Patch "PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fix dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() alignment support" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree
Subsystems (4)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Niklas Cassel
Reviewed-by Reviewed-by Ilpo Järvinen Reviewed-by Manivannan Sadhasivam Reviewed-by Reviewed-by Ilpo Järvinen Reviewed-by Manivannan SadhasivamQuoted 7 lines · Sasha Levin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fix
dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()alignment supportto the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
Quoted 6 lines
The filename of the patch is:
pci-dwc-endpoint-fix-dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq-align.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Hello stable maintainers,
I notice that upstream commit:2217fffcd63f ("PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fix dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() alignment support")
has been backported (as it should) to:
5.10: https://marc.info/?l=linux-stable-commits&m=170839241818847&w=2 (only queued so far) 5.15: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/
6.1: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/ 6.6: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/ 6.7: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/
Unfortunately, while this commit fixed a bug, it introduced another bug.
This "another bug" is fixed in upstream commit:b5d1b4b46f85 ("PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()")
This fix has been backported to:
6.7: https://marc.info/?l=linux-stable-commits&m=170836979506847&w=2 (only queued so far)
But needs to be backported to 5.10, 5.15, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7.
It does not apply without conflicts, so I've attached two backported versions. (There was a minor conflict with the headers.)
backport-all-but-5_10.patch - for 5.15, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7 backport-5_10.patch - for 5.10
Kind regards,
Niklas
From cbc98e30eb470a924d2fd59ae693d5480b3d263d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:40:37 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
commit b5d1b4b46f856da1473c7ba9a5cdfcb55c9b2478 upstream.
The "msg_addr" variable is u64. However, the "aligned_offset" is an unsigned int. This means that when the code does:
msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset;
it will unintentionally zero out the high 32 bits. Use ALIGN_DOWN() to do the alignment instead.
--- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c +2 -1
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@* Author: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]> */ +#include <linux/align.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -589,7 +590,7 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, } aligned_offset = msg_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size -1 ); - msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset; + msg_addr =ALIGN_DOWN (msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size); ret =dw_pcie_ep_map_addr (epc, func_no,0 , ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);if (ret)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.2
From 7ff5da5719c4d2ef67b89cdc9784bd8361b4b514 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:40:37 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
commit b5d1b4b46f856da1473c7ba9a5cdfcb55c9b2478 upstream.
The "msg_addr" variable is u64. However, the "aligned_offset" is an unsigned int. This means that when the code does:
msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset;
it will unintentionally zero out the high 32 bits. Use ALIGN_DOWN() to do the alignment instead.
--- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c +2 -1
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@* Author: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]> */ +#include <linux/align.h> #include <linux/of.h> #include "pcie-designware.h"
@@ -593,7 +594,7 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, } aligned_offset = msg_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size -1 ); - msg_addr &= ~aligned_offset; + msg_addr =ALIGN_DOWN (msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size); ret =dw_pcie_ep_map_addr (epc, func_no, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);if (ret)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.2
Quoted 36 lines · Niklas Cassel
Quoted 7 lines · Sasha Levin
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fix
dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()alignment supportto the 5.10-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summaryQuoted 6 lines
The filename of the patch is:
pci-dwc-endpoint-fix-dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq-align.patch
and it can be found in the queue-5.10 subdirectory.If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Hello stable maintainers,
I notice that upstream commit:
2217fffcd63f("PCI: dwc: endpoint: Fixdw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()alignment support")has been backported (as it should) to:
5.10: https://marc.info/?l=linux-stable-commits&m=170839241818847&w=2 (only queued so far) 5.15: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/6.1: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/ 6.6: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/ 6.7: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/[email protected]/Unfortunately, while this commit fixed a bug, it introduced another bug.
This "another bug" is fixed in upstream commit:
b5d1b4b46f85("PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug indw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq()")This fix has been backported to:
6.7: https://marc.info/?l=linux-stable-commits&m=170836979506847&w=2 (only queued so far)
Quoted 7 lines
But needs to be backported to 5.10, 5.15, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7.
It does not apply without conflicts, so I've attached two backported versions. (There was a minor conflict with the headers.)
backport-all-but-5_10.patch - for 5.15, 6.1, 6.6, 6.7 backport-5_10.patch - for 5.10
For some reason this was applied to 5.10.y, but not the other branches, our fault!
The other one is now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h