74123..3b4ee06a9164 100644
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_NEEDS_CPU_IDLE_COUPLED) += coupled.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DT_IDLE_STATES)		  += dt_idle_states.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX)	  += poll_state.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_HALTPOLL_CPUIDLE)		  += cpuidle-haltpoll.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IDLE_LATENCY_SELFTEST)	  += test-cpuidle_latency.o
 
 ##################################################################################
 # ARM SoC drivers
drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c new file +157 -0

157 lines not on this page · raw message

lib/Kconfig.debug +10 -0
index 2779c29d9981..60fa46a99a4f 100644
@@ -1513,6 +1513,16 @@ config DEBUG_KOBJECT
 	  If you say Y here, some extra kobject debugging messages will be sent
 	  to the syslog.
 
+config IDLE_LATENCY_SELFTEST
+	tristate "Cpuidle latency selftests"
+	depends on CPU_IDLE
+	help
+	  This option provides a kernel module that runs tests using the IPI and
+	  timers to measure latency.
+
+	  Say M if you want these self tests to build as a module.
+	  Say N if you are unsure.
+
 config DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
 	bool "kobject release debugging"
 	depends on DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
#2 lore raw

Re: [RFC v4 1/2] cpuidle: Extract IPI based and timer based wakeup latency from idle states

[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

Hi Pratik,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on kselftest/next]
[also build test WARNING on pm/linux-next linus/master daniel.lezcano/clockevents/next v5.12-rc7 next-20210412] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pratik-Rajesh-Sampat/CPU-Idle-latency-selftest-framework/20210412-154405
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git next
config: mips-randconfig-r024-20210413 (attached as .config)
compiler: mips64el-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0

reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/9a7bfb10e1fb1a0505295f7c662dc2c26823d589
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Pratik-Rajesh-Sampat/CPU-Idle-latency-selftest-framework/20210412-154405 git checkout 9a7bfb10e1fb1a0505295f7c662dc2c26823d589
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=mips

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c:34:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'run_smp_call_function_test' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

34 | void run_smp_call_function_test(unsigned int cpu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

vim +/run_smp_call_function_test +34 drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.c

    33	
  > 34	void run_smp_call_function_test(unsigned int cpu)
    35	{
    36		ipi_wakeup.src_cpu = smp_processor_id();
    37		ipi_wakeup.dest_cpu = cpu;
    38		ipi_wakeup.time_start = ktime_get();
    39		smp_call_function_single(cpu, measure_latency, &ipi_wakeup, 1);
    40	}
    41	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

Reviewed-by on v4 1/2
#3 lore raw

Re: [RFC v4 1/2] cpuidle: Extract IPI based and timer based wakeup latency from idle states

In reply to Pratik Rajesh Sampat

Hi Pratik,

Quoted 5 lines · Pratik Rajesh Sampat

Introduce a mechanism to fire directed IPIs from a specified source CPU to a specified target CPU and measure the difference in time incurred on wakeup.

Quoted 8 lines

Also, introduce a mechanism to queue a HR timer on a specified CPU and subsequently measure the time taken to wakeup the CPU.

Finally define a simple debugfs interface to control the knobs to fire the IPI and Timer events on specified CPU and view their incurred idle wakeup latencies.

#4 lore raw

RFC v4 2/2 selftest/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency measurement

In reply to Pratik Rajesh Sampat

The cpuidle latency selftest provides support to systematically extract, analyse and present IPI and timer based wakeup latencies for each CPU and each idle state available on the system.

The selftest leverages test-cpuidle_latency module's debugfs interface to interact and extract latency information from the kernel.

The selftest inserts the module if already not inserted, disables all the idle states and enables them one by one testing the following:
1. Keeping source CPU constant, iterate through all the CPUS measuring IPI latency for baseline (CPU is busy with cat /dev/random > /dev/null workload) and then when the CPU is allowed to be at rest
2. Iterating through all the CPUs, sending expected timer durations to be equivalent to the residency of the deepest idle state enabled and extracting the difference in time between the time of wakeup and the expected timer duration

The timer based test produces run to run variance on some intel based systems that sport a mechansim "C-state pre-wake" which can pre-wake a CPU from an idle state when timers are armed. For systems and architectures that don't have this mechansim can leverage timer tests with the -i option.

