Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

PATCH [email protected] 1 participant 1 message Jul 29, 2024

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 4811f7af6090e8f5a398fbdd766f903ef6c0d787
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024072929-blip-squad-13da@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

4811f7af6090 ("nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 4811f7af6090e8f5a398fbdd766f903ef6c0d787 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryusuke Konishi <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:20:07 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in
nilfs_btnode_create_block()

Syzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in nilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.

It is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur if the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created block) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.

So, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a possible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.

fs/nilfs2/btnode.c +20 -5
index 0131d83b912d..c034080c334b 100644
@@ -51,12 +51,21 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr)
 
 	bh = nilfs_grab_buffer(inode, btnc, blocknr, BIT(BH_NILFS_Node));
 	if (unlikely(!bh))
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	if (unlikely(buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_uptodate(bh) ||
 		     buffer_dirty(bh))) {
-		brelse(bh);
-		BUG();
+		/*
+		 * The block buffer at the specified new address was already
+		 * in use.  This can happen if it is a virtual block number
+		 * and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap
+		 * used to manage its allocation state (if not, the buffer
+		 * clearing of an abandoned b-tree node is missing somewhere).
+		 */
+		nilfs_error(inode->i_sb,
+			    "state inconsistency probably due to duplicate use of b-tree node block address %llu (ino=%lu)",
+			    (unsigned long long)blocknr, inode->i_ino);
+		goto failed;
 	}
 	memset(bh->b_data, 0, i_blocksize(inode));
 	bh->b_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
@@ -67,6 +76,12 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr)
 	folio_unlock(bh->b_folio);
 	folio_put(bh->b_folio);
 	return bh;
+
+failed:
+	folio_unlock(bh->b_folio);
+	folio_put(bh->b_folio);
+	brelse(bh);
+	return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
 }
 
 int nilfs_btnode_submit_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr,
@@ -217,8 +232,8 @@ int nilfs_btnode_prepare_change_key(struct address_space *btnc,
 	}
 
 	nbh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, newkey);
-	if (!nbh)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (IS_ERR(nbh))
+		return PTR_ERR(nbh);
 
 	BUG_ON(nbh == obh);
 	ctxt->newbh = nbh;
fs/nilfs2/btree.c +2 -2
index a139970e4804..862bdf23120e 100644
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int nilfs_btree_get_new_block(const struct nilfs_bmap *btree,
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 
 	bh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, ptr);
-	if (!bh)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (IS_ERR(bh))
+		return PTR_ERR(bh);
 
 	set_buffer_nilfs_volatile(bh);
 	*bhp = bh;