net/ice: save meta on switch filter creation
PATCH 1/2 net/ice: save meta on switch filter creation
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The meta is abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
This patch saved the meta in RTE flow for future use.
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +49 -20
@@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ struct sw_meta {struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; }; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf { +bool added; + +/* Only when added flag is true, the query data is valid */ +struct ice_rule_query_data sw_query_data; + +/* +* The lookup elements and rule info are saved here when filter creation +* succeeds. +*/ +uint16_t lkups_num; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups; +struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; +}; +static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_dist_parser;static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_perm_parser;
@@ -359,7 +374,7 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct ice_pf *pf = &ad->pf;struct ice_hw *hw =ICE_PF_TO_HW (pf);struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0 }; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = ((struct sw_meta *)meta)->list; uint16_t lkups_cnt =
@@ -381,18 +396,24 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, } ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);if (!ret) { - filter_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data ),0 ); -if (!filter_ptr) { + filter_conf_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , +sizeof (struct ice_switch_filter_conf ),0 ); +if (!filter_conf_ptr) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"No memory for ice_switch_filter" ); goto error; } - flow->rule = filter_ptr; -rte_memcpy (filter_ptr, - &rule_added, -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data )); + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = rule_added; + + filter_conf_ptr->lkups = list; + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num = lkups_cnt; + filter_conf_ptr->rule_info = *rule_info; + + filter_conf_ptr->added = true; + + flow->rule = filter_conf_ptr; }else { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -400,7 +421,6 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, goto error; } -rte_free (list);rte_free (meta);return 0 ;
@@ -411,6 +431,18 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } +static inline void +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) +{ +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; + +if (filter_conf_ptr) +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr->lkups); + +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr); +} + static int ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,
@@ -418,20 +450,23 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, {struct ice_hw *hw = &ad->hw;int ret; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr; - filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *) + filter_conf_ptr = (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *) flow->rule; -if (!filter_ptr) { +if (!filter_conf_ptr || !filter_conf_ptr->added) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"no such flow" " create by switch filter" ); + +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow); +return -rte_errno; } - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, filter_ptr); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data);if (ret) { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -439,16 +474,10 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } -rte_free (filter_ptr); +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow);return ret; } -static void -ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) -{ -rte_free (flow->rule); -} - static bool ice_switch_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[], struct rte_flow_error *error,
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH 2/2 net/ice: fix flow redirect failure
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
When the switch flow rules are redirected, if rule is removed but not added successfully, the rule addition in the next time will not succeed because the rule's meta cannot be found.
This patch uses the saved flow rule's meta when the flow rule is added again to make the addition succeed.
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +27 -2
@@ -1917,7 +1917,10 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct rte_flow *flow, struct ice_flow_redirect *rd) { - struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata = flow->rule; + struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; +struct ice_rule_query_data added_rdata = {0 };struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *list_itr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_dp =NULL ;struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *list_head;
@@ -1927,6 +1930,8 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,uint16_t lkups_cnt;int ret; + rdata = &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data; +if (rdata->vsi_handle != rd->vsi_handle)return 0 ;
@@ -1937,6 +1942,22 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,if (rd->type !=ICE_FLOW_REDIRECT_VSI )return -ENOTSUP ; +if (!filter_conf_ptr->added) { + ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, filter_conf_ptr->lkups, + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num, + &filter_conf_ptr->rule_info, + &added_rdata); + +if (ret) { +PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule again" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; + filter_conf_ptr->added = true; +return 0 ; + } + list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules;LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, list_entry) {
@@ -1983,10 +2004,14 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,/* Replay the rule */ ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_dp, lkups_cnt, - &rinfo, rdata); + &rinfo, &added_rdata);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule" ); + filter_conf_ptr->added = false; ret = -EINVAL ; + }else { + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; + filter_conf_ptr->added = true; } out:
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Quoted 11 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 4:45 PM
To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net/ice: save meta on switch filter creation
Quoted 6 lines
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The meta is abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
This patch saved the meta in RTE flow for future use.
