Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Create source symlink in perf object dir

PATCH Superseded Andi Kleen 2 participants 8 messages Jul 23, 2024 – Jul 24, 2024 perf events

v6 of 10 Superseded Latest is v10 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Andi Kleen

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v6 1/4 Create source symlink in perf object dir

Create a source symlink to the original source in the objdir. This is similar to what the main kernel build script does.

---
 tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
tools/perf/Makefile.perf +2 -0
index 175e4c7898f0..d46892d8223b 100644
@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ ifneq ($(OUTPUT),)
 # for flex/bison parsers.
 VPATH += $(OUTPUT)
 export VPATH
+# create symlink to the original source
+SOURCE := $(shell ln -sf $(srctree)/tools/perf $(OUTPUT)/source)
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(V),1)
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v6 2/4 perf test: Support external tests for separate objdir

Extend the searching for the test files so that it works when running perf from a separate objdir, and also when the perf executable is symlinked.

---
 tools/perf/tests/tests-scripts.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
tools/perf/tests/tests-scripts.c +28 -3
index e2042b368269..63be17289ac3 100644
@@ -29,16 +29,41 @@
 
 static int shell_tests__dir_fd(void)
 {
-	char path[PATH_MAX], *exec_path;
-	static const char * const devel_dirs[] = { "./tools/perf/tests/shell", "./tests/shell", };
+	struct stat st;
+	char path[PATH_MAX], path2[PATH_MAX], *exec_path;
+	static const char * const devel_dirs[] = {
+		"./tools/perf/tests/shell",
+		"./tests/shell",
+		"./source/tests/shell"
+	};
+	int fd;
+	char *p;
 
 	for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(devel_dirs); ++i) {
-		int fd = open(devel_dirs[i], O_PATH);
+		fd = open(devel_dirs[i], O_PATH);
 
 		if (fd >= 0)
 			return fd;
 	}
 
+	/* Use directory of executable */
+	if (readlink("/proc/self/exe", path2, sizeof path2) < 0)
+		return -1;
+	/* Follow another level of symlink if there */
+	if (lstat(path2, &st) == 0 && (st.st_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK) {
+		scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), path2);
+		if (readlink(path, path2, sizeof path2) < 0)
+			return -1;
+	}
+	/* Get directory */
+	p = strrchr(path2, '/');
+	if (*p)
+		p[1] = 0;
+	scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/tests/shell", path2);
+	fd = open(path, O_PATH);
+	if (fd >= 0)
+		return fd;
+
 	/* Then installed path. */
 	exec_path = get_argv_exec_path();
 	scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/tests/shell", exec_path);
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH v6 3/4 perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric

In reply to Andi Kleen

This fixes a regression with perf script -F +metric originally caused by :

commit 37cc8ad77cf81f3ffd226856c367b0e15333a738

Author: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 19 01:28:46 2023 -0800

perf metric: Directly use counts rather than saved_value

In the perf script environment the evsel wouldn't allocate an aggr values array, which led to a -1 reference because the metric evaluation would try to reference NULL - 1 (for aggr_idx)

Give the perf script evsels a single CPU aggr setup. That's enough because the groups are always contiguous, so no need to store more than one CPU's worth of values.

Before

% perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy % perf script -F +metric
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

After:

% perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy
...
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.028 MB perf.data (90 samples) ] % perf script -F +metric

       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:       3009       cycles:  ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:        382 instructions:  ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:         metric:    0.13  insn per cycle

...

Fixes 37cc8ad77cf8 ("perf metric: Directly use counts rather ...")

----

v2: Reformat code
v3: Work around bogus warning
v4: Set up aggr map only for metrics case to keep perf stat record working
v5: Broken version
v6: Only set up limited aggregation mode with -F +metric. Add conflict checks with perf stat record files.

---
 tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +32 -1
index c16224b1fef3..1a4b9b3d240d 100644
@@ -2133,12 +2133,17 @@ static void perf_sample__fprint_metric(struct perf_script *script,
 	if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum++ == 0)
 		perf_stat__reset_shadow_stats();
 	val = sample->period * evsel->scale;
+	/*
+	 * Always use CPU 0 storage because the groups are contiguous
+	 * and there's no need to handle multiple indexes for anything
+	 */
+	evsel->stats->aggr[0].counts.val = val;
 	evsel_script(evsel)->val = val;
 	if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum == leader->core.nr_members) {
 		for_each_group_member (ev2, leader) {
 			perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(&stat_config, ev2,
 						      evsel_script(ev2)->val,
-						      sample->cpu,
+						      0,
 						      &ctx,
 						      NULL);
 		}
@@ -2325,6 +2330,20 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script,
 		fflush(fp);
 }
 
+static void check_metric_conflict(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	/*
+	 * Avoid conflict with the aggregation mode used for the metric printing.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+		if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC) {
+			fprintf(stderr, "perf stat record files are not supported with -F metric\n");
+			exit(1);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static struct scripting_ops	*scripting_ops;
 
 static void __process_stat(struct evsel *counter, u64 tstamp)
@@ -2334,6 +2353,8 @@ static void __process_stat(struct evsel *counter, u64 tstamp)
 	struct perf_cpu cpu;
 	static int header_printed;
 
+	check_metric_conflict();
+
 	if (!header_printed) {
 		printf("%3s %8s %15s %15s %15s %15s %s\n",
 		       "CPU", "THREAD", "VAL", "ENA", "RUN", "TIME", "EVENT");
@@ -3725,6 +3746,8 @@ static int process_stat_config_event(struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused
 {
 	perf_event__read_stat_config(&stat_config, &event->stat_config);
 
+	check_metric_conflict();
+
 	/*
 	 * Aggregation modes are not used since post-processing scripts are
 	 * supposed to take care of such requirements
@@ -3760,6 +3783,8 @@ int process_thread_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
 	struct perf_tool *tool = session->tool;
 	struct perf_script *script = container_of(tool, struct perf_script, tool);
 
+	check_metric_conflict();
+
 	if (dump_trace)
 		perf_event__fprintf_thread_map(event, stdout);
 
@@ -3785,6 +3810,8 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
 	if (dump_trace)
 		perf_event__fprintf_cpu_map(event, stdout);
 
+	check_metric_conflict();
+
 	if (script->cpus) {
 		pr_warning("Extra cpu map event, ignoring.\n");
 		return 0;
@@ -4088,6 +4115,10 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
 
 	argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, options, script_subcommands, script_usage,
 			     PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
+	for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+		if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC)
+			stat_config.aggr_map = &(struct cpu_aggr_map){ .nr = 1 };
+	}
 
 	if (symbol_conf.guestmount ||
 	    symbol_conf.default_guest_vmlinux_name ||
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
reviewer
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric

Quoted 9 lines · Andi Kleen

This fixes a regression with perf script -F +metric originally caused by :

commit 37cc8ad77cf81f3ffd226856c367b0e15333a738

Author: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 19 01:28:46 2023 -0800

perf metric: Directly use counts rather than saved_value

Quoted 7 lines

In the perf script environment the evsel wouldn't allocate an aggr values array, which led to a -1 reference because the metric evaluation would try to reference NULL - 1 (for aggr_idx)

Give the perf script evsels a single CPU aggr setup. That's enough because the groups are always contiguous, so no need to store more than one CPU's worth of values.

I don't follow this. Samples have CPUs but you're associating all values with CPU0. Why not just use counts and aggregation properly?

Quoted 39 lines

Before

% perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy % perf script -F +metric
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

After:

% perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}:S' perf bench mem memcpy
...
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.028 MB perf.data (90 samples) ] % perf script -F +metric

       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:       3009       cycles:  ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:        382 instructions:  ffffffff990a579a native_write_msr+0xa ([kernel.kallsyms])
       perf-exec 1847557 264658.180789:         metric:    0.13  insn per cycle

...

Fixes 37cc8ad77cf8 ("perf metric: Directly use counts rather ...")

----

v2: Reformat code
v3: Work around bogus warning
v4: Set up aggr map only for metrics case to keep perf stat record working
v5: Broken version
v6: Only set up limited aggregation mode with -F +metric. Add conflict checks with perf stat record files.

---
 tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +0 -0
index c16224b1fef3..1a4b9b3d240d 100644

tools/perf/builtin-script.c static void perf_sample__fprint_metric(struct perf_script *script, · line 2140

Quoted 8 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +5 -0
@@ -2133,12 +2133,17 @@ static void perf_sample__fprint_metric(struct perf_script *script,
        if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum++ == 0)
                perf_stat__reset_shadow_stats();
        val = sample->period * evsel->scale;
+       /*
+        * Always use CPU 0 storage because the groups are contiguous
+        * and there's no need to handle multiple indexes for anything
+        */
+       evsel->stats->aggr[0].counts.val = val;

0 isn't necessary CPU0, it is what is the first aggregation cpu_aggr_map which can be CPU1, it can be a thread map index. The comment is confusing an index with a CPU number.

tools/perf/builtin-script.c static void perf_sample__fprint_metric(struct perf_script *script, · line 2141

Quoted 1 line
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +0 -0
        evsel_script(evsel)->val = val;

Why store val twice? Yes it is read below, but now you can also just read it from the counts. Not that it matters in the cases that apply but for json metrics all counts are unscaled.

Quoted 17 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +5 -1
        if (evsel_script(leader)->gnum == leader->core.nr_members) {
                for_each_group_member (ev2, leader) {
                        perf_stat__print_shadow_stats(&stat_config, ev2,
                                                      evsel_script(ev2)->val,
-                                                     sample->cpu,
+                                                     0,
                                                      &ctx,
                                                      NULL);
                }
@@ -2325,6 +2330,20 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script,
                fflush(fp);
 }
 
+static void check_metric_conflict(void)
+{
+       int i;
+       /*

tools/perf/builtin-script.c static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, · line 2346

Quoted 10 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +10 -0
+        * Avoid conflict with the aggregation mode used for the metric printing.
+        */
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC) {
+                       fprintf(stderr, "perf stat record files are not supported with -F metric\n");
+                       exit(1);
+               }
+       }
+}
+

No idea what this is doing. What's conflicting with what?

Quoted 40 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +8 -0
 static struct scripting_ops    *scripting_ops;
 
 static void __process_stat(struct evsel *counter, u64 tstamp)
@@ -2334,6 +2353,8 @@ static void __process_stat(struct evsel *counter, u64 tstamp)
        struct perf_cpu cpu;
        static int header_printed;
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        if (!header_printed) {
                printf("%3s %8s %15s %15s %15s %15s %s\n",
                       "CPU", "THREAD", "VAL", "ENA", "RUN", "TIME", "EVENT");
@@ -3725,6 +3746,8 @@ static int process_stat_config_event(struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused
 {
        perf_event__read_stat_config(&stat_config, &event->stat_config);
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        /*
         * Aggregation modes are not used since post-processing scripts are
         * supposed to take care of such requirements
@@ -3760,6 +3783,8 @@ int process_thread_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
        struct perf_tool *tool = session->tool;
        struct perf_script *script = container_of(tool, struct perf_script, tool);
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        if (dump_trace)
                perf_event__fprintf_thread_map(event, stdout);
 
@@ -3785,6 +3810,8 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
        if (dump_trace)
                perf_event__fprintf_cpu_map(event, stdout);
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        if (script->cpus) {
                pr_warning("Extra cpu map event, ignoring.\n");
                return 0;

tools/perf/builtin-script.c int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv) · line 4120

Quoted 6 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +3 -0
@@ -4088,6 +4115,10 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
 
        argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, options, script_subcommands, script_usage,
                             PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC)
+                       stat_config.aggr_map = &(struct cpu_aggr_map){ .nr = 1 };

Assigning the address a temporary rval to a global variable seems wrong to the point I'm surprised it compiles. Accessing stat_config.aggr_map->map[0] will lead to reading beyond the end of the value and presumably read uninitialized memory. Compiling with EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" should complain about all of this.

Thanks,
Ian

Quoted 8 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +1 -1
+       }
 
        if (symbol_conf.guestmount ||
            symbol_conf.default_guest_vmlinux_name ||
--

2.45.2

author
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric

Quoted 14 lines · Ian Rogers
Quoted 13 lines · Andi Kleen

This fixes a regression with perf script -F +metric originally caused by :

commit 37cc8ad77cf81f3ffd226856c367b0e15333a738

Author: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 19 01:28:46 2023 -0800

perf metric: Directly use counts rather than saved_value

In the perf script environment the evsel wouldn't allocate an aggr values array, which led to a -1 reference because the metric evaluation would try to reference NULL - 1 (for aggr_idx)

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Give the perf script evsels a single CPU aggr setup. That's enough because the groups are always contiguous, so no need to store more than one CPU's worth of values.

I don't follow this. Samples have CPUs but you're associating all values with CPU0. Why not just use counts and aggregation properly?

