spi: bcm-qspi: check for valid cs before applying chip select
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 spi: bcm-qspi: check for valid cs before applying chip select
Apply only valid chip select value. This change fixes case where chip select is set to initial value of '-1' during probe and PM supend and subsequent resume can try to use the value with undefined behaviour. Also in case where gpio based chip select, the check in bcm_qspi_chip_select() shall prevent undefined behaviour on resume.
--- drivers/spi/spi-bcm-qspi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/spi/spi-bcm-qspi.c +1 -1
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ static void bcm_qspi_chip_select(struct bcm_qspi *qspi, int cs)u32 rd =0 ;u32 wr =0 ; -if (qspi->base[CHIP_SELECT ]) { +if (cs >=0 && qspi->base[CHIP_SELECT ]) { rd =bcm_qspi_read (qspi,CHIP_SELECT ,0 ); wr = (rd & ~0xff ) | (1 << cs);if (rd == wr)
Signature · 1 line
2.17.1
Quoted 8 lines · Kamal Dasu
Apply only valid chip select value. This change fixes case where chip select is set to initial value of '-1' during probe and PM supend and subsequent resume can try to use the value with undefined behaviour. Also in case where gpio based chip select, the check in
bcm_qspi_chip_select()shall prevent undefined behaviour on resume.Fixes fa236a7ef240 ("spi: bcm-qspi: Add Broadcom MSPI driver")Signed-off-by Kamal Dasu <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Signature · 1 line
Florian
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 8 lines · Kamal Dasu
Apply only valid chip select value. This change fixes case where chip select is set to initial value of '-1' during probe and PM supend and subsequent resume can try to use the value with undefined behaviour. Also in case where gpio based chip select, the check in
bcm_qspi_chip_select()shall prevent undefined behaviour on resume.[...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-linus
Thanks!
[1/1] spi: bcm-qspi: check for valid cs before applying chip select
commit: 2cbd27267ffe020af1442b95ec57f59a157ba85c
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark