mm: add last level page table numa info to /proc/pid/numa_pgtable
Subsystems (3)
RFC PATCH v3 1/1 mm: add last level page table numa info to /proc/pid/numa_pgtable
In many data center servers, the shared memory architectures is Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), remote numa node data access often brings a high latency problem, but what we are easy to ignore is that the page table remote numa access, It can also leads to a performance degradation.
So there add a new interface in /proc, This will help developers to get more info about performance issues if they are caused by cross-NUMA.
V2 -> V3
1, Fix compile warning bug.
V1 -> V2
1, As Matthew Wilcox advise, Simplify the code.
2, Do some codes format fix.
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/T/
--- fs/proc/base.c | 2 ++ fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
fs/proc/base.c +2 -0
@@ -3224,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = { REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_maps_operations),#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG ("numa_maps" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), +REG ("numa_pgtable" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endifREG ("mem" ,S_IRUSR |S_IWUSR , proc_mem_operations), LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),
@@ -3571,6 +3572,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {#endif #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG ("numa_maps" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), +REG ("numa_pgtable" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endifREG ("mem" ,S_IRUSR |S_IWUSR , proc_mem_operations), LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),
fs/proc/internal.h +1 -0
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode);extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_maps_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations; +extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_rollup_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_clear_refs_operations;
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +87 -0
91 lines not on this page · raw message
--
2.31.0
Hi Xin,
Quoted 9 lines · Xin Hao
In many data center servers, the shared memory architectures is Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), remote numa node data access often brings a high latency problem, but what we are easy to ignore is that the page table remote numa access, It can also leads to a performance degradation.
So there add a new interface in /proc, This will help developers to get more info about performance issues if they are caused by cross-NUMA.
Quoted 6 lines
V2 -> V3
1, Fix compile warning bug.V1 -> V2
1, As Matthew Wilcox advise, Simplify the code.
2, Do some codes format fix.
Please move the changes history under your 'Signed-off-by' with '---'.
Quoted 58 lines
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/T/Reported-by kernel test robot <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Xin Hao <[email protected]>--- fs/proc/base.c | 2 ++ fs/proc/internal.h | 1 + fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+)fs/proc/base.c +2
-0@@ -3224,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = { REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_maps_operations),#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG ("numa_maps" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), +REG ("numa_pgtable" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endifREG ("mem" ,S_IRUSR |S_IWUSR , proc_mem_operations), LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),@@ -3571,6 +3572,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {#endif #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG ("numa_maps" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), +REG ("numa_pgtable" ,S_IRUGO , proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endifREG ("mem" ,S_IRUSR |S_IWUSR , proc_mem_operations), LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),fs/proc/internal.h +1
-0@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode);extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_maps_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations; +extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_rollup_operations;extern const struct file_operations proc_clear_refs_operations;fs/proc/task_mmu.c +6
-0@@ -1999,4 +1999,91 @@ const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations = { .release = proc_map_release, }; +struct pgtable_numa_private { +struct proc_maps_private proc_maps; +unsigned long node[MAX_NUMNODES ]; +}; + +static int gather_pgtable_numa_stats(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
fs/proc/task_mmu.c const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations = { · line 2017
Quoted 10 lines
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +10
-0+ unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk) +{ + struct pgtable_numa_private *priv = walk->private; +struct page *page; +int nid; + +if (pmd_huge (*pmd)) { + page =virt_to_page (pmd); + }else { + page =pmd_page (*pmd);
You should validate if the pmd is valid or present before getting the pagetable page.
if (pmd_none(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd))
Another issue is I think you should hold the pmd lock to call pmd_page(), since after the validation of pmd_huge(), the pmd entry can be modified by other threads if you did not hold the pmd lock.
Quoted 74 lines
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +71
-1+ } + + nid =page_to_nid (page); + priv->node[nid]++; + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct mm_walk_ops show_numa_pgtable_ops = { + .pmd_entry = gather_pgtable_numa_stats, +}; + +/* +* Display the page talbe allocated per node via /proc. +*/ +static int show_numa_pgtable (struct seq_file *m,void *v) +{ +struct pgtable_numa_private *numa_priv = m->private; +struct vm_area_struct *vma = v; +struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; +struct file *file = vma->vm_file; +int nid; + +if (!mm) +return 0 ; + +memset (numa_priv->node,0 ,sizeof (numa_priv->node)); + +seq_printf (m,"%08lx " , vma->vm_start); + +if (file) { +seq_puts (m," file=" ); +seq_file_path (m, file,"\n\t= " ); + }else if (vma->vm_start <= mm->brk && vma->vm_end >= mm->start_brk) { +seq_puts (m," heap" ); + }else if (is_stack (vma)) { +seq_puts (m," stack" ); + } + +/* mmap_lock is held by m_start */ +walk_page_vma (vma, &show_numa_pgtable_ops, numa_priv); + +for_each_node_state (nid,N_MEMORY ) { +if (numa_priv->node[nid]) +seq_printf (m," N%d=%lu" , nid, numa_priv->node[nid]); + } +seq_putc (m,'\n' ); + +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct seq_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_op = { + .start = m_start, + .next = m_next, + .stop = m_stop, + .show = show_numa_pgtable, +}; + +static int pid_numa_pgtable_open (struct inode *inode,struct file *file) +{ +return proc_maps_open (inode, file, &proc_pid_numa_pgtable_op, +sizeof (struct pgtable_numa_private )); +} + +const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations = { + .open = pid_numa_pgtable_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = proc_map_release, +}; +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */ --2.31.0
Quoted 95 lines · Baolin Wang
Hi Xin,
Quoted 9 lines · Xin Hao
In many data center servers, the shared memory architectures is Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA), remote numa node data access often brings a high latency problem, but what we are easy to ignore is that the page table remote numa access, It can also leads to a performance degradation.
So there add a new interface in /proc, This will help developers to get more info about performance issues if they are caused by cross-NUMA.
Quoted 6 lines
V2 -> V3
1, Fix compile warning bug.V1 -> V2
1, As Matthew Wilcox advise, Simplify the code.
2, Do some codes format fix.Please move the changes history under your 'Signed-off-by' with '---'.
Quoted 61 lines
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/[email protected]/T/Reported-by kernel test robot <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Xin Hao <[email protected]>---
fs/proc/base.c | 2 ++
fs/proc/internal.h| 1 +
fs/proc/task_mmu.c| 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++3 files changed, 90 insertions(+)fs/proc/base.c +1
-0@@ -3224,6 +3224,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tgid_base_stuff[] = { REG("maps", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_maps_operations), #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), + REG("numa_pgtable", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endif REG("mem", S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR, proc_mem_operations),
LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),fs/proc/base.c +1
-0@@ -3571,6 +3572,7 @@ static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = { #endif #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA REG("numa_maps", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_numa_maps_operations), + REG("numa_pgtable", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations), #endif REG("mem", S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR, proc_mem_operations), LNK("cwd", proc_cwd_link),fs/proc/internal.h +1
-0@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct mm_struct *proc_mem_open(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode); extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_maps_operations; extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations; +extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations; extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_operations; extern const struct file_operations proc_pid_smaps_rollup_operations;extern const struct
file_operationsproc_clear_refs_operations;fs/proc/task_mmu.c +6
-0@@ -1999,4 +1999,91 @@ const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_maps_operations = { .release = proc_map_release, }; +struct pgtable_numa_private { + struct proc_maps_private proc_maps; + unsigned long node[MAX_NUMNODES]; +}; + +static int gather_pgtable_numa_stats(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,fs/proc/task_mmu.c const struct file_operations · line 2018
Quoted 10 lines
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +10
-0+ unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk) +{ + struct pgtable_numa_private *priv = walk->private; + struct page *page; + int nid; + + if (pmd_huge(*pmd)) { + page = virt_to_page(pmd); + } else { + page = pmd_page(*pmd);You should validate if the pmd is valid or present before getting the pagetable page.
Quoted 4 lines
if (
pmd_none(*pmd)|| !pmd_present(*pmd))Another issue is I think you should hold the pmd lock to call
pmd_page(), since after the validation ofpmd_huge(), the pmd entry can be modified by other threads if you did not hold the pmd lock.
Thanks, Baolin, i will fix it in the next version.
Quoted 76 lines
Quoted 76 lines
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +34
-0+ } + + nid = page_to_nid(page); + priv->node[nid]++; + + return 0; +} + +static const struct mm_walk_ops show_numa_pgtable_ops = { + .pmd_entry = gather_pgtable_numa_stats, +}; + +/* +* Display the page talbe allocated per node via /proc. +*/ +static int show_numa_pgtable(struct seq_file *m, void *v) +{ + struct pgtable_numa_private *numa_priv = m->private; + struct vm_area_struct *vma = v; + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; + struct file *file = vma->vm_file; + int nid; + + if (!mm) + return 0; + + memset(numa_priv->node, 0, sizeof(numa_priv->node)); + + seq_printf(m, "%08lx ", vma->vm_start); + + if (file) { + seq_puts(m, " file="); + seq_file_path(m, file, "\n\t= "); + } else if (vma->vm_start <= mm->brk && vma->vm_end >=
mm->start_brk) {
+seq_puts(m, " heap");
+ } else if (is_stack(vma)) {
+seq_puts(m, " stack");
+ }fs/proc/task_mmu.c +21
-0+ + /* mmap_lock is held by m_start */ + walk_page_vma(vma, &show_numa_pgtable_ops, numa_priv); + + for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) { + if (numa_priv->node[nid]) + seq_printf(m, " N%d=%lu", nid, numa_priv->node[nid]); + } + seq_putc(m, '\n'); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct seq_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_op = { + .start = m_start, + .next = m_next, + .stop = m_stop, + .show = show_numa_pgtable, +}; + +static int pid_numa_pgtable_open(struct inode *inode, struct file*file)
fs/proc/task_mmu.c +12
-0+{ + return proc_maps_open(inode, file, &proc_pid_numa_pgtable_op, + sizeof(struct pgtable_numa_private)); +} + +const struct file_operations proc_pid_numa_pgtable_operations = { + .open = pid_numa_pgtable_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = proc_map_release, +}; +#endif /*
CONFIG_NUMA*/Signature · 1 line
2.31.0