Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree

PATCH In review [email protected] 3 participants 4 messages Jan 27, 2024

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024012740-mating-boxing-dd93@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

f546c4282673 ("btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:02:25 +1030
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not
64K aligned

[BUG]
There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to various problems, including:

- "unable to find chunk map" errors
BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096 BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056

This would lead to unrepariable errors.

- Use-after-free KASAN reports:
==================================================================

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
  CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
   print_report+0xcf/0x640
   kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
   __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
   virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
   virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
   blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
   __blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
   blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
   submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
  RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b

- Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free

[CAUSE]
The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:

item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single

For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end (2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).

This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio function for both of the two halves.

However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function to be called once, not any more.
This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio, leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to use-after-free.

[FIX]
- Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.

- Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.

Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:

- scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk, thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read beyond the chunk.

Fixes e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
fs/btrfs/scrub.c +22 -7
index a01807cbd4d4..2d81b1a18a04 100644
@@ -1098,12 +1098,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
+	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
+	int num_sectors;
+	u32 bio_size = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
+	bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
+		bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+	num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 
 	if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
 	} else {
-		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
 	}
 	bio_put(&bbio->bio);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
@@ -1701,6 +1711,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+	unsigned int nr_sectors = min(BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
+				      stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
+				  fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 	int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
 
 	ASSERT(stripe->bg);
@@ -1715,14 +1728,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
 			       scrub_read_endio, stripe);
 
-	/* Read the whole stripe. */
 	bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+	/* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
+	for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
+		struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
+		unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
 		int ret;
 
-		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
 		/* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
-		ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
+		ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
 
#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · On 2024/1/28 07:06, [email protected] wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

Quoted 8 lines

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x c
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024012740-mating-boxing-dd93@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..

Great new hints on the conflict resolve steps, especially for guys like me, who is not familiar with stable kernels.

Would backport it soon.

Thanks,
Qu

Quoted 162 lines

Possible dependencies:

f546c4282673 ("btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:02:25 +1030
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not
64K aligned

[BUG]
There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to various problems, including:

- "unable to find chunk map" errors
BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096 BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056

This would lead to unrepariable errors.

- Use-after-free KASAN reports:

   ==================================================================
   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
   CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
    print_report+0xcf/0x640
    kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
    __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
    virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
    virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
    blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
    __blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
    blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
    submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
    __x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
    do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
   RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b

- Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free

[CAUSE]
The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:

item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single

For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end (2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).

This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio function for both of the two halves.

However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function to be called once, not any more.
This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio, leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to use-after-free.

[FIX]
- Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.

- Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.

Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:

- scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk, thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read beyond the chunk.

Fixes e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
fs/btrfs/scrub.c +22 -7
index a01807cbd4d4..2d81b1a18a04 100644
@@ -1098,12 +1098,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
  static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
  {
  	struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
+	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
+	int num_sectors;
+	u32 bio_size = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
+	bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
+		bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+	num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 
  	if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
  	} else {
-		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
  	}
  	bio_put(&bbio->bio);
  	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
@@ -1701,6 +1711,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
  {
  	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
  	struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+	unsigned int nr_sectors = min(BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
+				      stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
+				  fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
  	int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
 
  	ASSERT(stripe->bg);
@@ -1715,14 +1728,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
  	bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
  			       scrub_read_endio, stripe);
 
-	/* Read the whole stripe. */
  	bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+	/* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
+	for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
+		struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
+		unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
  		int ret;
 
-		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
  		/* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
-		ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
+		ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
  	}
  	atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
 
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned

In reply to [email protected]

[ Upstream commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f ]

[BUG]
There is a bug report that, on a ext4-converted btrfs, scrub leads to various problems, including:

- "unable to find chunk map" errors
BTRFS info (device vdb): scrub: started on devid 1
BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 4096 BTRFS critical (device vdb): unable to find chunk map for logical 2214744064 length 45056

This would lead to unrepariable errors.

