soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driver
Subsystems (2)
Hello Roger Lu,
The patch 0bbb09b2af9d: "soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driver" from May 16, 2022, leads to the following (unpublished) Smatch static checker warning:
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:532 svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts()
warn: loop overwrites return value 'ret'
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
487 static int svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts(struct svs_bank *svsb)
488 {
489 int ret = -EPERM, tzone_temp = 0;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^What is this -EPERM for?
490 u32 i, svsb_volt, opp_volt, temp_voffset = 0, opp_start, opp_stop;
491
492 mutex_lock(&svsb->lock);
493
494 /*
495 * 2-line bank updates its corresponding opp volts.
496 * 1-line bank updates all opp volts.
497 */
498 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH) {
499 opp_start = 0;
500 opp_stop = svsb->turn_pt;
501 } else if (svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
502 opp_start = svsb->turn_pt;
503 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
504 } else {
505 opp_start = 0;
506 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
507 }
508
509 /* Get thermal effect */
510 if (svsb->phase == SVSB_PHASE_MON) {
511 ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(svsb->tzd, &tzone_temp);
512 if (ret || (svsb->temp > SVSB_TEMP_UPPER_BOUND &&
513 svsb->temp < SVSB_TEMP_LOWER_BOUND)) {
514 dev_err(svsb->dev, "%s: %d (0x%x), run default volts\n",
515 svsb->tzone_name, ret, svsb->temp);
516 svsb->phase = SVSB_PHASE_ERROR;ret is set here but there is no goto unlock_mutex;
517 }
518
519 if (tzone_temp >= svsb->tzone_htemp)
520 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_htemp_voffset;
521 else if (tzone_temp <= svsb->tzone_ltemp)
522 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_ltemp_voffset;
523
524 /* 2-line bank update all opp volts when running mon mode */
525 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH || svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
526 opp_start = 0;
527 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
528 }
529 }
530
531 /* vmin <= svsb_volt (opp_volt) <= default opp voltage */--> 532 for (i = opp_start; i < opp_stop; i++) {
I guess the bug is that there was supposed to be an explicit check?
if (opp_start == opp_stop) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock_mutex;
}Otherwise, we are possibly returning the ret from the /* Get thermal effect */ block.
533 switch (svsb->phase) {
534 case SVSB_PHASE_ERROR:
535 opp_volt = svsb->opp_dvolt[i];
536 break;
537 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT01:
538 /* do nothing */
539 goto unlock_mutex;
540 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT02:
541 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i], svsb->vmin);
542 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt,
543 svsb->volt_step,
544 svsb->volt_base);
545 break;
546 case SVSB_PHASE_MON:
547 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i] + temp_voffset, svsb->vmin);
548 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt,
549 svsb->volt_step,
550 svsb->volt_base);
551 break;
552 default:
553 dev_err(svsb->dev, "unknown phase: %u\n", svsb->phase);
554 ret = -EINVAL;
555 goto unlock_mutex;
556 }
557
558 opp_volt = min(opp_volt, svsb->opp_dvolt[i]);
559 ret = dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(svsb->opp_dev,
560 svsb->opp_dfreq[i],
561 opp_volt, opp_volt,
562 svsb->opp_dvolt[i]);
563 if (ret) {
564 dev_err(svsb->dev, "set %uuV fail: %d\n",
565 opp_volt, ret);
566 goto unlock_mutex;
567 }
568 }
569
570 unlock_mutex:
571 mutex_unlock(&svsb->lock);
572
573 return ret;
574 }regards,
dan carpenter
Hi Dan,
Excuse me, I didn't see the warning raised and explain in-line from your email. Please search "Roger (0622)" for the reply. Thanks a lot.
Sincerely,
Roger Lu.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:48 PM
To: Roger Lu (陸瑞傑) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [bug report] soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driver
Hello Roger Lu,
The patch 0bbb09b2af9d: "soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driver" from May 16, 2022, leads to the following (unpublished) Smatch static checker warning:
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:532 svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts()
warn: loop overwrites return value 'ret'
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c
487 static int svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts(struct svs_bank *svsb)
488 {
489 int ret = -EPERM, tzone_temp = 0;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^What is this -EPERM for?
Roger (0622): This -EPERM initialization is required. The ret value assignment in this function is put into if-statement so it needs the initialization.
490 u32 i, svsb_volt, opp_volt, temp_voffset = 0, opp_start, opp_stop;
491
492 mutex_lock(&svsb->lock);
493
494 /*
495 * 2-line bank updates its corresponding opp volts.
496 * 1-line bank updates all opp volts.
497 */
498 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH) {
499 opp_start = 0;
500 opp_stop = svsb->turn_pt;
501 } else if (svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
502 opp_start = svsb->turn_pt;
503 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
504 } else {
505 opp_start = 0;
506 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
507 }
508
509 /* Get thermal effect */
510 if (svsb->phase == SVSB_PHASE_MON) {
511 ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(svsb->tzd, &tzone_temp);
512 if (ret || (svsb->temp > SVSB_TEMP_UPPER_BOUND &&
513 svsb->temp < SVSB_TEMP_LOWER_BOUND)) {
514 dev_err(svsb->dev, "%s: %d (0x%x), run default volts\n",
515 svsb->tzone_name, ret, svsb->temp);
516 svsb->phase = SVSB_PHASE_ERROR;ret is set here but there is no goto unlock_mutex;
Roger (0622): We don't need goto here. If we cannot get temperature here, SVS bank will apply default voltages to DVFS. So we change SVS bank's phase to SVSB_PHASE_ERROR only.
517 }
518
519 if (tzone_temp >= svsb->tzone_htemp)
520 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_htemp_voffset;
521 else if (tzone_temp <= svsb->tzone_ltemp)
522 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_ltemp_voffset;
523
524 /* 2-line bank update all opp volts when running mon mode */
525 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH || svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) {
526 opp_start = 0;
527 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count;
528 }
529 }
530
531 /* vmin <= svsb_volt (opp_volt) <= default opp voltage */--> 532 for (i = opp_start; i < opp_stop; i++) {
I guess the bug is that there was supposed to be an explicit check?
if (opp_start == opp_stop) {
ret = -EPERM;
goto unlock_mutex;
}Otherwise, we are possibly returning the ret from the /* Get thermal effect */ block.
533 switch (svsb->phase) {
534 case SVSB_PHASE_ERROR:
535 opp_volt = svsb->opp_dvolt[i];
536 break;
537 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT01:
538 /* do nothing */
539 goto unlock_mutex;
540 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT02:
541 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i], svsb->vmin);
542 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt,
543 svsb->volt_step,
544 svsb->volt_base);
545 break;
546 case SVSB_PHASE_MON:
547 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i] + temp_voffset, svsb->vmin);
548 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt,
549 svsb->volt_step,
550 svsb->volt_base);
551 break;
552 default:
553 dev_err(svsb->dev, "unknown phase: %u\n", svsb->phase);
554 ret = -EINVAL;
555 goto unlock_mutex;
556 }
557
558 opp_volt = min(opp_volt, svsb->opp_dvolt[i]);
559 ret = dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(svsb->opp_dev,
560 svsb->opp_dfreq[i],
561 opp_volt, opp_volt,
562 svsb->opp_dvolt[i]);
563 if (ret) {
564 dev_err(svsb->dev, "set %uuV fail: %d\n",
565 opp_volt, ret);
566 goto unlock_mutex;
567 }
568 }
569
570 unlock_mutex:
571 mutex_unlock(&svsb->lock);
572
573 return ret;
574 }regards,
dan carpenter
Quoted 21 lines · Roger Lu (陸瑞傑)
Hi Dan,
Excuse me, I didn't see the warning raised and explain in-line from your email. Please search "Roger (0622)" for the reply. Thanks a lot.
Sincerely,
Roger Lu.-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2022 2:48 PM
To: Roger Lu (陸瑞傑) <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [bug report] soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driverHello Roger Lu,
The patch
0bbb09b2af9d: "soc: mediatek: SVS: add mt8192 SVS GPU driver" from May 16, 2022, leads to the following (unpublished) Smatch static checker warning:
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c:532svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts()
warn: loop overwrites return value 'ret'
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.c487 static int svs_adjust_pm_opp_volts(struct svs_bank *svsb) 488 { 489 int ret = -EPERM, tzone_temp = 0; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^What is this
-EPERMfor?
Roger (0622): This-EPERMinitialization is required. Theretvalue assignment in this function is put into if-statement so it needs the initialization.
There is no if statement which uses this assignment. I have copy and pasted the code from linux-next into this email so it should be easy to check.
regards,
dan carpenter
Quoted 102 lines
490 u32 i, svsb_volt, opp_volt, temp_voffset = 0, opp_start, opp_stop; 491 492 mutex_lock(&svsb->lock); 493 494 /* 495 * 2-line bank updates its corresponding opp volts. 496 * 1-line bank updates all opp volts. 497 */ 498 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH) { 499 opp_start = 0; 500 opp_stop = svsb->turn_pt; 501 } else if (svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) { 502 opp_start = svsb->turn_pt; 503 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count; 504 } else { 505 opp_start = 0; 506 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count; 507 } 508 509 /* Get thermal effect */ 510 if (svsb->phase == SVSB_PHASE_MON) { 511 ret = thermal_zone_get_temp(svsb->tzd, &tzone_temp); 512 if (ret || (svsb->temp > SVSB_TEMP_UPPER_BOUND && 513 svsb->temp < SVSB_TEMP_LOWER_BOUND)) { 514 dev_err(svsb->dev, "%s: %d (0x%x), run default volts\n", 515 svsb->tzone_name, ret, svsb->temp); 516 svsb->phase = SVSB_PHASE_ERROR;ret is set here but there is no goto
unlock_mutex;
Roger (0622): We don't need goto here. If we cannot get temperature here, SVS bank will apply default voltages to DVFS. So we change SVS bank's phase toSVSB_PHASE_ERRORonly.517 } 518 519 if (tzone_temp >= svsb->tzone_htemp) 520 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_htemp_voffset; 521 else if (tzone_temp <= svsb->tzone_ltemp) 522 temp_voffset += svsb->tzone_ltemp_voffset; 523 524 /* 2-line bank update all opp volts when running mon mode */ 525 if (svsb->type == SVSB_HIGH || svsb->type == SVSB_LOW) { 526 opp_start = 0; 527 opp_stop = svsb->opp_count; 528 } 529 } 530 531 /* vmin <= svsb_volt (opp_volt) <= default opp voltage */--> 532 for (i =
opp_start; i <opp_stop; i++) {I guess the bug is that there was supposed to be an explicit check?
if (opp_start == opp_stop) { ret = -EPERM; goto unlock_mutex; }Otherwise, we are possibly returning the ret from the /* Get thermal effect */ block.
533 switch (svsb->phase) { 534 case SVSB_PHASE_ERROR: 535 opp_volt = svsb->opp_dvolt[i]; 536 break; 537 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT01: 538 /* do nothing */ 539 goto unlock_mutex; 540 case SVSB_PHASE_INIT02: 541 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i], svsb->vmin); 542 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt, 543 svsb->volt_step, 544 svsb->volt_base); 545 break; 546 case SVSB_PHASE_MON: 547 svsb_volt = max(svsb->volt[i] + temp_voffset, svsb->vmin); 548 opp_volt = svs_bank_volt_to_opp_volt(svsb_volt, 549 svsb->volt_step, 550 svsb->volt_base); 551 break; 552 default: 553 dev_err(svsb->dev, "unknown phase: %u\n", svsb->phase); 554 ret = -EINVAL; 555 goto unlock_mutex; 556 } 557 558 opp_volt = min(opp_volt, svsb->opp_dvolt[i]); 559 ret = dev_pm_opp_adjust_voltage(svsb->opp_dev, 560 svsb->opp_dfreq[i], 561 opp_volt, opp_volt, 562 svsb->opp_dvolt[i]); 563 if (ret) { 564 dev_err(svsb->dev, "set %uuV fail: %d\n", 565 opp_volt, ret); 566 goto unlock_mutex; 567 } 568 } 569 570 unlock_mutex: 571 mutex_unlock(&svsb->lock); 572 573 return ret; 574 }regards,
dan carpenter