FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 864bcaa38ee44ec6c0e43f79c2d2997b977e26b2
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2023082125-untainted-putdown-eba5@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
864bcaa38ee4 ("x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM")d893832d0e1e ("x86/srso: Add IBPB on VMEXIT")233d6f68b98d ("x86/srso: Add IBPB")fb3bd914b3ec ("x86/srso: Add a Speculative RAS Overflow mitigation")941d77c77339 ("Merge tag 'x86_cpu_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 864bcaa38ee44ec6c0e43f79c2d2997b977e26b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:44:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/cpu/kvm: Provide UNTRAIN_RET_VM
Similar to how it doesn't make sense to have UNTRAIN_RET have two untrain calls, it also doesn't make sense for VMEXIT to have an extra IBPB call.
This cures VMEXIT doing potentially unret+IBPB or double IBPB. Also, the (SEV) VMEXIT case seems to have been overlooked.
Redefine the meaning of the synthetic IBPB flags to:
- ENTRY_IBPB -- issue IBPB on entry (was: entry + VMEXIT)
- IBPB_ON_VMEXIT -- issue IBPB on VMEXIT
And have 'retbleed=ibpb' set *BOTH* feature flags to ensure it retains the previous behaviour and issues IBPB on entry+VMEXIT.
The new 'srso=ibpb_vmexit' option only sets IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.
Create UNTRAIN_RET_VM specifically for the VMEXIT case, and have that check IBPB_ON_VMEXIT.
All this avoids having the VMEXIT case having to check both ENTRY_IBPB and IBPB_ON_VMEXIT and simplifies the alternatives.
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +11 -0
@@ -299,6 +299,17 @@#endif .endm +.macro UNTRAIN_RET_VM +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY ) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY ) || \ + defined(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING ) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SRSO ) +VALIDATE_UNRET_END + ALTERNATIVE_3 "", \ + CALL_UNTRAIN_RET, X86_FEATURE_UNRET, \ + "call entry_ibpb", X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT, \ + __stringify(RESET_CALL_DEPTH), X86_FEATURE_CALL_DEPTH +#endif +.endm + .macro UNTRAIN_RET_FROM_CALL#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY ) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_IBPB_ENTRY ) || \ defined(CONFIG_CALL_DEPTH_TRACKING )
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +1 -0
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ static void __init retbleed_select_mitigation(void)case RETBLEED_MITIGATION_IBPB :setup_force_cpu_cap (X86_FEATURE_ENTRY_IBPB ); +setup_force_cpu_cap (X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT ); mitigate_smt = true;break ;
arch/x86/kvm/svm/vmenter.S +2 -5
@@ -222,10 +222,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_vcpu_run) * because interrupt handlers won't sanitize 'ret' if the return is * from the kernel. */ - UNTRAIN_RET - - /* SRSO */ - ALTERNATIVE "", "call entry_ibpb", X86_FEATURE_IBPB_ON_VMEXIT + UNTRAIN_RET_VM /* * Clear all general purpose registers except RSP and RAX to prevent
@@ -362,7 +359,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__svm_sev_es_vcpu_run) * because interrupt handlers won't sanitize RET if the return is * from the kernel. */ - UNTRAIN_RET + UNTRAIN_RET_VM /* "Pop" @spec_ctrl_intercepted. */ pop %_ASM_BX