5.17.8-rc1 review
Subsystems (2)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainercover 5.17.8-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.17.8-rc1
Peter Xu <[email protected]>
mm: fix invalid page pointer returned with FOLL_PIN gups
Huang Ying <[email protected]>
mm,migrate: fix establishing demotion target
Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
mm/mlock: fix potential imbalanced rlimit ucounts adjustment
Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported "not recovered"
Muchun Song <[email protected]>
mm: userfaultfd: fix missing cache flush in mcopy_atomic_pte() and __mcopy_atomic()
Muchun Song <[email protected]>
mm: shmem: fix missing cache flush in shmem_mfill_atomic_pte()
Muchun Song <[email protected]>
mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte()
Muchun Song <[email protected]>
mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in copy_huge_page_from_user()
Muchun Song <[email protected]>
mm: fix missing cache flush for all tail pages of compound page
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
udf: Avoid using stale lengthOfImpUse
Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <[email protected]>
rfkill: uapi: fix RFKILL_IOCTL_MAX_SIZE ioctl request definition
Itay Iellin <[email protected]>
Bluetooth: Fix the creation of hdev->name
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- fs/udf/namei.c | 8 ++++---- include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 3 +++ include/uapi/linux/rfkill.h | 2 +- mm/gup.c | 2 +- mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++- mm/memory-failure.c | 4 +++- mm/memory.c | 2 ++ mm/migrate.c | 14 ++++++++++---- mm/mlock.c | 1 + mm/shmem.c | 4 +++- mm/userfaultfd.c | 3 +++ net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 6 +++--- 13 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 1/12 Bluetooth: Fix the creation of hdev->name
From: Itay Iellin <[email protected]>
commit 103a2f3255a95991252f8f13375c3a96a75011cd upstream.
Set a size limit of 8 bytes of the written buffer to "hdev->name" including the terminating null byte, as the size of "hdev->name" is 8 bytes. If an id value which is greater than 9999 is allocated, then the "snprintf(hdev->name, sizeof(hdev->name), "hci%d", id)" function call would lead to a truncation of the id value in decimal notation.
Set an explicit maximum id parameter in the id allocation function call. The id allocation function defines the maximum allocated id value as the maximum id parameter value minus one. Therefore, HCI_MAX_ID is defined as 10000.
--- include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 3 +++ net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h +3 -0
@@ -36,6 +36,9 @@/* HCI priority */ #define HCI_PRIO_MAX 7 +/* HCI maximum id value */ +#define HCI_MAX_ID 10000 +/* HCI Core structures */ struct inquiry_data {bdaddr_t bdaddr;
net/bluetooth/hci_core.c +3 -3
@@ -2554,10 +2554,10 @@ int hci_register_dev(struct hci_dev *hde*/ switch (hdev->dev_type) {case HCI_PRIMARY : - id =ida_simple_get (&hci_index_ida,0 ,0 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + id =ida_simple_get (&hci_index_ida,0 ,HCI_MAX_ID ,GFP_KERNEL );break ;case HCI_AMP : - id =ida_simple_get (&hci_index_ida,1 ,0 ,GFP_KERNEL ); + id =ida_simple_get (&hci_index_ida,1 ,HCI_MAX_ID ,GFP_KERNEL );break ;default :return -EINVAL ;
@@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ int hci_register_dev(struct hci_dev *hdeif (id <0 )return id; -sprintf (hdev->name,"hci%d" , id); +snprintf (hdev->name,sizeof (hdev->name),"hci%d" , id); hdev->id = id;BT_DBG ("%p name %s bus %d" , hdev, hdev->name, hdev->bus);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 2/12 rfkill: uapi: fix RFKILL_IOCTL_MAX_SIZE ioctl request definition
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <[email protected]>
commit a36e07dfe6ee71e209383ea9288cd8d1617e14f9 upstream.
The definition of RFKILL_IOCTL_MAX_SIZE introduced by commit 54f586a91532 ("rfkill: make new event layout opt-in") is unusable since it is based on RFKILL_IOC_EXT_SIZE which has not been defined. Fix that by replacing the undefined constant with the constant which is intended to be used in this definition.
--- include/uapi/linux/rfkill.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/uapi/linux/rfkill.h +1 -1
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ struct rfkill_event_ext {#define RFKILL_IOC_NOINPUT 1#define RFKILL_IOCTL_NOINPUT _IO(RFKILL_IOC_MAGIC, RFKILL_IOC_NOINPUT)#define RFKILL_IOC_MAX_SIZE 2 -#define RFKILL_IOCTL_MAX_SIZE _IOW(RFKILL_IOC_MAGIC, RFKILL_IOC_EXT_SIZE, __u32) +#define RFKILL_IOCTL_MAX_SIZE _IOW(RFKILL_IOC_MAGIC, RFKILL_IOC_MAX_SIZE, __u32)/* and that's all userspace gets */
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 3/12 udf: Avoid using stale lengthOfImpUse
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
commit c1ad35dd0548ce947d97aaf92f7f2f9a202951cf upstream.
udf_write_fi() uses lengthOfImpUse of the entry it is writing to. However this field has not yet been initialized so it either contains completely bogus value or value from last directory entry at that place. In either case this is wrong and can lead to filesystem corruption or kernel crashes.
