Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm-fix-for-negative-counter-nr_file_hugepages.patch removed from -mm tree

merged mm-hotfixes-stable Andrew Morton 1 participant 1 message Nov 15, 2023 Stable branch

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andrew Morton

author tree notice Applied
#0 lore raw

The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: fix for negative counter: nr_file_hugepages
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-fix-for-negative-counter-nr_file_hugepages.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-hotfixes-stable branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Subject: mm: fix for negative counter: nr_file_hugepages
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:19:18 -0800

While qualifiying the 6.4 release, the following warning was detected in messages:

vmstat_refresh: nr_file_hugepages -15664

The warning is caused by the incorrect updating of the NR_FILE_THPS counter in the function split_huge_page_to_list. The if case is checking for folio_test_swapbacked, but the else case is missing the check for folio_test_pmd_mappable. The other functions that manipulate the counter like __filemap_add_folio and filemap_unaccount_folio have the corresponding check.

I have a test case, which reproduces the problem. It can be found here:
https://github.com/sroeschus/testcase/blob/main/vmstat_refresh/madv.c

The test case reproduces on an XFS filesystem. Running the same test case on a BTRFS filesystem does not reproduce the problem.

AFAIK version 6.1 until 6.6 are affected by this problem.

---

 mm/huge_memory.c |   16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
mm/huge_memory.c renamed from mm/huge_memory.c~mm-fix-for-negative-counter-nr_file_hugepages +9 -7
@@ -2769,13 +2769,15 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page
 			int nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
 			xas_split(&xas, folio, folio_order(folio));
-			if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
-				__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SHMEM_THPS,
-							-nr);
-			} else {
-				__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_THPS,
-							-nr);
-				filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
+			if (folio_test_pmd_mappable(folio)) {
+				if (folio_test_swapbacked(folio)) {
+					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
+							NR_SHMEM_THPS, -nr);
+				} else {
+					__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio,
+							NR_FILE_THPS, -nr);
+					filemap_nr_thps_dec(mapping);
+				}
 			}
 		}
 

_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [email protected] are