LE OOB pairing support
v2 cover LE OOB pairing support
From: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
This patch series implements userspace support for LE OOB pairing. It was tested against an nRF52 dev kit with Nordic's NFC pairing example. Support is only for reading a tag; generating and sending back OOB information was not implemented.
Overall, LE EIR data is not dissimilar to BREDR, but the OOB blob starts off slightly differently necessitating a different code path before reaching the EIR parser.
Existing BREDR support was only for P-192 and that remains unchanged, though enough structure was added for P-256 support for LE. This was the change from the original patch series, where only the P-192 path existed.
Michael Brudevold (3):
eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Accept LE formatted EIR data with neard plugin
neard: Update D-Bus path and interface
plugins/neard.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- src/adapter.c | 19 +++++++--- src/adapter.h | 5 +-- src/eir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++---- src/eir.h | 10 ++++-- 5 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v2 1/3 eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
From: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
LE support added for P-256 and split out from existing BREDR support for P-192
Also attempt to free any existing values before setting new values
--- plugins/neard.c | 8 ++++---- src/eir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ src/eir.h | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
plugins/neard.c +4 -4
@@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote) remote->services = eir_data.services; eir_data.services =NULL ; - remote->hash = eir_data.hash; - eir_data.hash =NULL ; + remote->hash = eir_data.hash192; + eir_data.hash192 =NULL ; - remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer; - eir_data.randomizer =NULL ; + remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer192; + eir_data.randomizer192 =NULL ;eir_data_free (&eir_data);
src/eir.c +35 -6
70 lines not on this page · raw message
src/eir.h +8 -2
@@ -33,9 +33,12 @@#define EIR_PUB_TRGT_ADDR 0x17/* LE: Public Target Address */ #define EIR_RND_TRGT_ADDR 0x18/* LE: Random Target Address */ #define EIR_GAP_APPEARANCE 0x19/* GAP appearance */ +#define EIR_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS 0x1B/* LE: Bluetooth Device Address */ #define EIR_SOLICIT32 0x1F/* LE: Solicit UUIDs, 32-bit */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA32 0x20/* LE: Service data, 32-bit UUID */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA128 0x21/* LE: Service data, 128-bit UUID */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_CONF 0x22/* LE: Secure Connections Confirmation Value */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_RAND 0x23/* LE: Secure Connections Random Value */ #define EIR_TRANSPORT_DISCOVERY 0x26/* Transport Discovery Service */ #define EIR_MANUFACTURER_DATA 0xFF/* Manufacturer Specific Data */
@@ -77,9 +80,12 @@ struct eir_data {uint16_t appearance;bool name_complete;int8_t tx_power; -uint8_t *hash; -uint8_t *randomizer; +uint8_t *hash192; +uint8_t *randomizer192; +uint8_t *hash256; +uint8_t *randomizer256;bdaddr_t addr; +uint8_t addr_type;uint16_t did_vendor;uint16_t did_product;uint16_t did_version;
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
Dear submitter,
Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list. This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=649437
---Test result---
Test Summary:
CheckPatch FAIL 4.40 seconds GitLint PASS 2.99 seconds Prep - Setup ELL PASS 43.55 seconds Build - Prep PASS 0.74 seconds Build - Configure PASS 8.77 seconds Build - Make PASS 1434.98 seconds Make Check PASS 11.93 seconds Make Check w/Valgrind PASS 450.60 seconds Make Distcheck PASS 234.96 seconds Build w/ext ELL - Configure PASS 8.77 seconds Build w/ext ELL - Make PASS 1408.11 seconds Incremental Build with patchesPASS 4282.77 seconds
Details
##############################
Test: CheckPatch - FAIL
Desc: Run checkpatch.pl script with rule in .checkpatch.conf Output:
[v2,1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns #202: FILE: src/eir.h:40:
+#define EIR_LE_SC_CONF 0x22 /* LE: Secure Connections Confirmation Value */
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns #203: FILE: src/eir.h:41:
+#define EIR_LE_SC_RAND 0x23 /* LE: Secure Connections Random Value */
/github/workspace/src/12878130.patch total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 111 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
/github/workspace/src/12878130.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPDX_LICENSE_TAG SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
[v2,2/3] Accept LE formatted EIR data with neard plugin WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns #184: FILE: plugins/neard.c:581:
+ /* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns #193: FILE: plugins/neard.c:599:
+ /* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line length of 89 exceeds 80 columns #206: FILE: plugins/neard.c:617:
+ /* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns #243: FILE: plugins/neard.c:750:
+ remote.address_type);
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 85 exceeds 80 columns #252: FILE: plugins/neard.c:774:
+ remote.address_type, io_cap);
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 84 exceeds 80 columns #322: FILE: src/adapter.h:216:
+ const bdaddr_t *bdaddr, uint8_t bdaddr_type,
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns #323: FILE: src/adapter.h:217:
+ uint8_t *hash192, uint8_t *randomizer192,
WARNING:LONG_LINE: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns #324: FILE: src/adapter.h:218:
+ uint8_t *hash256, uint8_t *randomizer256);
/github/workspace/src/12878131.patch total: 0 errors, 8 warnings, 206 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
/github/workspace/src/12878131.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: Ignored message types: COMMIT_MESSAGE COMPLEX_MACRO CONST_STRUCT FILE_PATH_CHANGES MISSING_SIGN_OFF PREFER_PACKED SPDX_LICENSE_TAG SPLIT_STRING SSCANF_TO_KSTRTO
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
---
Regards,
Linux Bluetooth
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
In reply to Michael BrudevoldHi Michael,
Quoted 144 lines · Michael Brudevold
From: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
LE support added for P-256 and split out from existing BREDR support for P-192
Also attempt to free any existing values before setting new values
--- plugins/neard.c | 8 ++++---- src/eir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ src/eir.h | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)plugins/neard.c +4
-4@@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote) remote->services = eir_data.services; eir_data.services =NULL ; - remote->hash = eir_data.hash; - eir_data.hash =NULL ; + remote->hash = eir_data.hash192; + eir_data.hash192 =NULL ; - remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer; - eir_data.randomizer =NULL ; + remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer192; + eir_data.randomizer192 =NULL ;eir_data_free (&eir_data);src/eir.c +35
-6@@ -53,10 +53,14 @@ void eir_data_free(struct eir_data *eir) eir->services =NULL ;g_free (eir->name); eir->name =NULL ; -free (eir->hash); - eir->hash =NULL ; -free (eir->randomizer); - eir->randomizer =NULL ; +free (eir->hash192); + eir->hash192 =NULL ; +free (eir->randomizer192); + eir->randomizer192 =NULL ; +free (eir->hash256); + eir->hash256 =NULL ; +free (eir->randomizer256); + eir->randomizer256 =NULL ;g_slist_free_full (eir->msd_list, g_free); eir->msd_list =NULL ;g_slist_free_full (eir->sd_list, sd_free);@@ -323,13 +327,15 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len)case EIR_SSP_HASH :if (data_len <16 )break ; - eir->hash =util_memdup (data,16 ); +free (eir->hash192); + eir->hash192 =util_memdup (data,16 );break ;case EIR_SSP_RANDOMIZER :if (data_len <16 )break ; - eir->randomizer =util_memdup (data,16 ); +free (eir->randomizer192); + eir->randomizer192 =util_memdup (data,16 );break ;case EIR_DEVICE_ID :@@ -342,6 +348,15 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len) eir->did_version = data[6 ] | (data[7 ] <<8 );break ; +case EIR_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (data_len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&eir->addr, data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + eir->addr_type = data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; +case EIR_SVC_DATA16 :eir_parse_uuid16_data (eir, data, data_len);break ;@@ -354,6 +369,20 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len)eir_parse_uuid128_data (eir, data, data_len);break ; +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (data_len <16 ) +break ; +free (eir->hash256); + eir->hash256 =util_memdup (data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (data_len <16 ) +break ; +free (eir->randomizer256); + eir->randomizer256 =util_memdup (data,16 ); +break ; +case EIR_MANUFACTURER_DATA :eir_parse_msd (eir, data, data_len);break ;src/eir.h +8
-3@@ -33,9 +33,12 @@#define EIR_PUB_TRGT_ADDR 0x17/* LE: Public Target Address */ #define EIR_RND_TRGT_ADDR 0x18/* LE: Random Target Address */ #define EIR_GAP_APPEARANCE 0x19/* GAP appearance */ +#define EIR_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS 0x1B/* LE: Bluetooth Device Address */ #define EIR_SOLICIT32 0x1F/* LE: Solicit UUIDs, 32-bit */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA32 0x20/* LE: Service data, 32-bit UUID */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA128 0x21/* LE: Service data, 128-bit UUID */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_CONF 0x22/* LE: Secure Connections Confirmation Value */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_RAND 0x23/* LE: Secure Connections Random Value */ #define EIR_TRANSPORT_DISCOVERY 0x26/* Transport Discovery Service */ #define EIR_MANUFACTURER_DATA 0xFF/* Manufacturer Specific Data */ @@ -77,9 +80,12 @@ struct eir_data {uint16_t appearance;bool name_complete;int8_t tx_power; -uint8_t *hash; -uint8_t *randomizer; +uint8_t *hash192; +uint8_t *randomizer192; +uint8_t *hash256; +uint8_t *randomizer256;bdaddr_t addr; +uint8_t addr_type;uint16_t did_vendor;uint16_t did_product;uint16_t did_version; --
Quoted 1 line
2.25.1
It might be better to handle this via bt_ad instance instead of eir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch to bt_ad but it seems we forgot about it at some point.
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 145 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Michael,
Quoted 141 lines · Michael Brudevold
From: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
LE support added for P-256 and split out from existing BREDR support for P-192
Also attempt to free any existing values before setting new values
--- plugins/neard.c | 8 ++++---- src/eir.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ src/eir.h | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)plugins/neard.c +4
-4@@ -352,11 +352,11 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote) remote->services = eir_data.services; eir_data.services =NULL ; - remote->hash = eir_data.hash; - eir_data.hash =NULL ; + remote->hash = eir_data.hash192; + eir_data.hash192 =NULL ; - remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer; - eir_data.randomizer =NULL ; + remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer192; + eir_data.randomizer192 =NULL ;eir_data_free (&eir_data);src/eir.c +35
-6@@ -53,10 +53,14 @@ void eir_data_free(struct eir_data *eir) eir->services =NULL ;g_free (eir->name); eir->name =NULL ; -free (eir->hash); - eir->hash =NULL ; -free (eir->randomizer); - eir->randomizer =NULL ; +free (eir->hash192); + eir->hash192 =NULL ; +free (eir->randomizer192); + eir->randomizer192 =NULL ; +free (eir->hash256); + eir->hash256 =NULL ; +free (eir->randomizer256); + eir->randomizer256 =NULL ;g_slist_free_full (eir->msd_list, g_free); eir->msd_list =NULL ;g_slist_free_full (eir->sd_list, sd_free);@@ -323,13 +327,15 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len)case EIR_SSP_HASH :if (data_len <16 )break ; - eir->hash =util_memdup (data,16 ); +free (eir->hash192); + eir->hash192 =util_memdup (data,16 );break ;case EIR_SSP_RANDOMIZER :if (data_len <16 )break ; - eir->randomizer =util_memdup (data,16 ); +free (eir->randomizer192); + eir->randomizer192 =util_memdup (data,16 );break ;case EIR_DEVICE_ID :@@ -342,6 +348,15 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len) eir->did_version = data[6 ] | (data[7 ] <<8 );break ; +case EIR_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (data_len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&eir->addr, data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + eir->addr_type = data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; +case EIR_SVC_DATA16 :eir_parse_uuid16_data (eir, data, data_len);break ;@@ -354,6 +369,20 @@ void eir_parse(struct eir_data *eir, const uint8_t *eir_data, uint8_t eir_len)eir_parse_uuid128_data (eir, data, data_len);break ; +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (data_len <16 ) +break ; +free (eir->hash256); + eir->hash256 =util_memdup (data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (data_len <16 ) +break ; +free (eir->randomizer256); + eir->randomizer256 =util_memdup (data,16 ); +break ; +case EIR_MANUFACTURER_DATA :eir_parse_msd (eir, data, data_len);break ;src/eir.h +8
-2@@ -33,9 +33,12 @@#define EIR_PUB_TRGT_ADDR 0x17/* LE: Public Target Address */ #define EIR_RND_TRGT_ADDR 0x18/* LE: Random Target Address */ #define EIR_GAP_APPEARANCE 0x19/* GAP appearance */ +#define EIR_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS 0x1B/* LE: Bluetooth Device Address */ #define EIR_SOLICIT32 0x1F/* LE: Solicit UUIDs, 32-bit */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA32 0x20/* LE: Service data, 32-bit UUID */ #define EIR_SVC_DATA128 0x21/* LE: Service data, 128-bit UUID */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_CONF 0x22/* LE: Secure Connections Confirmation Value */ +#define EIR_LE_SC_RAND 0x23/* LE: Secure Connections Random Value */ #define EIR_TRANSPORT_DISCOVERY 0x26/* Transport Discovery Service */ #define EIR_MANUFACTURER_DATA 0xFF/* Manufacturer Specific Data */ @@ -77,9 +80,12 @@ struct eir_data {uint16_t appearance;bool name_complete;int8_t tx_power; -uint8_t *hash; -uint8_t *randomizer; +uint8_t *hash192; +uint8_t *randomizer192; +uint8_t *hash256; +uint8_t *randomizer256;bdaddr_t addr; +uint8_t addr_type;uint16_t did_vendor;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
src/eir.h +0
-1uint16_t did_product;uint16_t did_version; --2.25.1
It might be better to handle this via
bt_adinstance instead ofeir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch tobt_adbut it seems we forgot about it at some point.
Are you thinking something like below (doesn't fully compile, name2utf8 is static in eir so I did nothing about that yet)? Basically where the ad code parses the EIR data, but the neard plugin still manages what to do with the data? The alternative would be where device.c became smarter to consume the ad struct itself and the neard plugin becomes a simple conduit for the ad data.
index 77a4630da..3d4064515 100644
plugins/neard.c +47 -0
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@#include "src/agent.h" #include "src/btd.h" #include "src/shared/util.h" +#include "src/shared/ad.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard"#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard"
@@ -336,6 +337,52 @@ static int check_device(struct btd_device *device)return 0 ; } +static void process_oob_adv (void *data,void *user_data) +{ +struct bt_ad_data *ad_data = data; +struct oob_params *remote = user_data; +uint8_t name_len; + +switch (ad_data->type) { +case EIR_NAME_SHORT : +case EIR_NAME_COMPLETE : + name_len = ad_data->len; + +/* Some vendors put a NUL byte terminator into +* the name */ +while (name_len >0 && ad_data->data[name_len -1 ] =='\0' ) + name_len--; + +g_free (remote->name); + + remote->name =name2utf8 (ad_data->data, name_len); +break ; + +case BT_AD_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (ad_data->len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&remote->address, ad_data->data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + remote->address_type = ad_data->data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->hash256); + remote->hash256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->randomizer256); + remote->randomizer256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + } +} +static int process_eir (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) {struct eir_data eir_data;
@@ -370,32 +417,17 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t
size, struct oob_params *remote)
static void process_eir_le(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, structoob_params *remote)
{
- struct eir_data eir_data;
+ struct bt_ad *ad;
DBG("size %zu", size);- memset(&eir_data, 0, sizeof(eir_data));
-
- eir_parse(&eir_data, eir, size);
-
- bacpy(&remote->address, &eir_data.addr);
- remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type;
-
- remote->class = eir_data.class;
-
- remote->name = eir_data.name;
- eir_data.name = NULL;
-
- remote->services = eir_data.services;
- eir_data.services = NULL;
-
- remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; - eir_data.hash256 = NULL; + ad = bt_ad_new_with_data(size, eir);
- remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256;
- eir_data.randomizer256 = NULL;
+ if (ad) {+ bt_ad_foreach_data(ad, process_oob_adv, remote);
- eir_data_free(&eir_data);
+ bt_ad_unref(ad);
+ }
}
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Hi Mike,
Quoted 7 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 3 lines
It might be better to handle this via
bt_adinstance instead ofeir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch tobt_adbut it seems we forgot about it at some point.
Quoted 6 lines
Are you thinking something like below (doesn't fully compile, name2utf8 is static in eir so I did nothing about that yet)? Basically where the ad code parses the EIR data, but the neard plugin still manages what to do with the data? The alternative would be where
device.cbecame smarter to consume the ad struct itself and the neard plugin becomes a simple conduit for the ad data.
The later is probably better alternative, like I said I wrote bt_ad to replace eir handling completely so we could also write proper unit testing for it, Im fine if you want to take the time to change the daemon core itself but at least introduce support for the types you will be using in the plugin and then make use of them.
Quoted 50 lines
index
77a4630da..3d4064515100644plugins/neard.c +36
-0@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@#include "src/agent.h" #include "src/btd.h" #include "src/shared/util.h" +#include "src/shared/ad.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard"#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard"@@ -336,6 +337,52 @@ static int check_device(struct btd_device *device)return 0 ; } +static void process_oob_adv (void *data,void *user_data) +{ +struct bt_ad_data *ad_data = data; +struct oob_params *remote = user_data; +uint8_t name_len; + +switch (ad_data->type) { +case EIR_NAME_SHORT : +case EIR_NAME_COMPLETE : + name_len = ad_data->len; + +/* Some vendors put a NUL byte terminator into +* the name */ +while (name_len >0 && ad_data->data[name_len -1 ] =='\0' ) + name_len--; + +g_free (remote->name); + + remote->name =name2utf8 (ad_data->data, name_len); +break ; + +case BT_AD_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (ad_data->len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&remote->address, ad_data->data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + remote->address_type = ad_data->data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->hash256); + remote->hash256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 );
plugins/neard.c static int check_device(struct btd_device *device) · line 384
Quoted 10 lines
plugins/neard.c +10
-0+break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->randomizer256); + remote->randomizer256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + } +}
Do we need to duplicate this information? I'd consider just using the bt_ad instance to parse and store them, well perhaps we want to introduce something like bt_ad_foreach_type so you can locate the data by type?
Quoted 42 lines
plugins/neard.c +6
-21static int process_eir (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) {struct eir_data eir_data;@@ -370,32 +417,17 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote)static void process_eir_le (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) { -struct eir_data eir_data; +struct bt_ad *ad;DBG ("size %zu" , size); -memset (&eir_data,0 ,sizeof (eir_data)); - -eir_parse (&eir_data, eir, size); - -bacpy (&remote->address, &eir_data.addr); - remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type; - - remote->class = eir_data.class; - - remote->name = eir_data.name; - eir_data.name =NULL ; - - remote->services = eir_data.services; - eir_data.services =NULL ; - - remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; - eir_data.hash256 =NULL ; + ad =bt_ad_new_with_data (size, eir); - remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256; - eir_data.randomizer256 =NULL ; +if (ad) { +bt_ad_foreach_data (ad, process_oob_adv, remote); -eir_data_free (&eir_data); +bt_ad_unref (ad); + } }
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 81 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Mike,
Quoted 7 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 3 lines
It might be better to handle this via
bt_adinstance instead ofeir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch tobt_adbut it seems we forgot about it at some point.Quoted 6 lines
Are you thinking something like below (doesn't fully compile, name2utf8 is static in eir so I did nothing about that yet)? Basically where the ad code parses the EIR data, but the neard plugin still manages what to do with the data? The alternative would be where
device.cbecame smarter to consume the ad struct itself and the neard plugin becomes a simple conduit for the ad data.The later is probably better alternative, like I said I wrote
bt_adto replace eir handling completely so we could also write proper unit testing for it, Im fine if you want to take the time to change the daemon core itself but at least introduce support for the types you will be using in the plugin and then make use of them.Quoted 57 lines
index
77a4630da..3d4064515100644plugins/neard.c +43
-0@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@#include "src/agent.h" #include "src/btd.h" #include "src/shared/util.h" +#include "src/shared/ad.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard"#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard"@@ -336,6 +337,52 @@ static int check_device(struct btd_device *device)return 0 ; } +static void process_oob_adv (void *data,void *user_data) +{ +struct bt_ad_data *ad_data = data; +struct oob_params *remote = user_data; +uint8_t name_len; + +switch (ad_data->type) { +case EIR_NAME_SHORT : +case EIR_NAME_COMPLETE : + name_len = ad_data->len; + +/* Some vendors put a NUL byte terminator into +* the name */ +while (name_len >0 && ad_data->data[name_len -1 ] =='\0' ) + name_len--; + +g_free (remote->name); + + remote->name =name2utf8 (ad_data->data, name_len); +break ; + +case BT_AD_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (ad_data->len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&remote->address, ad_data->data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + remote->address_type = ad_data->data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->hash256); + remote->hash256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->randomizer256); + remote->randomizer256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 );
Quoted 8 lines
plugins/neard.c static int check_device(struct btd_device *device) · line 384
Quoted 3 lines
plugins/neard.c +3
-0+break ; + } +}Do we need to duplicate this information? I'd consider just using the
bt_adinstance to parse and store them, well perhaps we want to introduce something likebt_ad_foreach_typeso you can locate the data by type?
That's partly what I was checking on. The ad code doesn't have much functionality right now to be able to parse the meaning of the data, beyond storing them in TLV format (bt_ad_data). Which is the opposite to how the data is given to ad if you're creating an advertisement (e.g., service UUIDs are stored in bt_uuid_t format inside the service queue when using bt_ad_add_service_uuid, not in the data queue). This means the ad code likely has to get smarter, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something that should have been obvious. If the ad code can present the data back in a usable format, then it wouldn't really have to be duplicated. Otherwise this code would have been an easy way to not use the eir code while the ad code gets developed. With some concern still that there's a type_reject_list related to the data ad queue, but that can be completely bypassed when using bt_ad_new_with_data - so this method is doing something that seems unintended.
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 33 lines
plugins/neard.c +2
-18static int process_eir (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) {struct eir_data eir_data;@@ -370,32 +417,17 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote)static void process_eir_le (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) { -struct eir_data eir_data; +struct bt_ad *ad;DBG ("size %zu" , size); -memset (&eir_data,0 ,sizeof (eir_data)); - -eir_parse (&eir_data, eir, size); - -bacpy (&remote->address, &eir_data.addr); - remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type; - - remote->class = eir_data.class; - - remote->name = eir_data.name; - eir_data.name =NULL ; - - remote->services = eir_data.services; - eir_data.services =NULL ; - - remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; - eir_data.hash256 =NULL ; + ad =bt_ad_new_with_data (size, eir);plugins/neard.c static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t · line 433
Quoted 10 lines
plugins/neard.c +4
-3- remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256; - eir_data.randomizer256 =NULL ; +if (ad) { +bt_ad_foreach_data (ad, process_oob_adv, remote); -eir_data_free (&eir_data); +bt_ad_unref (ad); + } }--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
maintainerRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Hi Mike,
Quoted 95 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 81 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Mike,
Quoted 7 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 3 lines
It might be better to handle this via
bt_adinstance instead ofeir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch tobt_adbut it seems we forgot about it at some point.Quoted 6 lines
Are you thinking something like below (doesn't fully compile, name2utf8 is static in eir so I did nothing about that yet)? Basically where the ad code parses the EIR data, but the neard plugin still manages what to do with the data? The alternative would be where
device.cbecame smarter to consume the ad struct itself and the neard plugin becomes a simple conduit for the ad data.The later is probably better alternative, like I said I wrote
bt_adto replace eir handling completely so we could also write proper unit testing for it, Im fine if you want to take the time to change the daemon core itself but at least introduce support for the types you will be using in the plugin and then make use of them.Quoted 57 lines
index
77a4630da..3d4064515100644plugins/neard.c +43
-0@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@#include "src/agent.h" #include "src/btd.h" #include "src/shared/util.h" +#include "src/shared/ad.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard"#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard"@@ -336,6 +337,52 @@ static int check_device(struct btd_device *device)return 0 ; } +static void process_oob_adv (void *data,void *user_data) +{ +struct bt_ad_data *ad_data = data; +struct oob_params *remote = user_data; +uint8_t name_len; + +switch (ad_data->type) { +case EIR_NAME_SHORT : +case EIR_NAME_COMPLETE : + name_len = ad_data->len; + +/* Some vendors put a NUL byte terminator into +* the name */ +while (name_len >0 && ad_data->data[name_len -1 ] =='\0' ) + name_len--; + +g_free (remote->name); + + remote->name =name2utf8 (ad_data->data, name_len); +break ; + +case BT_AD_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (ad_data->len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&remote->address, ad_data->data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + remote->address_type = ad_data->data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->hash256); + remote->hash256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->randomizer256); + remote->randomizer256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 );Quoted 8 lines
plugins/neard.c static int check_device(struct btd_device *device) · line 384
Quoted 3 lines
plugins/neard.c +3
-0+break ; + } +}Do we need to duplicate this information? I'd consider just using the
bt_adinstance to parse and store them, well perhaps we want to introduce something likebt_ad_foreach_typeso you can locate the data by type?
Quoted 15 lines
That's partly what I was checking on. The ad code doesn't have much functionality right now to be able to parse the meaning of the data, beyond storing them in TLV format (
bt_ad_data). Which is the opposite to how the data is given to ad if you're creating an advertisement (e.g., service UUIDs are stored inbt_uuid_tformat inside the service queue when usingbt_ad_add_service_uuid, not in the data queue). This means the ad code likely has to get smarter, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something that should have been obvious. If the ad code can present the data back in a usable format, then it wouldn't really have to be duplicated. Otherwise this code would have been an easy way to not use the eir code while the ad code gets developed. With some concern still that there's atype_reject_listrelated to the data ad queue, but that can be completely bypassed when usingbt_ad_new_with_data- so this method is doing something that seems unintended.
Are you missing some feedback on these changes?
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 33 lines
plugins/neard.c +2
-18static int process_eir (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) {struct eir_data eir_data;@@ -370,32 +417,17 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote)static void process_eir_le (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) { -struct eir_data eir_data; +struct bt_ad *ad;DBG ("size %zu" , size); -memset (&eir_data,0 ,sizeof (eir_data)); - -eir_parse (&eir_data, eir, size); - -bacpy (&remote->address, &eir_data.addr); - remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type; - - remote->class = eir_data.class; - - remote->name = eir_data.name; - eir_data.name =NULL ; - - remote->services = eir_data.services; - eir_data.services =NULL ; - - remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; - eir_data.hash256 =NULL ; + ad =bt_ad_new_with_data (size, eir);plugins/neard.c static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t · line 433
Quoted 10 lines
plugins/neard.c +4
-3- remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256; - eir_data.randomizer256 =NULL ; +if (ad) { +bt_ad_foreach_data (ad, process_oob_adv, remote); -eir_data_free (&eir_data); +bt_ad_unref (ad); + } }--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Signature · 1 line
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] eir: parse data types for LE OOB pairing
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 115 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Mike,
Quoted 95 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 81 lines · Luiz Augusto von Dentz
Hi Mike,
Quoted 7 lines · Mike Brudevold
Hi Luiz,
Quoted 3 lines
It might be better to handle this via
bt_adinstance instead ofeir_data, in fact the plan was always to switch tobt_adbut it seems we forgot about it at some point.Quoted 6 lines
Are you thinking something like below (doesn't fully compile, name2utf8 is static in eir so I did nothing about that yet)? Basically where the ad code parses the EIR data, but the neard plugin still manages what to do with the data? The alternative would be where
device.cbecame smarter to consume the ad struct itself and the neard plugin becomes a simple conduit for the ad data.The later is probably better alternative, like I said I wrote
bt_adto replace eir handling completely so we could also write proper unit testing for it, Im fine if you want to take the time to change the daemon core itself but at least introduce support for the types you will be using in the plugin and then make use of them.Quoted 57 lines
index
77a4630da..3d4064515100644plugins/neard.c +43
-0@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@#include "src/agent.h" #include "src/btd.h" #include "src/shared/util.h" +#include "src/shared/ad.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard"#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard"@@ -336,6 +337,52 @@ static int check_device(struct btd_device *device)return 0 ; } +static void process_oob_adv (void *data,void *user_data) +{ +struct bt_ad_data *ad_data = data; +struct oob_params *remote = user_data; +uint8_t name_len; + +switch (ad_data->type) { +case EIR_NAME_SHORT : +case EIR_NAME_COMPLETE : + name_len = ad_data->len; + +/* Some vendors put a NUL byte terminator into +* the name */ +while (name_len >0 && ad_data->data[name_len -1 ] =='\0' ) + name_len--; + +g_free (remote->name); + + remote->name =name2utf8 (ad_data->data, name_len); +break ; + +case BT_AD_LE_DEVICE_ADDRESS : +if (ad_data->len <sizeof (bdaddr_t) +1 ) +break ; + +memcpy (&remote->address, ad_data->data,sizeof (bdaddr_t)); + remote->address_type = ad_data->data[sizeof (bdaddr_t)] &0x1 ? +BDADDR_LE_RANDOM :BDADDR_LE_PUBLIC ; +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_CONF : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->hash256); + remote->hash256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 ); +break ; + +case EIR_LE_SC_RAND : +if (ad_data->len <16 ) +break ; +free (remote->randomizer256); + remote->randomizer256 =util_memdup (ad_data->data,16 );Quoted 8 lines
plugins/neard.c static int check_device(struct btd_device *device) · line 384
Quoted 3 lines
plugins/neard.c +3
-0+break ; + } +}Do we need to duplicate this information? I'd consider just using the
bt_adinstance to parse and store them, well perhaps we want to introduce something likebt_ad_foreach_typeso you can locate the data by type?Quoted 15 lines
That's partly what I was checking on. The ad code doesn't have much functionality right now to be able to parse the meaning of the data, beyond storing them in TLV format (
bt_ad_data). Which is the opposite to how the data is given to ad if you're creating an advertisement (e.g., service UUIDs are stored inbt_uuid_tformat inside the service queue when usingbt_ad_add_service_uuid, not in the data queue). This means the ad code likely has to get smarter, but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something that should have been obvious. If the ad code can present the data back in a usable format, then it wouldn't really have to be duplicated. Otherwise this code would have been an easy way to not use the eir code while the ad code gets developed. With some concern still that there's atype_reject_listrelated to the data ad queue, but that can be completely bypassed when usingbt_ad_new_with_data- so this method is doing something that seems unintended.
Quoted 1 line
Are you missing some feedback on these changes?
If you have any, I welcome them. I have an idea of what I would do to augment struct bt_ad by making bt_ad_new_with_data smarter to parse out to other queues/data values, but it hasn't been the highest priority so I haven't put any time into it.
Quoted 54 lines
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 40 lines
plugins/neard.c +4
-20static int process_eir (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) {struct eir_data eir_data;@@ -370,32 +417,17 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote)static void process_eir_le (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) { -struct eir_data eir_data; +struct bt_ad *ad;DBG ("size %zu" , size); -memset (&eir_data,0 ,sizeof (eir_data)); - -eir_parse (&eir_data, eir, size); - -bacpy (&remote->address, &eir_data.addr); - remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type; - - remote->class = eir_data.class; - - remote->name = eir_data.name; - eir_data.name =NULL ; - - remote->services = eir_data.services; - eir_data.services =NULL ; - - remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; - eir_data.hash256 =NULL ; + ad =bt_ad_new_with_data (size, eir); - remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256; - eir_data.randomizer256 =NULL ; +if (ad) { +bt_ad_foreach_data (ad, process_oob_adv, remote);Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
plugins/neard.c static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t · line 433
Quoted 4 lines
plugins/neard.c +2
-1-eir_data_free (&eir_data); +bt_ad_unref (ad); + } }--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz--
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
PATCH v2 2/3 Accept LE formatted EIR data with neard plugin
In reply to Michael BrudevoldFrom: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
LE EIR differs from BREDR EIR in that it does not start with the device address. Add ability to handle this data and send the correct address type when adding remote OOB.
BREDR support remains for P-192; P-256 is not added.
This patch does not address requesting LE OOB data.
--- plugins/neard.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- src/adapter.c | 19 ++++++++--- src/adapter.h | 5 +-- 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
plugins/neard.c +71 -15
@@ -56,11 +56,14 @@ enum cps {struct oob_params {bdaddr_t address; +uint8_t address_type;uint32_t class;char *name;GSList *services; -uint8_t *hash; -uint8_t *randomizer; +uint8_t *hash192; +uint8_t *randomizer192; +uint8_t *hash256; +uint8_t *randomizer256;uint8_t *pin;int pin_len;enum cps power_state;
@@ -70,8 +73,10 @@ static void free_oob_params(struct oob_params *params) {g_slist_free_full (params->services, free);g_free (params->name); -g_free (params->hash); -g_free (params->randomizer); +g_free (params->hash192); +g_free (params->randomizer192); +g_free (params->hash256); +g_free (params->randomizer256);free (params->pin); }
@@ -352,10 +357,10 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote) remote->services = eir_data.services; eir_data.services =NULL ; - remote->hash = eir_data.hash192; + remote->hash192 = eir_data.hash192; eir_data.hash192 =NULL ; - remote->randomizer = eir_data.randomizer192; + remote->randomizer192 = eir_data.randomizer192; eir_data.randomizer192 =NULL ;eir_data_free (&eir_data);
@@ -363,6 +368,36 @@ static int process_eir(uint8_t *eir, size_t size, struct oob_params *remote)return 0 ; } +static void process_eir_le (uint8_t *eir,size_t size,struct oob_params *remote) +{ +struct eir_data eir_data; + +DBG ("size %zu" , size); + +memset (&eir_data,0 ,sizeof (eir_data)); + +eir_parse (&eir_data, eir, size); + +bacpy (&remote->address, &eir_data.addr); + remote->address_type = eir_data.addr_type; + + remote->class = eir_data.class; + + remote->name = eir_data.name; + eir_data.name =NULL ; + + remote->services = eir_data.services; + eir_data.services =NULL ; + + remote->hash256 = eir_data.hash256; + eir_data.hash256 =NULL ; + + remote->randomizer256 = eir_data.randomizer256; + eir_data.randomizer256 =NULL ; + +eir_data_free (&eir_data); +} +/* * This is (barely documented) Nokia extension format, most work was done by * reverse engineering.
@@ -543,7 +578,7 @@ static int process_message(DBusMessage *msg, struct oob_params *remote)uint8_t *eir;int size; -/* nokia.com:bt and EIR should not be passed together */ +/* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */ if (bacmp (&remote->address,BDADDR_ANY ) !=0 ) goto error;
@@ -561,7 +596,7 @@ static int process_message(DBusMessage *msg, struct oob_params *remote)uint8_t *data;int size; -/* nokia.com:bt and EIR should not be passed together */ +/* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */ if (bacmp (&remote->address,BDADDR_ANY ) !=0 ) goto error;
@@ -574,6 +609,23 @@ static int process_message(DBusMessage *msg, struct oob_params *remote)if (process_nokia_com_bt (data, size, remote)) goto error; + }else if (strcasecmp (key,"EIR.le" ) ==0 ) { +DBusMessageIter array; +uint8_t *eir; +int size; + +/* nokia.com:bt, EIR, and EIR.le should not be passed together */ +if (bacmp (&remote->address,BDADDR_ANY ) !=0 ) + goto error; + +if (dbus_message_iter_get_arg_type (&value) != +DBUS_TYPE_ARRAY ) + goto error; + +dbus_message_iter_recurse (&value, &array); +dbus_message_iter_get_fixed_array (&array, &eir, &size); + +process_eir_le (eir, size, remote); }else if (strcasecmp (key,"State" ) ==0 ) {const char *state;
@@ -635,10 +687,13 @@ static void store_params(struct btd_adapter *adapter, struct btd_device *device,if (params->services)device_add_eir_uuids (device, params->services); -if (params->hash) { +if (params->hash192 || params->hash256) {btd_adapter_add_remote_oob_data (adapter, ¶ms->address, - params->hash, - params->randomizer); + params->address_type, + params->hash192, + params->randomizer192, + params->hash256, + params->randomizer256); }else if (params->pin_len) {/* TODO * Handle PIN, for now only discovery mode and 'common' PINs
@@ -692,7 +747,7 @@ static DBusMessage *push_oob(DBusConnection *conn, DBusMessage *msg, void *data) } device =btd_adapter_get_device (adapter, &remote.address, -BDADDR_BREDR ); + remote.address_type); err =check_device (device);if (err <0 ) {
@@ -716,7 +771,7 @@ static DBusMessage *push_oob(DBusConnection *conn, DBusMessage *msg, void *data)free_oob_params (&remote); err =adapter_create_bonding (adapter,device_get_address (device), -BDADDR_BREDR , io_cap); + remote.address_type, io_cap);if (err <0 )return error_reply (msg, -err);
@@ -764,7 +819,8 @@ static DBusMessage *request_oob(DBusConnection *conn, DBusMessage *msg, goto done; } - device =btd_adapter_get_device (adapter, &remote.address,BDADDR_BREDR ); + device =btd_adapter_get_device (adapter, &remote.address, + remote.address_type); err =check_device (device);if (err <0 )
@@ -777,7 +833,7 @@ static DBusMessage *request_oob(DBusConnection *conn, DBusMessage *msg,store_params (adapter, device, &remote); -if (remote.hash &&btd_adapter_get_powered (adapter)) +if (remote.hash192 &&btd_adapter_get_powered (adapter)) goto read_local; done:free_oob_params (&remote);
src/adapter.c +14 -5
@@ -8770,7 +8770,11 @@ int adapter_set_io_capability(struct btd_adapter *adapter, uint8_t io_cap)int btd_adapter_add_remote_oob_data (struct btd_adapter *adapter,const bdaddr_t *bdaddr, -uint8_t *hash,uint8_t *randomizer) +uint8_t bdaddr_type, +uint8_t *hash192, +uint8_t *randomizer192, +uint8_t *hash256, +uint8_t *randomizer256) {struct mgmt_cp_add_remote_oob_data cp;char addr[18 ];
@@ -8780,10 +8784,15 @@ int btd_adapter_add_remote_oob_data(struct btd_adapter *adapter,memset (&cp,0 ,sizeof (cp));bacpy (&cp.addr.bdaddr, bdaddr); -memcpy (cp.hash192, hash,16 ); - -if (randomizer) -memcpy (cp.rand192, randomizer,16 ); + cp.addr.type = bdaddr_type; +if (hash192) +memcpy (cp.hash192, hash192,16 ); +if (hash256) +memcpy (cp.hash256, hash256,16 ); +if (randomizer192) +memcpy (cp.rand192, randomizer192,16 ); +if (randomizer256) +memcpy (cp.rand256, randomizer256,16 ); if (mgmt_send(adapter->mgmt, MGMT_OP_ADD_REMOTE_OOB_DATA, adapter->dev_id, sizeof(cp), &cp,
src/adapter.h +3 -2
@@ -213,8 +213,9 @@ int adapter_set_io_capability(struct btd_adapter *adapter, uint8_t io_cap);int btd_adapter_read_local_oob_data (struct btd_adapter *adapter);int btd_adapter_add_remote_oob_data (struct btd_adapter *adapter, -const bdaddr_t *bdaddr, -uint8_t *hash,uint8_t *randomizer); +const bdaddr_t *bdaddr,uint8_t bdaddr_type, +uint8_t *hash192,uint8_t *randomizer192, +uint8_t *hash256,uint8_t *randomizer256);int btd_adapter_remove_remote_oob_data (struct btd_adapter *adapter,const bdaddr_t *bdaddr);
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v2 3/3 neard: Update D-Bus path and interface
In reply to Michael BrudevoldFrom: Michael Brudevold <[email protected]>
neard has been carrying legacy interfaces since 2013
--- plugins/neard.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
plugins/neard.c +2 -2
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@#include "src/shared/util.h" #define NEARD_NAME "org.neard" -#define NEARD_PATH "/" -#define NEARD_MANAGER_INTERFACE "org.neard.Manager" +#define NEARD_PATH "/org/neard" +#define NEARD_MANAGER_INTERFACE "org.neard.AgentManager"#define AGENT_INTERFACE "org.neard.HandoverAgent"#define AGENT_PATH "/org/bluez/neard_handover_agent"#define AGENT_CARRIER_TYPE "bluetooth"
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1