Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Coverity: encode_cb_recallany4args(): Error handling issues

DISCUSSION coverity-bot 2 participants 2 messages Nov 18, 2022

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hello!

This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by Coverity from a scan of next-20221118 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan

You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:

Thu Nov 17 11:55:28 2022 -0500
32dce0f9611b ("NFSD: add support for sending CB_RECALL_ANY")

Coverity reported the following:

*** CID 1527365: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c:344 in encode_cb_recallany4args()
338 */

339     static void
340     encode_cb_recallany4args(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
341     	struct nfs4_cb_compound_hdr *hdr, struct nfsd4_cb_recall_any *ra)
342     {
343     	encode_nfs_cb_opnum4(xdr, OP_CB_RECALL_ANY);
vvv     CID 1527365:  Error handling issues  (CHECKED_RETURN)
vvv     Calling "xdr_stream_encode_u32" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 23 out of 24 times).
344     	xdr_stream_encode_u32(xdr, ra->ra_keep);
345     	xdr_stream_encode_uint32_array(xdr, ra->ra_bmval,
346     				       ARRAY_SIZE(ra->ra_bmval));
347     	hdr->nops++;
348     }

349

If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527365 ("Error handling issues")

Fixes 32dce0f9611b ("NFSD: add support for sending CB_RECALL_ANY")

Thanks for your attention!

Signature · 1 line
Coverity-bot
#1 lore raw
Quoted 40 lines · coverity-bot

Hello!

This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by Coverity from a scan of next-20221118 as part of the linux-next scan project:
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan

You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:

Thu Nov 17 11:55:28 2022 -0500
32dce0f9611b ("NFSD: add support for sending CB_RECALL_ANY")

Coverity reported the following:

*** CID 1527365: Error handling issues (CHECKED_RETURN) fs/nfsd/nfs4callback.c:344 in encode_cb_recallany4args()
338 */

339     static void
340     encode_cb_recallany4args(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
341     	struct nfs4_cb_compound_hdr *hdr, struct nfsd4_cb_recall_any *ra)
342     {
343     	encode_nfs_cb_opnum4(xdr, OP_CB_RECALL_ANY);
vvv     CID 1527365:  Error handling issues  (CHECKED_RETURN)
vvv     Calling "xdr_stream_encode_u32" without checking return value (as is done elsewhere 23 out of 24 times).
344     	xdr_stream_encode_u32(xdr, ra->ra_keep);
345     	xdr_stream_encode_uint32_array(xdr, ra->ra_bmval,
346     				       ARRAY_SIZE(ra->ra_bmval));
347     	hdr->nops++;
348     }

349

If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):

Quoted 5 lines

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1527365 ("Error handling issues")

Fixes 32dce0f9611b ("NFSD: add support for sending CB_RECALL_ANY")

Thanks for your attention!

My fault. I removed the WARN_ON_ONCE() wrappers, which are clutter (though they are clutter that is already used elsewhere).

I will update linux-next with a fix.

--
Chuck Lever