arm64/arch_timer: include <linux/percpu.h>
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v3 1/2 arm64/arch_timer: include <linux/percpu.h>
arch_timer.h includes linux/smp.h since the commit:
6acc71ccac7187fc ("arm64: arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")
It was included to use DEFINE_PER_CPU(), etc. But It should have included <linux/percpu.h> rather than <linux/smp.h>. It worked because smp.h includes percpu.h.
The next commit will remove percpu.h from smp.h and it will break this usage.
Explicitly include percpu.h and remove smp.h
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h +1 -1
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@#include <linux/bug.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/jump_label.h> -#include <linux/smp.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/types.h> #include <clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
PATCH v3 2/2 arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
Historically, arm64 implemented raw_smp_processor_id() as a read of current_thread_info()->cpu. This changed when arm64 moved thread_info into task struct, as at the time CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK made core code use thread_struct::cpu for the cpu number, and due to header dependencies prevented using this in raw_smp_processor_id(). As a workaround, we moved to using a percpu variable in commit:
57c82954e77fa12c ("arm64: make cpu number a percpu variable")
Since then, thread_info::cpu was reintroduced, and core code was made to use this in commits:
001430c1910df65a ("arm64: add CPU field to struct thread_info") bcf9033e5449bdca ("sched: move CPU field back into thread_info if THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK=y")
Consequently it is possible to use current_thread_info()->cpu again.
This decreases the number of emitted instructions like in the following example:
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_get_smp_processor_id:
0xffff8000802cd608 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802cd60c <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802cd610 <+8>: adrp x0, 0xffff800082138000 0xffff8000802cd614 <+12>: mrs x1, tpidr_el1 0xffff8000802cd618 <+16>: add x0, x0, #0x8 0xffff8000802cd61c <+20>: ldrsw x0, [x0, x1] 0xffff8000802cd620 <+24>: ret
After this patch:
Dump of assembler code for function bpf_get_smp_processor_id:
0xffff8000802c9130 <+0>: nop 0xffff8000802c9134 <+4>: nop 0xffff8000802c9138 <+8>: mrs x0, sp_el0 0xffff8000802c913c <+12>: ldr w0, [x0, #24] 0xffff8000802c9140 <+16>: ret
A microbenchmark[1] was built to measure the performance improvement provided by this change. It calls the following function given number of times and finds the runtime overhead:
static noinline int get_cpu_id(void)
{
return smp_processor_id();
}Run the benchmark like:
modprobe smp_processor_id nr_function_calls=1000000000
+--------------------------+------------------------+
| | Number of Calls | Time taken |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| Before | 1000000000 | 1602888401ns |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| After | 1000000000 | 1206212658ns |
+--------+-----------------+------------------------+
| Difference (decrease) | 396675743ns (24.74%) |
+---------------------------------------------------+Remove the percpu variable cpu_number as it is used only in set_smp_ipi_range() as a dummy variable to be passed to ipi_handler(). Use irq_stat in place of cpu_number here like arm32.
[1] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/commit/77d3fdd
--- arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h | 13 +------------ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h +1 -12
@@ -25,22 +25,11 @@#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ -#include <asm/percpu.h> -#include <linux/threads.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/thread_info.h> -DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); - -/* -* We don't use this_cpu_read(cpu_number) as that has implicit writes to -* preempt_count, and associated (compiler) barriers, that we'd like to avoid -* the expense of. If we're preemptible, the value can be stale at use anyway. -* And we can't use this_cpu_ptr() either, as that winds up recursing back -* here under CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. -*/ -#define raw_smp_processor_id () (*raw_cpu_ptr(&cpu_number)) +#define raw_smp_processor_id () (current_thread_info()->cpu)/* * Logical CPU mapping.
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +2 -7
@@ -55,9 +55,6 @@#include <trace/events/ipi.h> -DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY (int, cpu_number); -EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL (cpu_number); -/* * as from 2.5, kernels no longer have an init_tasks structure * so we need some other way of telling a new secondary core
@@ -742,8 +739,6 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)*/ for_each_possible_cpu (cpu) { -per_cpu (cpu_number, cpu) = cpu; -if (cpu ==smp_processor_id ())continue ;
@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err =request_percpu_nmi (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as NMI, err=%d\n" , i, err); }else { err =request_percpu_irq (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);WARN (err,"Could not request IPI %d as IRQ, err=%d\n" , i, err); }
Signature · 1 line
2.40.1
Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info
Quoting Puranjay Mohan (2024-05-03 10:18:47)
Quoted 5 lines
Remove the percpu variable
cpu_numberas it is used only inset_smp_ipi_range()as a dummy variable to be passed toipi_handler(). Useirq_statin place ofcpu_numberhere like arm32.
Maybe you should have put this under the cut for the patch so its on the mailing list, and lore.
Quoted 4 lines
Signed-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>Acked-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>---
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n) · line 1019
Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +1
-1@@ -1021,12 +1016,12 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)if (ipi_should_be_nmi (i)) { err =request_percpu_nmi (ipi_base + i, ipi_handler, -"IPI" , &cpu_number); +"IPI" , &irq_stat);
I know this is mirroring arm, but it would be nice to have a comment saying that we need some percpu variable here even if the handler doesn't use it.
Quoting Puranjay Mohan (2024-05-03 10:18:46)
Quoted 8 lines
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hsince the commit:
6acc71ccac7187fc("arm64:arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")It was included to use
DEFINE_PER_CPU(), etc. But It should have included <linux/percpu.h> rather than <linux/smp.h>. It worked becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h.
Quoted 8 lines
The next commit will remove
percpu.hfromsmp.hand it will break this usage.Explicitly include
percpu.hand removesmp.hSigned-off-by Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>Acked-by Mark Rutland <[email protected]>---
Quoted 9 lines · Puranjay Mohan
arch_timer.hincludeslinux/smp.hsince the commit:
6acc71ccac7187fc("arm64:arch_timer: Allows a CPU-specific erratum to only affect a subset of CPUs")It was included to use
DEFINE_PER_CPU(), etc. But It should have included <linux/percpu.h> rather than <linux/smp.h>. It worked becausesmp.hincludespercpu.h.[...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/misc), thanks!
[1/2] arm64/arch_timer: include <linux/percpu.h>
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/7647e2b109f4 [2/2] arm64: implement raw_smp_processor_id() using thread_info https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/bf0baa5bbdc9
Signature · 1 line
Catalin