Why use something that is not needed?

It's not needed because the CPUs are not interleaved because the code is just processing a single group which only has counts from a single CPU. And there is no need to output an extra index for the count because the sample already has all the context.

If it was extended to multiple groups it would be needed, but it's not clear how useful it is. The benefit of the feature is that you can get the metric at a very fine grained level -- only for the time interval since the last sample.

Doing it for multiple groups means you would do some level of aggregation over longer time periods.. You could handle more complex metrics, but would lose this very fine grain benefit. If you want that it's probably better use perf report's time slicing feature instead of perf script. That one currently doesn't support metrics though, but probably it should.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +0 -0
@@ -2325,6 +2330,20 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script,
                fflush(fp);
 }
 
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 4 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +4 -0
+static void check_metric_conflict(void)
+{
+       int i;
+       /*

tools/perf/builtin-script.c static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, · line 2346

Quoted 10 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +10 -0
+        * Avoid conflict with the aggregation mode used for the metric printing.
+        */
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC) {
+                       fprintf(stderr, "perf stat record files are not supported with -F metric\n");
+                       exit(1);
+               }
+       }
+}
+

No idea what this is doing. What's conflicting with what?

The conflict is between the -F +metric setup and processing STAT* records in the perf.data (as generated by perf stat record) The later uses AGGR_NONE which is a conflict.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +2 -0
@@ -3785,6 +3810,8 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
        if (dump_trace)
                perf_event__fprintf_cpu_map(event, stdout);
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        if (script->cpus) {
                pr_warning("Extra cpu map event, ignoring.\n");
                return 0;
@@ -4088,6 +4115,10 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
 
Quoted 8 lines

tools/perf/builtin-script.c int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv) · line 4120

Quoted 5 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +3 -0
        argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, options, script_subcommands, script_usage,
                             PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC)
+                       stat_config.aggr_map = &(struct cpu_aggr_map){ .nr = 1 };

Assigning the address a temporary rval to a global variable seems wrong to the point I'm surprised it compiles. Accessing

AFAIK gcc keeps the local around for the function, but you're right it's not good code, especially with the buffer overrun.

Quoted 3 lines

stat_config.aggr_map->map[0] will lead to reading beyond the end of the value and presumably read uninitialized memory. Compiling with EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" should complain about all of this.

Good point, but I doubt the address sanitizer would have caught it because it doesn't really track the stack.

-Andi

reviewer
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric

Quoted 16 lines · Andi Kleen
Quoted 14 lines · Ian Rogers
Quoted 13 lines · Andi Kleen

This fixes a regression with perf script -F +metric originally caused by :

commit 37cc8ad77cf81f3ffd226856c367b0e15333a738

Author: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 19 01:28:46 2023 -0800

perf metric: Directly use counts rather than saved_value

In the perf script environment the evsel wouldn't allocate an aggr values array, which led to a -1 reference because the metric evaluation would try to reference NULL - 1 (for aggr_idx)

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Give the perf script evsels a single CPU aggr setup. That's enough because the groups are always contiguous, so no need to store more than one CPU's worth of values.

I don't follow this. Samples have CPUs but you're associating all values with CPU0. Why not just use counts and aggregation properly?

Why use something that is not needed?

The main reason would be so that perf_stat_process_counter could work and update the aggregation accordingly. Then you can dump out the aggregation, be it per CPU, per core, per socket, per cache-level, etc. as appropriate. If you follow the perf stat convention you are also much less likely to be broken in the future, as perf stat would also get broken. It is complicated spaghetti to work out how this stuff works, but that's why I fixed in the patch I sent out.

Quoted 38 lines

It's not needed because the CPUs are not interleaved because the code is just processing a single group which only has counts from a single CPU. And there is no need to output an extra index for the count because the sample already has all the context.

If it was extended to multiple groups it would be needed, but it's not clear how useful it is. The benefit of the feature is that you can get the metric at a very fine grained level -- only for the time interval since the last sample.

Doing it for multiple groups means you would do some level of aggregation over longer time periods.. You could handle more complex metrics, but would lose this very fine grain benefit. If you want that it's probably better use perf report's time slicing feature instead of perf script. That one currently doesn't support metrics though, but probably it should.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +0 -0
@@ -2325,6 +2330,20 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script *script,
                fflush(fp);
 }
 
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 4 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +4 -0
+static void check_metric_conflict(void)
+{
+       int i;
+       /*

tools/perf/builtin-script.c static void process_event(struct perf_script *script, · line 2346

Quoted 10 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +10 -0
+        * Avoid conflict with the aggregation mode used for the metric printing.
+        */
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC) {
+                       fprintf(stderr, "perf stat record files are not supported with -F metric\n");
+                       exit(1);
+               }
+       }
+}
+

No idea what this is doing. What's conflicting with what?

Quoted 3 lines

The conflict is between the -F +metric setup and processing STAT* records in the perf.data (as generated by perf stat record) The later uses AGGR_NONE which is a conflict.

Or let it set the aggregation mode and just let the aggregation code handle it when computing metrics? I think getting the STAT events isn't typical, so this is an academic argument. I'm just thinking about future me, wondering why on earth this exists.

Thanks,
Ian

Quoted 33 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +2 -0
@@ -3785,6 +3810,8 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session,
        if (dump_trace)
                perf_event__fprintf_cpu_map(event, stdout);
 
+       check_metric_conflict();
+
        if (script->cpus) {
                pr_warning("Extra cpu map event, ignoring.\n");
                return 0;
@@ -4088,6 +4115,10 @@ int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv)
 
Quoted 8 lines

tools/perf/builtin-script.c int cmd_script(int argc, const char **argv) · line 4120

Quoted 5 lines
tools/perf/builtin-script.c +3 -0
        argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, options, script_subcommands, script_usage,
                             PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
+       for (i = 0; i < OUTPUT_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
+               if (output[i].fields & PERF_OUTPUT_METRIC)
+                       stat_config.aggr_map = &(struct cpu_aggr_map){ .nr = 1 };

Assigning the address a temporary rval to a global variable seems wrong to the point I'm surprised it compiles. Accessing

AFAIK gcc keeps the local around for the function, but you're right it's not good code, especially with the buffer overrun.

Quoted 3 lines

stat_config.aggr_map->map[0] will lead to reading beyond the end of the value and presumably read uninitialized memory. Compiling with EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address" should complain about all of this.

Good point, but I doubt the address sanitizer would have caught it because it doesn't really track the stack.

-Andi

author
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf script: Fix perf script -F +metric

Quoted 4 lines

The main reason would be so that perf_stat_process_counter could work and update the aggregation accordingly. Then you can dump out the aggregation, be it per CPU, per core, per socket, per cache-level, etc. as appropriate.

But there's is none. It's only for a short time on a single CPU.

Quoted 4 lines

If you follow the perf stat convention you are
also much less likely to be broken in the future, as perf stat would also get broken. It is complicated spaghetti to work out how this stuff works, but that's why I fixed in the patch I sent out.

Hopefully the regression tests will prevent future breakage.

Quoted 3 lines

Or let it set the aggregation mode and just let the aggregation code handle it when computing metrics? I think getting the STAT events isn't typical, so this is an academic argument.

I don't see why users shouldn't use perf stat record. It makes sense for any large scale count collections. And it's tested by the test suite at least.

-Andi

author
#7 lore raw

PATCH v6 4/4 Add a test case for perf script -F +metric

In reply to Andi Kleen

Just a simple test

----

v2: Avoid bashisms. Use noploop
v3: Avoid false positive in shellcheck

---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
tools/perf/tests/shell/script.sh +14 -0
index c1a603653662..5e080e40b390 100755
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ set -e
 temp_dir=$(mktemp -d /tmp/perf-test-script.XXXXXXXXXX)
 
 perfdatafile="${temp_dir}/perf.data"
+scriptoutput="${temp_dir}/script"
 db_test="${temp_dir}/db_test.py"
 
 err=0
@@ -88,8 +89,21 @@ test_parallel_perf()
 	echo "parallel-perf test [Success]"
 }
 
+test_metric()
+{
+	echo "script metric test"
+	if ! perf list | grep -q cycles ; then return ; fi
+	if ! perf list | grep -q instructions ; then return ; fi
+	perf record -e '{cycles,instructions}' -o "${perfdatafile}" perf test -w noploop
+	perf script -i "${perfdatafile}" -F +metric  > $scriptoutput
+	test "`grep -c metric $scriptoutput`" -gt 5
+	grep metric $scriptoutput | head
+	echo "script metric test [Success]"
+}
+
 test_db
 test_parallel_perf
+test_metric
 
 cleanup
 
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2