Can be more specific, it is used for flow replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
Will update during merge.
Quoted 149 lines
Fixes 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +48
-20@@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ struct sw_meta {struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; }; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf { +bool added; + +/* Only when added flag is true, the query data is valid */ +struct ice_rule_query_data sw_query_data; + +/* +* The lookup elements and rule info are saved here when filter creation +* succeeds. +*/ +uint16_t lkups_num; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups; +struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; +}; +static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_dist_parser;static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_perm_parser;@@ -359,7 +374,7 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct ice_pf *pf = &ad->pf;struct ice_hw *hw =ICE_PF_TO_HW (pf);struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0 }; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = ((struct sw_meta *)meta)->list; uint16_t lkups_cnt =@@ -381,18 +396,24 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, } ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);if (!ret) { - filter_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data ),0 ); -if (!filter_ptr) { + filter_conf_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , +sizeof (struct ice_switch_filter_conf ),0 ); +if (!filter_conf_ptr) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"No memory for ice_switch_filter" ); goto error; } - flow->rule = filter_ptr; -rte_memcpy (filter_ptr, - &rule_added, -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data )); + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = rule_added; + + filter_conf_ptr->lkups = list; + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num = lkups_cnt; + filter_conf_ptr->rule_info = *rule_info; + + filter_conf_ptr->added = true; + + flow->rule = filter_conf_ptr; }else { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,@@ -400,7 +421,6 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, goto error; } -rte_free (list);rte_free (meta);return 0 ;@@ -411,6 +431,18 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } +static inline void +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) { +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; + +if (filter_conf_ptr) +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr->lkups); + +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr); +} + static int ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,@@ -418,20 +450,23 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, {struct ice_hw *hw = &ad->hw;int ret; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr; - filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *) + filter_conf_ptr = (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *) flow->rule; -if (!filter_ptr) { +if (!filter_conf_ptr || !filter_conf_ptr->added) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"no such flow" " create by switch filter" ); + +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow); +return -rte_errno; } - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, filter_ptr); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data);if (ret) { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,@@ -439,16 +474,10 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } -rte_free (filter_ptr); +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow);return ret; } -static void -ice_switch_filter_rule_free(struct rte_flow *flow) -{ -rte_free (flow->rule); -} - static bool ice_switch_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[], struct rte_flow_error *error, --2.27.0
Quoted 27 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Qi Z
Sent: Tuesday, November 2, 2021 8:07 AM
To: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] net/ice: save meta on switch filter creationQuoted 14 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 4:45 PM
To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] net/ice: save meta on switch filter creationFrom: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The meta is abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
This patch saved the meta in RTE flow for future use.
Can be more specific, it is used for flow replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
Will update during merge.
Quoted 2 lines
Fixes 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")
This is not a fix, but can cc stable as the real fix patch depends on this. will remove fixline during merge.
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi
Quoted 5 lines · On 11/1/2021 8:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Dapeng Yu<[email protected]>
The meta is abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
What is 'meta', do you mean 'metadata'? Can you please clarify which metadata you are referring to?
Quoted 6 lines
This patch saved the meta in RTE flow for future use.
Fixes 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu<[email protected]>
Quoted 13 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Yigit, Ferruh <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 12:11 AM
To: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] net/ice: save meta on switch filter creationOn 11/1/2021 8:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
From: Dapeng Yu<[email protected]>
The meta is abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
What is 'meta', do you mean 'metadata'? Can you please clarify which metadata you are referring to?
The commit log will be improved in the next version.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
This patch saved the meta in RTE flow for future use.