To run this test specifically:

$ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS="cpuidle" run_tests

There are a few optional arguments too that the script can take
[-h <help>]
[-i <run timer tests>]
[-m <location of the module>]
[-o <location of the output>]
[-v <verbose> (run on all cpus)]
Default Output location in: tools/testing/selftest/cpuidle/cpuidle.log

To run the test without re-compiling:

$ cd tools/testing/selftest/cpuidle/
$ sudo ./cpuidle.sh
---
 tools/testing/selftests/Makefile           |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/Makefile   |   6 +
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/cpuidle.sh | 402 +++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/settings   |   2 +
 4 files changed, 411 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/Makefile
 create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/cpuidle.sh
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/settings
tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +1 -0
index 6c575cf34a71..561eb67a4839 100644
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ TARGETS += cgroup
 TARGETS += clone3
 TARGETS += core
 TARGETS += cpufreq
+TARGETS += cpuidle
 TARGETS += cpu-hotplug
 TARGETS += drivers/dma-buf
 TARGETS += efivarfs
tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/Makefile new file +6 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..72fd5d2e974d
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+all:
+
+TEST_PROGS := cpuidle.sh
+
+include ../lib.mk
tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/cpuidle.sh new file +402 -0

402 lines not on this page · raw message

tools/testing/selftests/cpuidle/settings new file +2 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a26c38a70d77
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+timeout=0
+
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Reviewed-by on v4 2/2
#5 lore raw

Re: [RFC v4 2/2] selftest/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency measurement

Hi Pratik,

Quoted 35 lines · Pratik Rajesh Sampat

The cpuidle latency selftest provides support to systematically extract, analyse and present IPI and timer based wakeup latencies for each CPU and each idle state available on the system.

The selftest leverages test-cpuidle_latency module's debugfs interface to interact and extract latency information from the kernel.

The selftest inserts the module if already not inserted, disables all the idle states and enables them one by one testing the following:
1. Keeping source CPU constant, iterate through all the CPUS measuring IPI latency for baseline (CPU is busy with cat /dev/random > /dev/null workload) and then when the CPU is allowed to be at rest
2. Iterating through all the CPUs, sending expected timer durations to be equivalent to the residency of the deepest idle state enabled and extracting the difference in time between the time of wakeup and the expected timer duration

The timer based test produces run to run variance on some intel based systems that sport a mechansim "C-state pre-wake" which can pre-wake a CPU from an idle state when timers are armed. For systems and architectures that don't have this mechansim can leverage timer tests with the -i option.

To run this test specifically:

$ sudo make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS="cpuidle" run_tests

There are a few optional arguments too that the script can take
[-h <help>]
[-i <run timer tests>]
[-m <location of the module>]
[-o <location of the output>]
[-v <verbose> (run on all cpus)]
Default Output location in: tools/testing/selftest/cpuidle/cpuidle.log

Quoted 5 lines

To run the test without re-compiling:

$ cd tools/testing/selftest/cpuidle/
$ sudo ./cpuidle.sh

...

#6 lore raw
In reply to Pratik Rajesh Sampat

Hi Pratik,

V4 seems fine. Thank you.

Quoted 11 lines · Pratik Rajesh Sampat

Changelog v3-->v4
Based on review comments by Doug Smythies,
1. Parsing the thread_siblings_list for CPU topology information to correctly identify the cores the test should run on in default(quick) mode.
2. The source CPU to source CPU interaction in the IPI test will always result in a lower latency and cause a bias in the average, hence avoid adding the latency to be averaged for same cpu IPIs. The latency will still be displayed in the detailed logs.

Quoted 1 line

RFC v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/4/4/31

Example output for an Intel i5-10600K, HWP active, performance mode. System very idle:

$ sudo ./cpuidle.sh -v -i
Inserting /lib/modules/5.12.0-rc7-prs-v4/kernel/drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.ko
module

--IPI Latency Test---
Baseline Avg IPI latency(ns): 686 Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 0: 468 Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 1: 956 Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 2: 17936 Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 3: 17968

--Timeout Latency Test--
Baseline Avg timeout diff(ns): 445
Observed Avg timeout diff(ns) - State 0: 377
Observed Avg timeout diff(ns) - State 1: 630
Observed Avg timeout diff(ns) - State 2: 322812
Observed Avg timeout diff(ns) - State 3: 306067
Removing /lib/modules/5.12.0-rc7-prs-v4/kernel/drivers/cpuidle/test-cpuidle_latency.ko module
Full Output logged at: cpuidle.log

$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state*/residency
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state0/residency:0
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state1/residency:1
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state2/residency:360
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state3/residency:3102
$ grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state*/latency
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state0/latency:0
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state1/latency:1
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state2/latency:120
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpuidle/state3/latency:1034

... Doug