damon: Use pmdp_get instead of drect dereferencing pmd.
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 damon: Use pmdp_get instead of drect dereferencing pmd.
As ptep_get, Use the pmdp_get wrapper when we accessing pmdval instead of direct dereferencing pmd.
--- mm/damon/ops-common.c | 2 +- mm/damon/paddr.c | 2 +- mm/damon/vaddr.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
mm/damon/ops-common.c +1 -1
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addrvoid damon_pmdp_mkold (pmd_t *pmd,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long addr) {#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE -struct folio *folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (*pmd)); +struct folio *folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (pmdp_get (pmd)));if (!folio)return ;
mm/damon/paddr.c +1 -1
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static bool __damon_pa_young(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,mmu_notifier_test_young (vma->vm_mm, addr); }else {#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE - *accessed =pmd_young (*pvmw.pmd) || + *accessed =pmd_young (pmdp_get (pvmw.pmd)) || !folio_test_idle (folio) ||mmu_notifier_test_young (vma->vm_mm, addr);#else
mm/damon/vaddr.c +14 -8
@@ -301,16 +301,19 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk) { pte_t *pte; +pmd_t pmde;spinlock_t *ptl; -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmdp_get_lockless (pmd))) { ptl =pmd_lock (walk->mm, pmd); -if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) { + pmde =pmdp_get (pmd); + +if (!pmd_present (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ; } -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmde)) {damon_pmdp_mkold (pmd, walk->vma, addr);spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ;
@@ -434,26 +437,29 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, {pte_t *pte;pte_t ptent; +pmd_t pmde;spinlock_t *ptl;struct folio *folio;struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmdp_get_lockless (pmd))) { ptl =pmd_lock (walk->mm, pmd); -if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) { + pmde =pmdp_get (pmd); + +if (!pmd_present (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ; } -if (!pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (!pmd_trans_huge (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl); goto regular_page; } - folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (*pmd)); + folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (pmde));if (!folio) goto huge_out; -if (pmd_young (*pmd) || !folio_test_idle (folio) || +if (pmd_young (pmde) || !folio_test_idle (folio) ||mmu_notifier_test_young (walk->mm, addr)) priv->young = true;
Signature · 1 line
2.37.2
SeongJae Park
maintainerHi Levi,
Thank you for this patch.
Nit for the subject, what about s/drect/directly/? Also, let's remove the period at the end.
Quoted 2 lines · On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:37:45 +0900 Levi Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
As
ptep_get, Use thepmdp_getwrapper when we accessing pmdval instead of direct dereferencing pmd.
Nit: s/Use/use/ and s/direct/directly
Quoted 39 lines
Signed-off-by Levi Yun <[email protected]>--- mm/damon/ops-common.c | 2 +- mm/damon/paddr.c | 2 +- mm/damon/vaddr.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)mm/damon/ops-common.c +1
-1@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ void damon_ptep_mkold(pte_t *pte, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addrvoid damon_pmdp_mkold (pmd_t *pmd,struct vm_area_struct *vma,unsigned long addr) {#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE -struct folio *folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (*pmd)); +struct folio *folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (pmdp_get (pmd)));if (!folio)return ;mm/damon/paddr.c +1
-1@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static bool __damon_pa_young(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,mmu_notifier_test_young (vma->vm_mm, addr); }else {#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE - *accessed =pmd_young (*pvmw.pmd) || + *accessed =pmd_young (pmdp_get (pvmw.pmd)) || !folio_test_idle (folio) ||mmu_notifier_test_young (vma->vm_mm, addr);#else mm/damon/vaddr.c +0
-0
mm/damon/vaddr.c static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 307
Quoted 8 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +2
-1@@ -301,16 +301,19 @@ static int damon_mkold_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk) { pte_t *pte; +pmd_t pmde;spinlock_t *ptl; -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmdp_get_lockless (pmd))) {
I don't think we really need to use pmdp_get_lockless() here, since we will do this check again with the lock, and we have the fallback for the intermediate changes.
Quoted 15 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +4
-2ptl =pmd_lock (walk->mm, pmd); -if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) { + pmde =pmdp_get (pmd); + +if (!pmd_present (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ; } -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmde)) {damon_pmdp_mkold (pmd, walk->vma, addr);spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ;
mm/damon/vaddr.c static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 440
Quoted 4 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +1
-0@@ -434,26 +437,29 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, {pte_t *pte;pte_t ptent; +pmd_t pmde;
This would cause below build warning if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not defined.
.../mm/damon/vaddr.c:440:8: warning: unused variable 'pmde' [-Wunused-variable]
440 | pmd_t pmde;
| ^~~~mm/damon/vaddr.c static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 446
Quoted 7 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +1
-1spinlock_t *ptl;struct folio *folio;struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmdp_get_lockless (pmd))) {
Again, pmdp_get() might be enough?
Quoted 26 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +6
-4ptl =pmd_lock (walk->mm, pmd); -if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) { + pmde =pmdp_get (pmd); + +if (!pmd_present (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl);return 0 ; } -if (!pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (!pmd_trans_huge (pmde)) {spin_unlock (ptl); goto regular_page; } - folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (*pmd)); + folio =damon_get_folio (pmd_pfn (pmde));if (!folio) goto huge_out; -if (pmd_young (*pmd) || !folio_test_idle (folio) || +if (pmd_young (pmde) || !folio_test_idle (folio) ||mmu_notifier_test_young (walk->mm, addr)) priv->young = true;Signature · 1 line
2.37.2
Thanks,
SJ
Hi SJ.
Thanks for looking into this.
Quoted 4 lines
Nit for the subject, what about s/drect/directly/? Also, let's remove the period at the end.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 03:37:45 +0900 Levi Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks. But I don't know why period is added thou I sent via git send-email ..
Quoted 6 lines
Review
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1- if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) { + if (pmd_trans_huge(pmdp_get_lockless(pmd))) {I don't think we really need to use
pmdp_get_lockless()here, since we will do this check again with the lock, and we have the fallback for the intermediate changes.
Agree. I'll change. Thanks :)
Quoted 9 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, · line 440
Quoted 5 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +1
-0@@ -434,26 +437,29 @@ static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, {pte_t *pte;pte_t ptent; +pmd_t pmde;This would cause below build warning if
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEis not defined.
Quoted 12 lines
.../mm/damon/vaddr.c:440:8: warning: unused variable 'pmde' [-Wunused-variable]440 | pmd_t pmde; | ^~~~Quoted 7 lines
mm/damon/vaddr.c +1
-1spinlock_t *ptl;struct folio *folio;struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE -if (pmd_trans_huge (*pmd)) { +if (pmd_trans_huge (pmdp_get_lockless (pmd))) {
Oh.. I miss this. Many thanks..!
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks,
SJ
Many Thanks..!
---------
Sincerely,
Levi.
kernel test robot
build botkernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
Hi Levi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3 next-20230728] [cannot apply to sj/damon/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Levi-Yun/damon-Use-pmdp_get-instead-of-drect-dereferencing-pmd/20230728-024044 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727183745.682880-1-ppbuk5246%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] damon: Use pmdp_get instead of drect dereferencing pmd. config: i386-randconfig-i016-20230727 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230728/[email protected]/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230728/[email protected]/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/damon/vaddr.c: In function 'damon_young_pmd_entry':
>> mm/damon/vaddr.c:440:15: warning: unused variable 'pmde' [-Wunused-variable]
440 | pmd_t pmde;
| ^~~~vim +/pmde +440 mm/damon/vaddr.c
434
435 static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
436 unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
437 {
438 pte_t *pte;
439 pte_t ptent;
> 440 pmd_t pmde;
441 spinlock_t *ptl;
442 struct folio *folio;
443 struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;
444
Signature · 2 lines
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
This build warning is fixed in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Quoted 51 lines · kernel test robot
Hi Levi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.5-rc3 next-20230728] [cannot apply to sj/damon/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Levi-Yun/damon-Use-pmdp_get-instead-of-drect-dereferencing-pmd/20230728-024044 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727183745.682880-1-ppbuk5246%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] damon: Use pmdp_get instead of drect dereferencing pmd. config: i386-randconfig-i016-20230727 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230728/[email protected]/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230728/[email protected]/reproduce)If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/damon/vaddr.c: In function 'damon_young_pmd_entry':Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
mm/damon/vaddr.c:440:15: warning: unused variable 'pmde' [-Wunused-variable]440 | pmd_t pmde; | ^~~~vim +/pmde +440
mm/damon/vaddr.c434 435 static int damon_young_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, 436 unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk) 437 { 438 pte_t *pte; 439 pte_t ptent;Quoted 1 line
440
pmd_tpmde;441 spinlock_t *ptl; 442 struct folio *folio; 443 struct damon_young_walk_private *priv = walk->private;444
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki