FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tpm: Lock TPM chip in tpm_pm_suspend() first" failed to apply to 6.6-stable tree
Subsystems (2)
[email protected]
maintainerThe patch below does not apply to the 6.6-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to <[email protected]>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.6.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 9265fed6db601ee2ec47577815387458ef4f047a
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<[email protected]>' --in-reply-to '2024110926-shortness-stark-e2ea@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.6.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 9265fed6db601ee2ec47577815387458ef4f047a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 02:16:09 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Lock TPM chip in tpm_pm_suspend() first
Setting TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED in the end of tpm_pm_suspend() can be racy according, as this leaves window for tpm_hwrng_read() to be called while the operation is in progress. The recent bug report gives also evidence of this behaviour.
Aadress this by locking the TPM chip before checking any chip->flags both in tpm_pm_suspend() and tpm_hwrng_read(). Move TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED check inside tpm_get_random() so that it will be always checked only when the lock is reserved.
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c +0 -4
@@ -525,10 +525,6 @@ static int tpm_hwrng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait) { struct tpm_chip *chip = container_of(rng, struct tpm_chip, hwrng); -/* Give back zero bytes, as TPM chip has not yet fully resumed: */ -if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED ) -return 0 ; -return tpm_get_random (chip, data, max); }
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-interface.c +22 -10
@@ -370,6 +370,13 @@ int tpm_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)if (!chip)return -ENODEV ; + rc =tpm_try_get_ops (chip); +if (rc) { +/* Can be safely set out of locks, as no action cannot race: */ + chip->flags |=TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED ; + goto out; + } +if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_ALWAYS_POWERED ) goto suspended;
@@ -377,21 +384,19 @@ int tpm_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) !pm_suspend_via_firmware()) goto suspended; - rc =tpm_try_get_ops (chip); -if (!rc) { -if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 ) { -tpm2_end_auth_session (chip); -tpm2_shutdown (chip,TPM2_SU_STATE ); - }else { - rc =tpm1_pm_suspend (chip, tpm_suspend_pcr); - } - -tpm_put_ops (chip); +if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 ) { +tpm2_end_auth_session (chip); +tpm2_shutdown (chip,TPM2_SU_STATE ); + goto suspended; } + rc =tpm1_pm_suspend (chip, tpm_suspend_pcr); + suspended: chip->flags |=TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED ; +tpm_put_ops (chip); +out:if (rc)dev_err (dev,"Ignoring error %d while suspending\n" , rc);return 0 ;
@@ -440,11 +445,18 @@ int tpm_get_random(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *out, size_t max)if (!chip)return -ENODEV ; +/* Give back zero bytes, as TPM chip has not yet fully resumed: */ +if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_SUSPENDED ) { + rc =0 ; + goto out; + } +if (chip->flags &TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 ) rc =tpm2_get_random (chip, out, max);else rc =tpm1_get_random (chip, out, max); +out:tpm_put_ops (chip);return rc; }