Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kunit: move KUNIT_TABLE out of INIT_DATA

PATCH Superseded Rae Moar 2 participants 12 messages Dec 13, 2023

Subsystems (6)

v4 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Rae Moar

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/6 kunit: move KUNIT_TABLE out of INIT_DATA

Alter the linker section of KUNIT_TABLE to move it out of INIT_DATA and into DATA_DATA.

Data for KUnit tests does not need to be in the init section.

In order to run tests again after boot the KUnit data cannot be labeled as init data as the kernel could write over it.

Add a KUNIT_INIT_TABLE in the next patch for KUnit tests that test init data/functions.

---
Changes since v3:
- No changes

 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h +3 -3
index bae0fe4d499b..1107905d37fc 100644
@@ -370,7 +370,8 @@
 	BRANCH_PROFILE()						\
 	TRACE_PRINTKS()							\
 	BPF_RAW_TP()							\
-	TRACEPOINT_STR()
+	TRACEPOINT_STR()						\
+	KUNIT_TABLE()
 
 /*
  * Data section helpers
@@ -699,8 +700,7 @@
 	THERMAL_TABLE(governor)						\
 	EARLYCON_TABLE()						\
 	LSM_TABLE()							\
-	EARLY_LSM_TABLE()						\
-	KUNIT_TABLE()
+	EARLY_LSM_TABLE()
 
 #define INIT_TEXT							\
 	*(.init.text .init.text.*)					\

base-commit: b285ba6f8cc1b2bfece0b4350fdb92c8780bc698

Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v4 2/6 kunit: add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to init linker section

Add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to the INIT_DATA linker section.

Alter the KUnit macros to create init tests:
kunit_test_init_section_suites

Update lib/kunit/executor.c to run both the suites in KUNIT_TABLE and KUNIT_INIT_TABLE.

---
Changes since v3:
- Add to comments in test.h for kunit_test_init_section_suites macro to note init tests cannot be run after boot and the structs cannot be marked with __initdata

 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |  9 ++++-
 include/kunit/test.h              | 30 +++++++++------
 include/linux/module.h            |  2 +
 kernel/module/main.c              |  3 ++
 lib/kunit/executor.c              | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 lib/kunit/test.c                  | 26 +++++++++----
 6 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h +8 -1
index 1107905d37fc..5dd3a61d673d 100644
@@ -700,7 +700,8 @@
 	THERMAL_TABLE(governor)						\
 	EARLYCON_TABLE()						\
 	LSM_TABLE()							\
-	EARLY_LSM_TABLE()
+	EARLY_LSM_TABLE()						\
+	KUNIT_INIT_TABLE()
 
 #define INIT_TEXT							\
 	*(.init.text .init.text.*)					\
@@ -926,6 +927,12 @@
 		. = ALIGN(8);						\
 		BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(.kunit_test_suites, __kunit_suites, _start, _end)
 
+/* Alignment must be consistent with (kunit_suite *) in include/kunit/test.h */
+#define KUNIT_INIT_TABLE()						\
+		. = ALIGN(8);						\
+		BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(.kunit_init_test_suites, \
+				__kunit_init_suites, _start, _end)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
 #define INIT_RAM_FS							\
 	. = ALIGN(4);							\
include/kunit/test.h +19 -11
index 20ed9f9275c9..fe79cd736e94 100644
@@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites);
 void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, bool builtin);
 void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, bool include_attr);
 
+struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set,
+		struct kunit_suite_set suite_set);
+
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 int kunit_run_all_tests(void);
 #else
@@ -371,6 +374,11 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 
 #define kunit_test_suite(suite)	kunit_test_suites(&suite)
 
+#define __kunit_init_test_suites(unique_array, ...)			       \
+	static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[]			       \
+	__aligned(sizeof(struct kunit_suite *))				       \
+	__used __section(".kunit_init_test_suites") = { __VA_ARGS__ }
+
 /**
  * kunit_test_init_section_suites() - used to register one or more &struct
  *				      kunit_suite containing init functions or
@@ -378,21 +386,21 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  *
  * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
- * This functions identically as kunit_test_suites() except that it suppresses
- * modpost warnings for referencing functions marked __init or data marked
- * __initdata; this is OK because currently KUnit only runs tests upon boot
- * during the init phase or upon loading a module during the init phase.
+ * This functions similar to kunit_test_suites() except that it compiles the
+ * list of suites during init phase.
+ *
+ * This macro also suffixes the array and suite declarations it makes with
+ * _probe; so that modpost suppresses warnings about referencing init data
+ * for symbols named in this manner.
  *
- * NOTE TO KUNIT DEVS: If we ever allow KUnit tests to be run after boot, these
- * tests must be excluded.
+ * Note: these init tests are not able to be run after boot so there is no
+ * "run" debugfs file generated for these tests.
  *
- * The only thing this macro does that's different from kunit_test_suites is
- * that it suffixes the array and suite declarations it makes with _probe;
- * modpost suppresses warnings about referencing init data for symbols named in
- * this manner.
+ * Also, do not mark the suite or test case structs with __initdata because
+ * they will be used after the init phase with debugfs.
  */
 #define kunit_test_init_section_suites(__suites...)			\
-	__kunit_test_suites(CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(array), _probe),	\
+	__kunit_init_test_suites(CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(array), _probe), \
 			    ##__suites)
 