- Use-after-free KASAN reports:
==================================================================

  BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
  Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881013c9040 by task btrfs/909
  CPU: 0 PID: 909 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.7.0-x64v3-dbg #11 c50636e9419a8354555555245df535e380563b2b
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 2023.11-2 12/24/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x43/0x60
   print_report+0xcf/0x640
   kasan_report+0xa6/0xd0
   __blk_rq_map_sg+0x18f/0x7c0
   virtblk_prep_rq.isra.0+0x215/0x6a0 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
   virtio_queue_rqs+0xc4/0x310 [virtio_blk 19a65eeee9ae6fcf02edfad39bb9ddee07dcdaff]
   blk_mq_flush_plug_list.part.0+0x780/0x860
   __blk_flush_plug+0x1ba/0x220
   blk_finish_plug+0x3b/0x60
   submit_initial_group_read+0x10a/0x290 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   flush_scrub_stripes+0x38e/0x430 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_stripe+0x82a/0xae0 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_chunk+0x178/0x200 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x4bc/0xa30 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   btrfs_scrub_dev+0x398/0x810 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x4b9/0x3020 [btrfs e57987a360bed82fe8756dcd3e0de5406ccfe965]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0xbd/0x100
   do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xe0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
  RIP: 0033:0x7f47e5e0952b

- Crash, mostly due to above use-after-free

[CAUSE]
The converted fs has the following data chunk layout:

item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 2214658048) itemoff 16025 itemsize 80
length 86016 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|single

For above logical bytenr 2214744064, it's at the chunk end (2214658048 + 86016 = 2214744064).

This means btrfs_submit_bio() would split the bio, and trigger endio function for both of the two halves.

However scrub_submit_initial_read() would only expect the endio function to be called once, not any more.
This means the first endio function would already free the bbio::bio, leaving the bvec freed, thus the 2nd endio call would lead to use-after-free.

[FIX]
- Make sure scrub_read_endio() only updates bits in its range Since we may read less than 64K at the end of the chunk, we should not touch the bits beyond chunk boundary.

- Make sure scrub_submit_initial_read() only to read the chunk range This is done by calculating the real number of sectors we need to read, and add sector-by-sector to the bio.

Thankfully the scrub read repair path won't need extra fixes:

- scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read()
With above fixes, we won't update error bit for range beyond chunk, thus scrub_stripe_submit_repair_read() should never submit any read beyond the chunk.

Fixes e02ee89baa66 ("btrfs: scrub: switch scrub_simple_mirror() to scrub_stripe infrastructure")
[ Use min_t() to fix a compiling error due to difference types ]
(cherry picked from commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f)
---
 fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/scrub.c +22 -7
index 4445a52a0707..1e3ff87d0447 100644
@@ -1099,12 +1099,22 @@ static void scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 static void scrub_read_endio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
 {
 	struct scrub_stripe *stripe = bbio->private;
+	struct bio_vec *bvec;
+	int sector_nr = calc_sector_number(stripe, bio_first_bvec_all(&bbio->bio));
+	int num_sectors;
+	u32 bio_size = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	ASSERT(sector_nr < stripe->nr_sectors);
+	bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvec, &bbio->bio, i)
+		bio_size += bvec->bv_len;
+	num_sectors = bio_size >> stripe->bg->fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 
 	if (bbio->bio.bi_status) {
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
-		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
+		bitmap_set(&stripe->error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
 	} else {
-		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, 0, stripe->nr_sectors);
+		bitmap_clear(&stripe->io_error_bitmap, sector_nr, num_sectors);
 	}
 	bio_put(&bbio->bio);
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&stripe->pending_io)) {
@@ -1640,6 +1650,9 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 {
 	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = sctx->fs_info;
 	struct btrfs_bio *bbio;
+	unsigned int nr_sectors = min_t(u64, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN, stripe->bg->start +
+				      stripe->bg->length - stripe->logical) >>
+				  fs_info->sectorsize_bits;
 	int mirror = stripe->mirror_num;
 
 	ASSERT(stripe->bg);
@@ -1649,14 +1662,16 @@ static void scrub_submit_initial_read(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,
 	bbio = btrfs_bio_alloc(SCRUB_STRIPE_PAGES, REQ_OP_READ, fs_info,
 			       scrub_read_endio, stripe);
 
-	/* Read the whole stripe. */
 	bbio->bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = stripe->logical >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
-	for (int i = 0; i < BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
+	/* Read the whole range inside the chunk boundary. */
+	for (unsigned int cur = 0; cur < nr_sectors; cur++) {
+		struct page *page = scrub_stripe_get_page(stripe, cur);
+		unsigned int pgoff = scrub_stripe_get_page_offset(stripe, cur);
 		int ret;
 
-		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, stripe->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		ret = bio_add_page(&bbio->bio, page, fs_info->sectorsize, pgoff);
 		/* We should have allocated enough bio vectors. */
-		ASSERT(ret == PAGE_SIZE);
+		ASSERT(ret == fs_info->sectorsize);
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&stripe->pending_io);
 
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 6.6.y] btrfs: scrub: avoid use-after-free when chunk length is not 64K aligned

Quoted 2 lines · Qu Wenruo

[ Upstream commit f546c4282673497a06ecb6190b50ae7f6c85b02f ]

Now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h