RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function
Subsystems (2)
v2 cover RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function
Earlier patch series were part of the clk and reset series [1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Now I treed to split the series for phy changes.
Latest clk and reset changes are below
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
v2: Fix some typo in the subjects.
Thanks
-Anand
Anand Moon (3):
phy: rockchip-pcie: Simplify error handling with dev_err_probe()
phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
phy: rockchip-pcie: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for PCIe reference
clk PLL status
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 92 +++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
base-commit: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
PATCH v2 1/3 phy: rockchip-pcie: Simplify error handling with dev_err_probe()
Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify error handling during probe. This also handle scenario, when -EDEFER is returned and useless error is printed.
---
v2: None
v1: None
--- drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3 -6
@@ -371,12 +371,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)mutex_init (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); rk_phy->phy_rst =devm_reset_control_get (dev,"phy" ); -if (IS_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst)) { -if (PTR_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER ) -dev_err (dev, -"missing phy property for reset controller\n" ); -return PTR_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst); - } +if (IS_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst)) +return dev_err_probe (&pdev->dev,PTR_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst), +"missing phy property for reset controller\n" ); rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref =devm_clk_get (dev,"refclk" );if (IS_ERR (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) {
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
PATCH v2 2/3 phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
In reply to Anand MoonUse devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare(), as this is exactly what this function does. Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify error handling during probe.
---
v2: Change the subject drop: Change to use/Use
v1: New patch in this series
--- drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 25 ++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +6 -19
@@ -277,26 +277,16 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) goto err_out; - err =clk_prepare_enable (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref); -if (err) { -dev_err (&phy->dev,"Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n" ); - goto err_refclk; - } - err =reset_control_assert (rk_phy->phy_rst);if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"assert phy_rst err %d\n" , err); - goto err_reset; + goto err_out; } -err_out:mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return 0 ; -err_reset: - -clk_disable_unprepare (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref); -err_refclk: +err_out: rk_phy->init_cnt--;mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return err;
@@ -312,8 +302,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)if (--rk_phy->init_cnt) goto err_init_cnt; -clk_disable_unprepare (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref); - err_init_cnt:mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return 0 ;
@@ -375,11 +363,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return dev_err_probe (&pdev->dev,PTR_ERR (rk_phy->phy_rst),"missing phy property for reset controller\n" ); - rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref =devm_clk_get (dev,"refclk" ); -if (IS_ERR (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) { -dev_err (dev,"refclk not found.\n" ); -return PTR_ERR (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref); - } + rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref =devm_clk_get_enabled (dev,"refclk" ); +if (IS_ERR (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) +return dev_err_probe (&pdev->dev,PTR_ERR (rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref), +"failed to get phyclk\n" );/* parse #phy-cells to see if it's legacy PHY model */ if (of_property_read_u32 (dev->of_node,"#phy-cells" , &phy_num))
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Hi Anand,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anand-Moon/phy-rockchip-pcie-Simplify-error-handling-with-dev_err_probe/20241007-115910 base: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007035616.2701-3-linux.amoon%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper config: loongarch-randconfig-r071-20241009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/[email protected]/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/
smatch warnings:drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278 rockchip_pcie_phy_init() warn: missing error code 'err'
vim +/err +278 drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 269 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 270 {
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 271 struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 272 struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst);
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 273 int err = 0;
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 274
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 275 mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 276
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 277 if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 @278 goto err_out;Originally, this path just unlocked at returned zero.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 279
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 280 err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 281 if (err) {
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 282 dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 283 goto err_out;
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 284 }
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 285
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 286 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 287 return 0;
fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 288
3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 289 err_out:
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 290 rk_phy->init_cnt--;Now it decrements the counter so presumably it leads to an underflow/use after free.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 291 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 292 return err; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 293 }
Signature · 2 lines
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the report.
Quoted 12 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hi Anand,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anand-Moon/phy-rockchip-pcie-Simplify-error-handling-with-dev_err_probe/20241007-115910 base: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007035616.2701-3-linux.amoon%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper config: loongarch-randconfig-r071-20241009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/[email protected]/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
Quoted 9 lines
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278rockchip_pcie_phy_init()warn: missing error code 'err'
All the functions in this file explicitly return 0 instead of err, I will fix this.
Quoted 28 lines
vim +/err +278
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.cfcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 269 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 270 { 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 271 struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 272 struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 273 int err = 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 274 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 275 mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 276 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 277 if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 @278 goto err_out;Originally, this path just unlocked at returned zero.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 279 fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 280 err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 281 if (err) { fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 282 dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err); 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 283 goto err_out; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 284 } fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 285 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 286 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 287 return 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 288 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 289 err_out: 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 290 rk_phy->init_cnt--;
Quoted 2 lines
Now it decrements the counter so presumably it leads to an underflow/use after free.
I was planning to replace the mutex_lock / mutex_unlock with guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex) in the follow up patch. I will add this in the next revision.