 #define kunit_test_init_section_suite(suite)	\
include/linux/module.h +2 -0
index a98e188cf37b..9cd0009bd050 100644
@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct module {
 	struct static_call_site *static_call_sites;
 #endif
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+	int num_kunit_init_suites;
+	struct kunit_suite **kunit_init_suites;
 	int num_kunit_suites;
 	struct kunit_suite **kunit_suites;
 #endif
kernel/module/main.c +3 -0
index 98fedfdb8db5..36681911c05a 100644
@@ -2199,6 +2199,9 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
 	mod->kunit_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_test_suites",
 					      sizeof(*mod->kunit_suites),
 					      &mod->num_kunit_suites);
+	mod->kunit_init_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_init_test_suites",
+					      sizeof(*mod->kunit_init_suites),
+					      &mod->num_kunit_init_suites);
 #endif
 
 	mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table",
lib/kunit/executor.c +58 -6

100 lines not on this page · raw message

lib/kunit/test.c +19 -7
index 0308865194bb..6c082911a85f 100644
@@ -704,28 +704,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
 static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
 {
-	struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = {
+	struct kunit_suite_set suite_set, filtered_set;
+	struct kunit_suite_set normal_suite_set = {
 		mod->kunit_suites, mod->kunit_suites + mod->num_kunit_suites,
 	};
+	struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set = {
+		mod->kunit_init_suites, mod->kunit_init_suites + mod->num_kunit_init_suites,
+	};
 	const char *action = kunit_action();
 	int err = 0;
 
-	suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set,
+	if (mod->num_kunit_init_suites > 0)
+		suite_set = kunit_merge_suite_sets(init_suite_set, normal_suite_set);
+	else
+		suite_set = normal_suite_set;
+
+	filtered_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set,
 					kunit_filter_glob() ?: "*.*",
 					kunit_filter(), kunit_filter_action(),
 					&err);
 	if (err)
 		pr_err("kunit module: error filtering suites: %d\n", err);
 
-	mod->kunit_suites = (struct kunit_suite **)suite_set.start;
-	mod->num_kunit_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start;
+	mod->kunit_suites = (struct kunit_suite **)filtered_set.start;
+	mod->num_kunit_suites = filtered_set.end - filtered_set.start;
+
+	if (mod->num_kunit_init_suites > 0)
+		kfree(suite_set.start);
 
 	if (!action)
-		kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set, false);
+		kunit_exec_run_tests(&filtered_set, false);
 	else if (!strcmp(action, "list"))
-		kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set, false);
+		kunit_exec_list_tests(&filtered_set, false);
 	else if (!strcmp(action, "list_attr"))
-		kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set, true);
+		kunit_exec_list_tests(&filtered_set, true);
 	else
 		pr_err("kunit: unknown action '%s'\n", action);
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
Reviewed-by on v4 2/6
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] kunit: add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to init linker section

Quoted 9 lines · Rae Moar

Add KUNIT_INIT_TABLE to the INIT_DATA linker section.

Alter the KUnit macros to create init tests:
kunit_test_init_section_suites

Update lib/kunit/executor.c to run both the suites in KUNIT_TABLE and KUNIT_INIT_TABLE.

Quoted 7 lines

---
Changes since v3:
- Add to comments in test.h for kunit_test_init_section_suites macro to note init tests cannot be run after boot and the structs cannot be marked with __initdata

Thanks -- this is looking good.

Cheers,
-- David

Quoted 284 lines
 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |  9 ++++-
 include/kunit/test.h              | 30 +++++++++------
 include/linux/module.h            |  2 +
 kernel/module/main.c              |  3 ++
 lib/kunit/executor.c              | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 lib/kunit/test.c                  | 26 +++++++++----
 6 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h +8 -1
index 1107905d37fc..5dd3a61d673d 100644
@@ -700,7 +700,8 @@
        THERMAL_TABLE(governor)                                         \
        EARLYCON_TABLE()                                                \
        LSM_TABLE()                                                     \
-       EARLY_LSM_TABLE()
+       EARLY_LSM_TABLE()                                               \
+       KUNIT_INIT_TABLE()
 
 #define INIT_TEXT                                                      \
        *(.init.text .init.text.*)                                      \
@@ -926,6 +927,12 @@
                . = ALIGN(8);                                           \
                BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(.kunit_test_suites, __kunit_suites, _start, _end)
 
+/* Alignment must be consistent with (kunit_suite *) in include/kunit/test.h */
+#define KUNIT_INIT_TABLE()                                             \
+               . = ALIGN(8);                                           \
+               BOUNDED_SECTION_POST_LABEL(.kunit_init_test_suites, \
+                               __kunit_init_suites, _start, _end)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
 #define INIT_RAM_FS                                                    \
        . = ALIGN(4);                                                   \
include/kunit/test.h +19 -11
index 20ed9f9275c9..fe79cd736e94 100644
@@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites);
 void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, bool builtin);
 void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, bool include_attr);
 
+struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set,
+               struct kunit_suite_set suite_set);
+
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 int kunit_run_all_tests(void);
 #else
@@ -371,6 +374,11 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 
 #define kunit_test_suite(suite)        kunit_test_suites(&suite)
 
