Skip to contentSkip to conversation

riscv-mm-init-use-is_enabledconfig_kexec_core-instead-of-ifdef.patch removed from -mm tree

merged Andrew Morton 1 participant 1 message Mar 25, 2022

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andrew Morton

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The patch titled
Subject: riscv: mm: init: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
riscv-mm-init-use-is_enabledconfig_kexec_core-instead-of-ifdef.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Subject: riscv: mm: init: use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE) instead of #ifdef

Replace the conditional compilation using "#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE" by a check for "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE)", to simplify the code and increase compile coverage.

Cc Albert Ou <[email protected]>
Cc Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Cc Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]>
Cc H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
Cc Paul Walmsley <[email protected]>
Cc Russell King <[email protected]>
Cc Russell King (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Cc Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>

---

 arch/riscv/mm/init.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/riscv/mm/init.c renamed from arch/riscv/mm/init.c~riscv-mm-init-use-is_enabledconfig_kexec_core-instead-of-ifdef +2 -4
@@ -957,7 +957,6 @@ static inline void setup_vm_final(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
 /*
  * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
  *
@@ -974,6 +973,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(v
 
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE))
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * Don't reserve a region for a crash kernel on a crash kernel
 	 * since it doesn't make much sense and we have limited memory
@@ -1023,7 +1024,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(v
 	crashk_res.start = crash_base;
 	crashk_res.end = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
 
 void __init paging_init(void)
 {
@@ -1037,9 +1037,7 @@ void __init misc_mem_init(void)
 	arch_numa_init();
 	sparse_init();
 	zone_sizes_init();
-#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
 	reserve_crashkernel();
-#endif
 	memblock_dump_all();
 }
 

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are