Quoted 5 lines
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 291 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 292 return err; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 293 }
Here are my modified changes on top of my changes for the review process. -----8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<-----
(quoted diff) +0 -0
b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 2c4d6f68f02a..09685dc3fe17 100644
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +7 -8
@@ -248,20 +248,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)mutex_lock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) - goto err_out; +if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) { +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err; + } err =reset_control_assert (rk_phy->phy_rst);if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"assert phy_rst err %d\n" , err); - goto err_out; + rk_phy->init_cnt--; +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err; } -mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -return 0 ; - -err_out: - rk_phy->init_cnt--;mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return err; }
Thanks
-Anand
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Quoted 58 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the report.
Quoted 12 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hi Anand,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anand-Moon/phy-rockchip-pcie-Simplify-error-handling-with-dev_err_probe/20241007-115910 base: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007035616.2701-3-linux.amoon%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper config: loongarch-randconfig-r071-20241009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/[email protected]/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0Quoted 9 lines
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278rockchip_pcie_phy_init()warn: missing error code 'err'All the functions in this file explicitly return 0 instead of err, I will fix this.
Quoted 28 lines
vim +/err +278
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.cfcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 269 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 270 { 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 271 struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 272 struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 273 int err = 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 274 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 275 mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 276 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 277 if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 @278 goto err_out;Originally, this path just unlocked at returned zero.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 279 fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 280 err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 281 if (err) { fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 282 dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err); 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 283 goto err_out; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 284 } fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 285 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 286 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 287 return 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 288 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 289 err_out: 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 290 rk_phy->init_cnt--;
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Now it decrements the counter so presumably it leads to an underflow/use after free.
I was planning to replace the
mutex_lock/mutex_unlockwith guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex) in the follow up patch. I will add this in the next revision.Quoted 5 lines
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 291 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 292 return err; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 293 }
Thanks!
Quoted 8 lines
Here are my modified changes on top of my changes for the review process. -----8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<-----
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +0
-0
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 253
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3
-2@@ -248,20 +248,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)mutex_lock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) - goto err_out; +if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) { +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err;
Please make this a return 0. It's faster to not have to look up what a variable is.
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3
-1+ } err =reset_control_assert (rk_phy->phy_rst);if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"assert phy_rst err %d\n" , err); - goto err_out; + rk_phy->init_cnt--; +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 265
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +1
-5+return err; } -mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -return 0 ; - -err_out: - rk_phy->init_cnt--;mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return err;
return 0; here too.
regards,
dan carpenter
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Hi Dan,
Quoted 87 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 58 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the report.
Quoted 12 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hi Anand,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anand-Moon/phy-rockchip-pcie-Simplify-error-handling-with-dev_err_probe/20241007-115910 base: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007035616.2701-3-linux.amoon%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper config: loongarch-randconfig-r071-20241009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/[email protected]/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0Quoted 9 lines
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278rockchip_pcie_phy_init()warn: missing error code 'err'All the functions in this file explicitly return 0 instead of err, I will fix this.
Quoted 28 lines
vim +/err +278
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.cfcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 269 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 270 { 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 271 struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 272 struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 273 int err = 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 274 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 275 mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 276 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 277 if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 @278 goto err_out;Originally, this path just unlocked at returned zero.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 279 fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 280 err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 281 if (err) { fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 282 dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err); 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 283 goto err_out; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 284 } fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 285 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 286 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 287 return 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 288 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 289 err_out: 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 290 rk_phy->init_cnt--;Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Now it decrements the counter so presumably it leads to an underflow/use after free.
I was planning to replace the
mutex_lock/mutex_unlockwith guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex) in the follow up patch. I will add this in the next revision.Quoted 5 lines
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 291 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 292 return err; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 293 }Thanks!
Quoted 11 lines
Here are my modified changes on top of my changes for the review process. -----8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<-----
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +0
-0@@ -248,20 +248,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)mutex_lock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 253
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3
-2-if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) - goto err_out; +if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) { +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err;Please make this a return 0. It's faster to not have to look up what a variable is.
Ok.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +4
-1+ } err =reset_control_assert (rk_phy->phy_rst);if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"assert phy_rst err %d\n" , err); - goto err_out; + rk_phy->init_cnt--; +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err; }
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 265
Quoted 7 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +0
-5-mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -return 0 ; - -err_out: - rk_phy->init_cnt--;mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return err;return 0; here too.
Ok. I will update the patch.
Quoted 3 lines
regards,
dan carpenter
Thanks
-Anand
Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Hi Dan,
Quoted 100 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Dan,
Quoted 87 lines · Dan Carpenter
Quoted 58 lines · Anand Moon
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the report.
Quoted 12 lines · Dan Carpenter
Hi Anand,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Anand-Moon/phy-rockchip-pcie-Simplify-error-handling-with-dev_err_probe/20241007-115910 base: 8f602276d3902642fdc3429b548d73c745446601 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007035616.2701-3-linux.amoon%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper config: loongarch-randconfig-r071-20241009 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/[email protected]/config) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0Quoted 9 lines
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278rockchip_pcie_phy_init()warn: missing error code 'err'All the functions in this file explicitly return 0 instead of err, I will fix this.
Quoted 28 lines
vim +/err +278
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.cfcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 269 static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 270 { 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 271 struct phy_pcie_instance *inst = phy_get_drvdata(phy); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 272 struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy = to_pcie_phy(inst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 273 int err = 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 274 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 275 mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 276 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 277 if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 @278 goto err_out;Originally, this path just unlocked at returned zero.
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 279 fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 280 err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 281 if (err) { fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 282 dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err); 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 283 goto err_out; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 284 } fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 285 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 286 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 287 return 0; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 288 3114329651e74f drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Anand Moon 2024-10-07 289 err_out: 90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 290 rk_phy->init_cnt--;Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Now it decrements the counter so presumably it leads to an underflow/use after free.
I was planning to replace the
mutex_lock/mutex_unlockwith guard(mutex)(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex) in the follow up patch. I will add this in the next revision.Quoted 5 lines
90a7612d070d5c drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2017-07-19 291 mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 292 return err; fcffee3d54fcad drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-pcie.c Shawn Lin 2016-09-01 293 }Thanks!
Quoted 11 lines
Here are my modified changes on top of my changes for the review process. -----8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<-----
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +0
-0@@ -248,20 +248,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)mutex_lock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);Quoted 9 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 253
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3
-2-if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) - goto err_out; +if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) { +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); +return err;Please make this a return 0. It's faster to not have to look up what a variable is.
Quoted 21 lines
Ok.
Quoted 20 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +3
-1+ } err =reset_control_assert (rk_phy->phy_rst);if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"assert phy_rst err %d\n" , err); - goto err_out; + rk_phy->init_cnt--; +mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy) · line 265
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +1
-5+return err; } -mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex); -return 0 ; - -err_out: - rk_phy->init_cnt--;mutex_unlock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);return err;return 0; here too.
The above warning " missing error code 'err'"
so it's correct to return err. here.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Ok. I will update the patch.
Quoted 3 lines
regards,
dan carpenter
Thanks
-Anand
PATCH v2 3/3 phy: rockchip-pcie: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for PCIe reference clk PLL status
In reply to Anand MoonReplace open-coded phy PCIe reference clk PLL status polling with regmap_read_poll_timeout API. This change simplifies the code without altering functionality.
---
v2: Fix the subject, add the missing () in the function name,
Fix the typo reference
v1: None.
--- drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 56 +++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c +15 -41
@@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)struct rockchip_pcie_phy *rk_phy =to_pcie_phy (inst);int err =0 ;u32 status; -unsigned long timeout;mutex_lock (&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
@@ -191,21 +190,11 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)* so we make it large enough here. And we use loop-break * method which should not be harmful. */ - timeout = jiffies +msecs_to_jiffies (1000 ); - - err = -EINVAL ; -while (time_before (jiffies, timeout)) { -regmap_read (rk_phy->reg_base, - rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, - &status); -if (status &PHY_PLL_LOCKED ) { -dev_dbg (&phy->dev,"pll locked!\n" ); - err =0 ; -break ; - } -msleep (20 ); - } - + err =regmap_read_poll_timeout (rk_phy->reg_base, + rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, + status, + status &PHY_PLL_LOCKED , +200 ,100000 );if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"pll lock timeout!\n" ); goto err_pll_lock;
@@ -214,19 +203,11 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)phy_wr_cfg (rk_phy,PHY_CFG_CLK_TEST ,PHY_CFG_SEPE_RATE );phy_wr_cfg (rk_phy,PHY_CFG_CLK_SCC ,PHY_CFG_PLL_100M ); - err = -ETIMEDOUT ; -while (time_before (jiffies, timeout)) { -regmap_read (rk_phy->reg_base, - rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, - &status); -if (!(status &PHY_PLL_OUTPUT )) { -dev_dbg (&phy->dev,"pll output enable done!\n" ); - err =0 ; -break ; - } -msleep (20 ); - } - + err =regmap_read_poll_timeout (rk_phy->reg_base, + rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, + status, + !(status &PHY_PLL_OUTPUT ), +200 ,100000 );if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"pll output enable timeout!\n" ); goto err_pll_lock;
@@ -236,19 +217,12 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)HIWORD_UPDATE (PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK ,PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK , PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT)); - err = -EINVAL ; -while (time_before (jiffies, timeout)) { -regmap_read (rk_phy->reg_base, - rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, - &status); -if (status &PHY_PLL_LOCKED ) { -dev_dbg (&phy->dev,"pll relocked!\n" ); - err =0 ; -break ; - } -msleep (20 ); - } + err =regmap_read_poll_timeout (rk_phy->reg_base, + rk_phy->phy_data->pcie_status, + status, + status &PHY_PLL_LOCKED , +200 ,100000 );if (err) {dev_err (&phy->dev,"pll relock timeout!\n" ); goto err_pll_lock;
Signature · 1 line
2.44.0