--- fs/udf/namei.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
fs/udf/namei.c +4 -4
@@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ int udf_write_fi(struct inode *inode, stif (fileident) {if (adinicb || (offset + lfi <0 )) { -memcpy (udf_get_fi_ident (sfi), fileident, lfi); +memcpy (sfi->impUse + liu, fileident, lfi); }else if (offset >=0 ) {memcpy (fibh->ebh->b_data + offset, fileident, lfi); }else { -memcpy (udf_get_fi_ident (sfi), fileident, -offset); +memcpy (sfi->impUse + liu, fileident, -offset);memcpy (fibh->ebh->b_data, fileident - offset, lfi + offset); }
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@ int udf_write_fi(struct inode *inode, st offset += lfi;if (adinicb || (offset + padlen <0 )) { -memset (udf_get_fi_ident (sfi) + lfi,0x00 , padlen); +memset (sfi->impUse + liu + lfi,0x00 , padlen); }else if (offset >=0 ) {memset (fibh->ebh->b_data + offset,0x00 , padlen); }else { -memset (udf_get_fi_ident (sfi) + lfi,0x00 , -offset); +memset (sfi->impUse + liu + lfi,0x00 , -offset);memset (fibh->ebh->b_data,0x00 , padlen + offset); }
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 4/12 mm: fix missing cache flush for all tail pages of compound page
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
commit 2771739a7162782c0aa6424b2e3dd874e884a15d upstream.
The D-cache maintenance inside move_to_new_page() only consider one page, there is still D-cache maintenance issue for tail pages of compound page (e.g. THP or HugeTLB).
THP migration is only enabled on x86_64, ARM64 and powerpc, while powerpc and arm64 need to maintain the consistency between I-Cache and D-Cache, which depends on flush_dcache_page() to maintain the consistency between I-Cache and D-Cache.
But there is no issues on arm64 and powerpc since they already considers the compound page cache flushing in their icache flush function. HugeTLB migration is enabled on arm, arm64, mips, parisc, powerpc, riscv, s390 and sh, while arm has handled the compound page cache flush in flush_dcache_page(), but most others do not.
In theory, the issue exists on many architectures. Fix this by not using flush_dcache_folio() since it is not backportable.
--- mm/migrate.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/migrate.c +5 -2
@@ -916,9 +916,12 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct pageif (!PageMappingFlags (page)) page->mapping =NULL ; -if (likely (!is_zone_device_page (newpage))) -flush_dcache_page (newpage); +if (likely (!is_zone_device_page (newpage))) { +int i, nr =compound_nr (newpage); +for (i =0 ; i < nr; i++) +flush_dcache_page (newpage + i); + } } out:return rc;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 5/12 mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in copy_huge_page_from_user()
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
commit e763243cc6cb1fcc720ec58cfd6e7c35ae90a479 upstream.
userfaultfd calls copy_huge_page_from_user() which does not do any cache flushing for the target page. Then the target page will be mapped to the user space with a different address (user address), which might have an alias issue with the kernel address used to copy the data from the user to.
Fix this issue by flushing dcache in copy_huge_page_from_user().
--- mm/memory.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
mm/memory.c +2 -0
@@ -5475,6 +5475,8 @@ long copy_huge_page_from_user(struct pagif (rc)break ; +flush_dcache_page (subpage); +cond_resched (); }return ret_val;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 6/12 mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte()
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
commit 348923665a0e50ad9fc0b3bb8127d3cb976691cc upstream.
folio_copy() will copy the data from one page to the target page, then the target page will be mapped to the user space address, which might have an alias issue with the kernel address used to copy the data from the page to. There are 2 ways to fix this issue.
1) insert flush_dcache_page() after folio_copy().
2) replace folio_copy() with copy_user_huge_page() which already considers the cache maintenance.
We chose 2) way to fix the issue since architectures can optimize this situation. It is also make backports easier.
--- mm/hugetlb.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/hugetlb.c +2 -1
@@ -5820,7 +5820,8 @@ int hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_s *pagep =NULL ; goto out; } -folio_copy (page_folio (page),page_folio (*pagep)); +copy_user_huge_page (page, *pagep, dst_addr, dst_vma, +pages_per_huge_page (h));put_page (*pagep); *pagep =NULL ; }
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 7/12 mm: shmem: fix missing cache flush in shmem_mfill_atomic_pte()
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
commit 19b482c29b6f3805f1d8e93015847b89e2f7f3b1 upstream.
userfaultfd calls shmem_mfill_atomic_pte() which does not do any cache flushing for the target page. Then the target page will be mapped to the user space with a different address (user address), which might have an alias issue with the kernel address used to copy the data from the user to. Insert flush_dcache_page() in non-zero-page case. And replace clear_highpage() with clear_user_highpage() which already considers the cache maintenance.
--- mm/shmem.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/shmem.c +3 -1
@@ -2357,8 +2357,10 @@ int shmem_mfill_atomic_pte(struct mm_str/* don't free the page */ goto out_unacct_blocks; } + +flush_dcache_page (page); }else {/* ZEROPAGE */ -clear_highpage (page); +clear_user_highpage (page, dst_addr); } }else { page = *pagep;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 8/12 mm: userfaultfd: fix missing cache flush in mcopy_atomic_pte() and __mcopy_atomic()
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
commit 7c25a0b89a487878b0691e6524fb5a8827322194 upstream.
userfaultfd calls mcopy_atomic_pte() and __mcopy_atomic() which do not do any cache flushing for the target page. Then the target page will be mapped to the user space with a different address (user address), which might have an alias issue with the kernel address used to copy the data from the user to. Fix this by insert flush_dcache_page() after copy_from_user() succeeds.
--- mm/userfaultfd.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
mm/userfaultfd.c +3 -0
@@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ static int mcopy_atomic_pte(struct mm_st/* don't free the page */ goto out; } + +flush_dcache_page (page); }else { page = *pagep; *pagep =NULL ;
@@ -628,6 +630,7 @@ retry: err = -EFAULT ; goto out; } +flush_dcache_page (page); goto retry; }else BUG_ON (page);
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 9/12 mm/hwpoison: fix error page recovered but reported "not recovered"
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
commit 046545a661af2beec21de7b90ca0e35f05088a81 upstream.
When an uncorrected memory error is consumed there is a race between the CMCI from the memory controller reporting an uncorrected error with a UCNA signature, and the core reporting and SRAR signature machine check when the data is about to be consumed.
If the CMCI wins that race, the page is marked poisoned when uc_decode_notifier() calls memory_failure() and the machine check processing code finds the page already poisoned. It calls kill_accessing_process() to make sure a SIGBUS is sent. But returns the wrong error code.
Console log looks like this:
mce: Uncorrected hardware memory error in user-access at 3710b3400
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: already hardware poisoned
Memory failure: 0x3710b3: Sending SIGBUS to einj_mem_uc:361438 due to hardware memory corruption
mce: Memory error not recovered
kill_accessing_process() is supposed to return -EHWPOISON to notify that SIGBUS is already set to the process and kill_me_maybe() doesn't have to send it again. But current code simply fails to do this, so fix it to make sure to work as intended. This change avoids the noise message "Memory error not recovered" and skips duplicate SIGBUSs.
[[email protected]: reword some parts of commit message]
--- mm/memory-failure.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/memory-failure.c +3 -1
@@ -707,8 +707,10 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct (void *)&priv);if (ret ==1 && priv.tk.addr)kill_proc (&priv.tk, pfn, flags); +else + ret =0 ;mmap_read_unlock (p->mm); -return ret ? -EFAULT : -EHWPOISON ; +return ret >0 ? -EHWPOISON : -EFAULT ; }static const char *action_name[] = {
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 10/12 mm/mlock: fix potential imbalanced rlimit ucounts adjustment
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
commit 5c2a956c3eea173b2bc89f632507c0eeaebf6c4a upstream.
user_shm_lock forgets to set allowed to 0 when get_ucounts fails. So the later user_shm_unlock might do the extra dec_rlimit_ucounts. Fix this by resetting allowed to 0.
--- mm/mlock.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
mm/mlock.c +1 -0
@@ -838,6 +838,7 @@ int user_shm_lock(size_t size, struct uc }if (!get_ucounts (ucounts)) {dec_rlimit_ucounts (ucounts,UCOUNT_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK , locked); + allowed =0 ; goto out; } allowed =1 ;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 11/12 mm,migrate: fix establishing demotion target
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Huang Ying <[email protected]>
commit fc89213a636c3735eb3386f10a34c082271b4192 upstream.
In commit ac16ec835314 ("mm: migrate: support multiple target nodes demotion"), after the first demotion target node is found, we will continue to check the next candidate obtained via find_next_best_node(). This is to find all demotion target nodes with same NUMA distance. But one side effect of find_next_best_node() is that the candidate node returned will be set in "used" parameter, even if the candidate node isn't passed in the following NUMA distance checking, the candidate node will not be used as demotion target node for the following nodes. For example, for system as follows,
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 21 17 28 1: 21 10 28 17 2: 17 28 10 28 3: 28 17 28 10
when we establish demotion target node for node 0, in the first round node 2 is added to the demotion target node set. Then in the second round, node 3 is checked and failed because distance(0, 3) > distance(0, 2). But node 3 is set in "used" nodemask too. When we establish demotion target node for node 1, there is no available node. This is wrong, node 3 should be set as the demotion target of node 1.
To fix this, if the candidate node is failed to pass the distance checking, it will be cleared in "used" nodemask. So that it can be used for the following node.
The bug can be reproduced and fixed with this patch on a 2 socket server machine with DRAM and PMEM.
--- mm/migrate.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/migrate.c +5 -2
@@ -3085,18 +3085,21 @@ static int establish_migrate_target(intif (best_distance !=-1 ) { val =node_distance (node, migration_target);if (val > best_distance) -return NUMA_NO_NODE ; + goto out_clear; } index = nd->nr;if (WARN_ONCE (index >=DEMOTION_TARGET_NODES ,"Exceeds maximum demotion target nodes\n" )) -return NUMA_NO_NODE ; + goto out_clear; nd->nodes[index] = migration_target; nd->nr++;return migration_target; +out_clear: +node_clear (migration_target, *used); +return NUMA_NO_NODE ; }/*
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 12/12 mm: fix invalid page pointer returned with FOLL_PIN gups
In reply to Greg Kroah-HartmanFrom: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
commit 7196040e19ad634293acd3eff7083149d7669031 upstream.
Patch series "mm/gup: some cleanups", v5.
This patch (of 5):
Alex reported invalid page pointer returned with pin_user_pages_remote() from vfio after upstream commit 4b6c33b32296 ("vfio/type1: Prepare for batched pinning with struct vfio_batch").
It turns out that it's not the fault of the vfio commit; however after vfio switches to a full page buffer to store the page pointers it starts to expose the problem easier.
The problem is for VM_PFNMAP vmas we should normally fail with an -EFAULT then vfio will carry on to handle the MMIO regions. However when the bug triggered, follow_page_mask() returned -EEXIST for such a page, which will jump over the current page, leaving that entry in **pages untouched. However the caller is not aware of it, hence the caller will reference the page as usual even if the pointer data can be anything.
We had that -EEXIST logic since commit 1027e4436b6a ("mm: make GUP handle pfn mapping unless FOLL_GET is requested") which seems very reasonable. It could be that when we reworked GUP with FOLL_PIN we could have overlooked that special path in commit 3faa52c03f44 ("mm/gup:
track FOLL_PIN pages"), even if that commit rightfully touched up follow_devmap_pud() on checking FOLL_PIN when it needs to return an -EEXIST.
Attaching the Fixes to the FOLL_PIN rework commit, as it happened later than 1027e4436b6a.
[[email protected]: added some tags, removed a reference to an out of tree module.]
--- mm/gup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
mm/gup.c +1 -1
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int follow_pfn_pte(struct vm_area pte_t *pte, unsigned int flags) {/* No page to get reference */ -if (flags &FOLL_GET ) +if (flags & (FOLL_GET |FOLL_PIN ))return -EFAULT ;if (flags &FOLL_TOUCH ) {
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.17:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
130 tests: 130 pass, 0 failLinux version: 5.17.8-rc1-ga8480fa60862
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04Jon
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Signature · 1 line
Florian
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 5.17.8-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.17.y
* git commit: a8480fa60862622d04d6440efdfda7e367721037
* git describe: v5.17.7-13-ga8480fa60862
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.7-13-ga8480fa60862
## Test Regressions (compared to v5.17.6-141-g34d85184d6b8) No test regressions found.
## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.17.6-141-g34d85184d6b8) No metric regressions found.
## Test Fixes (compared to v5.17.6-141-g34d85184d6b8) No test fixes found.
## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.17.6-141-g34d85184d6b8) No metric fixes found.
## Test result summary
total: 103104, pass: 86581, fail: 1173, skip: 14138, xfail: 1212
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 296 total, 293 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 47 total, 47 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 45 total, 41 passed, 4 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 41 total, 38 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 59 total, 56 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 26 total, 23 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 47 total, 47 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* v4l[
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Hey Greg,
Ran tests and boot tested on my system, no regression found
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.8-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-5.17.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
5.17.8-rc1 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.8 release. There are 12 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun, 15 May 2022 14:22:19 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build results:
total: 155 pass: 155 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 489 pass: 489 fail: 0
Guenter