Fixes 47d460d63233 ("net/ice: rework switch filter")Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu<[email protected]>
PATCH v2 1/2 net/ice: save rule on switch filter creation
In reply to [email protected]From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The VSI number, lookup elements and rule information for creating switch filter are abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
This patch saved the abandoned data in RTE flow, it is for future use on replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +58 -20
@@ -180,6 +180,27 @@ struct sw_meta {struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; }; +enum ice_sw_fltr_status { +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED , +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +}; + +struct ice_switch_filter_conf { +enum ice_sw_fltr_status fltr_status; + +struct ice_rule_query_data sw_query_data; + +/* +* The lookup elements and rule info are saved here when filter creation +* succeeds. +*/ +uint16_t vsi_num; +uint16_t lkups_num; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups; +struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; +}; +static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_dist_parser;static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_perm_parser;
@@ -359,7 +380,7 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct ice_pf *pf = &ad->pf;struct ice_hw *hw =ICE_PF_TO_HW (pf);struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0 }; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = ((struct sw_meta *)meta)->list; uint16_t lkups_cnt =
@@ -381,18 +402,26 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, } ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);if (!ret) { - filter_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data ),0 ); -if (!filter_ptr) { + filter_conf_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , +sizeof (struct ice_switch_filter_conf ),0 ); +if (!filter_conf_ptr) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"No memory for ice_switch_filter" ); goto error; } - flow->rule = filter_ptr; -rte_memcpy (filter_ptr, - &rule_added, -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data )); + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = rule_added; + + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = +ice_get_hw_vsi_num (hw, rule_info->sw_act.vsi_handle); + filter_conf_ptr->lkups = list; + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num = lkups_cnt; + filter_conf_ptr->rule_info = *rule_info; + + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; + + flow->rule = filter_conf_ptr; }else { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -400,7 +429,6 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, goto error; } -rte_free (list);rte_free (meta);return 0 ;
@@ -411,6 +439,18 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } +static inline void +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) +{ +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; + +if (filter_conf_ptr) +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr->lkups); + +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr); +} + static int ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,
@@ -418,20 +458,24 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, {struct ice_hw *hw = &ad->hw;int ret; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr; - filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *) + filter_conf_ptr = (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *) flow->rule; -if (!filter_ptr) { +if (!filter_conf_ptr || + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status ==ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"no such flow" " create by switch filter" ); + +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow); +return -rte_errno; } - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, filter_ptr); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data);if (ret) { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -439,16 +483,10 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } -rte_free (filter_ptr); +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow);return ret; } -static void -ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) -{ -rte_free (flow->rule); -} - static bool ice_switch_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[], struct rte_flow_error *error,
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH v2 2/2 net/ice: fix flow redirect failure
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
It's possible that a switch rule can't be redirect successfully due to kernel driver is busy to handle an ongoing VF reset, so the redirect action need to be deferred into next redirect request which is promised by kernel driver after VF reset done.
This patch uses the saved flow rule's meta to replay switch rule remove/add during next flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +45 -2
@@ -1926,7 +1926,10 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct rte_flow *flow, struct ice_flow_redirect *rd) { - struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata = flow->rule; + struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; +struct ice_rule_query_data added_rdata = {0 };struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *list_itr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_dp =NULL ;struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *list_head;
@@ -1936,6 +1939,8 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,uint16_t lkups_cnt;int ret; + rdata = &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data; +if (rdata->vsi_handle != rd->vsi_handle)return 0 ;
@@ -1946,6 +1951,33 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,if (rd->type !=ICE_FLOW_REDIRECT_VSI )return -ENOTSUP ; +if (filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status ==ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ) { +/* Save VSI number for failure recover */ + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num; + +/* Update VSI context */ + hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num; + + ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, filter_conf_ptr->lkups, + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num, + &filter_conf_ptr->rule_info, + &added_rdata); + +if (ret) { +PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule again" ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; +return 0 ; + } + +if (filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status ==ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ) { +/* Recover VSI context */ + hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num; + } + list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules;LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, list_entry) {
