ata: libata-core: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM for all Crucial BX SSD1 models
Subsystems (2)
Niklas Cassel
maintainerPATCH v2 1/1 ata: libata-core: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM for all Crucial BX SSD1 models
We got another report that CT1000BX500SSD1 does not work with LPM.
If you look in libata-core.c, we have six different Crucial devices that are marked with ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM. This model would have been the seventh. (This quirk is used on Crucial models starting with both CT* and Crucial_CT*)
It is obvious that this vendor does not have a great history of supporting LPM properly, therefore, add the ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM quirk for all Crucial BX SSD1 models.
---
Changes since v1:
-Picked up tags.
-Use real name in Reported-by tag.
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-core.c +1 -2
@@ -4137,8 +4137,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = { { "PIONEER BD-RW BDR-205", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },/* Crucial devices with broken LPM support */ - { "CT500BX100SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM }, - { "CT240BX500SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM }, + { "CT*0BX*00SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM },/* 512GB MX100 with MU01 firmware has both queued TRIM and LPM issues */ { "Crucial_CT512MX100*", "MU01", ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM |
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
Quoted 8 lines · Niklas Cassel
We got another report that CT1000BX500SSD1 does not work with LPM.
If you look in
libata-core.c, we have six different Crucial devices that are marked withATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM. This model would have been the seventh. (This quirk is used on Crucial models starting with both CT* and Crucial_CT*)[...]
Applied to libata/linux.git (for-6.10-fixes), thanks!
[1/1] ata: libata-core: Add ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM for all Crucial BX SSD1 models
https://git.kernel.org/libata/linux/c/1066fe82
Kind regards,
Niklas