Skip to contentSkip to conversation

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree

PATCH Applied [email protected] 2 participants 7 messages Aug 26, 2024 – Sep 4, 2024

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore

[email protected]

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

The patch below does not apply to the 6.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.

To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:

git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.1.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024082618-wilt-deafness-0a89@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.1.y' HEAD^..

Possible dependencies:

e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints") b5e2fb832f48 ("selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd")

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 21:45:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints

After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using previously used IDs.

Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.

The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID.

tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +30 -0
index fbb0174145ad..f609c02c6123 100755
@@ -3651,6 +3651,36 @@ endpoint_tests()
 		chk_rm_nr 2 1 invert
 	fi
 
+	# flush and re-add
+	if reset_with_tcp_filter "flush re-add" ns2 10.0.3.2 REJECT OUTPUT &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 2
+		# broadcast IP: no packet for this address will be received on ns1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 224.0.0.1 id 2 flags signal
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		test_linkfail=4 speed=20 \
+			run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_attempt_fail $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr "before flush" 1
+		chk_mptcp_info subflows 0 subflows 0
+
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns2
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns1
+		wait_rm_addr $ns2 0
+		ip netns exec "${ns2}" ${iptables} -D OUTPUT -s "10.0.3.2" -p tcp -j REJECT
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 id 2 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		mptcp_lib_kill_wait $tests_pid
+
+		chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+		chk_add_nr 2 2
+		chk_rm_nr 1 0 invert
+	fi
 }
 
 # [$1: error message]
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/2 selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd

From: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

commit b5e2fb832f48bc01d937a053e0550a1465a2f05d upstream.

Delete and re-create a signal endpoint and ensure that the PM actually deletes and re-create the subflow.

Stable-dep-of: e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints") [ No conflicts, but adapt the test to the helpers in this version:
- run_tests has been modified a few times to reduce the number of positional parameters
- no pm_nl_check_endpoint helper
- no chk_mptcp_info helper
- chk_subflow_nr taking an extra parameter
- kill_tests_wait instead of mptcp_lib_kill_wait ]

---
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +23 -0
index c54df4a6627c..549b230238ca 100755
@@ -3297,6 +3297,29 @@ endpoint_tests()
 		chk_join_nr 3 3 3
 		chk_rm_nr 1 1
 	fi
+
+	# remove and re-add
+	if reset "delete re-add signal" &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 1 1
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 id 1 flags signal
+		run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 4 0 0 speed_20 2>/dev/null &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr needtitle "before delete" 2
+
+		pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns1 1 10.0.2.1
+		sleep 0.5
+		chk_subflow_nr "" "after delete" 1
+
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr "" "after re-add" 2
+		kill_tests_wait
+	fi
+
 }
 
 # [$1: error message]
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
#2 lore raw

PATCH 2/2 selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints

commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.

After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using previously used IDs.

Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.

The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID.

[ No conflicts, but adapt the test to the helpers in this version:
- run_tests has been modified a few times to reduce the number of positional parameters
- no chk_mptcp_info helper
- chk_subflow_nr taking an extra parameter
- kill_tests_wait instead of mptcp_lib_kill_wait ]

---
 .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +29 -0
index 549b230238ca..0d2f30affe1b 100755
@@ -3320,6 +3320,35 @@ endpoint_tests()
 		kill_tests_wait
 	fi
 
+	# flush and re-add
+	if reset_with_tcp_filter "flush re-add" ns2 10.0.3.2 REJECT OUTPUT &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 2
+		# broadcast IP: no packet for this address will be received on ns1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 224.0.0.1 id 2 flags signal
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 4 0 0 speed_20 2>/dev/null &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_attempt_fail $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr needtitle "before flush" 1
+
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns2
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns1
+		wait_rm_addr $ns2 0
+		ip netns exec "${ns2}" ${iptables} -D OUTPUT -s "10.0.3.2" -p tcp -j REJECT
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 id 2 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		kill_wait "${tests_pid}"
+		kill_tests_wait
+
+		chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+		chk_add_nr 2 2
+		chk_rm_nr 1 0 invert
+	fi
 }
 
 # [$1: error message]
Signature · 1 line
2.45.2
author maintainer Applied
#3 lore raw

Patch "selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
selftests-mptcp-join-test-for-flush-re-add-endpoints.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From [email protected] Wed Sep 4 13:06:39 2024
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:06:13 +0200
Subject: selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <[email protected]>, "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>, Mat Martineau <[email protected]>, Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>

commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.

After having flushed endpoints that didn't cause the creation of new subflows, it is important to check endpoints can be re-created, re-using previously used IDs.

Before the previous commit, the client would not have been able to re-create the subflow that was previously rejected.

The 'Fixes' tag here below is the same as the one from the previous
commit: this patch here is not fixing anything wrong in the selftests, but it validates the previous fix for an issue introduced by this commit ID.

