mmc: arasan: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 mmc: arasan: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.
--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c +1 -1
@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ static void sdhci_arasan_unregister_sdclk(struct device *dev) {struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; -if (!of_find_property (np,"#clock-cells" ,NULL )) +if (!of_property_present (np,"#clock-cells" ))return ;of_clk_del_provider (dev->of_node);
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Quoted 9 lines · Rob Herring
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added
of_property_present()helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.Signed-off-by Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
Quoted 18 lines
--- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c +1
-2@@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ static void sdhci_arasan_unregister_sdclk(struct device *dev) {struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; -if (!of_find_property (np,"#clock-cells" ,NULL )) +if (!of_property_present (np,"#clock-cells" ))return ;of_clk_del_provider (dev->of_node); --
Quoted 2 lines
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel