6.1.73-rc1 review
Subsystems (3)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainercover 6.1.73-rc1 review
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 6.1.73-rc1
Jon Maxwell <[email protected]>
ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Revert "nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put()"
Steve French <[email protected]>
cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++-- fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 9 ++------- fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 8 +------- fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- include/net/dst_ops.h | 2 +- net/core/dst.c | 8 ++------ net/ipv6/route.c | 13 +++++-------- 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 1/4 cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
filemap_get_folio works differenty in 6.1 vs. later kernels (returning NULL in 6.1 instead of an error). Add
this minor correction which addresses the regression in the patch:
cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size with copy_file_range()
--- fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +1 -1
@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inodeint rc =0 ; folio =filemap_get_folio (inode->i_mapping, index); -if (IS_ERR (folio)) +if ((!folio) || (IS_ERR (folio)))return 0 ; size =folio_size (folio);
Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/4] cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
Hi Greg,
Quoted 21 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
filemap_get_folioworks differenty in 6.1 vs. later kernels (returning NULL in 6.1 instead of an error). Add
this minor correction which addresses the regression in the patch:
cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size withcopy_file_range()Suggested-by David Howells <[email protected]>Reported-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Steve French <[email protected]>Tested-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>--- fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inode · line 1246
Quoted 8 lines
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +1
-1@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inodeint rc =0 ; folio =filemap_get_folio (inode->i_mapping, index); -if (IS_ERR (folio)) +if ((!folio) || (IS_ERR (folio)))return 0 ; size =folio_size (folio);
Note, this one needs to be revisited:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/T/#md6a3f0beceaa886ca0d1e4a47ff5a575340d7e8f
Regards,
Salvatore
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerRe: [PATCH 6.1 1/4] cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
Quoted 31 lines · Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Greg,
Quoted 28 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
filemap_get_folioworks differenty in 6.1 vs. later kernels (returning NULL in 6.1 instead of an error). Add
this minor correction which addresses the regression in the patch:
cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size withcopy_file_range()Suggested-by David Howells <[email protected]>Reported-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Steve French <[email protected]>Tested-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>--- fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +1
-1@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inodeint rc =0 ; folio =filemap_get_folio (inode->i_mapping, index); -if (IS_ERR (folio)) +if ((!folio) || (IS_ERR (folio)))return 0 ;
Quoted 5 lines
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inode · line 1246
Quoted 1 line
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +0
-0size =folio_size (folio);Note, this one needs to be revisited:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/T/#md6a3f0beceaa886ca0d1e4a47ff5a575340d7e8f
I see that, thanks, I'll go fix this up.
greg k-h
Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/4] cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
Hi Greg,
Quoted 32 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 31 lines · Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Greg,
Quoted 28 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
filemap_get_folioworks differenty in 6.1 vs. later kernels (returning NULL in 6.1 instead of an error). Add
this minor correction which addresses the regression in the patch:
cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size withcopy_file_range()Suggested-by David Howells <[email protected]>Reported-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Steve French <[email protected]>Tested-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>--- fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +1
-1@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inodeint rc =0 ; folio =filemap_get_folio (inode->i_mapping, index); -if (IS_ERR (folio)) +if ((!folio) || (IS_ERR (folio)))return 0 ;
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inode · line 1246
Quoted 1 line
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +0
-0size =folio_size (folio);Note, this one needs to be revisited:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/T/#md6a3f0beceaa886ca0d1e4a47ff5a575340d7e8f
I see that, thanks, I'll go fix this up.
Thanks!
Please note, the metadata for the commit needs as well some fixup: The actual first reporter was here:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/raw
and was "Jitindar Singh, Suraj" <[email protected]>. I only reported it as regression from the Debian perspective following up on Jitindar Singh, Suraj first reporting.
Sorry did not spotted earlier that reported-by was missing in the above.
Thanks for all the work of the involved people.
Regards,
Salvatore
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerRe: [PATCH 6.1 1/4] cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
Quoted 48 lines · Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Greg,
Quoted 32 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
Quoted 31 lines · Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Greg,
Quoted 28 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
filemap_get_folioworks differenty in 6.1 vs. later kernels (returning NULL in 6.1 instead of an error). Add
this minor correction which addresses the regression in the patch:
cifs: Fix flushing, invalidation and file size withcopy_file_range()Suggested-by David Howells <[email protected]>Reported-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Steve French <[email protected]>Tested-by Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>--- fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +1
-1@@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inodeint rc =0 ; folio =filemap_get_folio (inode->i_mapping, index); -if (IS_ERR (folio)) +if ((!folio) || (IS_ERR (folio)))return 0 ;Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c static int cifs_flush_folio(struct inode · line 1246
Quoted 1 line
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c +0
-0size =folio_size (folio);Note, this one needs to be revisited:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/T/#md6a3f0beceaa886ca0d1e4a47ff5a575340d7e8f
I see that, thanks, I'll go fix this up.
Thanks!
Please note, the metadata for the commit needs as well some fixup: The actual first reporter was here:
Quoted 8 lines
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/raw
and was "Jitindar Singh, Suraj" <[email protected]>. I only reported it as regression from the Debian perspective following up on Jitindar Singh, Suraj first reporting.
Sorry did not spotted earlier that reported-by was missing in the above.
Added that, and found the original link of the issue reported here and added that to the commit.
thanks,
greg k-h
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 2/4 Revert "nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put()"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit bb4f791cb2de1140d0fbcedfe9e791ff364021d7 which is commit 2a501f55cd641eb4d3c16a2eab0d678693fac663 upstream.
It is reported to cause issues, so revert it.
--- fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 9 ++------- fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 1 - fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c +2 -7
@@ -716,10 +716,8 @@ static ssize_t __write_ports_addfd(char err =svc_addsock (nn->nfsd_serv, net, fd, buf,SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT , cred); -if (err <0 && !nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active) -nfsd_last_thread (net); -else if (err >=0 && - !nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg (&nn->keep_active,1 )) +if (err >=0 && + !nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !xchg (&nn->keep_active,1 ))svc_get (nn->nfsd_serv);nfsd_put (net);
@@ -769,9 +767,6 @@ out_close:svc_xprt_put (xprt); } out_err: -if (!nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads && !nn->keep_active) -nfsd_last_thread (net); -nfsd_put (net);return err; }
fs/nfsd/nfsd.h +0 -1
@@ -139,7 +139,6 @@ int nfsd_vers(struct nfsd_net *nn, int vint nfsd_minorversion (struct nfsd_net *nn,u32 minorversion,enum vers_op change);void nfsd_reset_versions (struct nfsd_net *nn);int nfsd_create_serv (struct net *net); -void nfsd_last_thread (struct net *net);extern int nfsd_max_blksize;
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c +1 -1
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static struct notifier_block nfsd_inet6a/* Only used under nfsd_mutex, so this atomic may be overkill: */ static atomic_t nfsd_notifier_refcount =ATOMIC_INIT (0 ); -void nfsd_last_thread (struct net *net) +static void nfsd_last_thread (struct net *net) {struct nfsd_net *nn =net_generic (net, nfsd_net_id);struct svc_serv *serv = nn->nfsd_serv;
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 3/4 Revert "nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put()"
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 03d68ffc48b94cc1e15bbf3b4f16f1e1e4fa286a which is commit 9f28a971ee9fdf1bf8ce8c88b103f483be610277 upstream.
It is reported to cause issues, so revert it.
--- fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 7 +------ fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
fs/nfsd/nfsd.h +1 -6
@@ -97,12 +97,7 @@ int nfsd_pool_stats_open(struct inode *int nfsd_pool_stats_release (struct inode *,struct file *);void nfsd_shutdown_threads (struct net *net); -static inline void nfsd_put (struct net *net) -{ -struct nfsd_net *nn =net_generic (net, nfsd_net_id); - -svc_put (nn->nfsd_serv); -} +void nfsd_put (struct net *net);bool i_am_nfsd (void );
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c +33 -19
114 lines not on this page · raw message
Greg Kroah-Hartman
maintainerPATCH 4/4 ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4
In reply to Greg Kroah-Hartman6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jon Maxwell <[email protected]>
commit af6d10345ca76670c1b7c37799f0d5576ccef277 upstream.
In ip6_dst_gc() replace:
if (entries > gc_thresh)
With:
if (entries > ops->gc_thresh)
Sending Ipv6 packets in a loop via a raw socket triggers an issue where a route is cloned by ip6_rt_cache_alloc() for each packet sent. This quickly consumes the Ipv6 max_size threshold which defaults to 4096 resulting in these warnings:
[1] 99.187805] dst_alloc: 7728 callbacks suppressed
[2] Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size. .
.
[300] Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size.
When this happens the packet is dropped and sendto() gets a network is unreachable error:
remaining pkt 200557 errno 101
remaining pkt 196462 errno 101
.
.
remaining pkt 126821 errno 101
Implement David Aherns suggestion to remove max_size check seeing that Ipv6 has a GC to manage memory usage. Ipv4 already does not check max_size.
Here are some memory comparisons for Ipv4 vs Ipv6 with the patch:
Test by running 5 instances of a program that sends UDP packets to a raw socket 5000000 times. Compare Ipv4 and Ipv6 performance with a similar program.
Ipv4:
Before test:
MemFree: 29427108 kB Slab: 237612 kB
ip6_dst_cache 1912 2528 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 2881 3990 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
During test:
MemFree: 29417608 kB Slab: 247712 kB
ip6_dst_cache 1912 2528 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 44394 44394 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
After test:
MemFree: 29422308 kB Slab: 238104 kB
ip6_dst_cache 1912 2528 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 3048 4116 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
Ipv6 with patch:
Errno 101 errors are not observed anymore with the patch.
Before test:
MemFree: 29422308 kB Slab: 238104 kB
ip6_dst_cache 1912 2528 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 3048 4116 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
During Test:
MemFree: 29431516 kB Slab: 240940 kB
ip6_dst_cache 11980 12064 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 3048 4116 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
After Test:
MemFree: 29441816 kB Slab: 238132 kB
ip6_dst_cache 1902 2432 256 32 2 : tunables 0 0 0 xfrm_dst_cache 0 0 320 25 2 : tunables 0 0 0 ip_dst_cache 3048 4116 192 42 2 : tunables 0 0 0
--- include/net/dst_ops.h | 2 +- net/core/dst.c | 8 ++------ net/ipv6/route.c | 13 +++++-------- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
include/net/dst_ops.h +1 -1
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct dst_ops {unsigned short family;unsigned int gc_thresh; -int (*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops); +void (*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops);struct dst_entry * (*check)(struct dst_entry *,__u32 cookie);unsigned int (*default_advmss)(const struct dst_entry *);unsigned int (*mtu)(const struct dst_entry *);
net/core/dst.c +2 -6
@@ -82,12 +82,8 @@ void *dst_alloc(struct dst_ops *ops, strif (ops->gc && !(flags &DST_NOCOUNT ) && -dst_entries_get_fast (ops) > ops->gc_thresh) { -if (ops->gc (ops)) { -pr_notice_ratelimited ("Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size.\n" ); -return NULL ; - } - } +dst_entries_get_fast (ops) > ops->gc_thresh) + ops->gc (ops); dst =kmem_cache_alloc (ops->kmem_cachep,GFP_ATOMIC );if (!dst)
net/ipv6/route.c +5 -8
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *ip6_negative_adstatic void ip6_dst_destroy (struct dst_entry *);static void ip6_dst_ifdown (struct dst_entry *,struct net_device *dev,int how); -static int ip6_dst_gc (struct dst_ops *ops); +static void ip6_dst_gc (struct dst_ops *ops);static int ip6_pkt_discard (struct sk_buff *skb);static int ip6_pkt_discard_out (struct net *net,struct sock *sk,struct sk_buff *skb);
@@ -3288,11 +3288,10 @@ out:return dst; } -static int ip6_dst_gc (struct dst_ops *ops) +static void ip6_dst_gc (struct dst_ops *ops) { struct net *net = container_of(ops, struct net, ipv6.ip6_dst_ops);int rt_min_interval = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_min_interval; -int rt_max_size = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size;int rt_elasticity = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_elasticity;int rt_gc_timeout = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout;unsigned long rt_last_gc = net->ipv6.ip6_rt_last_gc;
@@ -3300,11 +3299,10 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *opint entries; entries =dst_entries_get_fast (ops); -if (entries > rt_max_size) +if (entries > ops->gc_thresh) entries =dst_entries_get_slow (ops); -if (time_after (rt_last_gc + rt_min_interval, jiffies) && - entries <= rt_max_size) +if (time_after (rt_last_gc + rt_min_interval, jiffies)) goto out;fib6_run_gc (atomic_inc_return (&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire), net, true);
@@ -3314,7 +3312,6 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *op out: val =atomic_read (&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire);atomic_set (&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, val - (val >> rt_elasticity)); -return entries > rt_max_size; } static int ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net, struct fib6_config *cfg,
@@ -6517,7 +6514,7 @@ static int __net_init ip6_route_net_init#endif net->ipv6.sysctl.flush_delay =0 ; - net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size =4096 ; + net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size =INT_MAX ; net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_min_interval =HZ /2 ; net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout =60 *HZ ; net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_interval =30 *HZ ;
Hello,
Quoted 5 lines · On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:38 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman…
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Quoted 8 lines
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine. Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] ccaabe946278 ("Linux 6.1.73-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
Hi!
Quoted 4 lines
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Best regards,
Pavel
Signature · 2 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Quoted 8 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Quoted 8 lines
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y and the diffstat can be found below.
Hi,
6.1.73-rc1 compiled and booted just fine on x86_64, no errors or regressions.
Best,
Slade
Quoted 10 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.73-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: ccaabe94627897d3e2d2234aa6b2196c32a63325
* git describe: v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278/
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.71)
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.71)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.71)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.71)
## Test result summary
total: 253149, pass: 214510, fail: 4787, skip: 33543, xfail: 309
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 150 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 52 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 failLinux version: 6.1.73-rc1-gccaabe946278
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04Jon
Quoted 5 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Quoted 9 lines
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
Please find the KernelCI report for this week :-
## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.1.y:
Date: 2024-01-13
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=ccaabe94627897d3e2d2234aa6b2196c32a63325
## Build failures:
No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
## Boot failures:
No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/
Thanks,
Shreeya Patel
Quoted 7 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
It may be too late, but
Cheers,
Conor.
Quoted 9 lines · Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 8 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC:
Signature · 1 line
Florian
Quoted 9 lines
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
Quoted 9 lines
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gzor in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.gitlinux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.thanks,
greg k-h
Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or regressions.
Thanks.