4.9.301-rc1 review
Subsystems (3)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainercover 4.9.301-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 4.9.301-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- kernel/cgroup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 1/2 cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent
From: Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
commit 24f6008564183aa120d07c03d9289519c2fe02af upstream.
The cgroup release_agent is called with call_usermodehelper. The function call_usermodehelper starts the release_agent with a full set fo capabilities. Therefore require capabilities when setting the release_agaent.
--- kernel/cgroup.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
kernel/cgroup.c +26 -0
@@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ static int cgroup_remount(struct kernfs_ {int ret =0 ;struct cgroup_root *root =cgroup_root_from_kf (kf_root); +struct cgroup_namespace *ns = current->nsproxy->cgroup_ns;struct cgroup_sb_opts opts;u16 added_mask, removed_mask;
@@ -1873,6 +1874,13 @@ static int cgroup_remount(struct kernfs_pr_warn ("option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=%d comm=%s)\n" ,task_tgid_nr (current), current->comm); +/* See cgroup_mount release_agent handling */ +if (opts.release_agent && + ((ns->user_ns != &init_user_ns) || !capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN ))) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out_unlock; + } + added_mask = opts.subsys_mask & ~root->subsys_mask; removed_mask = root->subsys_mask & ~opts.subsys_mask;
@@ -2248,6 +2256,16 @@ static struct dentry *cgroup_mount(struc goto out_unlock; } +/* +* Release agent gets called with all capabilities, +* require capabilities to set release agent. +*/ +if (opts.release_agent && + ((ns->user_ns != &init_user_ns) || !capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN ))) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out_unlock; + } + root =kzalloc (sizeof (*root),GFP_KERNEL );if (!root) { ret = -ENOMEM ;
@@ -3026,6 +3044,14 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_writBUILD_BUG_ON (sizeof (cgrp->root->release_agent_path) <PATH_MAX ); +/* +* Release agent gets called with all capabilities, +* require capabilities to set release agent. +*/ +if ((of->file->f_cred->user_ns != &init_user_ns) || + !capable (CAP_SYS_ADMIN )) +return -EPERM ; + cgrp =cgroup_kn_lock_live (of->kn, false);if (!cgrp)return -ENODEV ;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 2/2 moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit bd2db32e7c3e35bd4d9b8bbff689434a50893546 upstream.
It was reported that the mmc host structure could be accessed after it was freed in moxart_remove(), so fix this by saving the base register of the device and using it instead of the pointer dereference.
--- drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/moxart-mmc.c +1 -1
@@ -698,12 +698,12 @@ static int moxart_remove(struct platformif (!IS_ERR (host->dma_chan_rx))dma_release_channel (host->dma_chan_rx);mmc_remove_host (mmc); -mmc_free_host (mmc);writel (0 , host->base +REG_INTERRUPT_MASK );writel (0 , host->base +REG_POWER_CONTROL );writel (readl (host->base +REG_CLOCK_CONTROL ) |CLK_OFF , host->base +REG_CLOCK_CONTROL ); +mmc_free_host (mmc); }return 0 ; }
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Signature · 1 line
Florian
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v4.9:
8 builds: 8 pass, 0 fail
16 boots: 16 pass, 0 fail
32 tests: 32 pass, 0 failLinux version: 4.9.301-rc1-g2b86ebafad46
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Jon
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.301-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-4.9.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 4.9.301-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-4.9.y
* git commit: 2b86ebafad46c4f70ed4fbe3a0aff9c3e9b61763
* git describe: v4.9.299-52-g2b86ebafad46
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-4.9.y/build/v4.9.299-52-g2b86ebafad46
## Test Regressions (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v4.9.299-49-gfa39f098578a) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 54263, pass: 45234, fail: 188, skip: 7979, xfail: 862
## Build Summary
* arm: 254 total, 238 passed, 16 failed
* arm64: 32 total, 32 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 22 total, 22 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 31 total, 31 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Compiled and booted 4.9.301-rc1 on my x86_64 test system successfully without errors or regressions.
Thanks,
Slade
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.301 release. There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 163 pass: 163 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 397 pass: 397 fail: 0
Guenter