Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kmap_local: don't assume kmap PTEs are linear arrays in memory

PATCH RESEND In review Ard Biesheuvel 4 participants 6 messages Nov 16, 2021 – Nov 25, 2021

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH RESEND 1/1 kmap_local: don't assume kmap PTEs are linear arrays in memory

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

---
Resent to linux-mm on akpm's request

 arch/arm/Kconfig |  1 +
 mm/Kconfig       |  3 ++
 mm/highmem.c     | 32 +++++++++++++-------
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
arch/arm/Kconfig +1 -0
index 899830259bed..5d4ab8e8477f 100644
@@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ config HIGHMEM
 	bool "High Memory Support"
 	depends on MMU
 	select KMAP_LOCAL
+	select KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY
 	help
 	  The address space of ARM processors is only 4 Gigabytes large
 	  and it has to accommodate user address space, kernel address
mm/Kconfig +3 -0
index 068ce591a13a..28edafc820ad 100644
@@ -890,6 +890,9 @@ config MAPPING_DIRTY_HELPERS
 config KMAP_LOCAL
 	bool
 
+config KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY
+	bool
+
 # struct io_mapping based helper.  Selected by drivers that need them
 config IO_MAPPING
 	bool
mm/highmem.c +21 -11
index 88f65f155845..ca9fa8c92593 100644
@@ -503,16 +503,22 @@ static inline int kmap_local_calc_idx(int idx)
 
 static pte_t *__kmap_pte;
 
-static pte_t *kmap_get_pte(void)
+static pte_t *kmap_get_pte(unsigned long vaddr, int idx)
 {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY))
+		/*
+		 * Set by the arch if __kmap_pte[-idx] does not produce
+		 * the correct entry.
+		 */
+		return virt_to_kpte(vaddr);
 	if (!__kmap_pte)
 		__kmap_pte = virt_to_kpte(__fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN));
-	return __kmap_pte;
+	return &__kmap_pte[-idx];
 }
 
 void *__kmap_local_pfn_prot(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
-	pte_t pteval, *kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte();
+	pte_t pteval, *kmap_pte;
 	unsigned long vaddr;
 	int idx;
 
@@ -524,9 +530,10 @@ void *__kmap_local_pfn_prot(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	preempt_disable();
 	idx = arch_kmap_local_map_idx(kmap_local_idx_push(), pfn);
 	vaddr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx);
-	BUG_ON(!pte_none(*(kmap_pte - idx)));
+	kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte(vaddr, idx);
+	BUG_ON(!pte_none(*kmap_pte));
 	pteval = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
-	arch_kmap_local_set_pte(&init_mm, vaddr, kmap_pte - idx, pteval);
+	arch_kmap_local_set_pte(&init_mm, vaddr, kmap_pte, pteval);
 	arch_kmap_local_post_map(vaddr, pteval);
 	current->kmap_ctrl.pteval[kmap_local_idx()] = pteval;
 	preempt_enable();
@@ -559,7 +566,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmap_local_page_prot);
 void kunmap_local_indexed(void *vaddr)
 {
 	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) vaddr & PAGE_MASK;
-	pte_t *kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte();
+	pte_t *kmap_pte;
 	int idx;
 
 	if (addr < __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_END) ||
@@ -584,8 +591,9 @@ void kunmap_local_indexed(void *vaddr)
 	idx = arch_kmap_local_unmap_idx(kmap_local_idx(), addr);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(addr != __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx));
 
+	kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte(addr, idx);
 	arch_kmap_local_pre_unmap(addr);
-	pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte - idx);
+	pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte);
 	arch_kmap_local_post_unmap(addr);
 	current->kmap_ctrl.pteval[kmap_local_idx()] = __pte(0);
 	kmap_local_idx_pop();
@@ -607,7 +615,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kunmap_local_indexed);
 void __kmap_local_sched_out(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	pte_t *kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte();
+	pte_t *kmap_pte;
 	int i;
 
