Skip to contentSkip to conversation

cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent

PATCH In review Masami Ichikawa 2 participants 3 messages Feb 15, 2022 – Feb 17, 2022 Stable branch

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 cgroup-v1: Require capabilities to set release_agent

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>

commit 24f6008564183aa120d07c03d9289519c2fe02af upstream.

The cgroup release_agent is called with call_usermodehelper. The function call_usermodehelper starts the release_agent with a full set fo capabilities. Therefore require capabilities when setting the release_agaent.

Fixes 81a6a5cdd2c5 ("Task Control Groups: automatic userspace notification of idle cgroups")
Cc [email protected] # v2.6.24+
[mkoutny: Adjust for pre-fs_context, duplicate mount/remount check, drop log messages.]

[masami: Backport patch from 4.9. Adjust to use current_user_ns() to get current user_ns. Fix conflict in cgroup_release_agent_write().]
Reference: CVE-2022-0492

---
 kernel/cgroup.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
kernel/cgroup.c +25 -0
index 1f5e7dcbfd40..af521a3da21c 100644
@@ -1786,6 +1786,13 @@ static int cgroup_remount(struct kernfs_root *kf_root, int *flags, char *data)
 		pr_warn("option changes via remount are deprecated (pid=%d comm=%s)\n",
 			task_tgid_nr(current), current->comm);
 
+	/* See cgroup_mount release_agent handling */
+	if (opts.release_agent &&
+	    ((current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	added_mask = opts.subsys_mask & ~root->subsys_mask;
 	removed_mask = root->subsys_mask & ~opts.subsys_mask;
 
@@ -2135,6 +2142,16 @@ static struct dentry *cgroup_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+	 * require capabilities to set release agent.
+	 */
+	if (opts.release_agent &&
+	    ((current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+
 	root = kzalloc(sizeof(*root), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!root) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2839,6 +2856,14 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path) < PATH_MAX);
 
+	/*
+	 * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+	 * require capabilities to set release agent.
+	 */
+	if ((of->file->f_cred->user_ns != &init_user_ns) ||
+		!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+
 	cgrp = cgroup_kn_lock_live(of->kn);
 	if (!cgrp)
 		return -ENODEV;
Signature · 1 line
2.35.1
#1 lore raw

Thanks for sharing this Masami, I've been looking into pre-cgroup_ns backport too.

Quoted 2 lines · Masami Ichikawa

[masami: Backport patch from 4.9. Adjust to use current_user_ns() to get current user_ns. Fix conflict in cgroup_release_agent_write().]

The condition to allow modifying release_agent is two-fold:
a) caller is capabable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN),
b) cgroup_ns is owned by init_user_ns.

In pre-cgroup_ns kernels, it is IMO safer to consider all (=the only) cgroup_ns owned by init_user_ns.

So the (positive) condition translates into capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) only.

[
Additionally, there's invariant/implication
capable(CAP_XXX) -> (current_user_ns() == &init_user_ns) ,
so the expression
(current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
simplifies to
!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) .
]

kernel/cgroup.c static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, · line 2866

Quoted 12 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +8 -0
@@ -2839,6 +2856,14 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path) < PATH_MAX);
 
+	/*
+	 * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+	 * require capabilities to set release agent.
+	 */
+	if ((of->file->f_cred->user_ns != &init_user_ns) ||
+		!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+

Following the reasoning above, the check simplifies too but it should be be against the opener, not the writer:
file_ns_capable(of->file, &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)

(It seems to be to be incorrect even in the original commit. So I'll send a patch there to rectify that.)

Michal

#2 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Michal Koutný

Thanks for sharing this Masami, I've been looking into pre-cgroup_ns backport too.

Thank you for the review.

Quoted 13 lines · Masami Ichikawa
Quoted 2 lines

[masami: Backport patch from 4.9. Adjust to use current_user_ns() to get current user_ns. Fix conflict in cgroup_release_agent_write().]

The condition to allow modifying release_agent is two-fold:
a) caller is capabable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN),
b) cgroup_ns is owned by init_user_ns.

In pre-cgroup_ns kernels, it is IMO safer to consider all (=the only) cgroup_ns owned by init_user_ns.

So the (positive) condition translates into capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) only.

I see. Thank you for the details.
If we treat cgroup_ns as only cgroup_ns that are owned by init_user_ns, we don't have to have an extra check.

Quoted 14 lines

[
Additionally, there's invariant/implication
capable(CAP_XXX) -> (current_user_ns() == &init_user_ns) ,
so the expression
(current_user_ns() != &init_user_ns) || !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)
simplifies to
!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) .
]

Quoted 4 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +0 -0
@@ -2839,6 +2856,14 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 
      BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(cgrp->root->release_agent_path) < PATH_MAX);
 
Quoted 13 lines

kernel/cgroup.c static ssize_t cgroup_release_agent_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, · line 2866

Quoted 8 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +8 -0
+     /*
+      * Release agent gets called with all capabilities,
+      * require capabilities to set release agent.
+      */
+     if ((of->file->f_cred->user_ns != &init_user_ns) ||
+             !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+                     return -EPERM;
+

Following the reasoning above, the check simplifies too but it should be be against the opener, not the writer:
file_ns_capable(of->file, &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)

Thanks. I got it.

Quoted 7 lines

(It seems to be to be incorrect even in the original commit. So I'll send a patch there to rectify that.)

Michal

Regards,

Signature · 5 lines
/**
* Masami Ichikawa
* personal: [email protected]
* fedora project: [email protected]
*/