usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Fix crash in vbus_draw
Subsystems (2)
Jon Hunter
maintainerPATCH 1/2 usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Fix crash in vbus_draw
Commit ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support") populated the vbus_draw callback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The function tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.
--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1 -1
@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Jon Hunter
maintainerPATCH 2/2 usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Remove unneeded return variable
The 'ret' variable in the function tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw() is not needed and so remove this variable.
--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +2 -3
@@ -2162,15 +2162,14 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_stop(struct usb_gadget *gadget)static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw (struct usb_gadget *gadget,unsigned int m_a) { -int ret =0 ;struct tegra_xudc *xudc =to_xudc (gadget);dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a);if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) - ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a); +return usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a); -return ret; +return 0 ; }static int tegra_xudc_set_selfpowered (struct usb_gadget *gadget,int is_on)
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Remove unneeded return variable
Quoted 7 lines · Jon Hunter
The 'ret' variable in the function
tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw()is not needed and so remove this variable.Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Quoted 19 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
ac82b56bda5f("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Addvbus_drawsupport") populated thevbus_drawcallback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The functiontegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.Fixes ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +0
-0
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget, · line 2173
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1
-1@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);return ret;
Looking at tegra_xudc_probe(), that calls tegra_xudc_update_data_role() for all PHYs, so shouldn't that be enough to get curr_usbphy set? Or is there perhaps a race between ->vbus_draw() and the data role update? Is ->vbus_draw() perhaps called as part of usb_add_gadget_udc()? Should we reorder those to make sure the role is properly updated before the gadget is registered?
Thierry
Jon Hunter
maintainerQuoted 27 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 26 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
ac82b56bda5f("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Addvbus_drawsupport") populated thevbus_drawcallback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The functiontegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.Fixes ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1
-1@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget, · line 2173
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +0
-0return ret;Looking at
tegra_xudc_probe(), that callstegra_xudc_update_data_role()for all PHYs, so shouldn't that be enough to getcurr_usbphyset? Or is there perhaps a race between ->vbus_draw() and the data role update? Is ->vbus_draw() perhaps called as part ofusb_add_gadget_udc()? Should we reorder those to make sure the role is properly updated before the gadget is registered?
Yes it does call it, but it still does not set the curr_usbphy. If you look at the function it may not set it.
In the backtrace I saw, which was happening on reboot, it was in the unregister of the gadget ...
[ 1102.047896] Call trace: [ 1102.050402] 0xffffde9fd18c0878 [ 1102.053602] usb_gadget_vbus_draw+0x28/0x50 [ 1102.057879] composite_disconnect+0x1c/0x40 [libcomposite] [ 1102.063509] usb_get_function_instance+0x1808/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.069935] usb_gadget_disconnect+0x64/0xa0 [ 1102.074304] usb_gadget_remove_driver+0x2c/0xc0 [ 1102.078942] usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0x70/0xf0 [ 1102.083927] usb_get_function_instance+0x2774/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.090339] unregister_gadget_item+0x280/0x470 [libcomposite] [ 1102.096314] configfs_write_iter+0xc4/0x120 [ 1102.100609] new_sync_write+0xe8/0x190 [ 1102.104461] vfs_write+0x234/0x380 [ 1102.107938] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100 [ 1102.111417] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x30 [ 1102.115427] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xe0 [ 1102.120245] do_el0_svc+0x50/0x150 [ 1102.123723] el0_svc+0x28/0xc0 [ 1102.126854] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xc0 [ 1102.131138] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 1102.134889] Code: 910003fd a90153f3 f94ce413 f100027f (b9409a60) [ 1102.141139] ---[ end trace cdf6612bd43fcbf2 ]---
Jon
Thierry Reding
Reviewed-byQuoted 55 lines · Jon Hunter
Quoted 24 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 23 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
ac82b56bda5f("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Addvbus_drawsupport") populated thevbus_drawcallback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The functiontegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.Fixes ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1
-1@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget, · line 2173
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +0
-0return ret;Looking at
tegra_xudc_probe(), that callstegra_xudc_update_data_role()for all PHYs, so shouldn't that be enough to getcurr_usbphyset? Or is there perhaps a race between ->vbus_draw() and the data role update? Is ->vbus_draw() perhaps called as part ofusb_add_gadget_udc()? Should we reorder those to make sure the role is properly updated before the gadget is registered?Yes it does call it, but it still does not set the
curr_usbphy. If you look at the function it may not set it.In the backtrace I saw, which was happening on reboot, it was in the unregister of the gadget ...
[ 1102.047896] Call trace: [ 1102.050402] 0xffffde9fd18c0878 [ 1102.053602] usb_gadget_vbus_draw+0x28/0x50 [ 1102.057879] composite_disconnect+0x1c/0x40 [libcomposite] [ 1102.063509] usb_get_function_instance+0x1808/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.069935] usb_gadget_disconnect+0x64/0xa0 [ 1102.074304] usb_gadget_remove_driver+0x2c/0xc0 [ 1102.078942] usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0x70/0xf0 [ 1102.083927] usb_get_function_instance+0x2774/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.090339] unregister_gadget_item+0x280/0x470 [libcomposite] [ 1102.096314] configfs_write_iter+0xc4/0x120 [ 1102.100609] new_sync_write+0xe8/0x190 [ 1102.104461] vfs_write+0x234/0x380 [ 1102.107938] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100
Quoted 8 lines
[ 1102.111417] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x30 [ 1102.115427] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xe0 [ 1102.120245] do_el0_svc+0x50/0x150 [ 1102.123723] el0_svc+0x28/0xc0 [ 1102.126854] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xc0 [ 1102.131138] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 1102.134889] Code: 910003fd a90153f3 f94ce413 f100027f (b9409a60) [ 1102.141139] ---[ end trace cdf6612bd43fcbf2 ]---
Alright. There are a lot of cases where we can run into this and it all looks a little complicated, so I think it would be good to unwind this at some point. But I can't think of an easy way to do that, so for a fix this looks good:
Jon Hunter
maintainerHi Greg,
Quoted 65 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 55 lines · Jon Hunter
Quoted 24 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 23 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
ac82b56bda5f("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Addvbus_drawsupport") populated thevbus_drawcallback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The functiontegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.Fixes ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1
-1@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget, · line 2173
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +0
-0return ret;Looking at
tegra_xudc_probe(), that callstegra_xudc_update_data_role()for all PHYs, so shouldn't that be enough to getcurr_usbphyset? Or is there perhaps a race between ->vbus_draw() and the data role update? Is ->vbus_draw() perhaps called as part ofusb_add_gadget_udc()? Should we reorder those to make sure the role is properly updated before the gadget is registered?Yes it does call it, but it still does not set the
curr_usbphy. If you look at the function it may not set it.In the backtrace I saw, which was happening on reboot, it was in the unregister of the gadget ...
[ 1102.047896] Call trace: [ 1102.050402] 0xffffde9fd18c0878 [ 1102.053602] usb_gadget_vbus_draw+0x28/0x50 [ 1102.057879] composite_disconnect+0x1c/0x40 [libcomposite] [ 1102.063509] usb_get_function_instance+0x1808/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.069935] usb_gadget_disconnect+0x64/0xa0 [ 1102.074304] usb_gadget_remove_driver+0x2c/0xc0 [ 1102.078942] usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0x70/0xf0 [ 1102.083927] usb_get_function_instance+0x2774/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.090339] unregister_gadget_item+0x280/0x470 [libcomposite] [ 1102.096314] configfs_write_iter+0xc4/0x120 [ 1102.100609] new_sync_write+0xe8/0x190 [ 1102.104461] vfs_write+0x234/0x380 [ 1102.107938] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100Quoted 8 lines
[ 1102.111417] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x30 [ 1102.115427] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xe0 [ 1102.120245] do_el0_svc+0x50/0x150 [ 1102.123723] el0_svc+0x28/0xc0 [ 1102.126854] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xc0 [ 1102.131138] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 1102.134889] Code: 910003fd a90153f3 f94ce413 f100027f (b9409a60) [ 1102.141139] ---[ end trace cdf6612bd43fcbf2 ]---
Quoted 6 lines
Alright. There are a lot of cases where we can run into this and it all looks a little complicated, so I think it would be good to unwind this at some point. But I can't think of an easy way to do that, so for a fix this looks good:
Reviewed-by Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
OK for pick this up v6.4?