+#define __kunit_init_test_suites(unique_array, ...)                           \
+       static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[]                              \
+       __aligned(sizeof(struct kunit_suite *))                                \
+       __used __section(".kunit_init_test_suites") = { __VA_ARGS__ }
+
 /**
  * kunit_test_init_section_suites() - used to register one or more &struct
  *                                   kunit_suite containing init functions or
@@ -378,21 +386,21 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
  *
  * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
  *
- * This functions identically as kunit_test_suites() except that it suppresses
- * modpost warnings for referencing functions marked __init or data marked
- * __initdata; this is OK because currently KUnit only runs tests upon boot
- * during the init phase or upon loading a module during the init phase.
+ * This functions similar to kunit_test_suites() except that it compiles the
+ * list of suites during init phase.
+ *
+ * This macro also suffixes the array and suite declarations it makes with
+ * _probe; so that modpost suppresses warnings about referencing init data
+ * for symbols named in this manner.
  *
- * NOTE TO KUNIT DEVS: If we ever allow KUnit tests to be run after boot, these
- * tests must be excluded.
+ * Note: these init tests are not able to be run after boot so there is no
+ * "run" debugfs file generated for these tests.
  *
- * The only thing this macro does that's different from kunit_test_suites is
- * that it suffixes the array and suite declarations it makes with _probe;
- * modpost suppresses warnings about referencing init data for symbols named in
- * this manner.
+ * Also, do not mark the suite or test case structs with __initdata because
+ * they will be used after the init phase with debugfs.
  */
 #define kunit_test_init_section_suites(__suites...)                    \
-       __kunit_test_suites(CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(array), _probe),    \
+       __kunit_init_test_suites(CONCATENATE(__UNIQUE_ID(array), _probe), \
                            ##__suites)
 
 #define kunit_test_init_section_suite(suite)   \
include/linux/module.h +2 -0
index a98e188cf37b..9cd0009bd050 100644
@@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct module {
        struct static_call_site *static_call_sites;
 #endif
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+       int num_kunit_init_suites;
+       struct kunit_suite **kunit_init_suites;
        int num_kunit_suites;
        struct kunit_suite **kunit_suites;
 #endif
kernel/module/main.c +3 -0
index 98fedfdb8db5..36681911c05a 100644
@@ -2199,6 +2199,9 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
        mod->kunit_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_test_suites",
                                              sizeof(*mod->kunit_suites),
                                              &mod->num_kunit_suites);
+       mod->kunit_init_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_init_test_suites",
+                                             sizeof(*mod->kunit_init_suites),
+                                             &mod->num_kunit_init_suites);
 #endif
 
        mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table",
lib/kunit/executor.c +58 -6
index 1236b3cd2fbb..847329c51e91 100644
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
  */
 extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_start[];
 extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_end[];
+extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_init_suites_start[];
+extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_init_suites_end[];
 
 static char *action_param;
 
@@ -292,6 +294,33 @@ void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct kunit_suite_set *suite_set, bool include_attr)
        }
 }
 
+struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set,
+               struct kunit_suite_set suite_set)
+{
+       struct kunit_suite_set total_suite_set = {NULL, NULL};
+       struct kunit_suite **total_suite_start = NULL;
+       size_t init_num_suites, num_suites, suite_size;
+
+       init_num_suites = init_suite_set.end - init_suite_set.start;
+       num_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start;
+       suite_size = sizeof(suite_set.start);
+
+       /* Allocate memory for array of all kunit suites */
+       total_suite_start = kmalloc_array(init_num_suites + num_suites, suite_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!total_suite_start)
+               return total_suite_set;
+
+       /* Append init suites and then all other kunit suites */
+       memcpy(total_suite_start, init_suite_set.start, init_num_suites * suite_size);
+       memcpy(total_suite_start + init_num_suites, suite_set.start, num_suites * suite_size);
+
+       /* Set kunit suite set start and end */
+       total_suite_set.start = total_suite_start;
+       total_suite_set.end = total_suite_start + (init_num_suites + num_suites);
+
+       return total_suite_set;
+}
+
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 
 static char *kunit_shutdown;
@@ -313,21 +342,41 @@ static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void)
 
 int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 {
-       struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = {
+       struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = {NULL, NULL};
+       struct kunit_suite_set filtered_suite_set = {NULL, NULL};
+       struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set = {
+               __kunit_init_suites_start, __kunit_init_suites_end,
+       };
+       struct kunit_suite_set normal_suite_set = {
                __kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end,
        };
+       size_t init_num_suites = init_suite_set.end - init_suite_set.start;
        int err = 0;
+
+       if (init_num_suites > 0) {
+               suite_set = kunit_merge_suite_sets(init_suite_set, normal_suite_set);
+               if (!suite_set.start)
+                       goto out;
+       } else
+               suite_set = normal_suite_set;
+
        if (!kunit_enabled()) {
                pr_info("kunit: disabled\n");
-               goto out;
+               goto free_out;
        }
 
        if (filter_glob_param || filter_param) {
-               suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param,
+               filtered_suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param,
                                filter_param, filter_action_param, &err);
+
+               /* Free original suite set before using filtered suite set */
+               if (init_num_suites > 0)
+                       kfree(suite_set.start);
+               suite_set = filtered_suite_set;
+
                if (err) {
                        pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err);
-                       goto out;
+                       goto free_out;
                }
        }
 
@@ -340,9 +389,12 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
        else
                pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param);
 
-       if (filter_glob_param || filter_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */
+free_out:
+       if (filter_glob_param || filter_param)
                kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
-       }
+       else if (init_num_suites > 0)
+               /* Don't use kunit_free_suite_set because suites aren't individually allocated */
+               kfree(suite_set.start);
 
 out:
        kunit_handle_shutdown();
lib/kunit/test.c +19 -8
index 0308865194bb..6c082911a85f 100644
@@ -704,28 +704,40 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
 static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod)
 {
-       struct kunit_suite_set suite_set = {
+       struct kunit_suite_set suite_set, filtered_set;
+       struct kunit_suite_set normal_suite_set = {
                mod->kunit_suites, mod->kunit_suites + mod->num_kunit_suites,
        };
+       struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_set = {
+               mod->kunit_init_suites, mod->kunit_init_suites + mod->num_kunit_init_suites,
+       };
        const char *action = kunit_action();
        int err = 0;
 