@@ -1977,12 +2009,17 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,if (!lkups_dp)return -EINVAL ; +/* Save VSI number for failure recover */ + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num; +/* Remove the old rule */ ret =ice_rem_adv_rule (hw, list_itr->lkups, lkups_cnt, &rinfo);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to delete the old rule %d" , rdata->rule_id); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; goto out; }
@@ -1992,10 +2029,16 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,/* Replay the rule */ ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_dp, lkups_cnt, - &rinfo, rdata); + &rinfo, &added_rdata);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule" ); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; + }else { + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; } out:
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH v3 1/2 net/ice: save rule on switch filter creation
In reply to [email protected]From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The VSI number, lookup elements and rule information for creating switch filter are abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
This patch saved the abandoned data in RTE flow, it is for future use on replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
V3:
* Use switch statement to make code clear
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +58 -20
@@ -180,6 +180,27 @@ struct sw_meta {struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; }; +enum ice_sw_fltr_status { +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED , +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +}; + +struct ice_switch_filter_conf { +enum ice_sw_fltr_status fltr_status; + +struct ice_rule_query_data sw_query_data; + +/* +* The lookup elements and rule info are saved here when filter creation +* succeeds. +*/ +uint16_t vsi_num; +uint16_t lkups_num; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups; +struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; +}; +static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_dist_parser;static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_perm_parser;
@@ -359,7 +380,7 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct ice_pf *pf = &ad->pf;struct ice_hw *hw =ICE_PF_TO_HW (pf);struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0 }; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = ((struct sw_meta *)meta)->list; uint16_t lkups_cnt =
@@ -381,18 +402,26 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, } ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);if (!ret) { - filter_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data ),0 ); -if (!filter_ptr) { + filter_conf_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , +sizeof (struct ice_switch_filter_conf ),0 ); +if (!filter_conf_ptr) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"No memory for ice_switch_filter" ); goto error; } - flow->rule = filter_ptr; -rte_memcpy (filter_ptr, - &rule_added, -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data )); + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = rule_added; + + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = +ice_get_hw_vsi_num (hw, rule_info->sw_act.vsi_handle); + filter_conf_ptr->lkups = list; + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num = lkups_cnt; + filter_conf_ptr->rule_info = *rule_info; + + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; + + flow->rule = filter_conf_ptr; }else { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -400,7 +429,6 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, goto error; } -rte_free (list);rte_free (meta);return 0 ;
@@ -411,6 +439,18 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } +static inline void +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) +{ +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; + +if (filter_conf_ptr) +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr->lkups); + +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr); +} + static int ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,
@@ -418,20 +458,24 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, {struct ice_hw *hw = &ad->hw;int ret; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr; - filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *) + filter_conf_ptr = (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *) flow->rule; -if (!filter_ptr) { +if (!filter_conf_ptr || + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status ==ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"no such flow" " create by switch filter" ); + +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow); +return -rte_errno; } - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, filter_ptr); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data);if (ret) { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -439,16 +483,10 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } -rte_free (filter_ptr); +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow);return ret; } -static void -ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) -{ -rte_free (flow->rule); -} - static bool ice_switch_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[], struct rte_flow_error *error,
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH v3 2/2 net/ice: fix flow redirect failure
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
It's possible that a switch rule can't be redirect successfully due to kernel driver is busy to handle an ongoing VF reset, so the redirect action need to be deferred into next redirect request which is promised by kernel driver after VF reset done.
This patch uses the saved flow rule's data to replay switch rule remove/add during next flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
V3:
* Use switch statement to make code clear
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +78 -30
@@ -1926,8 +1926,12 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct rte_flow *flow, struct ice_flow_redirect *rd) { - struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata = flow->rule; + struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; +struct ice_rule_query_data added_rdata = {0 };struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *list_itr; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_ref =NULL ;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_dp =NULL ;struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *list_head;struct ice_adv_rule_info rinfo;
@@ -1936,6 +1940,8 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,uint16_t lkups_cnt;int ret; + rdata = &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data; +if (rdata->vsi_handle != rd->vsi_handle)return 0 ;
@@ -1946,56 +1952,98 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,if (rd->type !=ICE_FLOW_REDIRECT_VSI )return -ENOTSUP ; - list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules; -LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, - list_entry) { - rinfo = list_itr->rule_info; -if ((rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI && - rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle == rd->vsi_handle) || - (rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST )){ - lkups_cnt = list_itr->lkups_cnt; - lkups_dp = (struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *) -ice_memdup (hw, list_itr->lkups, -sizeof (*list_itr->lkups) * - lkups_cnt,ICE_NONDMA_TO_NONDMA ); - -if (!lkups_dp) { -PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to allocate memory." ); -return -EINVAL ; - } +switch (filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status) { +case ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED : + list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules; +LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, + ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, + list_entry) { + rinfo = list_itr->rule_info; +if ((rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI && + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle == rd->vsi_handle) || + (rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST )){ + lkups_cnt = list_itr->lkups_cnt; + + lkups_dp = (struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *) +ice_memdup (hw, list_itr->lkups, +sizeof (*list_itr->lkups) * + lkups_cnt, +ICE_NONDMA_TO_NONDMA ); +if (!lkups_dp) { +PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR , +"Failed to allocate memory." ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + lkups_ref = lkups_dp; -if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { - rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = rd->vsi_handle; - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; +if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act == +ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = + rd->vsi_handle; + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; + } +break ; } -break ; } - } -if (!lkups_dp) +if (!lkups_ref) +return -EINVAL ; + + goto rmv_rule; +case ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT : +/* Recover VSI context */ + hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num; + rinfo = filter_conf_ptr->rule_info; + lkups_cnt = filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num; + lkups_ref = filter_conf_ptr->lkups; + +if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = rd->vsi_handle; + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; + } + + goto rmv_rule; +case ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT : + rinfo = filter_conf_ptr->rule_info; + lkups_cnt = filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num; + lkups_ref = filter_conf_ptr->lkups; + + goto add_rule; +default :return -EINVAL ; + } + rmv_rule:/* Remove the old rule */ - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule (hw, list_itr->lkups, - lkups_cnt, &rinfo); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule (hw, lkups_ref, lkups_cnt, &rinfo);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to delete the old rule %d" , rdata->rule_id); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; goto out; } +add_rule:/* Update VSI context */ hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num;/* Replay the rule */ - ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_dp, lkups_cnt, - &rinfo, rdata); + ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_ref, lkups_cnt, + &rinfo, &added_rdata);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule" ); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; + }else { + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; +/* Save VSI number for failure recover */ + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num; + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; } out:
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH v4 1/2 net/ice: save rule on switch filter creation
In reply to [email protected]From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The VSI number, lookup elements and rule information for creating switch filter are abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
This patch saved the abandoned data in RTE flow, it is for future use on replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
V3:
* No change
V4:
* No change
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +58 -20
@@ -180,6 +180,27 @@ struct sw_meta {struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; }; +enum ice_sw_fltr_status { +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED , +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT , +}; + +struct ice_switch_filter_conf { +enum ice_sw_fltr_status fltr_status; + +struct ice_rule_query_data sw_query_data; + +/* +* The lookup elements and rule info are saved here when filter creation +* succeeds. +*/ +uint16_t vsi_num; +uint16_t lkups_num; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups; +struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info; +}; +static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_dist_parser;static struct ice_flow_parser ice_switch_perm_parser;
@@ -359,7 +380,7 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct ice_pf *pf = &ad->pf;struct ice_hw *hw =ICE_PF_TO_HW (pf);struct ice_rule_query_data rule_added = {0 }; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list = ((struct sw_meta *)meta)->list; uint16_t lkups_cnt =
@@ -381,18 +402,26 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, } ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, list, lkups_cnt, rule_info, &rule_added);if (!ret) { - filter_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data ),0 ); -if (!filter_ptr) { + filter_conf_ptr =rte_zmalloc ("ice_switch_filter" , +sizeof (struct ice_switch_filter_conf ),0 ); +if (!filter_conf_ptr) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"No memory for ice_switch_filter" ); goto error; } - flow->rule = filter_ptr; -rte_memcpy (filter_ptr, - &rule_added, -sizeof (struct ice_rule_query_data )); + + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = rule_added; + + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = +ice_get_hw_vsi_num (hw, rule_info->sw_act.vsi_handle); + filter_conf_ptr->lkups = list; + filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num = lkups_cnt; + filter_conf_ptr->rule_info = *rule_info; + + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; + + flow->rule = filter_conf_ptr; }else { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -400,7 +429,6 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad, goto error; } -rte_free (list);rte_free (meta);return 0 ;
@@ -411,6 +439,18 @@ ice_switch_create(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } +static inline void +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) +{ +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; + +if (filter_conf_ptr) +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr->lkups); + +rte_free (filter_conf_ptr); +} + static int ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, struct rte_flow *flow,
@@ -418,20 +458,24 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad, {struct ice_hw *hw = &ad->hw;int ret; -struct ice_rule_query_data *filter_ptr; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr; - filter_ptr = (struct ice_rule_query_data *) + filter_conf_ptr = (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *) flow->rule; -if (!filter_ptr) { +if (!filter_conf_ptr || + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status ==ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ) {rte_flow_error_set (error,EINVAL ,RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE ,NULL ,"no such flow" " create by switch filter" ); + +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow); +return -rte_errno; } - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, filter_ptr); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule_by_id (hw, &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data);if (ret) { rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, NULL,
@@ -439,16 +483,10 @@ ice_switch_destroy(struct ice_adapter *ad,return -rte_errno; } -rte_free (filter_ptr); +ice_switch_filter_rule_free (flow);return ret; } -static void -ice_switch_filter_rule_free (struct rte_flow *flow) -{ -rte_free (flow->rule); -} - static bool ice_switch_parse_pattern(const struct rte_flow_item pattern[], struct rte_flow_error *error,
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
PATCH v4 2/2 net/ice: fix flow redirect failure
From: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
It's possible that a switch rule can't be redirect successfully due to kernel driver is busy to handle an ongoing VF reset, so the redirect action need to be deferred into next redirect request which is promised by kernel driver after VF reset done.
This patch uses the saved flow rule's data to replay switch rule remove/add during next flow redirect.
---
V2:
* Add more filter status and VSI number
V3:
* Use switch statement to make code clear
V4:
* Trim leading space
--- drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ice/ice_switch_filter.c +78 -30
@@ -1926,8 +1926,12 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,struct rte_flow *flow, struct ice_flow_redirect *rd) { - struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata = flow->rule; + struct ice_rule_query_data *rdata; +struct ice_switch_filter_conf *filter_conf_ptr = + (struct ice_switch_filter_conf *)flow->rule; +struct ice_rule_query_data added_rdata = {0 };struct ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry *list_itr; +struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_ref =NULL ;struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups_dp =NULL ;struct LIST_HEAD_TYPE *list_head;struct ice_adv_rule_info rinfo;
@@ -1936,6 +1940,8 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,uint16_t lkups_cnt;int ret; + rdata = &filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data; +if (rdata->vsi_handle != rd->vsi_handle)return 0 ;
@@ -1946,56 +1952,98 @@ ice_switch_redirect(struct ice_adapter *ad,if (rd->type !=ICE_FLOW_REDIRECT_VSI )return -ENOTSUP ; - list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules; -LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, - list_entry) { - rinfo = list_itr->rule_info; -if ((rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI && - rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle == rd->vsi_handle) || - (rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST )){ - lkups_cnt = list_itr->lkups_cnt; - lkups_dp = (struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *) -ice_memdup (hw, list_itr->lkups, -sizeof (*list_itr->lkups) * - lkups_cnt,ICE_NONDMA_TO_NONDMA ); - -if (!lkups_dp) { -PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to allocate memory." ); -return -EINVAL ; - } +switch (filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status) { +case ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED : + list_head = &sw->recp_list[rdata->rid].filt_rules; +LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY (list_itr, list_head, + ice_adv_fltr_mgmt_list_entry, + list_entry) { + rinfo = list_itr->rule_info; +if ((rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI && + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle == rd->vsi_handle) || + (rinfo.fltr_rule_id == rdata->rule_id && + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST )){ + lkups_cnt = list_itr->lkups_cnt; + + lkups_dp = (struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *) +ice_memdup (hw, list_itr->lkups, +sizeof (*list_itr->lkups) * + lkups_cnt, +ICE_NONDMA_TO_NONDMA ); +if (!lkups_dp) { +PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR , +"Failed to allocate memory." ); +return -EINVAL ; + } + lkups_ref = lkups_dp; -if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { - rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = rd->vsi_handle; - rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; +if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act == +ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = + rd->vsi_handle; + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; + } +break ; } -break ; } - } -if (!lkups_dp) +if (!lkups_ref) +return -EINVAL ; + + goto rmv_rule; +case ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT : +/* Recover VSI context */ + hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num; + rinfo = filter_conf_ptr->rule_info; + lkups_cnt = filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num; + lkups_ref = filter_conf_ptr->lkups; + +if (rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act ==ICE_FWD_TO_VSI_LIST ) { + rinfo.sw_act.vsi_handle = rd->vsi_handle; + rinfo.sw_act.fltr_act =ICE_FWD_TO_VSI ; + } + + goto rmv_rule; +case ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT : + rinfo = filter_conf_ptr->rule_info; + lkups_cnt = filter_conf_ptr->lkups_num; + lkups_ref = filter_conf_ptr->lkups; + + goto add_rule; +default :return -EINVAL ; + } +rmv_rule:/* Remove the old rule */ - ret =ice_rem_adv_rule (hw, list_itr->lkups, - lkups_cnt, &rinfo); + ret =ice_rem_adv_rule (hw, lkups_ref, lkups_cnt, &rinfo);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to delete the old rule %d" , rdata->rule_id); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_RMV_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; goto out; } +add_rule:/* Update VSI context */ hw->vsi_ctx[rd->vsi_handle]->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num;/* Replay the rule */ - ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_dp, lkups_cnt, - &rinfo, rdata); + ret =ice_add_adv_rule (hw, lkups_ref, lkups_cnt, + &rinfo, &added_rdata);if (ret) {PMD_DRV_LOG (ERR ,"Failed to replay the rule" ); + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status = +ICE_SW_FLTR_ADD_FAILED_ON_RIDRECT ; ret = -EINVAL ; + }else { + filter_conf_ptr->sw_query_data = added_rdata; +/* Save VSI number for failure recover */ + filter_conf_ptr->vsi_num = rd->new_vsi_num; + filter_conf_ptr->fltr_status =ICE_SW_FLTR_ADDED ; } out:
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: fix flow redirect failure
Quoted 18 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] net/ice: fix flow redirect failureFrom: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
It's possible that a switch rule can't be redirect successfully due to kernel driver is busy to handle an ongoing VF reset, so the redirect action need to be deferred into next redirect request which is promised by kernel driver after VF reset done.
Quoted 7 lines
This patch uses the saved flow rule's data to replay switch rule remove/add during next flow redirect.
Fixes 397b4b3c5095 ("net/ice: enable flow redirect on switch")Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] net/ice: save rule on switch filter creation
In reply to [email protected]Quoted 16 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 4:46 PM
To: Yang, Qiming <[email protected]>; Zhang, Qi Z <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Wang, Haiyue <[email protected]>; Yu, DapengX <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] net/ice: save rule on switch filter creationFrom: Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
The VSI number, lookup elements and rule information for creating switch filter are abandoned when switch filter is created in original implementation.
Quoted 6 lines
This patch saved the abandoned data in RTE flow, it is for future use on replay when handling exception at flow redirect.
Signed-off-by Dapeng Yu <[email protected]>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel.
Thanks
Qi