Thanks
Jon
Signature · 1 line
nvpublic
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerQuoted 68 lines · Jon Hunter
Hi Greg,
Quoted 65 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 63 lines · Jon Hunter
Quoted 24 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 23 lines · Jon Hunter
Commit
ac82b56bda5f("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Addvbus_drawsupport") populated thevbus_drawcallback for the Tegra XUDC driver. The functiontegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(), that was added by this commit, assumes that the pointer 'curr_usbphy' has been initialised, which is not always the case because this is only initialised when the USB role is updated. Fix this crash, by checking that the 'curr_usbphy' is valid before dereferencing.Fixes ac82b56bda5f ("usb: gadget: tegra-xudc: Add vbus_draw support")Signed-off-by Jon Hunter <[email protected]>--- drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +1
-1@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget,dev_dbg (xudc->dev,"%s: %u mA\n" , __func__, m_a); -if (xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) +if (xudc->curr_usbphy && xudc->curr_usbphy->chg_type ==SDP_TYPE ) ret =usb_phy_set_power (xudc->curr_usbphy, m_a);Quoted 8 lines
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c static int tegra_xudc_gadget_vbus_draw(struct usb_gadget *gadget, · line 2173
Quoted 1 line
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/tegra-xudc.c +0
-0return ret;Looking at
tegra_xudc_probe(), that callstegra_xudc_update_data_role()for all PHYs, so shouldn't that be enough to getcurr_usbphyset? Or is there perhaps a race between ->vbus_draw() and the data role update? Is ->vbus_draw() perhaps called as part ofusb_add_gadget_udc()? Should we reorder those to make sure the role is properly updated before the gadget is registered?Yes it does call it, but it still does not set the
curr_usbphy. If you look at the function it may not set it.In the backtrace I saw, which was happening on reboot, it was in the unregister of the gadget ...
[ 1102.047896] Call trace: [ 1102.050402] 0xffffde9fd18c0878 [ 1102.053602] usb_gadget_vbus_draw+0x28/0x50 [ 1102.057879] composite_disconnect+0x1c/0x40 [libcomposite] [ 1102.063509] usb_get_function_instance+0x1808/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.069935] usb_gadget_disconnect+0x64/0xa0 [ 1102.074304] usb_gadget_remove_driver+0x2c/0xc0 [ 1102.078942] usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0x70/0xf0 [ 1102.083927] usb_get_function_instance+0x2774/0x27b0 [libcomposite] [ 1102.090339] unregister_gadget_item+0x280/0x470 [libcomposite] [ 1102.096314] configfs_write_iter+0xc4/0x120 [ 1102.100609] new_sync_write+0xe8/0x190 [ 1102.104461] vfs_write+0x234/0x380 [ 1102.107938] ksys_write+0x6c/0x100 [ 1102.111417] __arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x30 [ 1102.115427] invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x4c/0xe0 [ 1102.120245] do_el0_svc+0x50/0x150 [ 1102.123723] el0_svc+0x28/0xc0 [ 1102.126854] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xc0 [ 1102.131138] el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 [ 1102.134889] Code: 910003fd a90153f3 f94ce413 f100027f (b9409a60) [ 1102.141139] ---[ end trace cdf6612bd43fcbf2 ]---
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Alright. There are a lot of cases where we can run into this and it all looks a little complicated, so I think it would be good to unwind this at some point. But I can't think of an easy way to do that, so for a fix this looks good:
Reviewed-by Thierry Reding <[email protected]>OK for pick this up v6.4?
It's in my queue, which is big, I'm at a conference this week but will try to get to it today on the train ride...
greg k-h