Kunit to check the longest symbol length
Subsystems (4)
PATCH v4 1/1 Kunit to check the longest symbol length
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
This test can also help other efforts for longer symbol lenght, like [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
V1 -> V2: corrected CI tests. Added fix proposed at [3]
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9ES4UKl%[email protected]/T/#m3ef0e12bb834d01ed1ebdcae12ef5f2add342077
---
V2 -> V3: updated base and added MODULE_DESCRIPTION() and MODULE_AUTHOR()
---
V3 -> V4: add x86 mantainers, add new reference.
--- arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 3 +- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c +2 -1
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#include <assert.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdarg.h> +#include <linux/kallsysms.h> #define unlikely (cond) (cond)
@@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static void parse_args(int argc, char **argv) } } -#define BUFSIZE 256 +#define BUFSIZE (256 + KSYM_NAME_LEN)int main (int argc,char **argv) {
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
@@ -2805,6 +2805,15 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests. +config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT && KPROBES + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests the longest symbol possible + + If unsure, say N. + config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
lib/Makefile +2 -0
@@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ CFLAGS_fortify_kunit.o += $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_USERCOPY_KUNIT_TEST) += usercopy_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o +CFLAGS_longest_symbol_kunit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-prototypes) obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file +124 -0
124 lines not on this page · raw message
base-commit: abf2050f51fdca0fd146388f83cddd95a57a008d
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Shuah Khan
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · Sergio González Collado
The longest length of a symbol (
KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.This test can also help other efforts for longer symbol lenght,
Spelling - length
Can you explain what kind of tests does it run and how it is useful? Include test output in the change log.
Quoted 49 lines
like [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/Signed-off-by Sergio González Collado <[email protected]>---
V1 -> V2: corrected CI tests. Added fix proposed at [3][3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9ES4UKl%[email protected]/T/#m3ef0e12bb834d01ed1ebdcae12ef5f2add342077
---
V2 -> V3: updated base and addedMODULE_DESCRIPTION()andMODULE_AUTHOR()
---
V3 -> V4: add x86 mantainers, add new reference.--- arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 3 +- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 2 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)create mode 100644
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.carch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c +2
-1@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#include <assert.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdarg.h> +#include <linux/kallsysms.h> #define unlikely (cond) (cond)@@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ static void parse_args(int argc, char **argv) } } -#define BUFSIZE 256 +#define BUFSIZE (256 + KSYM_NAME_LEN)int main (int argc,char **argv) {lib/Kconfig.debug +0
-0
lib/Kconfig.debug config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST · line 2813
Quoted 9 lines
lib/Kconfig.debug +6
-0@@ -2805,6 +2805,15 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests. +config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT && KPROBES + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests the longest symbol possible
Can you add more detail why one would want to enable this test?
Quoted 150 lines
lib/Kconfig.debug +3
-0+ + If unsure, say N. + config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINTlib/Makefile +2
-0@@ -389,6 +389,8 @@ CFLAGS_fortify_kunit.o += $(DISABLE_STRUCTLEAK_PLUGIN) obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_USERCOPY_KUNIT_TEST) += usercopy_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o +CFLAGS_longest_symbol_kunit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-prototypes) obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.olib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file +124
-0@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* +* Test the longest symbol length. Execute with: +* ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run longest-symbol +* --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_KPROBES=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_MODULES=y +* --kconfig_add CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n +*/ + +#define pr_fmt (fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/stringify.h> +#include <linux/kprobes.h> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h> + +#define DI (name) s##name##name +#define DDI (name) DI(n##name##name) +#define DDDI (name) DDI(n##name##name) +#define DDDDI (name) DDDI(n##name##name) +#define DDDDDI (name) DDDDI(n##name##name) + +#define PLUS1 (name) __PASTE(name, e) + +/*Generate a symbol whose name length is 511 */ +#define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n) + +/*Generate a symbol whose name length is 512 */ +#define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME) + +#define RETURN_LONGEST_SYM 0xAAAAA +#define RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1 0x55555 + +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void); +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void) +{ +return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM ; +} + +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void); +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void) +{ +return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1 ; +} + +_Static_assert (sizeof (__stringify (LONGEST_SYM_NAME )) ==KSYM_NAME_LEN , +"Incorrect symbol length found. Expected KSYM_NAME_LEN: " +__stringify(KSYM_NAME) ", but found: " +__stringify(sizeof (LONGEST_SYM_NAME ))); + +static void test_longest_symbol (struct kunit *test) +{ +KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ (test,RETURN_LONGEST_SYM ,LONGEST_SYM_NAME ()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_kallsyms (struct kunit *test) +{ +unsigned long (*kallsyms_lookup_name)(const char *name); +static int (*longest_sym)(void ); + +struct kprobe kp = { + .symbol_name ="kallsyms_lookup_name" , + }; + +if (register_kprobe (&kp) <0 ) { +pr_info ("%s: kprobe not registered\n" , __func__); +KUNIT_FAIL (test,"test_longest_symbol kallsysms: kprobe not registered\n" ); +return ; + } + +kunit_warn (test,"test_longest_symbol kallsyms: kprobe registered\n" ); + kallsyms_lookup_name = (unsigned long (*)(const char *name))kp.addr; +unregister_kprobe (&kp); + + longest_sym = + (void *)kallsyms_lookup_name (__stringify (LONGEST_SYM_NAME )); +KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ (test,RETURN_LONGEST_SYM ,longest_sym ()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_plus1 (struct kunit *test) +{ +KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ (test,RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1 ,LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 ()); +}; + +static void test_longest_symbol_plus1_kallsyms (struct kunit *test) +{ +unsigned long (*kallsyms_lookup_name)(const char *name); +static int (*longest_sym_plus1)(void ); + +struct kprobe kp = { + .symbol_name ="kallsyms_lookup_name" , + }; + +if (register_kprobe (&kp) <0 ) { +pr_info ("%s: kprobe not registered\n" , __func__); +KUNIT_FAIL (test,"test_longest_symbol kallsysms: kprobe not registered\n" ); +return ; + } + +kunit_warn (test,"test_longest_symbol_plus1 kallsyms: kprobe registered\n" ); + kallsyms_lookup_name = (unsigned long (*)(const char *name))kp.addr; +unregister_kprobe (&kp); + + longest_sym_plus1 = + (void *)kallsyms_lookup_name (__stringify (LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 )); +KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL (test, longest_sym_plus1); +}; + +static struct kunit_case longest_symbol_test_cases[] = { +KUNIT_CASE (test_longest_symbol), +KUNIT_CASE (test_longest_symbol_kallsyms), +KUNIT_CASE (test_longest_symbol_plus1), +KUNIT_CASE (test_longest_symbol_plus1_kallsyms), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite longest_symbol_test_suite = { + .name ="longest-symbol" , + .test_cases = longest_symbol_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite (longest_symbol_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Test the longest symbol length" ); +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Sergio González Collado" );
Quoted 1 line
base-commit:
abf2050f51fdca0fd146388f83cddd95a57a008d
thanks,
-- Shuah