-       suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set,
+       if (mod->num_kunit_init_suites > 0)
+               suite_set = kunit_merge_suite_sets(init_suite_set, normal_suite_set);
+       else
+               suite_set = normal_suite_set;
+
+       filtered_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set,
                                        kunit_filter_glob() ?: "*.*",
                                        kunit_filter(), kunit_filter_action(),
                                        &err);
        if (err)
                pr_err("kunit module: error filtering suites: %d\n", err);
 
-       mod->kunit_suites = (struct kunit_suite **)suite_set.start;
-       mod->num_kunit_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start;
+       mod->kunit_suites = (struct kunit_suite **)filtered_set.start;
+       mod->num_kunit_suites = filtered_set.end - filtered_set.start;
+
+       if (mod->num_kunit_init_suites > 0)
+               kfree(suite_set.start);
 
        if (!action)
-               kunit_exec_run_tests(&suite_set, false);
+               kunit_exec_run_tests(&filtered_set, false);
        else if (!strcmp(action, "list"))
-               kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set, false);
+               kunit_exec_list_tests(&filtered_set, false);
        else if (!strcmp(action, "list_attr"))
-               kunit_exec_list_tests(&suite_set, true);
+               kunit_exec_list_tests(&filtered_set, true);
        else
                pr_err("kunit: unknown action '%s'\n", action);
 }
--

2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

author
#3 lore raw

PATCH v4 3/6 kunit: add example suite to test init suites

In reply to Rae Moar

Add example_init_test_suite to allow for testing the feature of running test suites marked as init to indicate they use init data and/or functions.

This suite should always pass and uses a simple init function.

This suite can also be used to test the is_init attribute introduced in the next patch.

---
Changes since v3:
- I ended up not changing anything as adding __init to the test gave a build warning. It did still work so I could add it back if wanted.

 lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +37 -0
index 6bb5c2ef6696..18495778de7c 100644
@@ -287,4 +287,41 @@ static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = {
  */
 kunit_test_suites(&example_test_suite);
 
+static int __init init_add(int x, int y)
+{
+	return (x + y);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This test should always pass. Can be used to test init suites.
+ */
+static void example_init_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, init_add(1, 1), 2);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The kunit_case struct cannot be marked as __initdata as this will be
+ * used in debugfs to retrieve results after test has run
+ */
+static struct kunit_case example_init_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(example_init_test),
+	{}
+};
+
+/*
+ * The kunit_suite struct cannot be marked as __initdata as this will be
+ * used in debugfs to retrieve results after test has run
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite example_init_test_suite = {
+	.name = "example_init",
+	.test_cases = example_init_test_cases,
+};
+
+/*
+ * This registers the test suite and marks the suite as using init data
+ * and/or functions.
+ */
+kunit_test_init_section_suites(&example_init_test_suite);
+
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] kunit: add example suite to test init suites

Quoted 7 lines · Rae Moar

Add example_init_test_suite to allow for testing the feature of running test suites marked as init to indicate they use init data and/or functions.

This suite should always pass and uses a simple init function.

Quoted 8 lines

This suite can also be used to test the is_init attribute introduced in the next patch.

---
Changes since v3:
- I ended up not changing anything as adding __init to the test gave a build warning. It did still work so I could add it back if wanted.

I had another look at this, and I think the most correct solution here is to make the test __init, and the array of tests __refdata.

(Ideally this would be something we could wrap in a macro, but I think it's fine to just have it written here for now, so it's explicit in the example._

How does that sound?

-- David

Quoted 11 lines
 lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +0 -0
index 6bb5c2ef6696..18495778de7c 100644
@@ -287,4 +287,41 @@ static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = {
  */
 kunit_test_suites(&example_test_suite);

lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = { · line 298

Quoted 10 lines
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +9 -0
 
+static int __init init_add(int x, int y)
+{
+       return (x + y);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This test should always pass. Can be used to test init suites.
+ */
+static void example_init_test(struct kunit *test)

Add __init here.

lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c static struct kunit_suite example_test_suite = { · line 307

Quoted 9 lines
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +9 -0
+{
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, init_add(1, 1), 2);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The kunit_case struct cannot be marked as __initdata as this will be
+ * used in debugfs to retrieve results after test has run
+ */
+static struct kunit_case example_init_test_cases[] = {

Make this 'static struct kunit_case __refdata example_init_test_cases[] = {'...

Quoted 23 lines
lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +19 -1
+       KUNIT_CASE(example_init_test),
+       {}
+};
+
+/*
+ * The kunit_suite struct cannot be marked as __initdata as this will be
+ * used in debugfs to retrieve results after test has run
+ */
+static struct kunit_suite example_init_test_suite = {
+       .name = "example_init",
+       .test_cases = example_init_test_cases,
+};
+
+/*
+ * This registers the test suite and marks the suite as using init data
+ * and/or functions.
+ */
+kunit_test_init_section_suites(&example_init_test_suite);
+
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--

2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

author
#5 lore raw

PATCH v4 4/6 kunit: add is_init test attribute

In reply to Rae Moar

Add is_init test attribute of type bool. Add to_string, get, and filter methods to lib/kunit/attributes.c.

Mark each of the tests in the init section with the is_init=true attribute.

Add is_init to the attributes documentation.

---
Changes since v3:
- Move the attribute from kunit_attributes to a suite field.

 .../dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst          |  7 +++
 include/kunit/test.h                          |  1 +
 lib/kunit/attributes.c                        | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/executor.c                          |  6 +-
 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst +7 -0
index 766f9cdea0fa..024e9ad1d1e9 100644
@@ -428,3 +428,10 @@ This attribute indicates the name of the module associated with the test.
 
 This attribute is automatically saved as a string and is printed for each suite.
 Tests can also be filtered using this attribute.
+
+``is_init``
+
+This attribute indicates whether the test uses init data or functions.
+
+This attribute is automatically saved as a boolean and tests can also be
+filtered using this attribute.
include/kunit/test.h +1 -0
index fe79cd736e94..b163b9984b33 100644
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
 	struct dentry *debugfs;
 	struct string_stream *log;
 	int suite_init_err;
+	bool is_init;
 };
 
 /* Stores an array of suites, end points one past the end */
lib/kunit/attributes.c +60 -0

84 lines not on this page · raw message

lib/kunit/executor.c +5 -1
index 847329c51e91..717b9599036b 100644
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_
 	struct kunit_suite_set total_suite_set = {NULL, NULL};
 	struct kunit_suite **total_suite_start = NULL;
 	size_t init_num_suites, num_suites, suite_size;
+	int i = 0;
 
 	init_num_suites = init_suite_set.end - init_suite_set.start;
 	num_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start;
@@ -310,8 +311,11 @@ struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_
 	if (!total_suite_start)
 		return total_suite_set;
 
-	/* Append init suites and then all other kunit suites */
+	/* Append and mark init suites and then append all other kunit suites */
 	memcpy(total_suite_start, init_suite_set.start, init_num_suites * suite_size);
+	for (i = 0; i < init_num_suites; i++)
+		total_suite_start[i]->is_init = true;
+
 	memcpy(total_suite_start + init_num_suites, suite_set.start, num_suites * suite_size);
 
 	/* Set kunit suite set start and end */
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
Reviewed-by on v4 4/6
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] kunit: add is_init test attribute

Quoted 10 lines · Rae Moar

Add is_init test attribute of type bool. Add to_string, get, and filter methods to lib/kunit/attributes.c.

Mark each of the tests in the init section with the is_init=true attribute.

Add is_init to the attributes documentation.

---

This looks much better, thanks.

Maybe in the future, we'll want to collate several suite-level attributes (in a suite_attributes struct or a bitfield), but I think that should wait until after we have more examples.

Cheers,
-- David

Quoted 156 lines

Changes since v3:
- Move the attribute from kunit_attributes to a suite field.

 .../dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst          |  7 +++
 include/kunit/test.h                          |  1 +
 lib/kunit/attributes.c                        | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/executor.c                          |  6 +-
 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst +7 -0
index 766f9cdea0fa..024e9ad1d1e9 100644
@@ -428,3 +428,10 @@ This attribute indicates the name of the module associated with the test.
 
 This attribute is automatically saved as a string and is printed for each suite.
 Tests can also be filtered using this attribute.
+
+``is_init``
+
+This attribute indicates whether the test uses init data or functions.
+
+This attribute is automatically saved as a boolean and tests can also be
+filtered using this attribute.
include/kunit/test.h +1 -0
index fe79cd736e94..b163b9984b33 100644
@@ -253,6 +253,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
        struct dentry *debugfs;
        struct string_stream *log;
        int suite_init_err;
+       bool is_init;
 };
 
 /* Stores an array of suites, end points one past the end */
lib/kunit/attributes.c +60 -0
index 1b512f7e1838..2cf04cc09372 100644
@@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ static const char *attr_enum_to_string(void *attr, const char * const str_list[]
        return str_list[val];
 }
 
+static const char *attr_bool_to_string(void *attr, bool *to_free)
+{
+       bool val = (bool)attr;
+
+       *to_free = false;
+       if (val)
+               return "true";
+       return "false";
+}
+
 static const char *attr_speed_to_string(void *attr, bool *to_free)
 {
        return attr_enum_to_string(attr, speed_str_list, to_free);
@@ -166,6 +176,37 @@ static int attr_string_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err)
        return false;
 }
 
+static int attr_bool_filter(void *attr, const char *input, int *err)
+{
+       int i, input_int = -1;
+       long val = (long)attr;
+       const char *input_str = NULL;
+
+       for (i = 0; input[i]; i++) {
+               if (!strchr(op_list, input[i])) {
+                       input_str = input + i;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+
+       if (!input_str) {
+               *err = -EINVAL;
+               pr_err("kunit executor: filter value not found: %s\n", input);
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       if (!strcmp(input_str, "true"))
+               input_int = (int)true;
+       else if (!strcmp(input_str, "false"))
+               input_int = (int)false;
+       else {
+               *err = -EINVAL;
+               pr_err("kunit executor: invalid filter input: %s\n", input);
+               return false;
+       }
+
+       return int_filter(val, input, input_int, err);
+}
 
 /* Get Attribute Methods */
 
@@ -194,6 +235,17 @@ static void *attr_module_get(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test)
                return (void *) "";
 }
 
