regulator: max77802: Bounds check regulator id against opmode
PATCH 1/1 regulator: max77802: Bounds check regulator id against opmode
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] == MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
--- drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c +24 -10
@@ -94,9 +94,11 @@ static int max77802_set_suspend_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev) {unsigned int val =MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ ;struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802 =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); -int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +unsigned int id =rdev_get_id (rdev);int shift =max77802_get_opmode_shift (id); +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (id >=ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode))) +return -EINVAL ; max77802->opmode[id] = val;return regmap_update_bits (rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->enable_reg, rdev->desc->enable_mask, val << shift);
@@ -110,7 +112,7 @@ static int max77802_set_suspend_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)static int max77802_set_mode (struct regulator_dev *rdev,unsigned int mode) {struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802 =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); -int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +unsigned int id =rdev_get_id (rdev);unsigned int val;int shift =max77802_get_opmode_shift (id);
@@ -127,6 +129,9 @@ static int max77802_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode)return -EINVAL ; } +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (id >=ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode))) +return -EINVAL ; + max77802->opmode[id] = val;return regmap_update_bits (rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->enable_reg, rdev->desc->enable_mask, val << shift);
@@ -135,8 +140,10 @@ static int max77802_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode)static unsigned max77802_get_mode (struct regulator_dev *rdev) {struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802 =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); -int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +unsigned int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (id >=ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode))) +return -EINVAL ;return max77802_map_mode (max77802->opmode[id]); }
@@ -160,10 +167,13 @@ static int max77802_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode) {struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802 =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); -int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +unsigned int id =rdev_get_id (rdev);unsigned int val;int shift =max77802_get_opmode_shift (id); +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (id >=ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode))) +return -EINVAL ; +/* * If the regulator has been disabled for suspend * then is invalid to try setting a suspend mode.
@@ -209,9 +219,11 @@ static int max77802_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,static int max77802_enable (struct regulator_dev *rdev) {struct max77802_regulator_prv *max77802 =rdev_get_drvdata (rdev); -int id =rdev_get_id (rdev); +unsigned int id =rdev_get_id (rdev);int shift =max77802_get_opmode_shift (id); +if (WARN_ON_ONCE (id >=ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode))) +return -EINVAL ;if (max77802->opmode[id] ==MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ ) max77802->opmode[id] =MAX77802_OPMODE_NORMAL ;
@@ -495,7 +507,7 @@ static int max77802_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)for (i =0 ; i <MAX77802_REG_MAX ; i++) {struct regulator_dev *rdev; -int id = regulators[i].id; +unsigned int id = regulators[i].id;int shift =max77802_get_opmode_shift (id);int ret;
@@ -513,10 +525,12 @@ static int max77802_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)* the hardware reports OFF as the regulator operating mode. * Default to operating mode NORMAL in that case. */ -if (val ==MAX77802_STATUS_OFF ) - max77802->opmode[id] =MAX77802_OPMODE_NORMAL ; -else - max77802->opmode[id] = val; +if (id <ARRAY_SIZE (max77802->opmode)) { +if (val ==MAX77802_STATUS_OFF ) + max77802->opmode[id] =MAX77802_OPMODE_NORMAL ; +else + max77802->opmode[id] = val; + } rdev =devm_regulator_register (&pdev->dev, ®ulators[i], &config);
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Hello Kees,
Quoted 12 lines · Kees Cook
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] ==MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
Quoted 6 lines
Cc Javier Martinez Canillas <[email protected]>Cc Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>Cc Mark Brown <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>--- drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++--------
The patch looks good to me.
Best regards,
Javier
Mark Brown
maintainerQuoted 6 lines · Kees Cook
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] ==MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
Quoted 6 lines
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~[...]
Applied to
broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] regulator: max77802: Bounds check regulator id against opmode
commit: 4fd8bcec5fd7c0d586206fa2f42bd67b06cdaa7e
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark