Skip to contentSkip to conversation

virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate

PATCH In review Halil Pasic 4 participants 9 messages Oct 11, 2021 – Oct 13, 2021

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate

The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not been acknowledged by the driver." This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1 has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.

However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.

In that case, any transitional device relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in legacy format. In particular, this implies that it is in big endian format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which expects little endian in the modern mode.

It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so let's address this here as well.

The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default. See Fixes tags for relevant commits.

For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set. We (ab)use the finalize_features config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.

No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.

Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.

Cc <[email protected]> #v4.11
Fixes 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space")
Fixes fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
Reported-by [email protected]

---

@Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)

---
 drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
drivers/virtio/virtio.c +11 -0
index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
 		driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
+	 * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
+	 * these when needed.
+	 */
+	if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
+			  && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+		dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+		dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
+	}
+
 	if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
 		dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
 	else

base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51

Signature · 6 lines
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
#1 lore raw
Quoted 44 lines · Halil Pasic

The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not been acknowledged by the driver." This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1 has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.

However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.

In that case, any transitional device relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in legacy format. In particular, this implies that it is in big endian format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which expects little endian in the modern mode.

It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so let's address this here as well.

The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default. See Fixes tags for relevant commits.

For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set. We (ab)use the finalize_features config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.

No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.

Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.

Cc <[email protected]> #v4.11
Fixes 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space")
Fixes fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
Reported-by [email protected]
Quoted 5 lines

---

@Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)

No need to shout, still looks good to me :)

Quoted 30 lines
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
drivers/virtio/virtio.c +11 -0
index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
 		driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
+	 * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
+	 * these when needed.
+	 */
+	if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
+			  && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+		dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+		dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
+	}
+
 	if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
 		dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
 	else

base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw
In reply to Halil Pasic
Quoted 36 lines · Halil Pasic

The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not been acknowledged by the driver." This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1 has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.

However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.

In that case, any transitional device relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in legacy format. In particular, this implies that it is in big endian format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which expects little endian in the modern mode.

It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so let's address this here as well.

The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default. See Fixes tags for relevant commits.

For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set. We (ab)use the finalize_features config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.

No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.

Quoted 8 lines

Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.

Cc <[email protected]> #v4.11
Fixes 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space")
Fixes fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
Reported-by [email protected]

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on BE?

Quoted 35 lines

---

@Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)

---
 drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
drivers/virtio/virtio.c +11 -0
index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
 		driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
+	 * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
+	 * these when needed.
+	 */
+	if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
+			  && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+		dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+		dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
+	}
+
 	if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
 		dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
 	else

base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#3 lore raw

Am 13.10.21 um 12:10 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:

Quoted 46 lines · Halil Pasic
Quoted 36 lines

The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not been acknowledged by the driver." This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1 has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.

However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.

In that case, any transitional device relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in legacy format. In particular, this implies that it is in big endian format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which expects little endian in the modern mode.

It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so let's address this here as well.

The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default. See Fixes tags for relevant commits.

For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set. We (ab)use the finalize_features config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.

No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.

Quoted 8 lines

Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.

Cc <[email protected]> #v4.11
Fixes 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space")
Fixes fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
Reported-by [email protected]
Quoted 2 lines

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on BE?

Who is going to do that? Halil? you? Conny?

Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch as we have a regression with 4.14?

Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 33 lines

---

@Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)

---
  drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
drivers/virtio/virtio.c +11 -0
index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
  		driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
  	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
+	 * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
+	 * these when needed.
+	 */
+	if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
+			  && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+		dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+		dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
+	}
+
  	if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
  		dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
  	else
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

#4 lore raw
Quoted 49 lines · Christian Borntraeger

Am 13.10.21 um 12:10 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:

Quoted 46 lines · Halil Pasic
Quoted 44 lines

The virtio specification virtio-v1.1-cs01 states: "Transitional devices MUST detect Legacy drivers by detecting that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 has not been acknowledged by the driver." This is exactly what QEMU as of 6.1 has done relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting that.

However, the specification also says: "... the driver MAY read (but MUST NOT write) the device-specific configuration fields to check that it can support the device ..." before setting FEATURES_OK.

In that case, any transitional device relying solely on VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 for detecting legacy drivers will return data in legacy format. In particular, this implies that it is in big endian format for big endian guests. This naturally confuses the driver which expects little endian in the modern mode.

It is probably a good idea to amend the spec to clarify that VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 can only be relied on after the feature negotiation is complete. Before validate callback existed, config space was only read after FEATURES_OK. However, we already have two regressions, so let's address this here as well.

The regressions affect the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature of virtio-net and the VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE feature of virtio-blk for BE guests when virtio 1.0 is used on both sides. The latter renders virtio-blk unusable with DASD backing, because things simply don't work with the default. See Fixes tags for relevant commits.

For QEMU, we can work around the issue by writing out the feature bits with VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 bit set. We (ab)use the finalize_features config op for this. This isn't enough to address all vhost devices since these do not get the features until FEATURES_OK, however it looks like the affected devices actually never handled the endianness for legacy mode correctly, so at least that's not a regression.

No devices except virtio net and virtio blk seem to be affected.

Long term the right thing to do is to fix the hypervisors.

Cc <[email protected]> #v4.11
Fixes 82e89ea077b9 ("virtio-blk: Add validation for block size in config space")
Fixes fe36cbe0671e ("virtio_net: clear MTU when out of range")
Reported-by [email protected]
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on BE?

Who is going to do that? Halil? you? Conny?

Halil said he'll do it... Right, Halil?

Quoted 2 lines

Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch as we have a regression with 4.14?

Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15 and back. Maybe both?

Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 35 lines

---

@Connie: I made some more commit message changes to accommodate Michael's requests. I just assumed these will work or you as well and kept your r-b. Please shout at me if it needs to be dropped :)

---
  drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 11 +++++++++++
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
drivers/virtio/virtio.c +11 -0
index 0a5b54034d4b..236081afe9a2 100644
@@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ static int virtio_dev_probe(struct device *_d)
  		driver_features_legacy = driver_features;
  	}
+	/*
+	 * Some devices detect legacy solely via F_VERSION_1. Write
+	 * F_VERSION_1 to force LE config space accesses before FEATURES_OK for
+	 * these when needed.
+	 */
+	if (drv->validate && !virtio_legacy_is_little_endian()
+			  && device_features & BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+		dev->features = BIT_ULL(VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+		dev->config->finalize_features(dev);
+	}
+
  	if (device_features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
  		dev->features = driver_features & device_features;
  	else
 

base-commit: 60a9483534ed0d99090a2ee1d4bb0b8179195f51

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#5 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:24:53 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on BE?

Who is going to do that? Halil? you? Conny?

Halil said he'll do it... Right, Halil?

I can do it but not right away. Maybe in a couple of weeks. I have some other bugs to hunt down, before proceeding to this. If somebody else wants to do it, I'm fine with that as well.

Regards,
Halil
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

#6 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Halil Pasic
Quoted 5 lines · On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:24:53 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines

OK this looks good! How about a QEMU patch to make it spec compliant on BE?

Who is going to do that? Halil? you? Conny?

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

Halil said he'll do it... Right, Halil?

I can do it but not right away. Maybe in a couple of weeks. I have some other bugs to hunt down, before proceeding to this. If somebody else wants to do it, I'm fine with that as well.

Regards,
Halil

Couple of weeks is ok I think.

Signature · 1 line
MST
#7 lore raw
In reply to Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 6 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 2 lines · Christian Borntraeger

Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch as we have a regression with 4.14?

Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15 and back. Maybe both?

Probably better queue this one, in case we have some undiscovered problems with the config space access in virtio-net?

#8 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Cornelia Huck
Quoted 6 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoted 2 lines · Christian Borntraeger

Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch as we have a regression with 4.14?

Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15 and back. Maybe both?

Probably better queue this one, in case we have some undiscovered problems with the config space access in virtio-net?

So both then. I think you are right. Pushed out to -next. Will do a pull towards end of the week.

Signature · 1 line
MST