swiotlb: Do not set total_used to 0 in swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 swiotlb: Do not set total_used to 0 in swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()
Sometimes the readout of /sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/io_tlb_used and io_tlb_used_hiwater can be a huge number (e.g. 18446744073709551615), which is actually a negative number if we use "%ld" to print the number.
When swiotlb_create_default_debugfs() is running from late_initcall, mem->total_used may already be non-zero, because the storage driver may have already started to perform I/O operations: if the storage driver is built-in, its probe() callback is called before late_initcall.
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files() should not blindly set mem->total_used and mem->used_hiwater to 0; actually it doesn't have to initialize the fields at all, because the fields, as part of the global struct io_tlb_default_mem, have been implicitly initialized to zero.
Also don't explicitly set mem->transient_nslabs to 0.
--- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +0 -4
@@ -1647,9 +1647,6 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_hiwater, io_tlb_hiwater_get,static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files (struct io_tlb_mem *mem,const char *dirname) { -atomic_long_set (&mem->total_used,0 ); -atomic_long_set (&mem->used_hiwater,0 ); - mem->debugfs =debugfs_create_dir (dirname, io_tlb_default_mem.debugfs);if (!mem->nslabs)return ;
@@ -1660,7 +1657,6 @@ static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem,debugfs_create_file ("io_tlb_used_hiwater" ,0600 , mem->debugfs, mem, &fops_io_tlb_hiwater);#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC -atomic_long_set (&mem->transient_nslabs,0 );debugfs_create_file ("io_tlb_transient_nslabs" ,0400 , mem->debugfs, mem, &fops_io_tlb_transient_used);#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
Quoted 16 lines · Dexuan Cui
Sometimes the readout of
/sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/io_tlb_usedandio_tlb_used_hiwatercan be a huge number (e.g. 18446744073709551615), which is actually a negative number if we use "%ld" to print the number.When
swiotlb_create_default_debugfs()is running fromlate_initcall,mem->total_usedmay already be non-zero, because the storage driver may have already started to perform I/O operations: if the storage driver is built-in, itsprobe()callback is called beforelate_initcall.
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()should not blindly setmem->total_usedandmem->used_hiwaterto 0; actually it doesn't have to initialize the fields at all, because the fields, as part of the global structio_tlb_default_mem, have been implicitly initialized to zero.Also don't explicitly set
mem->transient_nslabsto 0.
Quoted 8 lines
Fixes 8b0977ecc8b3 ("swiotlb: track and report io_tlb_used high water marks in debugfs")Fixes 02e765697038 ("swiotlb: add debugfs to track swiotlb transient pool usage")Signed-off-by Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>--- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
Sorry, I'm missing a why in this commit message. Can you say what happens if the total_used and used_hiwater IS blindly set to 0? Is the only effect the change in the readout of the swiotlb debugfs files?
Thanks,
Easwar
Quoted 9 lines
From: Easwar Hariharan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 12:47 PM
[...]
Sorry, I'm missing a why in this commit message. Can you say what happens if thetotal_usedandused_hiwaterIS blindly set to 0? Is the only effect the change in the readout of the swiotlb debugfs files?Thanks,
Easwar
Right, when the system is not doing any I/O, the readout may return a huge number while it should return 0. This is the only effect.
Thanks,
Dexuan
Quoted 18 lines
From: Dexuan Cui
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 1:23 PM
To: Easwar Hariharan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] swiotlb: Do not settotal_usedto 0 inswiotlb_create_debugfs_files()Quoted 4 lines
From: Easwar Hariharan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 12:47 PM
[...]
Sorry, I'm missing a why in this commit message. Can you say whathappens
Quoted 3 lines
if the
total_usedandused_hiwaterIS blindly set to 0? Is the only effect the change in the readout of the swiotlb debugfs files?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks,
EaswarRight, when the system is not doing any I/O, the readout may return a huge number while it should return 0. This is the only effect.
Thanks,
Dexuan
Let me share more details.
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c uses inc_used_and_hiwater() and dec_used() to do the accounting.
The issue happens this way:
1. inc_used_and_hiwater() adds n to total_used.
2. swiotlb_create_debugfs_files() sets total_used to 0.
3. dec_used() decreases total_used by n, i.e. total_used incorrectly becomes a negative number -n, which is a huge number since mem_used() converts the 'long' to 'unsigned long'.
Thanks,
Dexuan
Quoted 34 lines · Dexuan Cui
Quoted 18 lines
From: Dexuan Cui
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 1:23 PM
To: Easwar Hariharan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] swiotlb: Do not settotal_usedto 0 inswiotlb_create_debugfs_files()Quoted 4 lines
From: Easwar Hariharan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 12:47 PM
[...]
Sorry, I'm missing a why in this commit message. Can you say whathappens
Quoted 3 lines
if the
total_usedandused_hiwaterIS blindly set to 0? Is the only effect the change in the readout of the swiotlb debugfs files?Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Thanks,
EaswarRight, when the system is not doing any I/O, the readout may return a huge number while it should return 0. This is the only effect.
Thanks,
DexuanLet me share more details.
kernel/dma/swiotlb.cusesinc_used_and_hiwater()anddec_used()to do the accounting.The issue happens this way:
Quoted 9 lines
1.
inc_used_and_hiwater()adds n tototal_used.
2.swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()setstotal_usedto 0.
3.dec_used()decreasestotal_usedby n, i.e.total_usedincorrectly becomes a negative number -n, which is a huge number sincemem_used()converts the 'long' to 'unsigned long'.Thanks,
Dexuan
Thanks for the detail. I only ask because the patch is marked for stable, and I was wondering if it meets the criteria. But, as you mentioned off list, two Fixes tags probably do meet the bar.
Thanks,
Easwar
From: Dexuan Cui <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 12:28 PM
Quoted 49 lines
Sometimes the readout of
/sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/io_tlb_usedandio_tlb_used_hiwatercan be a huge number (e.g. 18446744073709551615), which is actually a negative number if we use "%ld" to print the number.When
swiotlb_create_default_debugfs()is running fromlate_initcall,mem->total_usedmay already be non-zero, because the storage driver may have already started to perform I/O operations: if the storage driver is built-in, itsprobe()callback is called beforelate_initcall.
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()should not blindly setmem->total_usedandmem->used_hiwaterto 0; actually it doesn't have to initialize the fields at all, because the fields, as part of the global structio_tlb_default_mem, have been implicitly initialized to zero.Also don't explicitly set
mem->transient_nslabsto 0.Fixes 8b0977ecc8b3 ("swiotlb: track and report io_tlb_used high water marks in debugfs")Fixes 02e765697038 ("swiotlb: add debugfs to track swiotlb transient pool usage")Signed-off-by Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>--- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +0
-3@@ -1647,9 +1647,6 @@ DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_hiwater, io_tlb_hiwater_get, static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, const char *dirname) { - atomic_long_set(&mem->total_used, 0); - atomic_long_set(&mem->used_hiwater, 0); - mem->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dirname, io_tlb_default_mem.debugfs); if (!mem->nslabs)kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +0
-2return ;@@ -1660,7 +1657,6 @@ static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem,debugfs_create_file ("io_tlb_used_hiwater" ,0600 , mem->debugfs, mem, &fops_io_tlb_hiwater);#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC -atomic_long_set (&mem->transient_nslabs,0 );debugfs_create_file ("io_tlb_transient_nslabs" ,0400 , mem->debugfs, mem, &fops_io_tlb_transient_used);#endif --
Quoted 1 line
2.34.1
Quoted 14 lines · Dexuan Cui
Sometimes the readout of
/sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/io_tlb_usedandio_tlb_used_hiwatercan be a huge number (e.g. 18446744073709551615), which is actually a negative number if we use "%ld" to print the number.When
swiotlb_create_default_debugfs()is running fromlate_initcall,mem->total_usedmay already be non-zero, because the storage driver may have already started to perform I/O operations: if the storage driver is built-in, itsprobe()callback is called beforelate_initcall.
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()should not blindly setmem->total_usedandmem->used_hiwaterto 0; actually it doesn't have to initialize the fields at all, because the fields, as part of the global structio_tlb_default_mem, have been implicitly initialized to zero.
Quoted 6 lines
Also don't explicitly set
mem->transient_nslabsto 0.Fixes 8b0977ecc8b3 ("swiotlb: track and report io_tlb_used high water marks in debugfs")Fixes 02e765697038 ("swiotlb: add debugfs to track swiotlb transient pool usage")Signed-off-by Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>
Signature · 2 lines
Best Regards, Peng
V Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:28:09 -0700
Dexuan Cui <[email protected]> napsáno:
Quoted 14 lines
Sometimes the readout of
/sys/kernel/debug/swiotlb/io_tlb_usedandio_tlb_used_hiwatercan be a huge number (e.g. 18446744073709551615), which is actually a negative number if we use "%ld" to print the number.When
swiotlb_create_default_debugfs()is running fromlate_initcall,mem->total_usedmay already be non-zero, because the storage driver may have already started to perform I/O operations: if the storage driver is built-in, itsprobe()callback is called beforelate_initcall.
swiotlb_create_debugfs_files()should not blindly setmem->total_usedandmem->used_hiwaterto 0; actually it doesn't have to initialize the fields at all, because the fields, as part of the global structio_tlb_default_mem, have been implicitly initialized to zero.
Quoted 6 lines
Also don't explicitly set
mem->transient_nslabsto 0.Fixes 8b0977ecc8b3 ("swiotlb: track and report io_tlb_used high water marks in debugfs")Fixes 02e765697038 ("swiotlb: add debugfs to track swiotlb transient pool usage")Signed-off-by Dexuan Cui <[email protected]>
FWIW I confirm that the transient_nslabs counter does not have to be initialized either.
Petr T
Christoph Hellwig
AppliedThanks,
applied to the dma-mapping tree for Linux 6.9-rc.