[ No conflicts, but adapt the test to the helpers in this version:
- run_tests has been modified a few times to reduce the number of positional parameters
- no chk_mptcp_info helper
- chk_subflow_nr taking an extra parameter
- kill_tests_wait instead of mptcp_lib_kill_wait ]

---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +29 -0
@@ -3368,6 +3368,35 @@ endpoint_tests()
 		chk_rm_nr 3 2 invert
 	fi
 
+	# flush and re-add
+	if reset_with_tcp_filter "flush re-add" ns2 10.0.3.2 REJECT OUTPUT &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 0 2
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 2
+		# broadcast IP: no packet for this address will be received on ns1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 224.0.0.1 id 2 flags signal
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 4 0 0 speed_20 2>/dev/null &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_attempt_fail $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr needtitle "before flush" 1
+
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns2
+		pm_nl_flush_endpoint $ns1
+		wait_rm_addr $ns2 0
+		ip netns exec "${ns2}" ${iptables} -D OUTPUT -s "10.0.3.2" -p tcp -j REJECT
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns2 10.0.3.2 id 3 flags subflow
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.3.1 id 2 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		kill_wait "${tests_pid}"
+		kill_tests_wait
+
+		chk_join_nr 2 2 2
+		chk_add_nr 2 2
+		chk_rm_nr 1 0 invert
+	fi
 }
 
 # [$1: error message]

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fix-rm_addr-id-for-the-initial-subflow.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-validate-fullmesh-endp-on-1st-sf.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fix-id-0-endp-usage-after-multiple-re-creations.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-make-pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows-static.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-avoid-possible-uaf-when-selecting-endp.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-reuse-id-0-after-delete-and-re-add.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-adding-init-endp-with-id.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-test-for-flush-re-add-endpoints.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-re.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-readd.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-adding-init-endp-with-.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-closed-subflow.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fullmesh-select-the-right-id-later.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pr_debug-add-missing-n-at-the-end.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-unused-add.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-unused-add_addr.patch

author maintainer Applied
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y 2/2] selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints

In reply to Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Quoted 2 lines · On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:06:13PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:

commit e06959e9eebdfea4654390f53b65cff57691872e upstream.

Applied

author maintainer Applied
#5 lore raw

Patch "selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

In reply to Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-readd.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.

From [email protected] Wed Sep 4 13:06:37 2024
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 13:06:12 +0200
Subject: selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <[email protected]>, Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>, Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]>, "David S . Miller" <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <[email protected]>

From: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

commit b5e2fb832f48bc01d937a053e0550a1465a2f05d upstream.

Delete and re-create a signal endpoint and ensure that the PM actually deletes and re-create the subflow.

Stable-dep-of: e06959e9eebd ("selftests: mptcp: join: test for flush/re-add endpoints") [ No conflicts, but adapt the test to the helpers in this version:
- run_tests has been modified a few times to reduce the number of positional parameters
- no pm_nl_check_endpoint helper
- no chk_mptcp_info helper
- chk_subflow_nr taking an extra parameter
- kill_tests_wait instead of mptcp_lib_kill_wait ]

---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh +23 -0
@@ -3239,6 +3239,29 @@ userspace_tests()
 		chk_join_nr 1 1 1
 		chk_rm_nr 1 1
 	fi
+
+	# remove and re-add
+	if reset "delete re-add signal" &&
+	   mptcp_lib_kallsyms_has "subflow_rebuild_header$"; then
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns1 1 1
+		pm_nl_set_limits $ns2 1 1
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 id 1 flags signal
+		run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 4 0 0 speed_20 2>/dev/null &
+		local tests_pid=$!
+
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr needtitle "before delete" 2
+
+		pm_nl_del_endpoint $ns1 1 10.0.2.1
+		sleep 0.5
+		chk_subflow_nr "" "after delete" 1
+
+		pm_nl_add_endpoint $ns1 10.0.2.1 flags signal
+		wait_mpj $ns2
+		chk_subflow_nr "" "after re-add" 2
+		kill_tests_wait
+	fi
+
 }
 
 endpoint_tests()

Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are

queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fix-rm_addr-id-for-the-initial-subflow.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-validate-fullmesh-endp-on-1st-sf.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fix-id-0-endp-usage-after-multiple-re-creations.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-make-pm_remove_addrs_and_subflows-static.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-avoid-possible-uaf-when-selecting-endp.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-reuse-id-0-after-delete-and-re-add.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-adding-init-endp-with-id.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-test-for-flush-re-add-endpoints.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-re.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-add-explicit-test-case-for-remove-readd.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-adding-init-endp-with-.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-closed-subflow.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pm-fullmesh-select-the-right-id-later.patch queue-6.1/mptcp-pr_debug-add-missing-n-at-the-end.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-unused-add.patch queue-6.1/selftests-mptcp-join-check-re-using-id-of-unused-add_addr.patch

author maintainer Applied
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH 6.1.y 1/2] selftests: mptcp: add explicit test case for remove/readd

In reply to Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Quoted 4 lines · On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:06:12PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:

From: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

commit b5e2fb832f48bc01d937a053e0550a1465a2f05d upstream.

Applied