FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in" failed to apply to 5.15-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 5.15-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.15.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 8dfcffa37094fef2c8cf8b602316766a86956d07
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024073032-uniquely-herring-53cb@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.15.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
8dfcffa37094 ("Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again"") 9319b647902c ("mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in wb_dirty_limits(), again")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 8dfcffa37094fef2c8cf8b602316766a86956d07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:42:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm/writeback: fix possible divide-by-zero in
wb_dirty_limits(), again"
Patch series "mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling".
Dirty throttling logic assumes dirty limits in page units fit into 32-bits. This patch series makes sure this is true (see patch 2/2 for more details).
This patch (of 2):
This reverts commit 9319b647902cbd5cc884ac08a8a6d54ce111fc78.
The commit is broken in several ways. Firstly, the removed (u64) cast from the multiplication will introduce a multiplication overflow on 32-bit archs if wb_thresh * bg_thresh >= 1<<32 (which is actually common - the default settings with 4GB of RAM will trigger this). Secondly, the div64_u64() is unnecessarily expensive on 32-bit archs. We have div64_ul() in case we want to be safe & cheap. Thirdly, if dirty thresholds are larger than 1<<32 pages, then dirty balancing is going to blow up in many other spectacular ways anyway so trying to fix one possible overflow is just moot.
mm/page-writeback.c +1 -1
@@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ static inline void wb_dirty_limits(struct dirty_throttle_control *dtc)*/ dtc->wb_thresh =__wb_calc_thresh (dtc, dtc->thresh); dtc->wb_bg_thresh = dtc->thresh ? -div64_u64 (dtc->wb_thresh * dtc->bg_thresh, dtc->thresh) :0 ; +div_u64 ((u64 )dtc->wb_thresh * dtc->bg_thresh, dtc->thresh) :0 ;/* * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need