Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY_SOURCE

PATCH In review Marco Elver 4 participants 5 messages Jan 24, 2022

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 kasan: test: fix compatibility with FORTIFY_SOURCE

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations, the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  <TASK>
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...

Fix it by also hiding ptr from the optimizer, which will ensure that __builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing fortified string functions from panicking.

---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
lib/test_kasan.c +5 -0
index 847cdbefab46..26a5c9007653 100644
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 				memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
@@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
 	kfree(ptr);
@@ -893,6 +896,7 @@ static void kasan_memchr(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_ptr_result = memchr(ptr, '1', size + 1));
@@ -919,6 +923,7 @@ static void kasan_memcmp(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 	memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_int_result = memcmp(ptr, arr, size+1));
Signature · 1 line
2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Marco Elver

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations, the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

Nit: FORITY_SOURCE -> FORTIFY_SOURCE

Quoted 67 lines
 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  <TASK>
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...

Fix it by also hiding ptr from the optimizer, which will ensure that __builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing fortified string functions from panicking.

---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
lib/test_kasan.c +5 -1
index 847cdbefab46..26a5c9007653 100644
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
        ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                                memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
@@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
        memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
        memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
        kfree(ptr);
@@ -893,6 +896,7 @@ static void kasan_memchr(struct kunit *test)
        ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                kasan_ptr_result = memchr(ptr, '1', size + 1));
@@ -919,6 +923,7 @@ static void kasan_memcmp(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
        memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
 
+       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
        OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
                kasan_int_result = memcmp(ptr, arr, size+1));
--
Quoted 2 lines

2.35.0.rc0.227.g00780c9af4-goog

#2 lore raw
Quoted 11 lines · Andrey Konovalov
Quoted 7 lines · Marco Elver

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations, the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

Nit: FORITY_SOURCE -> FORTIFY_SOURCE

How did that happen?! My hands need some better synchronization...

I'll refrain sending a v2, assuming Andrew can fix up this spelling mistake upon applying.

[...]

Quoted 2 lines

Thanks!

Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#3 lore raw
In reply to Marco Elver
Quoted 18 lines · Marco Elver

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations, the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  <TASK>
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...
Quoted 6 lines

Fix it by also hiding ptr from the optimizer, which will ensure that __builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing fortified string functions from panicking.

Yup, more good fixes. Thanks!

Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
Reviewed-by on v1 1/1
#4 lore raw
In reply to Marco Elver
Quoted 18 lines · Marco Elver

With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE enabled, string functions will also perform dynamic checks using __builtin_object_size(ptr), which when failed will panic the kernel.

Because the KASAN test deliberately performs out-of-bounds operations, the kernel panics with FORITY_SOURCE, for example:

 | kernel BUG at lib/string_helpers.c:910!
 | invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
 | CPU: 1 PID: 137 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G    B             5.16.0-rc3+ #3
 | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
 | RIP: 0010:fortify_panic+0x19/0x1b
 | ...
 | Call Trace:
 |  <TASK>
 |  kmalloc_oob_in_memset.cold+0x16/0x16
 |  ...
Quoted 6 lines

Fix it by also hiding ptr from the optimizer, which will ensure that __builtin_object_size() does not return a valid size, preventing fortified string functions from panicking.

Looks good! Thanks for posting this Marco :)

Quoted 49 lines
---
 lib/test_kasan.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
lib/test_kasan.c +5 -0
index 847cdbefab46..26a5c9007653 100644
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 				memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE));
@@ -515,6 +516,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
@@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_invalid_size(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
 	memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64);
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size));
 	kfree(ptr);
@@ -893,6 +896,7 @@ static void kasan_memchr(struct kunit *test)
 	ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_ptr_result = memchr(ptr, '1', size + 1));
@@ -919,6 +923,7 @@ static void kasan_memcmp(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr);
 	memset(arr, 0, sizeof(arr));
 
+	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(ptr);
 	OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test,
 		kasan_int_result = memcmp(ptr, arr, size+1));