Skip to contentSkip to conversation

general protection fault in raw_seq_start

DISCUSSION Dae R. Jeong 5 participants 6 messages Mar 26, 2023 – Mar 31, 2023

Subsystems (2)
Networking Network drivers
lore
Share & tools
lore

Dae R. Jeong

author
#0 lore raw

Hi,

We observed an issue "general protection fault in raw_seq_start" during fuzzing.

Unfortunately, we have not found a reproducer for the crash yet. We will inform you if we have any update on this crash. Detailed crash information is attached below.

Best regards,
Dae R. Jeong

-----

- Kernel version
6.2

- Last executed input
unshare(0x40060200)
r0 = syz_open_procfs(0x0, &(0x7f0000002080)='net/raw\x00') socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
ppoll(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
pread64(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)=""/10, 0xa, 0x10000000007f)

- Crash report

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f]
CPU: 2 PID: 20952 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.2.0-g048ec869bafd-dirty #7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055bb9614b35f CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 seq_read_iter+0x4c6/0x10f0 fs/seq_file.c:225
 seq_read+0x224/0x320 fs/seq_file.c:162
 pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:316 [inline]
 proc_reg_read+0x23f/0x330 fs/proc/inode.c:328
 vfs_read+0x31e/0xd30 fs/read_write.c:468
 ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:665 [inline]
 __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:675 [inline]
 __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:672 [inline]
 __x64_sys_pread64+0x1e9/0x280 fs/read_write.c:672
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x478d29
Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f843ae8dbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000791408 RCX: 0000000000478d29
RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000f477909a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000010000000007f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000791740
R13: 0000000000791414 R14: 0000000000791408 R15: 00007ffc2eb48a50
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f92ff166000 CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
#1 lore raw
From:   "Dae R. Jeong" <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun, 26 Mar 2023 21:12:08 +0900
Quoted 17 lines

Hi,

We observed an issue "general protection fault in raw_seq_start" during fuzzing.

Unfortunately, we have not found a reproducer for the crash yet. We will inform you if we have any update on this crash. Detailed crash information is attached below.

Best regards,
Dae R. Jeong

-----

- Kernel version
6.2

Quoted 7 lines

- Last executed input
unshare(0x40060200)
r0 = syz_open_procfs(0x0, &(0x7f0000002080)='net/raw\x00') socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
ppoll(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
pread64(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)=""/10, 0xa, 0x10000000007f)

Thanks for reporting the issue.

It seems we need to use RCU variant in raw_get_first(). I'll post a patch.

---

net/ipv4/raw.c +1 -1
index 3cf68695b40d..fe0d1ad20b35 100644
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)
 	for (state->bucket = bucket; state->bucket < RAW_HTABLE_SIZE;
 			++state->bucket) {
 		hlist = &h->ht[state->bucket];
-		sk_nulls_for_each(sk, hnode, hlist) {
+		sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, hnode, hlist) {
 			if (sock_net(sk) == seq_file_net(seq))
 				return sk;
 		}

---

Thanks,
Kuniyuki

Quoted 65 lines

- Crash report

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f]
CPU: 2 PID: 20952 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.2.0-g048ec869bafd-dirty #7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055bb9614b35f CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 seq_read_iter+0x4c6/0x10f0 fs/seq_file.c:225
 seq_read+0x224/0x320 fs/seq_file.c:162
 pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:316 [inline]
 proc_reg_read+0x23f/0x330 fs/proc/inode.c:328
 vfs_read+0x31e/0xd30 fs/read_write.c:468
 ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:665 [inline]
 __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:675 [inline]
 __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:672 [inline]
 __x64_sys_pread64+0x1e9/0x280 fs/read_write.c:672
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x478d29
Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f843ae8dbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000791408 RCX: 0000000000478d29
RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000f477909a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000010000000007f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000791740
R13: 0000000000791414 R14: 0000000000791408 R15: 00007ffc2eb48a50
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f92ff166000 CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
#2 lore raw
Quoted 39 lines · Kuniyuki Iwashima
From:   "Dae R. Jeong" <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun, 26 Mar 2023 21:12:08 +0900
Quoted 17 lines

Hi,

We observed an issue "general protection fault in raw_seq_start" during fuzzing.

Unfortunately, we have not found a reproducer for the crash yet. We will inform you if we have any update on this crash. Detailed crash information is attached below.

Best regards,
Dae R. Jeong

-----

- Kernel version
6.2

Quoted 7 lines

- Last executed input
unshare(0x40060200)
r0 = syz_open_procfs(0x0, &(0x7f0000002080)='net/raw\x00') socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
ppoll(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0) socket$inet_icmp_raw(0x2, 0x3, 0x1)
pread64(r0, &(0x7f0000000000)=""/10, 0xa, 0x10000000007f)

Thanks for reporting the issue.

It seems we need to use RCU variant in raw_get_first(). I'll post a patch.

---

net/ipv4/raw.c +0 -0
index 3cf68695b40d..fe0d1ad20b35 100644

net/ipv4/raw.c static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket) · line 960

Quoted 5 lines
net/ipv4/raw.c +1 -1
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)
        for (state->bucket = bucket; state->bucket < RAW_HTABLE_SIZE;
                        ++state->bucket) {
                hlist = &h->ht[state->bucket];
-               sk_nulls_for_each(sk, hnode, hlist) {
+               sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, hnode, hlist) {

Hello Kuniyuki,

I'm wondering if we should also use rcu_read_lock()/_unlock() pair to protect?

CC Eric

It seems that we have to convert all the sk_nulls_for_each() to sk_nulls_for_each_rcu() with the rcu_read_lock/_unlock protection in net/ipv4/raw.c?

Thanks,
Jason

Quoted 75 lines
net/ipv4/raw.c +0 -1
                        if (sock_net(sk) == seq_file_net(seq))
                                return sk;
                }
---

Thanks,
Kuniyuki

Quoted 65 lines

- Crash report

general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f]
CPU: 2 PID: 20952 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.2.0-g048ec869bafd-dirty #7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055bb9614b35f CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 seq_read_iter+0x4c6/0x10f0 fs/seq_file.c:225
 seq_read+0x224/0x320 fs/seq_file.c:162
 pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:316 [inline]
 proc_reg_read+0x23f/0x330 fs/proc/inode.c:328
 vfs_read+0x31e/0xd30 fs/read_write.c:468
 ksys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:665 [inline]
 __do_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:675 [inline]
 __se_sys_pread64 fs/read_write.c:672 [inline]
 __x64_sys_pread64+0x1e9/0x280 fs/read_write.c:672
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x4e/0xa0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x478d29
Code: f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f843ae8dbe8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000791408 RCX: 0000000000478d29
RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000020000000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00000000f477909a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 000010000000007f R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000791740
R13: 0000000000791414 R14: 0000000000791408 R15: 00007ffc2eb48a50
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:read_pnet include/net/net_namespace.h:383 [inline]
RIP: 0010:sock_net include/net/sock.h:649 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_next net/ipv4/raw.c:974 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_get_idx net/ipv4/raw.c:986 [inline]
RIP: 0010:raw_seq_start+0x431/0x800 net/ipv4/raw.c:995
Code: ef e8 33 3d 94 f7 49 8b 6d 00 4c 89 ef e8 b7 65 5f f7 49 89 ed 49 83 c5 98 0f 84 9a 00 00 00 48 83 c5 c8 48 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 80 3c 30 00 74 08 48 89 ef e8 00 3d 94 f7 4c 8b 7d 00 48 89 ef
RSP: 0018:ffffc9001154f9b0 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 1ffff1100302c8fd RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: ffffc9001154f988 RDI: ffffc9000f77a338
RBP: 0000000000000029 R08: ffffffff8a50ffb4 R09: fffffbfff24b6bd9
R10: fffffbfff24b6bd9 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88801db73b78
R13: fffffffffffffff9 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000030
FS:  00007f843ae8e700(0000) GS:ffff888063700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f92ff166000 CR3: 000000003c672000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
#3 lore raw
In reply to Kuniyuki Iwashima
Quoted 11 lines · Kuniyuki Iwashima

Thanks for reporting the issue.

It seems we need to use RCU variant in raw_get_first(). I'll post a patch.

---

net/ipv4/raw.c +0 -0
index 3cf68695b40d..fe0d1ad20b35 100644

net/ipv4/raw.c static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket) · line 963

Quoted 8 lines
net/ipv4/raw.c +1 -1
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)
        for (state->bucket = bucket; state->bucket < RAW_HTABLE_SIZE;
                        ++state->bucket) {
                hlist = &h->ht[state->bucket];
-               sk_nulls_for_each(sk, hnode, hlist) {
+               sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, hnode, hlist) {
                        if (sock_net(sk) == seq_file_net(seq))
                                return sk;

No, we do not want this.
You missed that sk_nulls_for_each_rcu() needs a specific protocol (see Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst for details)

RCU is needed in the data path, not for this control path.

My patch went too far in the RCU conversion. I did not think about syzbot harassing /proc files :)

We need raw_seq_start and friends to go back to use the lock.

#4 lore raw
From:   Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:04:47 +0200
Quoted 17 lines · Kuniyuki Iwashima
Quoted 16 lines

Thanks for reporting the issue.

It seems we need to use RCU variant in raw_get_first(). I'll post a patch.

---

net/ipv4/raw.c +0 -1
index 3cf68695b40d..fe0d1ad20b35 100644
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)
        for (state->bucket = bucket; state->bucket < RAW_HTABLE_SIZE;
                        ++state->bucket) {
                hlist = &h->ht[state->bucket];
-               sk_nulls_for_each(sk, hnode, hlist) {
Quoted 8 lines

net/ipv4/raw.c static struct sock *raw_get_first(struct seq_file *seq, int bucket)

Quoted 4 lines
net/ipv4/raw.c +1 -0
+               sk_nulls_for_each_rcu(sk, hnode, hlist) {
                        if (sock_net(sk) == seq_file_net(seq))
                                return sk;

No, we do not want this.
You missed that sk_nulls_for_each_rcu() needs a specific protocol (see Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.rst for details)

Ah, exactly SOCK_RAW does not have SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU. Thank you for pointing this out!

And I found this seems wrong.

c25b7a7a565e ("inet: ping: use hlist_nulls rcu iterator during lookup")

Quoted 7 lines

RCU is needed in the data path, not for this control path.

My patch went too far in the RCU conversion. I did not think about syzbot harassing /proc files :)

We need raw_seq_start and friends to go back to use the lock.

Ok, then I'll change /proc/net/{raw, icmp} to use spinlock :)

#5 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Kuniyuki Iwashima

And I found this seems wrong.

c25b7a7a565e ("inet: ping: use hlist_nulls rcu iterator during lookup")

How so?