 	/* Clear kmaps */
@@ -634,8 +642,9 @@ void __kmap_local_sched_out(void)
 		idx = arch_kmap_local_map_idx(i, pte_pfn(pteval));
 
 		addr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx);
+		kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte(addr, idx);
 		arch_kmap_local_pre_unmap(addr);
-		pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte - idx);
+		pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte);
 		arch_kmap_local_post_unmap(addr);
 	}
 }
@@ -643,7 +652,7 @@ void __kmap_local_sched_out(void)
 void __kmap_local_sched_in(void)
 {
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	pte_t *kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte();
+	pte_t *kmap_pte;
 	int i;
 
 	/* Restore kmaps */
@@ -663,7 +672,8 @@ void __kmap_local_sched_in(void)
 		/* See comment in __kmap_local_sched_out() */
 		idx = arch_kmap_local_map_idx(i, pte_pfn(pteval));
 		addr = __fix_to_virt(FIX_KMAP_BEGIN + idx);
-		set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte - idx, pteval);
+		kmap_pte = kmap_get_pte(addr, idx);
+		set_pte_at(&init_mm, addr, kmap_pte, pteval);
 		arch_kmap_local_post_map(addr, pteval);
 	}
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.30.2
maintainer Acked-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 18 lines · Ard Biesheuvel

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

Quoted 5 lines

Thanks.

Signature · 2 lines
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
maintainer
#2 lore raw
In reply to Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 10 lines · On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:47:37 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> wrote:

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Quoted 7 lines

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

A Fixes: link would be helpful.

kmap_local() was a year ago, so is a -stable backport desired here?

#3 lore raw
Quoted 16 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 13 lines · On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:47:37 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> wrote:

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

A Fixes: link would be helpful.

kmap_local() was a year ago, so is a -stable backport desired here?

Fixes 1834eb1a6027 ("kmap_local: don't assume kmap PTEs are linear

arrays in memory")
Cc: <[email protected]>

#4 lore raw
Quoted 23 lines · Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 21 lines · Andrew Morton
Quoted 17 lines · On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 10:47:37 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> wrote:

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

A Fixes: link would be helpful.

kmap_local() was a year ago, so is a -stable backport desired here?

Fixes 1834eb1a6027 ("kmap_local: don't assume kmap PTEs are linear

arrays in memory")

Oops that should be

Fixes 2a15ba82fa6c ("ARM: highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic")
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#5 lore raw
In reply to Ard Biesheuvel
Quoted 5 lines · Ard Biesheuvel

The kmap_local conversion broke the ARM architecture, because the new code assumes that all PTEs used for creating kmaps form a linear array in memory, and uses array indexing to look up the kmap PTE belonging to a certain kmap index.

Quoted 7 lines

On ARM, this cannot work, not only because the PTE pages may be non-adjacent in memory, but also because ARM/!LPAE interleaves hardware entries and extended entries (carrying software-only bits) in a way that is not compatible with array indexing.

Fortunately, this only seems to affect configurations with more than 8 CPUs, due to the way the per-CPU kmap slots are organized in memory.

Ooops. I completely missed that detail. Sorry for the wreckage.

mm/highmem.c static inline int kmap_local_calc_idx(int idx) · line 513

Quoted 12 lines

Work around this by permitting an architecture to set a Kconfig symbol that signifies that the kmap PTEs do not form a lineary array in memory, and so the only way to locate the appropriate one is to walk the page tables.

mm/highmem.c +7 -0
+static pte_t *kmap_get_pte(unsigned long vaddr, int idx)
 {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY))
+		/*
+		 * Set by the arch if __kmap_pte[-idx] does not produce
+		 * the correct entry.
+		 */
+		return virt_to_kpte(vaddr);

Nit. The above is not a one line statement (even if it is from a compiler perspective).

	/*
	 * Does the architecture have non-linear KMAP pte entries which
	 * cannot be accessed by index?
	 */
	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY))
		return virt_to_kpte(vaddr);

or

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY)) {
        	/* PTE entries cannot be accessed by index. */
		return virt_to_kpte(vaddr);
        }

are readable but this is really breaking the brain OCR:

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KMAP_LOCAL_NON_LINEAR_PTE_ARRAY))
		/*
		 * Set by the arch if __kmap_pte[-idx] does not produce
		 * the correct entry.
		 */
		return virt_to_kpte(vaddr);

if (!__kmap_pte)

Other than that.