cfi: Use __builtin_function_start
Subsystems (2)
cover cfi: Use __builtin_function_start
Clang 14 introduced the __builtin_function_start intrinsic, which makes it possible to cleanly implement the function_nocfi() macro in a way that also works with static initializers. Add a default function_nocfi() implementation and drop the arm64 inline assembly version.
Sami Tolvanen (3):
kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start linux/compiler-clang.h: define function_nocfi
arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
arch/Kconfig | 5 +---- arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ---------------- include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 10 ++++++++++ init/Kconfig | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.35.0
PATCH 1/3 kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start
Clang 14 added support for the __builtin_function_start() built-in function, which allows us to implement function_nocfi() without architecture-specific inline assembly. This patch changes CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to depend on the built-in and effectively upgrades the minimum supported compiler version for CFI to Clang 14.
--- arch/Kconfig | 5 +---- init/Kconfig | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/Kconfig +1 -4
@@ -723,10 +723,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI_CLANG config CFI_CLANG bool "Use Clang's Control Flow Integrity (CFI)" depends on LTO_CLANG && ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI_CLANG - # Clang >= 12: - # - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46258 - # - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47479 - depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 + depends on CC_HAS_BUILTIN_FUNCTION_START select KALLSYMS help This option enables Clang’s forward-edge Control Flow Integrity
init/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ config CC_HAS_ASM_INLINE config CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR def_bool $(success,echo '__attribute__((no_profile_instrument_function)) int x();' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null -Werror) +config CC_HAS_BUILTIN_FUNCTION_START + def_bool $(success,echo 'void f(void) {}; void *p = __builtin_function_start(f);' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null) + config PAHOLE_VERSION int default $(shell,$(srctree)/scripts/pahole-version.sh $(PAHOLE))
Signature · 1 line
2.35.0
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start
Quoted 6 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Clang 14 added support for the
__builtin_function_start()built-in function, which allows us to implementfunction_nocfi()without architecture-specific inline assembly. This patch changesCONFIG_CFI_CLANGto depend on the built-in and effectively upgrades the minimum supported compiler version for CFI to Clang 14.
From this description, I think the straight-forward change would be:
depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000
-->
depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 140000Any reason to avoid this?
Quoted 38 lines
Signed-off-by Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>--- arch/Kconfig | 5 +---- init/Kconfig | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)arch/Kconfig +1
-4@@ -723,10 +723,7 @@ config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI_CLANG config CFI_CLANG bool "Use Clang's Control Flow Integrity (CFI)" depends on LTO_CLANG && ARCH_SUPPORTS_CFI_CLANG - # Clang >= 12: - # - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46258 - # - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47479 - depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 + depends on CC_HAS_BUILTIN_FUNCTION_START select KALLSYMS help This option enables Clang’s forward-edge Control Flow Integrityinit/Kconfig +3
-1@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ config CC_HAS_ASM_INLINE config CC_HAS_NO_PROFILE_FN_ATTR def_bool $(success,echo '__attribute__((no_profile_instrument_function)) int x();' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null -Werror) +config CC_HAS_BUILTIN_FUNCTION_START + def_bool $(success,echo 'void f(void) {}; void *p = __builtin_function_start(f);' | $(CC) -x c - -c -o /dev/null) + config PAHOLE_VERSION int default $(shell,$(srctree)/scripts/pahole-version.sh $(PAHOLE)) --
Quoted 2 lines
2.35.0
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start
Quoted 9 lines · Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 6 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Clang 14 added support for the
__builtin_function_start()built-in function, which allows us to implementfunction_nocfi()without architecture-specific inline assembly. This patch changesCONFIG_CFI_CLANGto depend on the built-in and effectively upgrades the minimum supported compiler version for CFI to Clang 14.
Quoted 7 lines
From this description, I think the straight-forward change would be:
depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 --> depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 140000Any reason to avoid this?
I thought testing for the compiler feature was preferred, but I can certainly just increase the minimum version number here too.
Sami
Nathan Chancellor
maintainerRe: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start
Quoted 12 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Quoted 11 lines · Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 6 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Clang 14 added support for the
__builtin_function_start()built-in function, which allows us to implementfunction_nocfi()without architecture-specific inline assembly. This patch changesCONFIG_CFI_CLANGto depend on the built-in and effectively upgrades the minimum supported compiler version for CFI to Clang 14.From this description, I think the straight-forward change would be:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 --> depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 140000Any reason to avoid this?
I thought testing for the compiler feature was preferred, but I can certainly just increase the minimum version number here too.
I think we have been somewhat inconsistent with feature versus version checking. It might be nice to hash out when a feature check should be done instead of a version one.
Generally, I think we tend to prefer version checks, as they are "cheaper" since we do not have to call the compiler again because we already cached the version code. When adding version checks, our policy has always been use the upstream version of LLVM that the feature in question shipped in, even if it is a top of tree version, as people who are using prereleased versions of LLVM should be frequently updating them.
Unfortunately, that does not always match reality. For example, Android's LLVM tracks the main branch but they are almost always behind by a few months. For example, the latest release is 14.0.4, based on a version of LLVM from January 28th:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/+/ab73cd180863dbd17fdb8f20e39b33ab38030cf9/clang-r450784b/clang_source_info.md
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits/282c83c32384cb2f37030c28650fef4150a8b67c
Normally, I would say "who cares?" but Android's LLVM is used by the Android kernel team both downstream and upstream, so I would argue it is important to take that into account when deciding to do a feature check versus a version check. In other words, by moving to a version check, will we knowingly break a version of clang that is relatively widely used?
In this case, 14.0.4 has __builtin_function_start(), so I think it is okay to use a version check instead of a feature one.
There are times where feature or problem checking is not always possible:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
In cases like these, we can work to upgrade the compiler before changing the feature check ot a version one, which helps minimize the window for breakage.
Another aspect of feature versus version checks is that it is easier to clean up stale versions checks when we bump the minimum supported version of the compiler (as we can just look for "CLANG_VERSION" across the tree) compared to stale feature checks. We could fix this by adding some sort of common keyword, like
Compiler check: <compiler> <comparison> <version>
like
Compiler check: clang <= 14.0.0
Cheers,
Nathan
Re: [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Change CFI_CLANG to depend on __builtin_function_start
Quoted 49 lines · Nathan Chancellor
Quoted 12 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Quoted 11 lines · Masahiro Yamada
Quoted 6 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Clang 14 added support for the
__builtin_function_start()built-in function, which allows us to implementfunction_nocfi()without architecture-specific inline assembly. This patch changesCONFIG_CFI_CLANGto depend on the built-in and effectively upgrades the minimum supported compiler version for CFI to Clang 14.From this description, I think the straight-forward change would be:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 120000 --> depends on CLANG_VERSION >= 140000Any reason to avoid this?
I thought testing for the compiler feature was preferred, but I can certainly just increase the minimum version number here too.
I think we have been somewhat inconsistent with feature versus version checking. It might be nice to hash out when a feature check should be done instead of a version one.
Generally, I think we tend to prefer version checks, as they are "cheaper" since we do not have to call the compiler again because we already cached the version code. When adding version checks, our policy has always been use the upstream version of LLVM that the feature in question shipped in, even if it is a top of tree version, as people who are using prereleased versions of LLVM should be frequently updating them.
Unfortunately, that does not always match reality. For example, Android's LLVM tracks the main branch but they are almost always behind by a few months. For example, the latest release is 14.0.4, based on a version of LLVM from January 28th:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/+/ab73cd180863dbd17fdb8f20e39b33ab38030cf9/clang-r450784b/clang_source_info.md
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commits/282c83c32384cb2f37030c28650fef4150a8b67cNormally, I would say "who cares?" but Android's LLVM is used by the Android kernel team both downstream and upstream, so I would argue it is important to take that into account when deciding to do a feature check versus a version check. In other words, by moving to a version check, will we knowingly break a version of clang that is relatively widely used?
Quoted 2 lines
In this case, 14.0.4 has
__builtin_function_start(), so I think it is okay to use a version check instead of a feature one.
Thanks for checking the details on that. Yeah, I think it's fine to go with a version check here.
Sami, can you send a v2, and I can take it via the hardening for -next? (Unless the ARM folks _really_ want it for -rc2 -- this is kind of a fix, but it's also kind of not.)
Signature · 1 line
Kees Cook
PATCH 2/3 linux/compiler-clang.h: define function_nocfi
In reply to Sami TolvanenUse __builtin_function_start() to implement the function_nocfi() macro when CONFIG_CFI_CLANG is selected.
--- include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
include/linux/compiler-clang.h +10 -0
@@ -69,6 +69,16 @@#define __nocfi __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("cfi")))#define __cficanonical __attribute__((__cfi_canonical_jump_table__)) +#if defined(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG ) +/* +* With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address +* references with the address of the function's CFI jump table +* entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the +* actual function instead. +*/ +#define function_nocfi (x) __builtin_function_start(x) +#endif +/* * Turn individual warnings and errors on and off locally, depending * on version.
Signature · 1 line
2.35.0
Mark Rutland
reviewerRe: [PATCH 2/3] linux/compiler-clang.h: define function_nocfi
Quoted 15 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Use
__builtin_function_start()to implement thefunction_nocfi()macro whenCONFIG_CFI_CLANGis selected.Signed-off-by Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>--- include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)include/linux/compiler-clang.h +0
-0@@ -69,6 +69,16 @@#define __nocfi __attribute__((__no_sanitize__("cfi")))#define __cficanonical __attribute__((__cfi_canonical_jump_table__))
include/linux/compiler-clang.h line 80
Quoted 10 lines
include/linux/compiler-clang.h +9
-0+#if defined(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG ) +/* +* With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address +* references with the address of the function's CFI jump table +* entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the +* actual function instead. +*/ +#define function_nocfi (x) __builtin_function_start(x) +#endif
As a heads-up, with patches 1 and 2 applied (but not patch 3), we have two definitions of function_nocfi(), which casues the compiler to scream for every object:
| In file included from <built-in>:3:
| In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:107:
| ./arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h:33:9: warning: 'function_nocfi' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
| #define function_nocfi(x) ({ \
| ^
| ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:79:9: note: previous definition is here
| #define function_nocfi(x) __builtin_function_start(x)
| ^
| 1 warning generated.... which would be painful for bisection.
I suspect It's probably worth folding patches 2 and 3 together to avoid that?
Arguably we could fold the entire series together into one commit at that point.
Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
PATCH 3/3 arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
In reply to Sami TolvanenDrop the inline assembly version of function_nocfi() now that CONFIG_CFI_CLANG depends on __builtin_function_start(), which allows this macro to be implemented more cleanly and in a way that works also with static initializers.
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h +0 -16
@@ -23,20 +23,4 @@#define __builtin_return_address (val) \ (void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val))) -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG -/* -* With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address -* references with the address of the function's CFI jump table -* entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the -* actual function instead. -*/ -#define function_nocfi (x) ({ \ - void *addr; \ - asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t" \ - "add %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x) \ - : "=r" (addr)); \ - addr; \ -}) -#endif -#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
Signature · 1 line
2.35.0
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
Quoted 25 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Drop the inline assembly version of
function_nocfi()now thatCONFIG_CFI_CLANGdepends on__builtin_function_start(), which allows this macro to be implemented more cleanly and in a way that works also with static initializers.Signed-off-by Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>--- arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h +0
-7@@ -23,20 +23,4 @@#define __builtin_return_address (val) \ (void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val))) -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG -/* -* With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address -* references with the address of the function's CFI jump table -* entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the -* actual function instead. -*/
arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h line 26
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h +0
-9-#define function_nocfi (x) ({ \ - void *addr; \ - asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t" \ - "add %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x) \ - : "=r" (addr)); \ - addr; \ -}) -#endif -#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */
Will
Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation of function_nocfi
In reply to Sami TolvanenQuoted 9 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Drop the inline assembly version of
function_nocfi()now thatCONFIG_CFI_CLANGdepends on__builtin_function_start(), which allows this macro to be implemented more cleanly and in a way that works also with static initializers.Signed-off-by Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>--- arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ---------------- 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
It's very nice to see the asm go here!
I grabbed the LLVM 14.0.0 binary release from llvm.org and gave this a spin. I tested with ThinLTO and CFI_CLANG, and verified that CPU hotplug and ftrace worked as expected (given those rely on function_nocfi()), and that the LKDTM CFI_FORWARD_PROTO caught the mismatched prototype as expected.
FWIW:
As noted on patch 2 I think we should squash the series together, but those tags apply either way.
Thanks,
Mark.
Quoted 29 lines
arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h +0
-16@@ -23,20 +23,4 @@#define __builtin_return_address (val) \ (void *)(ptrauth_clear_pac((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(val))) -#ifdef CONFIG_CFI_CLANG -/* -* With CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, the compiler replaces function address -* references with the address of the function's CFI jump table -* entry. The function_nocfi macro always returns the address of the -* actual function instead. -*/ -#define function_nocfi (x) ({ \ - void *addr; \ - asm("adrp %0, " __stringify(x) "\n\t" \ - "add %0, %0, :lo12:" __stringify(x) \ - : "=r" (addr)); \ - addr; \ -}) -#endif -#endif /* __ASM_COMPILER_H */ Signature · 1 line
2.35.0
Quoted 6 lines · Sami Tolvanen
Clang 14 introduced the
__builtin_function_startintrinsic, which makes it possible to cleanly implement thefunction_nocfi()macro in a way that also works with static initializers. Add a defaultfunction_nocfi()implementation and drop the arm64 inline assembly version.
For the series
I wouldn't mind if patch 1/3 included a link to the llvm commit in the commit message.
Quoted 15 lines
Sami Tolvanen (3):
kbuild: ChangeCFI_CLANGto depend on__builtin_function_startlinux/compiler-clang.h: definefunction_nocfi
arm64: Drop the inline assembly implementation offunction_nocfiarch/Kconfig | 5 +---- arch/arm64/include/asm/compiler.h | 16 ---------------- include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 10 ++++++++++ init/Kconfig | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)--
2.35.0
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers