Skip to contentSkip to conversation

irqchip/gic-v4: Correctly deal with set_affinity on lazily-mapped VPEs

PATCH Applied Marc Zyngier 2 participants 2 messages Oct 27, 2024

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Marc Zyngier

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 irqchip/gic-v4: Correctly deal with set_affinity on lazily-mapped VPEs

Zenghui points out that a recent change to the way set_affinity is handled for VPEs has the potential to return an error if the VPE hasn't been mapped yet (because the guest hasn't emited a MAPTI command yet), affecting GICv4.0 implementations that rely on the ITSList feature.

Fix this by making the set_affinity succeed in this case, and return early, without trying to touch the HW.

Fixes 1442ee0011983 ("irqchip/gic-v4: Don't allow a VMOVP on a dying VPE")
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +12 -2
index ab597e74ba08e..52f625e07658c 100644
@@ -3810,8 +3810,18 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 	 * Check if we're racing against a VPE being destroyed, for
 	 * which we don't want to allow a VMOVP.
 	 */
-	if (!atomic_read(&vpe->vmapp_count))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!atomic_read(&vpe->vmapp_count)) {
+		if (gic_requires_eager_mapping())
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/*
+		 * If we lazily map the VPEs, this isn't an error and
+		 * we can exit cleanly.
+		 */
+		cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+		irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+		return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
merge bot Applied
#1 lore raw
The following commit has been merged into the irq/urgent branch of tip:

The following commit has been merged into the irq/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     e6c24e2d05bb05de96ffb9bdb0ee62d20ad526f8
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/e6c24e2d05bb05de96ffb9bdb0ee62d20ad526f8
Author:        Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
AuthorDate:    Sun, 27 Oct 2024 10:22:20 
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
CommitterDate: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 17:30:16 +01:00

irqchip/gic-v4: Correctly deal with set_affinity on lazily-mapped VPEs

Zenghui points out that a recent change to the way set_affinity is handled for VPEs has the potential to return an error if the VPE hasn't been mapped yet (because the guest hasn't emited a MAPTI command yet), affecting GICv4.0 implementations that rely on the ITSList feature.

Fix this by making the set_affinity succeed in this case, and return early, without trying to touch the HW.

---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +12 -2
index ab597e7..52f625e 100644
@@ -3810,8 +3810,18 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 	 * Check if we're racing against a VPE being destroyed, for
 	 * which we don't want to allow a VMOVP.
 	 */
-	if (!atomic_read(&vpe->vmapp_count))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!atomic_read(&vpe->vmapp_count)) {
+		if (gic_requires_eager_mapping())
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/*
+		 * If we lazily map the VPEs, this isn't an error and
+		 * we can exit cleanly.
+		 */
+		cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+		irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+		return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as