Skip to contentSkip to conversation

4.9.301-rc1 review

PATCH In review Greg Kroah-Hartman 7 participants 9 messages Feb 9, 2022 – Feb 10, 2022

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Greg Kroah-Hartman

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

cover 4.9.301-rc1 review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

    Linux 4.9.301-rc1

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent

-------------

Diffstat:

 Makefile                      |  4 ++--
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c |  2 +-
 kernel/cgroup.c               | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent

From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>

commit 24f6008564183aa120d07c03d9289519c2fe02af upstream.

The cgroup release_agent is called with call_usermodehelper. The function call_usermodehelper starts the release_agent with a full set fo capabilities. Therefore require capabilities when setting the release_agaent.

Fixes 81a6a5cdd2c5 ("Task Control Groups: automatic userspace notification of idle cgroups")
Cc [email protected] # v2.6.24+
[mkoutny: Adjust for pre-fs_context, duplicate mount/remount check, drop log messages.]
---
 kernel/cgroup.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
kernel/cgroup.c +26 -0
@@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ static int cgroup_remount(struct kernfs_
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct cgroup_root *root = cgroup_root_from_kf(kf_root);
+	struct cgroup_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->cgroup_ns;
 	struct cgroup_sb_opts opts;
 	u16 added_mask, removed_mask;
 
@@ -1873,6 +1874,13 @@ static int cgroup_remount(struct kernfs_
 		pr_warn("option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=%d comm=%s)\n",
 			task_tgid_nr(current), current->comm);
 
+	/* See cgroup_mount release_agent handling */
+	if (opts.release_agent &&
+	    ((ns->user_ns != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	added_mask = opts.subsys_mask & ~root->subsys_mask;
 	removed_mask = root->subsys_mask & ~opts.subsys_mask;
 
@@ -2248,6 +2256,16 @@ static struct dentry *cgroup_mount(struc
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+	 * require capabilities to set release agent.
+	 */
+	if (opts.release_agent &&
+	    ((ns->user_ns != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	root = kzalloc(sizeof(*root), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!root) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3026,6 +3044,14 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_writ
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path) < PATH_MAX);
 
+	/*
+	 * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+	 * require capabilities to set release agent.
+	 */
+	if ((of->file->f_cred->user_ns != &init_user_ns) ||
+	    !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	cgrp = cgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn, false);
 	if (!cgrp)
 		return -ENODEV;
author maintainer
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path

In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.

It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.

---
 drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c +1 -1
@@ -698,12 +698,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platform
 		if (!IS_ERR(host->dma_chan_rx))
 			dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan_rx);
 		mmc_remove_host(mmc);
-		mmc_free_host(mmc);
 
 		writel(0, host->base + REG_INTERRUPT_MASK);
 		writel(0, host->base + REG_POWER_CONTROL);
 		writel(readl(host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL) | CLK_OFF,
 		       host->base + REG_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+		mmc_free_host(mmc);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
Tested-by on the v1 series
#3 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

Quoted 9 lines
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

thanks,
-- Shuah

Tested-by on the v1 series
#4 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

Quoted 8 lines
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:

Signature · 1 line
Florian
maintainer Tested-by on the v1 series
#5 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

Quoted 8 lines
	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

All tests passing for Tegra ...

Test results for stable-v4.9:

    8 builds:	8 pass, 0 fail
    16 boots:	16 pass, 0 fail
    32 tests:	32 pass, 0 fail

Linux version: 4.9.301-rc1-g2b86ebafad46
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,

                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04

Jon

Tested-by Linux Kernel Functional Testing on the v1 series
#6 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:

Quoted 8 lines
        https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz

or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

## Build
* kernel: 4.9.301-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.9.y
* git commit: 2b86ebafad46c4f70ed4fbe3a0aff9c3e9b61763
* git describe: v4.9.299-52-g2b86ebafad46
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.299-52-g2b86ebafad46

## Test Regressions (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No test regressions found.

## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 54263, pass: 45234, fail: 188, skip: 7979, xfail: 862

## Build Summary
* arm: 254 total, 238 passed, 16 failed
* arm64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Tested-by on the v1 series
#7 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Compiled and booted 4.9.301-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.

Thanks,
Slade

Tested-by on the v1 series
#8 lore raw
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.

Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build results:

	total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 397 pass: 397 fail: 0

Guenter