+static void *attr_is_init_get(void *test_or_suite, bool is_test)
+{
+       struct kunit_suite *suite = is_test ? NULL : test_or_suite;
+       struct kunit_case *test = is_test ? test_or_suite : NULL;
+
+       if (test)
+               return ((void *) NULL);
+       else
+               return ((void *) suite->is_init);
+}
+
 /* List of all Test Attributes */
 
 static struct kunit_attr kunit_attr_list[] = {
@@ -212,6 +264,14 @@ static struct kunit_attr kunit_attr_list[] = {
                .filter = attr_string_filter,
                .attr_default = (void *)"",
                .print = PRINT_SUITE,
+       },
+       {
+               .name = "is_init",
+               .get_attr = attr_is_init_get,
+               .to_string = attr_bool_to_string,
+               .filter = attr_bool_filter,
+               .attr_default = (void *)false,
+               .print = PRINT_SUITE,
        }
 };
 
lib/kunit/executor.c +5 -2
index 847329c51e91..717b9599036b 100644
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_
        struct kunit_suite_set total_suite_set = {NULL, NULL};
        struct kunit_suite **total_suite_start = NULL;
        size_t init_num_suites, num_suites, suite_size;
+       int i = 0;
 
        init_num_suites = init_suite_set.end - init_suite_set.start;
        num_suites = suite_set.end - suite_set.start;
@@ -310,8 +311,11 @@ struct kunit_suite_set kunit_merge_suite_sets(struct kunit_suite_set init_suite_
        if (!total_suite_start)
                return total_suite_set;
 
-       /* Append init suites and then all other kunit suites */
+       /* Append and mark init suites and then append all other kunit suites */
        memcpy(total_suite_start, init_suite_set.start, init_num_suites * suite_size);
+       for (i = 0; i < init_num_suites; i++)
+               total_suite_start[i]->is_init = true;
+
        memcpy(total_suite_start + init_num_suites, suite_set.start, num_suites * suite_size);
 
        /* Set kunit suite set start and end */
--

2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

author
#7 lore raw

PATCH v4 5/6 kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs

In reply to Rae Moar

Add functionality to run built-in tests after boot by writing to a debugfs file.

Add a new debugfs file labeled "run" for each test suite to use for this purpose.

As an example, write to the file using the following:

echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<testsuite>/run

This will trigger the test suite to run and will print results to the kernel log.

To guard against running tests concurrently with this feature, add a mutex lock around running kunit. This supports the current practice of not allowing tests to be run concurrently on the same kernel.

This new functionality could be used to design a parameter injection feature in the future.

---
Changes since v4:
- Rebased series causing a few small changes in debugfs.c in this patch

 lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/test.c    | 10 +++++++
 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
lib/kunit/debugfs.c +68 -0
index 382706dfb47d..d548750a325a 100644
@@ -8,12 +8,14 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "debugfs.h"
 
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
+#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN              "run"
 
 /*
  * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
@@ -21,6 +23,8 @@
  * Path						Semantics
  * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results	Show results of last run for
  *						testsuite
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run	Write to this file to trigger
+ *						testsuite to run
  *
  */
 
@@ -101,6 +105,51 @@ static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	return single_open(file, debugfs_print_results, suite);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Print a usage message to the debugfs "run" file
+ * (/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run) if opened.
+ */
+static int debugfs_print_run(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
+
+	seq_puts(seq, "Write to this file to trigger the test suite to run.\n");
+	seq_printf(seq, "usage: echo \"any string\" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/%s/run\n",
+			suite->name);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The debugfs "run" file (/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run)
+ * contains no information. Write to the file to trigger the test suite
+ * to run.
+ */
+static int debugfs_run_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	struct kunit_suite *suite;
+
+	suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
+
+	return single_open(file, debugfs_print_run, suite);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Trigger a test suite to run by writing to the suite's "run" debugfs
+ * file found at: /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run
+ *
+ * Note: what is written to this file will not be saved.
+ */
+static ssize_t debugfs_run(struct file *file,
+		const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	struct inode *f_inode = file->f_inode;
+	struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *) f_inode->i_private;
+
+	__kunit_test_suites_init(&suite, 1);
+
+	return count;
+}
+
 static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
 	.open = debugfs_results_open,
 	.read = seq_read,
@@ -108,11 +157,23 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
 	.release = debugfs_release,
 };
 
+static const struct file_operations debugfs_run_fops = {
+	.open = debugfs_run_open,
+	.read = seq_read,
+	.write = debugfs_run,
+	.llseek = seq_lseek,
+	.release = debugfs_release,
+};
+
 void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
 	struct kunit_case *test_case;
 	struct string_stream *stream;
 
+	/* If suite log already allocated, do not create new debugfs files. */
+	if (suite->log)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * Allocate logs before creating debugfs representation.
 	 * The suite->log and test_case->log pointer are expected to be NULL
@@ -140,6 +201,13 @@ void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
 			    suite->debugfs,
 			    suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
+
+	/* Do not create file to re-run test if test runs on init */
+	if (!suite->is_init) {
+		debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN, S_IFREG | 0644,
+				    suite->debugfs,
+				    suite, &debugfs_run_fops);
+	}
 	return;
 
 err:
lib/kunit/test.c +10 -0
index 6c082911a85f..a52fcb9a4457 100644
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/panic.h>
 #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -22,6 +23,8 @@
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(kunit_run_lock);
+
 /*
  * Hook to fail the current test and print an error message to the log.
  */
@@ -654,6 +657,7 @@ static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 	kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
 	suite->status_comment[0] = '\0';
 	suite->suite_init_err = 0;
+	string_stream_clear(suite->log);
 }
 
 bool kunit_enabled(void)
@@ -670,6 +674,11 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/* Use mutex lock to guard against running tests concurrently. */
+	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&kunit_run_lock)) {
+		pr_err("kunit: test interrupted\n");
+		return -EINTR;
+	}
 	static_branch_inc(&kunit_running);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) {
@@ -678,6 +687,7 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
 	}
 
 	static_branch_dec(&kunit_running);
+	mutex_unlock(&kunit_run_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
Reviewed-by on v4 5/6
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] kunit: add ability to run tests after boot using debugfs

Quoted 18 lines · Rae Moar

Add functionality to run built-in tests after boot by writing to a debugfs file.

Add a new debugfs file labeled "run" for each test suite to use for this purpose.

As an example, write to the file using the following:

echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<testsuite>/run

This will trigger the test suite to run and will print results to the kernel log.

To guard against running tests concurrently with this feature, add a mutex lock around running kunit. This supports the current practice of not allowing tests to be run concurrently on the same kernel.

Quoted 5 lines

This new functionality could be used to design a parameter injection feature in the future.

---

Excellent! Thanks for rebasing it!

This still works fine here, and looks good.

Cheers,
-- David

Quoted 177 lines

Changes since v4:
- Rebased series causing a few small changes in debugfs.c in this patch

 lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/kunit/test.c    | 10 +++++++
 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
lib/kunit/debugfs.c +68 -0
index 382706dfb47d..d548750a325a 100644
@@ -8,12 +8,14 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
 
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "debugfs.h"
 
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_ROOT             "kunit"
 #define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS          "results"
+#define KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN              "run"
 
 /*
  * Create a debugfs representation of test suites:
@@ -21,6 +23,8 @@
  * Path                                                Semantics
  * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/results Show results of last run for
  *                                             testsuite
+ * /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run     Write to this file to trigger
+ *                                             testsuite to run
  *
  */
 
@@ -101,6 +105,51 @@ static int debugfs_results_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
        return single_open(file, debugfs_print_results, suite);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Print a usage message to the debugfs "run" file
+ * (/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run) if opened.
+ */
+static int debugfs_print_run(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
+{
+       struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *)seq->private;
+
+       seq_puts(seq, "Write to this file to trigger the test suite to run.\n");
+       seq_printf(seq, "usage: echo \"any string\" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/%s/run\n",
+                       suite->name);
+       return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The debugfs "run" file (/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run)
+ * contains no information. Write to the file to trigger the test suite
+ * to run.
+ */
+static int debugfs_run_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+       struct kunit_suite *suite;
+
+       suite = (struct kunit_suite *)inode->i_private;
+
+       return single_open(file, debugfs_print_run, suite);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Trigger a test suite to run by writing to the suite's "run" debugfs
+ * file found at: /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<testsuite>/run
+ *
+ * Note: what is written to this file will not be saved.
+ */
+static ssize_t debugfs_run(struct file *file,
+               const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+       struct inode *f_inode = file->f_inode;
+       struct kunit_suite *suite = (struct kunit_suite *) f_inode->i_private;
+
+       __kunit_test_suites_init(&suite, 1);
+
+       return count;
+}
+
 static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
        .open = debugfs_results_open,
        .read = seq_read,
@@ -108,11 +157,23 @@ static const struct file_operations debugfs_results_fops = {
        .release = debugfs_release,
 };
 
+static const struct file_operations debugfs_run_fops = {
+       .open = debugfs_run_open,
+       .read = seq_read,
+       .write = debugfs_run,
+       .llseek = seq_lseek,
+       .release = debugfs_release,
+};
+
 void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 {
        struct kunit_case *test_case;
        struct string_stream *stream;
 
+       /* If suite log already allocated, do not create new debugfs files. */
+       if (suite->log)
+               return;
+
        /*
         * Allocate logs before creating debugfs representation.
         * The suite->log and test_case->log pointer are expected to be NULL
@@ -140,6 +201,13 @@ void kunit_debugfs_create_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
        debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RESULTS, S_IFREG | 0444,
                            suite->debugfs,
                            suite, &debugfs_results_fops);
+
+       /* Do not create file to re-run test if test runs on init */
+       if (!suite->is_init) {
+               debugfs_create_file(KUNIT_DEBUGFS_RUN, S_IFREG | 0644,
+                                   suite->debugfs,
+                                   suite, &debugfs_run_fops);
+       }
        return;
 
 err:
lib/kunit/test.c +10 -1
index 6c082911a85f..a52fcb9a4457 100644
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/panic.h>
 #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -22,6 +23,8 @@
 #include "string-stream.h"
 #include "try-catch-impl.h"
 
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(kunit_run_lock);
+
 /*
  * Hook to fail the current test and print an error message to the log.
  */
@@ -654,6 +657,7 @@ static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite)
        kunit_debugfs_create_suite(suite);
        suite->status_comment[0] = '\0';
        suite->suite_init_err = 0;
+       string_stream_clear(suite->log);
 }
 
 bool kunit_enabled(void)
@@ -670,6 +674,11 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
                return 0;
        }
 
+       /* Use mutex lock to guard against running tests concurrently. */
+       if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&kunit_run_lock)) {
+               pr_err("kunit: test interrupted\n");
+               return -EINTR;
+       }
        static_branch_inc(&kunit_running);
 
        for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) {
@@ -678,6 +687,7 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_
        }
 
        static_branch_dec(&kunit_running);
+       mutex_unlock(&kunit_run_lock);
        return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init);
--

2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

author
#9 lore raw

PATCH v4 6/6 Documentation: Add debugfs docs with run after boot

In reply to Rae Moar

Expand the documentation on the KUnit debugfs filesystem on the run_manual.rst page.

Add section describing how to access results using debugfs.

Add section describing how to run tests after boot using debugfs.

---
Changes since v3:
- Change the introduction of the debugfs section
- Add detail to not being able to run concurrently or run with init data

 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst | 51 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst +47 -4
index e7b46421f247..699d92885075 100644
@@ -49,9 +49,52 @@ loaded.
 
 The results will appear in TAP format in ``dmesg``.
 
+debugfs
+=======
+
+KUnit can be accessed from userspace via the debugfs filesystem (See more
+information about debugfs at Documentation/filesystems/debugfs.rst).
+
+If ``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` is enabled, the KUnit debugfs filesystem is
+mounted at /sys/kernel/debug/kunit. You can use this filesystem to perform
+the following actions.
+
+Retrieve Test Results
+=====================
+
+You can use debugfs to retrieve KUnit test results. The test results are
+accessible from the debugfs filesystem in the following read-only file:
+
+.. code-block :: bash
+
+	/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/results
+
+The test results are printed in a KTAP document. Note this document is separate
+to the kernel log and thus, may have different test suite numbering.
+
+Run Tests After Kernel Has Booted
+=================================
+
+You can use the debugfs filesystem to trigger built-in tests to run after
+boot. To run the test suite, you can use the following command to write to
+the ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/run`` file:
+
+.. code-block :: bash
+
+	echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<test_suite>/run
+
+As a result, the test suite runs and the results are printed to the kernel
+log.
+
+However, this feature is not available with KUnit suites that use init data,
+because init data may have been discarded after the kernel boots. KUnit
+suites that use init data should be defined using the
+kunit_test_init_section_suites() macro.
+
+Also, you cannot use this feature to run tests concurrently. Instead a test
+will wait to run until other tests have completed or failed.
+
 .. note ::
 
-	If ``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` is enabled, KUnit test results will
-	be accessible from the ``debugfs`` filesystem (if mounted).
-	They will be in ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/results``, in
-	TAP format.
+	For test authors, to use this feature, tests will need to correctly initialise
+	and/or clean up any data, so the test runs correctly a second time.
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
Reviewed-by on v4 6/6
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] Documentation: Add debugfs docs with run after boot

Quoted 10 lines · Rae Moar

Expand the documentation on the KUnit debugfs filesystem on the run_manual.rst page.

Add section describing how to access results using debugfs.

Add section describing how to run tests after boot using debugfs.

---

Looks good!

Thanks,
-- David

Quoted 71 lines

Changes since v3:
- Change the introduction of the debugfs section
- Add detail to not being able to run concurrently or run with init data

 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst | 51 ++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst +47 -5
index e7b46421f247..699d92885075 100644
@@ -49,9 +49,52 @@ loaded.
 
 The results will appear in TAP format in ``dmesg``.
 
+debugfs
+=======
+
+KUnit can be accessed from userspace via the debugfs filesystem (See more
+information about debugfs at Documentation/filesystems/debugfs.rst).
+
+If ``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` is enabled, the KUnit debugfs filesystem is
+mounted at /sys/kernel/debug/kunit. You can use this filesystem to perform
+the following actions.
+
+Retrieve Test Results
+=====================
+
+You can use debugfs to retrieve KUnit test results. The test results are
+accessible from the debugfs filesystem in the following read-only file:
+
+.. code-block :: bash
+
+       /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/results
+
+The test results are printed in a KTAP document. Note this document is separate
+to the kernel log and thus, may have different test suite numbering.
+
+Run Tests After Kernel Has Booted
+=================================
+
+You can use the debugfs filesystem to trigger built-in tests to run after
+boot. To run the test suite, you can use the following command to write to
+the ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/run`` file:
+
+.. code-block :: bash
+
+       echo "any string" > /sys/kernel/debugfs/kunit/<test_suite>/run
+
+As a result, the test suite runs and the results are printed to the kernel
+log.
+
+However, this feature is not available with KUnit suites that use init data,
+because init data may have been discarded after the kernel boots. KUnit
+suites that use init data should be defined using the
+kunit_test_init_section_suites() macro.
+
+Also, you cannot use this feature to run tests concurrently. Instead a test
+will wait to run until other tests have completed or failed.
+
 .. note ::
 
-       If ``CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS`` is enabled, KUnit test results will
-       be accessible from the ``debugfs`` filesystem (if mounted).
-       They will be in ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test_suite>/results``, in
-       TAP format.
+       For test authors, to use this feature, tests will need to correctly initialise
+       and/or clean up any data, so the test runs correctly a second time.
--

2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

Reviewed-by on v4 1/6
#11 lore raw
In reply to Rae Moar
Quoted 6 lines · Rae Moar

Alter the linker section of KUNIT_TABLE to move it out of INIT_DATA and into DATA_DATA.

Data for KUnit tests does not need to be in the init section.

Quoted 8 lines

In order to run tests again after boot the KUnit data cannot be labeled as init data as the kernel could write over it.

Add a KUNIT_INIT_TABLE in the next patch for KUnit tests that test init data/functions.

---

Looks good to me.

This shouldn't be strictly necessary for the rest of the series, but will be useful for future features which depend on having the suite_set around after boot.

Cheers,
-- David

Quoted 35 lines

Changes since v3:
- No changes

 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h +3 -3
index bae0fe4d499b..1107905d37fc 100644
@@ -370,7 +370,8 @@
        BRANCH_PROFILE()                                                \
        TRACE_PRINTKS()                                                 \
        BPF_RAW_TP()                                                    \
-       TRACEPOINT_STR()
+       TRACEPOINT_STR()                                                \
+       KUNIT_TABLE()
 
 /*
  * Data section helpers
@@ -699,8 +700,7 @@
        THERMAL_TABLE(governor)                                         \
        EARLYCON_TABLE()                                                \
        LSM_TABLE()                                                     \
-       EARLY_LSM_TABLE()                                               \
-       KUNIT_TABLE()
+       EARLY_LSM_TABLE()
 
 #define INIT_TEXT                                                      \
        *(.init.text .init.text.*)                                      \

base-commit: b285ba6f8cc1b2bfece0b4350fdb92c8780bc698 --
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog