Skip to contentSkip to conversation

skbuff: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size

PATCH Superseded Kees Cook 2 participants 2 messages Oct 21, 2022 – Oct 24, 2022

Subsystems (2)

v4 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Kees Cook

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/1 skbuff: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size

Instead of discovering the kmalloc bucket size _after_ allocation, round up proactively so the allocation is explicitly made for the full size, allowing the compiler to correctly reason about the resulting size of the buffer through the existing __alloc_size() hint.

This will allow for kernels built with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS or the coming dynamic bounds checking under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to gain back the __alloc_size() hints that were temporarily reverted in commit 93dd04ab0b2b ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller")

Cc "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Cc David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>

---
v4: use kmalloc_size_roundup() in callers, not kmalloc_reserve()
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
net/core/skbuff.c +25 -25
index 651a82d30b09..77af430296e2 100644
@@ -508,14 +508,14 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	 */
 	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
 	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
+	osize = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(osize, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
 	if (unlikely(!data))
 		goto nodata;
 	/* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested.
 	 * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone,
 	 * to allow max possible filling before reallocation.
 	 */
-	osize = ksize(data);
 	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize);
 	prefetchw(data + size);
 
@@ -1816,10 +1816,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pskb_copy_fclone);
 int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
 		     gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
-	int i, osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
-	int size = osize + nhead + ntail;
+	unsigned int osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = osize + nhead + ntail;
 	long off;
 	u8 *data;
+	int i;
 
 	BUG_ON(nhead < 0);
 
@@ -1827,15 +1828,16 @@ int pskb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhead, int ntail,
 
 	skb_zcopy_downgrade_managed(skb);
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		goto nodata;
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	/* Copy only real data... and, alas, header. This should be
 	 * optimized for the cases when header is void.
@@ -6169,21 +6171,20 @@ static int pskb_carve_inside_header(struct sk_buff *skb, const u32 off,
 				    const int headlen, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	int i;
-	int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
 	int new_hlen = headlen - off;
 	u8 *data;
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size +
-			       SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	/* Copy real data, and all frags */
 	skb_copy_from_linear_data_offset(skb, off, data, new_hlen);
@@ -6288,22 +6289,21 @@ static int pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear(struct sk_buff *skb, const u32 off,
 				       int pos, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	int i, k = 0;
-	int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
+	unsigned int size = skb_end_offset(skb);
 	u8 *data;
 	const int nfrags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 	struct skb_shared_info *shinfo;
 
-	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
-
 	if (skb_pfmemalloc(skb))
 		gfp_mask |= __GFP_MEMALLOC;
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size +
-			       SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)),
-			       gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
+
+	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
+	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+	size = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(ksize(data));
+	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(size);
 
 	memcpy((struct skb_shared_info *)(data + size),
 	       skb_shinfo(skb), offsetof(struct skb_shared_info, frags[0]));
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Acked-by on v4 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Kees Cook

Instead of discovering the kmalloc bucket size _after_ allocation, round up proactively so the allocation is explicitly made for the full size, allowing the compiler to correctly reason about the resulting size of the buffer through the existing __alloc_size() hint.

This will allow for kernels built with CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS or the coming dynamic bounds checking under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE to gain back the __alloc_size() hints that were temporarily reverted in commit 93dd04ab0b2b ("slab: remove __alloc_size attribute from __kmalloc_track_caller")

Quoted 10 lines
Cc "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Cc Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]>
Cc David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>

Nit below:

Quoted 13 lines

---
v4: use kmalloc_size_roundup() in callers, not kmalloc_reserve()
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
net/core/skbuff.c +0 -0
index 651a82d30b09..77af430296e2 100644

net/core/skbuff.c struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask, · line 515

Quoted 9 lines
net/core/skbuff.c +2 -1
@@ -508,14 +508,14 @@ struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	 */
 	size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(size);
 	size += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
-	data = kmalloc_reserve(size, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
+	osize = kmalloc_size_roundup(size);
+	data = kmalloc_reserve(osize, gfp_mask, node, &pfmemalloc);
 	if (unlikely(!data))
 		goto nodata;
 	/* kmalloc(size) might give us more room than requested.

The line above should now say kmalloc_size_roundup(size), or maybe could be deleted completely now?

Quoted 7 lines
net/core/skbuff.c +0 -1
 	 * Put skb_shared_info exactly at the end of allocated zone,
 	 * to allow max possible filling before reallocation.
 	 */
-	osize = ksize(data);
 	size = SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(osize);
 	prefetchw(data + size);